NSR Query Results


Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of May 8, 2024.

Search: Author = H.Sadeghi

Found 21 matches.

Back to query form



2024AS05      Pramana 98, 50 (2024)

L.Asgari, H.Sadeghi

Thermonuclear rate of the 7Be(p, γ)8B reaction by EFT

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 7Be(p, γ), E<1 MeV; calculated thermonuclear reaction rate using the effective field theory (EFT) and coupled-channel formalism, considering the contribution of the excited nuclei 7Be* up to the N2LO. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1007/s12043-024-02732-3
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2023KH11      Pramana 97, 91 (2023)

M.Khoddam, H.Sadeghi, S.Nahidinezhad

Three-body forces and Coulomb effects in the 3He (α, γ)7Be process

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 3He(α, γ), E<1.5 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced S-factors, reaction rates using the Faddeev equations approach to solve the Kernel functions in the two-body mode without taking the Coulomb interaction into account and we determined the astrophysical S-factor and two-body reaction rate up to LO.

doi: 10.1007/s12043-023-02569-2
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2023NA23      Pramana 97, 111 (2023)

S.Nahidinezhad, H.Sadeghi

Effects of three-nucleon forces in the d(α, γ)6Li reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(α, γ), E(cm)<0.4 MeV; calculated S-factors, reaction rates using effective field theory (EFT), up to next to leading order (NLO).

doi: 10.1007/s12043-023-02588-z
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2021NA26      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 84, 441 (2021)

S.Nahidinezhad, H.Sadeghi

Charge Form Factor and Radii of 6Li

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 6Li; calculated the charge form factor and the charge radius within the framework of Effective Field Theory (EFT) at low energy.

doi: 10.1134/S1063778821040219
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2016SA26      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 79, 44 (2016)

H.Sadeghi, M.M.Firoozabadi

Four-body calculation of 12C(α, γ)16O radiative capture reaction at stellar energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(α, γ), E(cm)=0.8-3.0 MeV; calculated σ E1 and E2 components, E1 and E2 S-factor, σ using four α model with Faddeev-Yakubovsky equations with two- and three-body elmg currents. Compared with data.

doi: 10.1134/S1063778816010154
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2016SA27      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 79, 55 (2016)

H.Sadeghi, M.Ghambari, R.Fereidonnejad

Study of the 12C (8B, 7Be)X knockout reaction at intermediate energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(8B, 7Be), E=142, 285, 790, 936 MeV/nucleon; calculated stripping and knockout σ vs longitudinal momentum, σ(p) vs longitudinal and transverse momentum using Glauber model eikonal approximation.

doi: 10.1134/S1063778816010166
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2016SA59      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 79, 375 (2016)

H.Sadeghi, R.Fereidonnejad, M.Ghambari

The knockout reaction of 15C on a 9Be target at intermediate energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 9Be(15C, 14C), E=103 MeV/nucleon; calculated reaction σ, knockout σ to gs and 1st excited state, stripping and diffractive σ, dσ; deduced transverse momentum distribution. Compared to data.

doi: 10.1134/S1063778816030133
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2015FI03      Chin.Phys.Lett. 32, 072101 (2015)

M.M.Firoozabadi, H.Sadeghi

Three-Body Calculation of 4He(αα, γ)12C Reaction at Stellar Energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(8Be, γ), E=30 KeV; calculated energy levels, J, π, Hoyle state resonance decay width. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/32/7/072101
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2015SA03      Int.J.Theor.Phys. 54, 368 (2015)

H.Sadeghi, M.Goodarzi

Three-body Calculation of Total Cross Sections of the p d → 3H e η Reaction From Chiral Dynamics

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(p, E), E=59.8 MeV; calculated σ for eta meson production. COSY-ANKE and the WASA-at-COSY experiments, Faddeev equations using chiral dynamics.

doi: 10.1007/s10773-014-2231-5
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2014SA08      Chin.Phys.Lett. 31, 012101 (2014)

H.Sadeghi, H.Khalili

Three-Body Calculation of the 4He(3H, γ)7Li and 4He(3He, γ)7Be Reactions and Structure of the 7Li and 7Be at Solar Energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 4He(t, γ), (t, 3He), E not given; calculated S-factors. Comparison with available data.

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 7Be, 7Li; calculated ground-state energies. SRG-N3LO NN potential.

doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/31/1/0121101
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2014SA44      Chin.Phys.C 38, 084101 (2014)

H.Sadeghi, R.Ghasemi, H.Khalili

Astrophysical S-factor of the 12C(α, γ)) 16O reaction at solar energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 12C(α, γ), E=0.1-2.0 MeV; calculated astrophysical S-factor. RADCAP computer code, comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/38/8/084101
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2014SA53      Chin.Phys.Lett. 31, 092102 (2014)

H.Sadeghi, M.Mosavi-Khansari

The Photon Polarization Parameter of 2H(n, γ)3H reaction with Inclusion of the Electric Quadrupole Contribution

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, γ), E low; calculated σ, photon polarization parameter. Effective field theory.

doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/31/9/092102
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2013KH13      Chin.Phys.C 37, 094101 (2013)

H.Khalili, H.Sadeghi

Fore-aft asymmetry of the 2H(n, γ)3H at very low energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, γ), E<60 MeV; calculated γ-rays fore-aft asymmetry parameters. N2LO (next-to-next-to leading order), comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/9/094101
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2013SA06      Chin.Phys.C 37, 044102 (2013)

H.Sadeghi, H.Khalili, M.Godarzi

Astrophysical S-factor of the d(p, γ)3He process by effective field theory

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(p, γ), E<1 MeV; calculated S-factors. Effective field theory study, comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/4/044102
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2013SA13      Chin.Phys.C 37, 054101 (2013)

H.Sadeghi, Sh.Nahidinejad, K.Bahraminejad

Structure of A=11 double-Λ hypernuclei studied with three-body forcess

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE A=11; calculated hypernuclei energy levels, J, π, rms radii. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/1674-1137/37/5/054102
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2013SA45      Chin.Phys.Lett. 30, 102501 (2013)

H.Sadeghi

S-Factor of the 3H(α, γ)7Li Reaction at Astrophysical Energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 3H(α, γ), E=0.05-1 MeV; calculated S-factor. AV18 two-body interactions and AV18/UIX three-body interactions, comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/30/10/102501
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2012SA43      Int.J.Mod.Phys. E21, 1230008 (2012)

H.Sadeghi

Triton breakup and formation at very low energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 3H(n, γ), 1H(d, γ), E = thermal; calculated σ, polarization observables. Effective field theory calculations.

doi: 10.1142/S0218301312300081
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2012SA54      Chin.Phys.Lett. 29, 122101 (2012)

H.Sadeghi

Photon Linear Polarization Coefficient of the Radiative Capture Process 2H(p, γ)3He at Thermal Energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(p, γ)3He, E = thermal; calculated σ, proton polarization parameters. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/29/12/122101
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2010SA33      Prog.Theor.Phys.(Kyoto) 124, 1037 (2010)

H.Sadeghi, J.Nezamdost

Triton Electric Form Factor at Low Energies

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 3H; calculated form factors, charge radius. Effective field theory, comparison with experiment.

doi: 10.1143/PTP.124.1037
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2007SA22      Phys.Rev. C 75, 044002 (2007)

H.Sadeghi

Neutron-deuteron system and the photon polarization parameter at thermal neutron energies

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, γ), E=thermal; calculated cross sections using pionless EFT with Argonne two-nucleon and Urbana IX or Tucson-Melbourne three-nucleon interactions; deduced photon polarization parameter.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.75.044002
Citations: PlumX Metrics


2005SA28      Nucl.Phys. A753, 291 (2005)

H.Sadeghi, S.Bayegan

Nd → 3Hγ with effective field theory

NUCLEAR REACTIONS 2H(n, γ), E=20-200 keV; calculated σ. Pionless effective field theory, three-body force.

doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.004
Citations: PlumX Metrics


Back to query form