Noncoplanar <span class="aps-inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mrow><mmultiscripts><mrow><mi mathvariant="normal">H</mi></mrow><mprescripts></mprescripts><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow><mrow></mrow><mrow></mrow></mmultiscripts></mrow><mn></mn><mo>(</mo><mi>p</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>2</mn><mi>p</mi><mo>)</mo><mi>n</mi></math></span> reaction

D. I. Bonbright; A. M. McDonald; W. T. H. van Oers; J. W. Watson; H. S. Caplan; J. M. Cameron; J. G. Rogers; J. Soukup; W. M. Kloet; C. Stolk; J. A. Tjon

doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.20.879

Noncoplanar ${}^{2}H (p, 2 p) n$ reaction

D. I. Bonbright, A. M. McDonald, W. T. H. van Oers, J. W. Watson, H. S. Caplan, J. M. Cameron, J. G. Rogers, J. Soukup, W. M. Kloet, C. Stolk, and J. A. Tjon

Phys. Rev. C 20, 879 – Published 1 September 1979

Abstract

Calculations based upon the Faddeev equations and measurements of proton-induced deuteron disintegration cross sections have been made at 23.0 and 39.5 MeV for two types of constant-relative-energy loci. In the first configuration the variation of the breakup cross section was studied for fixed values of the final state $NN$ relative energies and a fixed momentum of one of the emerging protons. In the second configuration the variation of the breakup cross section was studied for equal relative energies between all three pairs of nucleons with the two protons emerging with equal momenta symmetrically with respect to the incident beam direction. At 39.5 MeV calculations and measurements were made of both types of loci while at 23.0 MeV only the second kinematical configuration was studied.

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ${}^{2}H (p, 2 p) n$ at $T_{p} = 23.0 and 39.5$ MeV, measured two types of constant-relative-energy loci; comparisons with three-body calculations using the Reid soft-core potential.

Received 7 May 1979

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.20.879

Authors & Affiliations

D. I. Bonbright^*, A. M. McDonald^†, W. T. H. van Oers, and J. W. Watson^‡

Cyclotron Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada

H. S. Caplan

Department of Physics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 0W0, Canada

J. M. Cameron, J. G. Rogers^§, and J. Soukup

Nuclear Research Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6E 2J1, Canada

W. M. Kloet^∥

Theoretical Division, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87545

C. Stolk^¶ and J. A. Tjon

Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

^*Present address: Data/Ware Development, Inc., San Diego, California 92121.
^†Present address: Power Projects of Atomic Energy of Canada, Ltd., Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 1B2.
^‡Present address: Department of Physics, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242.
^§Present address: TRIUMF, Vancouver, B. C., Canada, V6T 1W5.
^∥Present address: Department of Physics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08873.
^¶Present address: Gemeentelyk Bureau voor Onderzoek en Statistiek, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Issue

Vol. 20, Iss. 3 — September 1979

Reuse & Permissions

Access Options

Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Physical Review C

covering nuclear physics