Skip to main content
Log in

Role of 8Be heavy stripping mechanism in the α + 12C inelastic scattering to the near-3α-threshold states in 12C

  • Nuclei
  • Experiment
  • Published:
Physics of Atomic Nuclei Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The angular distributions of α + 12C elastic and inelastic (to the 4.44 MeV, 2+; 7.65MeV, 0+; and 9.64MeV, 3 states) scattering at 110 MeV are characterized by pronounced enhancement and strong oscillations at large angles. We performed calculations of the differential cross sections of these reactions assuming a potential scattering in the forward hemisphere and the direct transfer of 8Be cluster θ c.m. > 90°. We showed that the α + 8Be cluster configuration with relative angular momentum L = 0 dominates in the Hoyle state being 4.4 times larger than that in the ground state. This result also contributes to the verification of αBEC hypothesis and is consistent with the conjecture of a dilute 3α structure of the Hoyle state. In the 9.64 MeV, 3 state, a positive interference of all allowed α + 8Be configurations with a dominance of the p-orbital (49%) α-8Be relative motion is found. This finding manifests the exotic 3α, but hardly condensed structure of the 9.64-MeV 3 state in 12C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. W. von Oertzen and H. G. Bohlen, Phys. Rep. 19, C1 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. T. L. Belyaeva, N. S. Zelenskaya, and I. B. Teplov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 35, 815 (1982); Sov. J.Nucl. Phys. 38, 540 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. S. Demyanova et al., Nucl. Phys. A 542, 208 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. S. Demyanova et al., in Proceedings of the 23rd International Nuclear Physics Conference, Tokyo, 3–8 June 2007, Ed. by S. Nagamiya et al. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2008), Vol. 2, p. 489; Phys. At. Nucl. 72, 1611 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Tohsaki, H. Horiuchi, P. Schuck, and G. Ropke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 192501 (2001); P. Schuck, Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, et al., Nucl. Phys. A 738, 94 (2004); Y. Funaki, H. Horiuchi, G. Ropke, et al., Phys. Rev. C 77, 064312 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. A. Ogloblin, S. A. Goncharov, T. L. Belyaeva, and A. S. Demyanova, Phys. At. Nucl. 69, 1149 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Kanada-En’yo, Phys. Rev. C 75, 024302 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Chernykh, H. Feldmeier, T. Neff, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 032501 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. R. Satchler, Introduction to Nuclear Reactions (Macmillan, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Rept. 7, 167 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. A. Goncharov and A. Izadpanah, Phys. At. Nucl. 70, 18, 1491 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. A. Ogloblin, A. S. Demyanova, and S. A. Goncharov, in Proceedings of the 23rd International Nuclear Physics Conference, Tokyo, 3–8 June 2007, Ed. by S. Nagamiya et al. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 2008), Vol. 2, p. 495.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Fukushima and M. Kamimura, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Nuclear Structure, Tokyo, Sept. 5–10, 1977, Ed. by T. Marumori (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1978); M. Kamimura, Nucl. Phys. A 351, 456 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Raman, C. W. Nestor, Jr., and P. Tikkanen, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 78, 1 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. Kurokawa and K. Kato, Nucl. Phys. A 792, 87 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. T. Yamada and P. Schuck, Phys. Rev. C 69, 024309 (2004); Eur. Phys. J. A 26, 185 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. N. Danilov, T. L. Belyaeva, A. S. Demyanova, et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 054603 (2009).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. E. Uegaki, S. Okabe, Y. Abe, and H. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 57, 1262 (1977); E. Uegaki, Y. Abe, S. Okabe, and H. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 59, 1031 (1978); Prog. Theor. Phys. 62, 1621 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. A. S. Demyanova, A. A. Ogloblin, S. A. Goncharov, and T. L. Belyaeva, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 17, 2118 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. A. Goncharov.

Additional information

The text was submitted by the authors in English.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belyaeva, T.L., Danilov, A.N., Demyanova, A.S. et al. Role of 8Be heavy stripping mechanism in the α + 12C inelastic scattering to the near-3α-threshold states in 12C. Phys. Atom. Nuclei 74, 1537–1542 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778811110032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778811110032

Keywords

Navigation