NSR Query Results
Output year order : Descending NSR database version of April 27, 2024. Search: Author = E.Lima Found 2 matches. 2023LA08 Phys.Rev. C 108, 025804 (2023) A.C.Larsen, G.M.Tveten, T.Renstrom, H.Utsunomiya, E.Algin, T.Ari-izumi, K.O.Ay, F.L.Bello Garrote, L.Crespo Campo, F.Furmyr, S.Goriely, A.Gorgen, M.Guttormsen, V.W.Ingeberg, B.V.Kheswa, I.K.B.Kullmann, T.Laplace, E.Lima, M.Markova, J.E.Midtbo, S.Miyamoto, A.H.Mjos, V.Modamio, M.Ozgur, F.Pogliano, S.Riemer-Sorensen, E.Sahin, S.Shen, S.Siem, A.Spyrou, M.Wiedeking New experimental constraint on the 185W(n, γ)186W cross section NUCLEAR REACTIONS 182,183,184W(γ, n), E=6.5-13 MeV; measured In, En; deduced σ(E), γ-ray strength function (GSF). 186W(α, α'γ), E=30 MeV; measured Eα, Iα, Eγ, Iγ, αγ-coin; deduced nuclear level density (NLD), γ-ray strength function (GSF). 185W(n, γ), T=0.5-1.1 GK; calculated Maxwellian averaged σ(E) (MACS), reaction rate (stellar reactivity), compared with experimental results, and recommended σ in compilations by Bao et al. Comparison to other experimental data, TALYS calculations and KADONIS-1.0 data. Photoneutron reactions were measured with quasi-monochromatic photon beam at NewSubaru synchrotron radiation facility using 4π detector consisting of 20 3He proportional counters. Experiment on inelastic α-scattering was performed at the Oslo Cyclotron Laboratory (OCL) using CACTUS NaI(Tl) scintillator γ-ray detector array, the Silicon Ring (SiRi) detector array and beam from MC-35 Scanditronix cyclotron.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025804
2018MI22 Phys.Rev. C 98, 064321 (2018) J.E.Midtbo, A.C.Larsen, T.Renstrom, F.L.Bello Garrote, E.Lima Consolidating the concept of low-energy magnetic dipole decay radiation NUCLEAR STRUCTURE 60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68Ga, 69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80Ga, 59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75Ni, 60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76Cu, 60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78Zn, 60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81Ge, 61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81As, 78,79,80,81,82Se, 21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33Al, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26O, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28F, 18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30Ne, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31Na, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32Mg, 22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34Si, 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35P, 24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36S, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37Cl, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38Ar, 44Sc, 56Fe, 37K; calculated M1 γ-ray strength functions for 283 nuclei, low-energy enhancements (LEE), total dipole (E1 and M1) strength for 44Sc and 29Si using large-scale shell model. Comparison with experimental data from the Oslo method.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.98.064321
Back to query form |