Coupling a proton and a neutron to the semidoubly magic nucleus Ni68: A study of Cu70 via the β decay of Ni70 and Cu70

J. Van Roosbroeck, H. De Witte, M. Gorska, M. Huyse, K. Kruglov, K. Van de Vel, P. Van Duppen, S. Franchoo, J. Cederkall, V. N. Fedoseyev, H. Fynbo, U. Georg, O. Jonsson, U. Köster, L. Weissman, W. F. Mueller, V. I. Mishin, D. Fedorov, W. B. Walters, N. A. Smirnova, A. Van Dyck, A. De Maesschalck, and K. Heyde (IS365 Collaboration and ISOLDE Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 69, 034313 – Published 10 March 2004

Abstract

The Ni70 nucleus has been produced at the LISOL facility and its β decay to Cu70 has been observed. In parallel, the Cu70 nucleus has been produced at the ISOLDE facility. A new third β-decaying isomeric state in Cu70 has been identified, partly with the aid of the in-source laser spectroscopy method. Its measured half-life is T12=33(2)s. In addition, two isomeric transitions in Cu70 have been observed at energies of 101.1(3) and 141.3(3)keV, and it allowed the relative placement of the three Cu70 isomeric states and their tentative spin and parity assignments. The new Cu70 isomer was found to be weakly populated in the β decay of Ni70. It allowed the construction of the Ni70 decay scheme. Furthermore, the β decay of the three Cu70 isomers to Zn70 has been measured and their decay schemes are presented. The Ni70 β decay to the isomeric states in Cu70 and their subsequent isomeric decay and β decay to Zn70 are discussed within the extreme shell-model picture of two valence nucleons outside the semidouble magic Ni402868 core and it yields satisfactory results. Large-basis shell-model calculations using Ni282856 as the core and a realistic effective interaction support rather well the suggested interpretation.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 20 November 2003

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.034313

©2004 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

J. Van Roosbroeck*, H. De Witte, M. Gorska, M. Huyse, K. Kruglov, K. Van de Vel, and P. Van Duppen

  • Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, University of Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200D, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium

S. Franchoo, J. Cederkall, V. N. Fedoseyev, H. Fynbo, U. Georg, O. Jonsson, and U. Köster

  • ISOLDE, CERN, 1211 Genève 23, Switzerland

L. Weissman and W. F. Mueller

  • National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, 164 S. Shaw Lane, Michigan 48824-1312, USA

V. I. Mishin

  • Institute of Spectroscopy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142092 Troitsk, Russia

D. Fedorov

  • St. Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, 188350 Gatchina, Russia

W. B. Walters

  • Department of Chemistry, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA

N. A. Smirnova, A. Van Dyck, A. De Maesschalck, and K. Heyde

  • Vakgroep Subatomaire en Stralingsfysica, Universiteit Gent, Proeftuinstraat 86, B-9000 Gent, Belgium

  • *Corresponding author. Email address: piet.vanduppen@fys.kuleuven.ac.be

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 69, Iss. 3 — March 2004

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×