NSR Query Results

Output year order : Descending
Format : Normal

NSR database version of May 8, 2024.

Search: Author = D.Chakraborty

Found 4 matches.

Back to query form

2016CH29      Phys.Rev. C 94, 015802 (2016)

D.Chakraborty, S.Dutta, G.Gangopadhyay, A.Bhattacharyya

Radiative proton capture cross sections in the mass range 40-54

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ⁴⁰Ar, ⁴¹K, ^{40,42,43,44,46}Ca, ⁴⁵Sc, ^{46,47,48,49,50}Ti, ⁵¹V, ^50,52,53,54Cr, ⁵⁴Fe; calculated binding energies (BE) and charge radii using RMF theory with the N_pN_n correction. Comparison with experimental values.

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁴¹K, ^42,44,48Ca, ^{46,47,48,49,50}Ti, ^50,53,54Cr, ⁵¹V, ⁵⁴Fe(p, γ), E=1-3 MeV; calculated astrophysical S factors and compared with available experimental values. ⁴²Ti, ^43,46V, ⁴³Sc, ⁴⁷Cr, ⁵²Fe, ^52,53Co(p, γ), T₉=1-5; calculated proton capture reaction rate, and compared with NON-SMOKER results. Hauser-Feshbach formalism with the reaction code TALYS1.6.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.94.015802
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2016DU04      Phys.Rev. C 93, 024602 (2016)

S.Dutta, D.Chakraborty, G.Gangopadhyay, A.Bhattacharyya

Neutron capture reactions near the N=82 shell-closure

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ¹⁴⁰Ce(n, n), E=1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 MeV; ¹⁴¹Pr(n, n), E=0.878, 1.2 MeV; ¹⁴²Nd(n, n), E=2.5 MeV; ¹⁴⁸Sm(n, n), E=2.7; calculated σ(θ) and compared to experimental data. ¹³³Cs, ¹³⁹La, ¹⁴⁰Ce, ¹⁴¹Pr, ^{135,136,137,138}Ba, ^{142,143,144,145,146}Nd, ^{144,147,148,149}Sm(n, γ), E=0.001-1 MeV; calculated σ(E), Maxwellian-averaged cross sections (MACS) at kT=30 keV, and compared to experimental data. Semimicroscopic optical model with the DDM3Y nucleon-nucleon interaction. Relevance to astrophysical s- and p-processes for nuclei near N=82 neutron shell-closure.

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^{133,134,135,136,137}Cs, ^{130,132,134,135,136,137,138}Ba, ^138,139La, ^{136,138,140,141,142}Ce, ^141,142,143Pr, ^{142,143,144,145,146,147}Nd, ^147,148Pm, ^{144,147,148,149}Sm; calculated charge densities, and root-mean-square (rms) charge radii using relativistic mean-field approach. Comparison with experimental values.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.024602
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2015CH34      Phys.Rev. C 91, 057602 (2015)

D.Chakraborty, S.Dutta, G.Gangopadhyay, A.Bhattacharyya

Microscopic study of (p, γ) reactions in the mass region A=110 - 125

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ¹¹⁰Pd, ^{110,111,112,113,114,116}Cd, ^113,115In, ^{112,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,122,124}Sn, ^121,123Sb, ^{122,123,124,125}Te, ¹²⁴Xe; calculated binding energies, and charge radii. Relativistic meanfield (RMF) calculations. Comparison with experimental values.

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ^121,123Sb, ^{112,114,116,119}Sn(p, γ), E=1.5-4.5 MeV; calculated astrophysical S factors and compared with experimental values. ^111,113,114In, ^112,114,115Sn(p, γ), T₉=1.5-4; calculated proton capture rates and compared with NON-SMOKER calculations. Optical potential model with density-dependent (DDM3Y) interaction.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.057602
Citations: PlumX Metrics

2015DU04      Phys.Rev. C 91, 025804 (2015)

S.Dutta, D.Chakraborty, G.Gangopadhyay, A.Bhattacharyya

Low-energy proton capture reactions in the mass region 55-60

NUCLEAR STRUCTURE ^56,58Fe, ^58,60Ni; calculated density profiles. ^55,56Mn, ^56,57,58Fe, ⁵⁹Co, ^58,60Ni; calculated charge radii. Relativistic mean field (RMF) theory. Comparison with experimental data.

NUCLEAR REACTIONS ⁵⁵Mn(p, γ)⁵⁶Fe, ⁵⁹Fe(p, γ)⁵⁹Co, ⁵⁹Co(p, γ)⁶⁰Ni, ⁵⁸Ni(p, γ)⁵⁹Cu, ⁶⁰Ni(p, γ)⁶¹Cu, E=1-3.5 MeV; calculated astrophysical S-factor. Comparison with available experimental data. ⁵⁶Ni(p, γ)⁵⁷Cu, ⁵⁷Cu(p, γ)⁵⁸Zn, ⁵⁹Cu(p, γ)⁶⁰Zn, at T₉=1-4; calculated astrophysical reaction rates. Comparison with calculations from NON-SMOKER model. Microscopic optical model using the relativistic mean field theory and DDM3Y interaction.

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.025804
Citations: PlumX Metrics

Note: The following list of authors and aliases matches the search parameter D.Chakraborty: , D.R.CHAKRABORTY