NSR Query Results


Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of April 27, 2024.

Search: Author = K.L.Martinez

Found 3 matches.

Back to query form



2020AN18      Phys.Rev. C 102, 065801 (2020)

S.Antic, J.R.Stone, J.C.Miller, K.L.Martinez, P.A.M.Guichon, A.W.Thomas

Outer crust of a cold, nonaccreting neutron star within the quark-meson-coupling model

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=26-50, N=20-90; calculated nuclear binding energies, two-neutron drip line using the QMCπ-III mass model, and compared with experimental data. 56Fe, 62,64,66,78Ni, 80Zn, 82Ge, 84Se, 86,118,120Kr, 120,122,124Sr, 121Y, 122Zr, 124Mo, 126Ru; calculated numerical results of the equation of state (EOSs) in the outer crust of cold nonaccreting, nonrotating neutron stars, such as baryon number densities at the bottom and top of each layer, and neutron and electron chemical potentials, and properties of individual layers in the outer crust. Comparison with results from FRDM, HFB24, and NL3 mass models.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.065801
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2020MA43      Phys.Rev. C 102, 034304 (2020)

K.L.Martinez, A.W.Thomas, P.A.M.Guichon, J.R.Stone

Tensor and pairing interactions within the quark-meson coupling energy-density functional

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=20, N=14-38; Z=28, N=20-50; Z=50, N=50-88; Z=82, N=96-138; calculated binding energies with and without tensor contribution, two-neutron shell gaps. 40,48Ca, 56,78Ni, 100,132Sn; calculated proton and neutron single-particle states, deformation energies, spin-orbit splittings with and without tensor contribution. 90,92,94,96,98,100,102,104,106,108,110,112Zr; calculated β2 deformation parameters and deformation energies. 254,256,254,256,258,260,262,264Fm, 254,256,258,260,262,264,266,268Rf; calculated two-neutron shell gaps. Quark-meson coupling (QMC) model (QMCπ-III-T), with the density functional which included tensor component, and pairing interaction from the QMC framework. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034304
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2019MA57      Phys.Rev. C 100, 024333 (2019)

K.L.Martinez, A.W.Thomas, J.R.Stone, P.A.M.Guichon

Parameter optimization for the latest quark-meson coupling energy-density functional

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Z=20, 28, 50, 82; N=20, 28, 50, 82, 126; calculated binding energies, rms charge radii, and pairing gaps for 70 nuclei. Z=8-96, N=8-160; calculated binding energies, rms charge radii, and S(2n) for 739 even-even nuclei. Z=20, N=16-36; Z=28, N=26-52; Z=50, N=52-86; Z=82, N=98-142; calculated S(2n) for even-even nuclei. Z=20, A=34-58; Z=82, A=178-220; calculated isotopic shifts for even-even nuclei. 36,38,40,48Ca, 54Fe, 58,60,64Ni, 90Zr, 112,116,124Sn, 208Pb; calculated skin thicknesses. 40Ca, 78Ni, 132Sn; calculated proton and neutron single-particle states. Z=64, A=134-170; calculated B(E2) and β2 for the first 2+ states in even-even nuclei. 90Zr, 116Sn, 144Sm, 208Pb; calculated energies of giant monopole resonances (GMR). Z>96, A=232-294; calculated binding energies for superheavy nuclei. HF+BCS calculations with quark-meson-coupling (QMC) model, using QMCπ-II energy density functional. Optimization of model parameters by detailed comparisons and fittings with the experimental data. Comparison with other theoretical calculations.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.100.024333
Citations: PlumX Metrics


Back to query form