Two-quasiparticle structures and isomers in Er168, Er170, and Er172

G. D. Dracoulis, G. J. Lane, F. G. Kondev, H. Watanabe, D. Seweryniak, S. Zhu, M. P. Carpenter, C. J. Chiara, R. V. F. Janssens, T. Lauritsen, C. J. Lister, E. A. McCutchan, and I. Stefanescu
Phys. Rev. C 81, 054313 – Published 20 May 2010

Abstract

The stable and neutron-rich isotopes Er168, Er170, and Er172 have been studied with Gammasphere using inelastic excitation with energetic Xe136 beams. The previously assigned structures based on the proposed Kπ=4 isomeric intrinsic states in both Er168 and Er170 have been re-evaluated and an equivalent band identified in Er172. In Er170, the identification of a Kπ=6 band with transitions close in energy to those of the 4 band leads to a modified interpretation, since the overlap would have compromised previous analyses. The gKgR values for the 4 bands deduced from the in-band γ-ray intensities for the sequence of isotopes suggest a predominantly two-neutron configuration in Er168, an equally mixed two-neutron, two-proton configuration in Er170, and a two-proton configuration in Er172. A comprehensive decay scheme for the previously proposed 6+ isomer in Er172 has also been established, as well as band structures built on this isomer that closely resemble the 6+ and 7 two-neutron structures known in the isotone Yb174. The implied K hindrances are discussed. The main decay path of the 6+ isomer occurs through the newly identified 4 isomer. The measured lifetimes of the 4 and 6+ isomers in Er172 are 57(3) and 822(90) ns, respectively. Multiquasiparticle calculations support the suggested configuration changes across the isotopic chain.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
3 More
  • Received 2 March 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.054313

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

G. D. Dracoulis1,*, G. J. Lane1, F. G. Kondev2, H. Watanabe3, D. Seweryniak4, S. Zhu4, M. P. Carpenter4, C. J. Chiara2,†, R. V. F. Janssens4, T. Lauritsen4, C. J. Lister4, E. A. McCutchan4, and I. Stefanescu4,5

  • 1Department of Nuclear Physics, R.S.P.E, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
  • 2Nuclear Engineering Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 3RIKEN Nishina Center, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
  • 4Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
  • 5Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

  • *Corresponding author; george.dracoulis@anu.edu.au
  • Present address: Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA, and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 81, Iss. 5 — May 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×