NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 26, 2024.

Search: Author = M.Fratoni

Found 2 matches.

Back to query form

2021VI05      Ann.Nucl.Energy 163, 108596 (2021)

P.Vicente-Valdez, L.Bernstein, M.Fratoni

Nuclear data evaluation augmented by machine learning

doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108596
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019BA16      Phys.Rev. C 99, 044612 (2019)

J.C.Batchelder, S.-A.Chong, J.Morrell, M.A.Unzueta, P.Adams, J.D.Bauer, T.Bailey, T.A.Becker, L.A.Bernstein, M.Fratoni, A.M.Hurst, J.James, A.M.Lewis, E.F.Matthews, M.Negus, D.Rutte, K.Song, K.Van Bibber, M.Wallace, C.S.Waltz

Possible evidence of nonstatistical properties in the ³⁵Cl (n, p) ³⁵S cross section

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ³⁵Cl(n, p)³⁵S, ³⁵Cl(n, α)³²P, E=2.74, 2.64, 2.58, 2.52, 2.42 MeV; measured β radiation and decay curves from the decay of ³⁵S and ³²P, and σ(E) using liquid scintillator counter at the Berkeley High Flux Neutron Generator (BHFNG) at the University of California. ⁵⁸Ni(n, p)⁵⁸Co and ¹¹⁵In(n, n')^115mIn used as references. Comparison with data in evaluated libraries: ENDF/B-VIII.0, ENDF/B-VII.1, JEFF-3.2, JENDL-4.0, and ROSFOND-2010. ³⁶Cl; deduced resonance, σ(E). ³⁵Cl(n, p), E=1 eV-15 MeV; ³⁵Cl(n, α), E=0-20 MeV; comparison of literature and present experimental σ(E) with nuclear data libraries; concluded that modeling of (n, X) cross sections for N=Z=20 shell gap nuclei requires a resolved resonance approach rather than a Hauser-Feshbach formalism.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044612
Citations: PlumX Metrics
Data from this article have been entered in the EXFOR database. For more information, access X4 dataset14556.