Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mmultiscripts><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">O</mi></mrow><mprescripts></mprescripts><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>17</mn></mrow><mrow></mrow><mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts></mrow></math> and <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mmultiscripts><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">’</mi></mrow><mprescripts></mprescripts><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>18</mn></mrow><mrow></mrow><mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts></mrow></math> ’’

D. M. Manley; J. J. Kelly

doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.36.1646

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}’$ ’’

D. M. Manley and J. J. Kelly

Phys. Rev. C 36, 1646 – Published 1 October 1987

Abstract

Some possible problems in Millener’s suggested spin assignments for states at high excitation energy in ${}^{17}O$ are pointed out.

Received 22 June 1987

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.36.1646

Authors & Affiliations

D. M. Manley

Department of Physics, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242

J. J. Kelly

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742

Comments & Replies

Comment on ‘‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}’$

D. J. Millener

Phys. Rev. C 36, 1643 (1987)

Original Article

Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}O$

D. M. Manley, B. L. Berman, W. Bertozzi, J. M. Finn, F. W. Hersman, C. E. Hyde-Wright, M. V. Hynes, J. J. Kelly, M. A. Kovash, S. Kowalski, R. W. Lourie, B. Murdock, B. E. Norum, B. Pugh, and C. P. Sargent

Phys. Rev. C 34, 1214 (1986)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Issue

Vol. 36, Iss. 4 — October 1987

Reuse & Permissions

Access Options

Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Physical Review C

covering nuclear physics

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}’$ ’’

D. M. Manley and J. J. Kelly

Phys. Rev. C 36, 1646 – Published 1 October 1987

Abstract

Authors & Affiliations

Comments & Replies

Comment on ‘‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}’$

D. J. Millener

Phys. Rev. C 36, 1643 (1987)

Original Article

Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}O$

D. M. Manley, B. L. Berman, W. Bertozzi, J. M. Finn, F. W. Hersman, C. E. Hyde-Wright, M. V. Hynes, J. J. Kelly, M. A. Kovash, S. Kowalski, R. W. Lourie, B. Murdock, B. E. Norum, B. Pugh, and C. P. Sargent

Phys. Rev. C 34, 1214 (1986)

References (Subscription Required)

Issue

Access Options

Physical Review C

covering nuclear physics

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in O17 and ’18 ’’

D. M. Manley and J. J. Kelly

Phys. Rev. C 36, 1646 – Published 1 October 1987

Abstract

Authors & Affiliations

Comments & Replies

Comment on ‘‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in O17 and ’18

D. J. Millener

Phys. Rev. C 36, 1643 (1987)

Original Article

Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in O17 and O18

D. M. Manley, B. L. Berman, W. Bertozzi, J. M. Finn, F. W. Hersman, C. E. Hyde-Wright, M. V. Hynes, J. J. Kelly, M. A. Kovash, S. Kowalski, R. W. Lourie, B. Murdock, B. E. Norum, B. Pugh, and C. P. Sargent

Phys. Rev. C 34, 1214 (1986)

References (Subscription Required)

Issue

Access Options

Authorization Required

Other Options

Download & Share

Images

Log In

Search

Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}’$ ’’

Comment on ‘‘Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}’$

Electroexcitation of M4 transitions in ${}^{17}O$ and ${}^{18}O$