NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of May 10, 2024.

Search: Author = H.Ozdogan

Found 18 matches.

Back to query form

2024OZ01      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 204, 111115 (2024)

H.Ozdogan, Y.A.Uncu, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

Neural network predictions of (α, n) reaction cross sections at 18.5±3 MeV using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴¹K, ⁵¹V, ⁵⁹Co, ⁶²Ni, ⁶³Cu, ^64,66,68Zn, ^69,71Ga, ^70,72Ge, ⁷⁶Se, ⁸¹Br, ⁸⁶Sr, ⁹³Nb, ^92,94Mo, ¹⁰⁰Ru, ¹⁰³Rh, ^107,109Ag, ¹¹⁴Cd, ¹¹³In, ^114,116,124Sn, ^121,123Sb, ¹³⁹La, ¹⁵⁰Nd, ¹⁵⁹Tb, ¹⁶⁵Ho, ¹⁶⁹Tm, ¹⁸¹Ta, ¹⁹¹Ir, ¹⁹⁷Au, ²⁰⁹Bi(α, n), E=18.5 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced σ.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111115
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023OZ01      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 192, 110609 (2023)

H.Ozdogan, Y.A.Uncu, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

Estimations for (n, α) reaction cross sections at around 14.5 MeV using Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm-based artificial neural network

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴⁰Ar, ^39,41K, ⁴⁰Ca, ⁴⁴Ca, ⁴⁵Sc, ^48,50Ti, ⁵¹V, ^50,52,54Cr, ⁵⁵Mn, ⁵⁴Fe, ^56,57,58Fe, ^60,61,62Ni, ⁶⁴Ni, ^63,65Cu, ⁶⁴Zn, ^68,70Zn, ^69,71Ga, ^72,74Ge, ⁷⁵As, ^78,80Se, ^79,81Br, ⁸⁶Kr, ⁸⁵Rb, ⁸⁹Y, ^90,92,94,96Zr, ⁹³Nb, ^92,94,96Mo, ^97,98Mo, ¹⁰⁰Mo, ⁹⁹Tc, ^102,104Ru, ¹⁰³Rh, ^106,108Pd, ¹⁰⁶Cd, ^112,114,116Cd, ¹¹⁵In, ^{116,117,118,119,120}Sn, ^122,124Sn, ^126,128Te, ¹²⁷I, ¹³³Cs, ¹³⁸Ba, ¹³⁹La, ¹⁴²Ce, ¹⁴¹Pr, ^144,146,148Nd, ^150,152,154Sm, ^151,153Eu, ^156,158,160Gd, ¹⁵⁹Tb, ^162,164Dy, ^168,170Er, ¹⁶⁹Tm, ^172,174,176Yb, ^175,176Lu, ^178,180Hf, ¹⁸¹Ta, ^184,186W, ¹⁸⁷Re, ^190,192Os, ¹⁹¹Ir, ^194,196Pt, ¹⁹⁷Au, ²⁰⁰Hg, ^203,205Tl, ²⁰⁴Pb, ^206,207,208Pb, ²⁰⁹Bi(n, α), E ∼ 14.5 MeV; analyzed available data; deduced σ using Accurate artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms. Comparison with TALYS 1.95 calculations.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110609
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023OZ02      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 199, 110922 (2023)

H.Ozdogan, Y.A.Uncu, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

Calculation of double differential neutron cross-sections of ⁵⁶Fe and ⁹⁰Zr isotopes

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁵⁶Fe, ⁹⁰Zr(p, Xn), E=22.2 MeV; calculated σ(θ, E) using the PHITS 3.22 Monte Carlo and the TALYS 1.95 codes. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110922
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2023SE02      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 194, 110714 (2023)

M.Sekerci, H.Ozdogan, A.Kaplan

A study on the cross-section data of ^{43, 44m, 46, 47}Sc isotopes via (d, x) reactions on natural abundance targets under the effects of deuteron optical models

NUCLEAR REACTIONS Ti(d, X)⁴³Sc/⁴⁴Sc/⁴⁶Sc/⁴⁷Sc, V(d, X)⁴⁷Sc, Cr(d, X)⁴⁷Sc, E<50 MeV; calculated σ using TALYS 1.95 model code. Comparison with the EXFOR library.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110714
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022OZ02      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 184, 110162 (2022)

H.Ozdogan, Y.A.Uncu, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

Mass excess estimations using artificial neural networks

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁵⁶Fe(p, X), E<65 MeV; calculated σ(E) using RIPL3 data.

ATOMIC MASSES ^{45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72}Fe, ^{47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58}Co, ^{184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217,218}Bi, ^{188,189,190,191,192}Po; calculated mass excess. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110162
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2022SE05      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 186, 110255 (2022)

M.Sekerci, H.Ozdogan, A.Kaplan

Effects of combining some theoretical models in the cross-section calculations of some alpha-induced reactions for ^natSb

NUCLEAR REACTIONS Sb(α, X)¹²¹I/¹²³I/¹²⁴I/¹²⁵I/¹²⁶I, E<50 MeV; calculated σ using TALYS-1.95 code. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110255
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021OZ01      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 169, 109581 (2021)

H.Ozdogan, Y.A.Uncu, O.Karaman, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

Estimations of giant dipole resonance parameters using artificial neural network

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^{142,143,144,145,146}Nd(γ, n), E<22 MeV; calculated σ. ^144,148Sm, ¹⁹³Ir, ¹⁹⁵Pt, ¹⁹⁷Au, ²⁰²Hg, ^206,207,208Pb, ²⁰⁹Bi, ¹⁶O, ⁶⁵Cu, ⁶⁹Ga, ^70,72Ge, ^80,82Se, ⁸⁵Rb, ⁸⁸Sr, ⁸⁹Y, ^90,91,92,94Zr, ⁹³Nb, ^{92,94,96,98,100}Mo, ¹⁰³Rh, ¹⁰⁸Pd, ¹⁰⁷Ag, ¹¹⁴Cd, ¹¹⁵In, ^{116,117,118,119,120,124}Sn, ¹²¹Sb, ^{124,126,128,130}Te, ¹³³Cs, ¹³⁸Ba, ¹³⁹La, ^140,142Ce, ¹⁴¹Pr, ^{142,143,144,145,146}Nd; deduced giant dipole resonance parameters, resonance σ using accurate artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109581
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021OZ02      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 170, 109584 (2021)

H.Ozdogan

Estimation of (n, p) reaction cross sections at 14.5 _∓ 0.5 MeV neutron energy by using artificial neural network

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ²³Na, ^24,25,26Mg, ²⁷Al, ^28,29Si, ³¹P, ^32,34S, ³⁷Cl, ⁴¹K, ^42,43,44Ca, ⁴⁵Sc, ^46,47,48Ti, ⁵⁰Ti, ⁵¹V, ^52,53,54Cr, ⁵⁵Mn, ^54,56Fe, ⁵⁷Fe, ⁵⁹Co, ^58,60Ni, ^61,62Ni, ^63,65Cu, ^64,66Zn, ^67,68Zn, ⁷⁰Ge, ^72,73,74Ge, ⁷⁶Ge, ⁷⁵As, ^74,76,78Se, ⁸¹Br, ^84,86,88Sr, ⁸⁹Y, ^90,91,92Zr, ^94,96Zr, ⁹²Mo, ^{94,95,96,97,98}Mo, ¹⁰⁰Mo, ⁹⁹Tc, ⁹⁶Ru, ¹⁰⁰Ru, ¹⁰³Rh, ^105,106Pd, ¹⁰⁸Pd, ¹⁰⁹Ag, ^{111,112,113,114}Cd, ¹¹⁶Cd, ¹¹⁵In, ¹¹²Sn, ^{117,118,119,120}Sn, ^121,123Sb, ^{122,124,126,128,130}Te, ¹²⁷I, ^132,134Ba, ^136,137,138Ba, ¹³⁹La, ^179,180Hf, ¹⁸¹Ta, ¹⁸⁰W, ^182,183,184W, ¹⁸⁶W, ¹⁸⁷Re, ^188,190,192Os, ^191,193Ir, ^194,195Pt, ¹⁹⁷Au, ¹⁹⁶Hg, ^{198,199,200,201,202}Hg, ²⁰⁴Hg, ^203,205Tl, ^{206,207,208,209}Pb, ^140,142Ce, ¹⁴¹Pr, ^{142,143,144,145,146}Nd, ¹⁴⁸Nd, ^{144,146,148,150,152}Sm, ¹⁵³Eu, ^156,157,158Gd, ¹⁵⁹Tb, ^158,160Dy, ¹⁶³Dy, ¹⁶⁵Ho, ^166,167,168Er, ^172,173,174Yb, ¹⁷⁶Yb(n, p), E ∼ 14 MeV; calculated σ. Comparison with EXFOR library, TALYS 1.95 calculations.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109584
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2021SE14      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 176, 109875 (2021)

M.Sekerci, H.Ozdogan, A.Kaplan

Effects of deuteron optical models on the cross-section calculations of deuteron induced reactions on natural germanium

NUCLEAR REACTIONS Ge(d, X)⁷⁰As/⁷¹As/⁷²As/⁷³As/⁷⁴As/⁷⁶As, E<50 MeV; calculated σ using TALYS-1.95 code. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2021.109875
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020OZ03      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 165, 109356 (2020)

H.Ozdogan, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

Photo-neutron cross-section calculations of ^{54, 56}Fe, ^{90, 91, 92, 94}Zr, ⁹³Nb and ¹⁰⁷Ag Isotopes with newly obtained Giant Dipole Resonance parameters

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^54,56Fe, ^90,91,92,94Zr, ⁹³Nb, ¹⁰⁷Ag(γ, n), E<30 MeV; calculated σ using TALIS-1.9 and EMPIRE nuclear model codes. Comparison with available data.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109356
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020OZ04      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 83, 820 (2020)

H.Ozdogan, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

An Investigation on the Effects of Some Theoretical Models in the Cross-Section Calculations of ^{50, 52, 53, 54}Cr(α, x) Reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^50,52,53,54Cr(α, X)⁴⁸Cr/⁴⁹Cr/⁵¹Cr/⁵⁴Mn/⁵⁶Mn, E<50 MeV; calculated σ using the level density models and alpha optical model potentials. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1134/S1063778820660060
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2020SE01      Radiochim.Acta 108, 11 (2020)

M.Sekerci, H.Ozdogan, A.Kaplan

An investigation of effects of level density models and gamma ray strength functions on cross-section calculations for the production of ⁹⁰Y, ¹⁵³Sm, ¹⁶⁹Er, ¹⁷⁷Lu and ¹⁸⁶Re therapeutic radioisotopes via (n, γ) reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁸⁹Y, ¹⁵²Sm, ¹⁶⁸Er, ¹⁷⁶Lu, ¹⁸⁵Re(n, γ), E<4 MeV; calculated σ using TALYS 1.9 code. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1515/ract-2019-3123
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019OZ01      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 143, 1 (2019)

H.Ozdogan

Theoretical calculations of production cross-sections for the ²⁰¹Pb, ¹¹¹In ¹⁸F and ¹¹C radioisotopes at proton induced reactions

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁴N(p, α), ¹⁸O(p, n), ¹¹²Cd(p, 2n), ²⁰³Tl(p, 3n), E<40 MeV; calculated σ using TALYS 1.8 nuclear model code. Comparison with EXFOR library.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.10.007
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019OZ02      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 143, 6 (2019)

H.Ozdogan, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

Investigation of gamma strength functions and level density models effects on photon induced reaction cross-section calculations for the fusion structural materials ^{46, 50}Ti, ⁵¹V, ⁵⁸Ni and ⁶³Cu

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴⁶Ti(γ, n), ⁵⁰Ti(γ, n), (γ, 2n), ⁵¹V, ⁵⁸Ni(γ, n), (γ, np), ⁶³Cu(γ, n), E<30 MeV; calculated σ using TALYS 1.8 code with different gamma strength functions. Comparison with experimental data.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.10.011
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2019OZ04      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 82, 324 (2019)

H.Ozdogan, M.Sekerci, A.Kaplan

S-Factor Analysis of Proton Capture Reactions on ^{112, 114, 116, 119}Sn and ^{113, 115}In Isotopes

doi: 10.1134/s106377881904015x
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2018OZ02      Appl.Radiat.Isot. 140, 29 (2018)

H.Ozdogan, M.Sekerci, I.H.Sarpun, A.Kaplan

Investigation of level density parameter effects on (p, n) and (p, 2n) reaction cross-sections for the fusion structural materials ⁴⁸Ti, ⁶³Cu and ⁹⁰Zr

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴⁸Ti, ⁶³Cu(p, n), ⁹⁰Zr(p, 2n), E<30 MeV; analyzed available data; calculated σ. deduced level density models by using TALYS 1.8 and EMPIRE 3.2 codes.

doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.06.013
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2015KA11      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 78, 53 (2015)

A.Kaplan, I.H.Sarpun, A.Aydin, E.Tel, V.Capali, H.Ozdogan

(γ, 2n)-Reaction cross-section calculations of several even-even lanthanide nuclei using different level density models

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^140,142Ce, ^{142,144,146,148,150}Nd, ^{144,148,150,152,154}Sm, ¹⁶⁰Gd(γ, 2n), E<30 MeV; calculated σ. TALYS 1.6 and EMPIRE 3.1 nuclear model codes, comparison with EXFOR database.

doi: 10.1134/S106377881501010X
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2014KA52      Phys.Atomic Nuclei 77, 1371 (2014)

A.Kaplan, H.Ozdogan, A.Aydin, E.Tel

Photo-neutron cross-section calculations of ^{142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 150}Nd rare-earth isotopes for (γ, n) reaction

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^{142,143,144,145,146,150}Nd(γ, n), E=8-23 MeV; calculated σ. PCROSS, TALYS 1.2, and EMPIRE 3.1 codes, comparison with EXFOR database.

doi: 10.1134/S1063778814100081
Citations: PlumX Metrics