98ZR 98Y B- DECAY (0.548 S) 2017UR03,1984BE50,1977SI0520NDS 202004
98ZR H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen, Balraj Singh$CIT=NDS 164, 1 (2020)$
98ZR2 H CUT=15-Feb-2020$
98ZR c 2017Ur03: {+98}Y source obtained as a fission fragment and using
98ZR2c Lohengrin separator. Measured E|g, I|g, |b|g-coin, |g|g-coin
98ZR3c using two clover Ge detectors for |g detection and three |b detectors.
98ZR4c The A=98 ions were deposited on a tape whose movement was correlated
98ZR5c with the beam ON and beam OFF cycles. Deduced levels, J|p,
98ZR6c multipolarities, |b feedings.
98ZR7c Angular correlation measurements were made in the study of prompt
98ZR8c |g rays from {+235}U(n,F|g) and {+252}Cf SF decay. Polarization
98ZR9c measurements for three |g-ray cascades were also made in
98ZRAc {+235}U(n,F|g). See these two datasets for data from Table IX in
98ZRBc 2017Ur03
98ZR c 1984Be50: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g|g(|q) using OSTIS separator
98ZR2c at Grenoble. Only a decay scheme is given, with no uncertainties for
98ZR3c E|g and I|g values. No |b feedings were deduced in this work.
98ZR c 1977Si05: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |b, |b|g-coin, (ce)|g(t).
98ZR2c Two independent measurements of E|g and I|g were made, one using
98ZR3c JOSEF separator at Julich and the other LOHENGRIN at Grenoble.
98ZR4c Separate E|g and I|g data, as well as averages of the two were
98ZR5c reported by 1977Si05
98ZR c 2010Be30: A=98 nuclei produced by thermal neutron-induced fission out
98ZR2c of a 400 |mg/cm{+2} {+235}U target and selected by the Lohengrin mass
98ZR3c separator at the high-flux reactor of the Institut Laue-Langevin in
98ZR4c Grenoble, France. Detector array of a thin plastic scintillator,
98ZR5c a LaBr{-3}(Ce) scintillation detector (LaBr) and a high-purity
98ZR6c germanium clover detector (HPGe). Measured |b|g|g-timing, lifetimes
98ZR7c of both yrast and non-yrast states.
98ZR c Others:
98ZR c |g: 1987Ma58, 1979Bo26
98ZR c ce: 1975Kh05, 1982Ka03, 1983VaZJ, 1983VaZQ, 1984VeZU,
98ZR2c 1985HaZH, 1994Lh01
98ZR c |b, |b|g-coin: 1988MaYY, 1983MaYZ, 1979Pe17, 1978St02.
98ZR d Theory for |b decay: 1983Be56
98ZR c |b|g(t), |b|g|g(t): 1989Ma38, 1982Ka03
98ZR c Q(|b{+-}) data: 8840 {I55} (1988GrZX,1978St02), 8780 {I30} (1984BlZN),
98ZR2c 8965 {I40} (1983MaYZ), 8963 {I41} (1988MaYY)
98ZR c T{-1/2}({+98}Y): 1986Wa17, 1983Re10, 1983En03, 1982Ga24, 1971Tr02
98ZR cB IB$Deduced by evaluators from |g+ce intensity balance.
98ZR cB LOGFT$Deduced by evaluators using LOGFT code
98ZR cG E,RI$From 2017Ur03, unless otherwise stated. To match the scale
98ZR2cG of relative intensities in 2017Ur03, and 1984Be50 or 1977Si05,
98ZR3cG multiply values in 2017Ur03 by a factor of |?0.156.
98ZR cG E(x),RI(x)$|g from 1984Be50, not reported by 2017Ur03.
98ZR2cG Intensity is readjusted to the scale in 2017Ur03
98ZR cG E(y)$|g from 1984Be50 only, and placed in the level scheme, but
98ZR2cG corresponding level is not confirmed by 2017Ur03. Intensity is
98ZR3cG relative to 100 for 1223|g
98ZR cG E(a)$|g from 1977Si05 only. Intensity is relative to 100 for 1223|g
98ZR cG RI(z)$Assigned by evaluators from intensity balance at 1806 level and
98ZR2cG branching ratios from values given in Table VIII of 2017Ur03
98ZR cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas, based some on |g|g(|q) and RUL in the present
98ZR2cG work. Assumed assignments given in square brackets are from |DJ|p in
98ZR3cG this dataset
98ZR cG M(E)$No |g corresponding to ce seen. High multipolarities excluded
98ZR2cG by RUL from known T{-1/2}(level)
98ZR cL $Level scheme is based on the works of 1977Si05 and 1984Be50, and
98ZR2cL extended significantly by 2017Ur03
98ZR cL $Previously proposed levels at 2047.8, 2478.9, 2796.8 and 3507.0
98ZR2cL keV in 1984Be50, and |g rays from these levels have not been confirmed
98ZR3cL by 2017Ur03, and have been omitted here, while the |g rays are included
98ZR4cL as unplaced
98ZR cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data
98ZR cL J$From the Adopted Levels
98Y P 0.0 0- 0.548 S 2 8992 12
98Y cP J,T$From {+98}Y Adopted Levels
98Y cP QP$From 2017Wa10
98ZR N 0.52 5 0.52 5 1 1
98ZR cN NR$From I|g(absolute)(1223|g)=36 {I3} (1987Ma58) in the decay of
98ZR2cN {+98}Y g.s.
98ZR PN 3
98ZR G 241.5
98ZR cG $|g with I|g=5.6 in 1984Be50 placed from a 2047.8 level,
98ZR2cG based on |g|g-coin, but 2048 level is populated only in the decay of
98ZR3cG 2.32-s isomer of {+98}Y according to 2017Ur03 and 1977Si05, decaying
98ZR4cG by a 241.5|g
98ZR G 297.3 y
98ZR cG $Uncertain |g from only |g|g-coin with 269|g and 213|g (1984Be50).
98ZR2cG This |g is not reported by 1977Si05 and 2017Ur03
98ZR G 386.1 2 a
98ZR cG $I|g=2.5 {I10} (1977Si05), contaminated by a neighboring nuclide.
98ZR G 547.5 2 a
98ZR cG $I|g=2.5 {I10} (1977Si05), contaminated by a neighboring nuclide.
98ZR G 600.0 2 a
98ZR cG $I|g=2.5 {I10} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 671.2 y
98ZR cG $|g with I|g=0.5 in 1984Be50 placed from a 2478.9 level,
98ZR2cG but this level is not confirmed by 2017Ur03. Also |g|g-coin
98ZR3cG with 213|g in 1984Be50 remained unexplained.
98ZR G 734.9 y
98ZR cG $|g with I|g=2.5 in 1984Be50 placed from a 2478.9 level,
98ZR2cG but this level is not confirmed by 2017Ur03.
98ZR G 840.3 2 a
98ZR cG $I|g=2.5 {I10} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 887.9 y
98ZR cG $|g with I|g=0.5 in 1984Be50 placed from a 2478.9 level,
98ZR2cG based on |g|g-coin, but this level is not confirmed by 2017Ur03.
98ZR G 936.3 y
98ZR cG $|g with I|g=0.5 in 1984Be50 placed from a 2796.8 level,
98ZR2cG but this level is not confirmed by 2017Ur03.
98ZR G 991.6 y
98ZR cG $Uncertain |g with I|g=0.7 in 1984Be50 placed from a 2796.8 level,
98ZR2cG but this level is not confirmed by 2017Ur03. Also |g|g-coin with 213|g
98ZR3cG in 1984Be50 is inconsistent with proposed level scheme
98ZR G 1762.7 y
98ZR cG $|g with I|g=5.4 in 1984Be50 placed from a 3507.0 level,
98ZR2cG but this level is not confirmed by 2017Ur03.
98ZR G 3203.7 5 a
98ZR cG $I|g=6.5 {I12} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 3375.7 5 a
98ZR cG $I|g=5.5 {I20} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 3468.6 5 a
98ZR cG $I|g=5.5 {I20} (1977Si05)
98ZR L 0.0 0+ 30.7 S 4
98ZR cL T$from the Adopted levels
98ZR B 18 9 5.8 2
98ZRS B EAV=4140.5 58
98ZR L 854.06 6 0+ 64 NS 7
98ZR cL T$from the Adopted Levels. Measurements in this dataset:
98ZR2cL 63 ns {I7} from (ce)|g(t) (1977Si05), weighted average of five values:
98ZR3cL 65 ns {I15} for 269|g, 62 ns {I15} for 369|g, 70 ns {I15} for 737|g,
98ZR4cL 63 ns {I15} for 890|g, and 54 ns {I15} for 3310|g
98ZR B 0.5 LT 7.2 GT ?
98ZRS B EAV=3730.4 58
98ZR G 854.06 6 E0 27.6 7 E
98ZRS G K/T=0.90$L/T=0.10
98ZR cG TI$from intensity balance, corresponding to %I(|g+ce)=14.4 {I14} in
98ZR2cG agreement with 15 {I3} deduced by 1987Ma58 from ce(K)(854)/ce(K)(268|g)
98ZR3cG (1983VaZJ,1982Ka03). Others: 4.9 {I18} (1983VaZJ), 26 {I5} (1971Fo21).
98ZR4cG Values of I(E0)(absolute)=4.4 and 7.2 are also quoted by 1983VaZJ based
98ZR5cG mult(119|g) from {+98}Sr |b{+-}. This values agrees with value of 40
98ZR6cG (relative to 100 for 1223|g) in 1984Be50, but a corresponding relative
98ZR7cG value of |?200 in 1977Si05 was grossly over estimated
98ZR cG $ceK/ceL=9.7 {I19} (1975Kh05)
98ZR cG $Energy of E0 transition from level energy difference
98ZR L 1222.91 6 2+ 2.63 PS 55
98ZR cL T$from the Adopted Levels. Measurements in this dataset:
98ZR2cL <11 ps (|b|g(t), 2010Be30), |<21 ps (|b|g(t),1989Ma38),
98ZR3cL <0.2 ns (|b|g(t),1982Ka03)
98ZR B 3.2 LT 8.4 GT C1U?
98ZRS B EAV=3546.6 58
98ZR cB $7250 {I100} from (1223|g)(7248|b)-coin (1988MaYY)
98ZR G 368.8 1 1.74 21 [E2] 0.0109 C
98ZR cG $E|g=368.5, I|g=1.6 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=368.5 {I2}, I|g=1.5 {I4} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG RI$2.5 {I2} in 2017Ur03 (Table VII) is probably the total
98ZR2cG intensity from the two activities in {+98}Y. Evaluators have subtracted
98ZR3cG 0.76 {I7} units to account for contribution from the 2.32-s isomer
98ZR4cG decay obtained from intensity balance at 1223 level in {+98}Y |b{+-}
98ZR5cG decay (2.32 s)
98ZR G 1222.9 1 69.8 31 E2 C
98ZR cG $E|g=1223.0, I|g=100 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=1222.8 {I2}, I|g=100.0 (1977Si05)
98ZR cG RI$100.0 {I30} in 2017Ur03 (Table VII) is likely the total
98ZR2cG intensity from the two activities in {+98}Y. Evaluators have subtracted
98ZR3cG 30.2 {I8} units to account for contribution from the 2.32-s isomer
98ZR4cG decay obtained from intensity balance at 1223 level in {+98}Y |b{+-}
98ZR5cG decay (2.32 s). Adjusted intensity gives I|g(1223)/100 decays=37.0
98ZR6cG {I17} consistent with measured I|g/100 decays=36 {I3} in 1987Ma58.
98ZR L 1436.16 7 0+ 0.72 NS 8
98ZR cL J$|g|g(|q) (1984Be50,1982Ka03)
98ZR cL T$0.72 ns {I8} from |b|g(t); unweighted average of 0.611 ns {I33}
98ZR2cL (2010Be30), 0.865 ns {I42} (1989Ma38), and 0.69 ns {I10} (1982Ka03).
98ZR3cL Weighted average is 0.71 ns {I9}, but reduced |h{+2}=11 is too large.
98ZR4cL Value is the same in the Adopted Levels
98ZR B 5.5 7 6.0 1 C
98ZRS B EAV=3450.6 58
98ZR cB $7437 {I70} from (213|g)(7437|b)-coin (1988MaYY)
98ZR G 213.2 1 14.6 5 E2 0.0714 C
98ZRS G KC=0.0617 9$LC=0.00815 12$MC=0.001418 20
98ZRS G NC=0.000194 3$OC=1.087E-5 16
98ZR cG E$213.1 {I1} from 1994Lh01. Precise E|g=213.948 {I22} (1979Bo26) from
98ZR2cG crystal spectrometer seems to be in error
98ZR cG $E|g=213.1 {I2}, I|g=12.0 {I20} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG $E|g=213.1, I|g=11.3 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG M$(213|g)(1223|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.36 {I12}, A{-4}=+1.19 {I19} (1984Be50),
98ZR2cG 1982Ka03
98ZR G 582.0 2 E0 0.95 7 E
98ZR cG E$from ce data in 1994Lh01. Other: 1982Ka03
98ZR cG TI$from I(E0)/I(E2(213|g))=0.065 {I4} (1994Lh01) and adopted
98ZR2cG I(213|g)=14.6 {I5} here.
98ZR cG $Monopole strength (|r)=0.274 {I15} (1994Lh01), 0.29 {I8} (1982Ka03)
98ZR L 1590.78 6 2+
98ZR B 0.3 LT 9.5 GT C1U?
98ZRS B EAV=3369.0 58
98ZR cB $6605 {I80} from (1591|g)(6605|b-coin) (1988MaYY). Other: 1984BlZN
98ZR G 154.5 0.48 [E2] 0.228 xC
98ZRS G KC=0.194 3$LC=0.0281 4$MC=0.00490 7
98ZRS G NC=0.000661 10$OC=3.31E-5 5
98ZR cG $I|g=0.8 in 1984Be50
98ZR G 367.8 1 2.9 2 [M1+E2] C
98ZR cG $E|g=367.5, I|g=2.4 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=367.6 {I2}, I|g=2.0 {I5} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG RI$3.1 {I2} in 2017Ur03 (Table VII) is probably the total
98ZR2cG intensity from the two activities in {+98}Y. Evaluators have subtracted
98ZR3cG 0.24 {I3} units to account for contribution from the 2.32-s isomer
98ZR4cG decay obtained from intensity balance at 1591 level in {+98}Y |b{+-}
98ZR5cG decay (2.32 s)
98ZR G 736.8 1 3.6 2 [E2] C
98ZR cG $E|g=736.7, I|g=4.5 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=736.7, I|g=3.5 (1977Si05)
98ZR cG RI$3.9 {I2} in 2017Ur03 (Table VII) is probably the total
98ZR2cG intensity from the two activities in {+98}Y. Evaluators have subtracted
98ZR3cG 0.30 {I3} units to account for contribution from the 2.32-s isomer
98ZR4cG decay obtained from intensity balance at 1591 level in {+98}Y |b{+-}
98ZR5cG decay (2.32 s)
98ZR G 1590.9 1 24.7 8 E2 C
98ZR cG $E|g=1590.9, I|g=40.9 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=1590.7 {I2}, I|g=40.5 {I20} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG RI$26.7 {I8} in 2017Ur03 (Table VII) is probably the total
98ZR2cG intensity from the two activities in {+98}Y. Evaluators have subtracted
98ZR3cG 2.04 {I17} units to account for contribution from the 2.32-s isomer
98ZR4cG decay obtained from intensity balance at 1591 level in {+98}Y |b{+-}
98ZR5cG decay (2.32 s)
98ZR L 1744.61 6 2+
98ZR B 3.0 4 8.3 1 C1U
98ZR cB $log| {Ift} value is lower than expected value of >8.5 for
98ZR2cB first-forbidden unique transitions
98ZR cB $4648 {I64} from (1744|g)(4648|b)-coin (1988MaYY)
98ZR G 152.7 0.23 [M1+E2] 0.15 9 x? ?
98ZRS G KC=0.13 8$LC=0.018 12$MC=0.0031 20
98ZRS G NC=0.0004 3$OC=2.3E-5 12
98ZR cG $|I|g=0.5 (1984Be50)
98ZR G 521.6 1 5.5 2 M1+E2 +0.44 4 C
98ZR cG $E|g=521.6, I|g=3.5 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=521.6 {I2}, I|g=6.0 {I5} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG $(522|g)(123|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.01 {I16}, A{-4}=-0.28 {I28}
98ZR2cG (1984Be50), |d(E2/M1)=+0.2 {I1}
98ZR G 890.6 1 3.0 2
98ZR cG $E|g=890.3 {I2}, I|g=3.0 {I10} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 1744.5 1 7.0 3
98ZR cG $E|g=1744.4, I|g=14.9 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=1744.1 {I5}, I|g=11.5 {I10} (1977Si05)
98ZR L 1806.20 10 3-
98ZR cL $Population of 2778.7 level requires 1806 level,
98ZR2cL although not listed in Table VII of 2017Ur03. The level was known
98ZR3cL earlier from 1984Be50
98ZR G 215.5 2 0.044 12[E1] 0.01222 z S
98ZRS G KC=0.01078 16$LC=0.001199 17$MC=0.000207 3
98ZRS G NC=2.91E-5 5$OC=1.96E-6 3
98ZR G 583.2 1 0.66 10E1 z S
98ZR L 1859.37 7 0+ 0.290 NS 13
98ZR cL J$|g|g(|q) (1984Be50,1982Ka03)
98ZR cL T$|b|g(t); weighted average of 0.318 ns {I27} (2010Be30),
98ZR2cL 0.283 ns {I15} (1989Ma38), 0.24 ns {I10} (1982Ka03). Same value
98ZR3cL in the Adopted Levels
98ZR B 11.1 12 5.6 1 C
98ZRS B EAV=3247.1 58
98ZR cB LOGFT$value is low for 0- to 0+ transition. For expected
98ZR2cB log| {Ift}>5.9 for first-forbidden transitions, I|b|<5%, suggesting
98ZR3cB that intensities of 268.7|g and/or 636.5|g may be overestimated by
98ZR4cB few percent
98ZR cB $7049 {I46} from (268|g)(7049|b)-coin (1988MaYY)
98ZR G 268.7 1 22.6 7 E2 0.0316 C
98ZRS G KC=0.0275 4$LC=0.00347 5$MC=0.000603 9
98ZRS G NC=8.32E-5 12$OC=4.95E-6 7
98ZR cG $E|g=268.7, I|g=18.6 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=268.6 {I2}, I|g=21.0 {I20} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG $(269|g)(154|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.50 {I16}, A{-4}=+1.1 {I3};
98ZR2cG (269|g)(1591|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.24 {I21}, A{-4}=+1.03 {I21} (1984Be50).
98ZR3cG (269|g)(737|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.6 {I3}, A{-4}=+1.5 {I5} (1982Ka03)
98ZR G 423.0 2 E0 0.29 4 E
98ZR cG E$from ce data in 1994Lh01. Other: 1982Ka03
98ZR cG TI$from I(E0)/I(E2(269|g))=0.0130 {I16} (1994Lh01) and adopted
98ZR2cG I(269|g)=22.6 {I7} here.
98ZR cG $Monopole strength (|r)=0.237 {I25} (1994Lh01), 0.29 {I15} (1982Ka03)
98ZR G 636.5 1 4.1 2 E2 C
98ZR cG $E|g=636.4, I|g=3.3 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=636.2 {I2}, I|g=4.0 {I10} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG $(636|g)(1223|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.6 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.9 {I5} (1982Ka03)
98ZR L 2225.15 8 (2+)
98ZR cL E$level proposed by 2017Ur03
98ZR G 789.0 2 0.5 1
98ZR G 1002.3 1 1.1 2
98ZR G 2225.2 2 0.5 2
98ZR L 2778.71 7 (2+)
98ZR cL E$level proposed by 2017Ur03
98ZR B 0.27 LT 8.9 GT 1U?
98ZRS B EAV=2796.1 58
98ZR G 972.2 2 0.7 1
98ZR G 1033.9 3 0.5 1
98ZR G 1187.8 2 0.4 1
98ZR G 1555.7 1 2.8 3
98ZR G 2779.0 2 0.4 1
98ZR L 3065.61 15 (1)
98ZR B 1.09 16 6.2 1
98ZRS B EAV=2667.0 58
98ZR G 3065.5 2 2.9 2
98ZR cG $E|g=3064.4, I|g=6.6 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=3064.4 {I5}, I|g=4.0 {I15} (1977Si05)
98ZR L 4108.67 13 (1)
98ZR cL E$level proposed by 2017Ur03
98ZR B 1.04 17 5.8 1
98ZRS B EAV=2164.7 58
98ZR G 2672.7 2 0.6 1
98ZR G 3254.4 2 1.0 2
98ZR G 4108.5 2 0.4 1
98ZR L 4165.18 6 1-
98ZR B 37 4 4.3 1 C
98ZRS B EAV=2137.8 58
98ZR cB $4810 {I100} from |b(2941|g)-coin (1979Pe17), 4820 {I45} (1988MaYY),
98ZR2cB 4854 {I62} (|b(3310|g)-coin (1988MaYY))
98ZR G 1099.5 2 0.8 1
98ZR G 1386.3 1 3.2 2
98ZR G 2305.9 1 4.8 2 C
98ZR cG $E|g=2305.5, I|g=9.8 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=2305.5 {I5}, I|g=5.5 {I15} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG $(2305|g)(269|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.28 {I21}, A{-4}=+0.29 {I27} (1984Be50)
98ZR G 2420.6 1 7.6 2 C
98ZR cG $E|g=2420.6, I|g=16.3 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=2420.6 {I5}, I|g=13.5 {I20} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 2574.4 1 6.6 2 (E1) C
98ZR cG $E|g=2573.9, I|g=9.3 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=2573.9 {I5}, I|g=7.0 {I15} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 2728.9 1 2.2 1 C
98ZR cG $E|g=2728.3, I|g=1.3 (1984Be50)
98ZR G 2942.3 1 28.8 8 (E1) C
98ZR cG $E|g=2941.3, I|g=46.3 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=2941.3 {I5}, I|g=48.5 {I30} (1977Si05)
98ZR cG $(2941|g)(1223|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.18 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I27} (1984Be50)
98ZR G 3311.1 1 15.1 5
98ZR cG $E|g=3310.0 {I5}, I|g=20 {I3} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 4164.9 2 1.1 1
98ZR L 4271.11 6 1-
98ZR cL E$level proposed by 2017Ur03
98ZR B 4.0 5 5.2 1
98ZRS B EAV=2086.7 58
98ZR G 1492.4 1 1.5 1
98ZR G 2045.9 2 0.3 1
98ZR G 2411.9 2 0.4 1
98ZR G 2526.3 1 1.1 1
98ZR G 2680.3 1 1.6 1 (E1)
98ZR G 2834.4 3 0.4 1
98ZR G 3048.3 1 0.9 1
98ZR G 3416.9 1 1.0 1
98ZR G 4271.3 2 0.5 1
98ZR L 4399.07 12 1-
98ZR cL E$level proposed by 2017Ur03
98ZR B 2.9 4 5.3 1
98ZRS B EAV=2025.2 58
98ZR G 2174.4 2 1.5 5
98ZR G 2539.5 2 0.7 1
98ZR G 2962.1 5 0.2 1
98ZR G 3176.0 3 0.3 1
98ZR G 4398.8 2 2.8 1
98ZR L 4452.58 9 1-
98ZR B 14.2 15 4.5 1 C
98ZRS B EAV=1999.6 58
98ZR cB E$4430 {I62} from (4450|g)(4430|b), 4483 {I88} from (3228|g)(|b)
98ZR2cB (1988MaYY)
98ZR G 2227.3 2 1.0 2
98ZR G 2593.0 3 0.5 1
98ZR G 2707.8 3 0.6 2
98ZR G 2861.7 3 0.5 1
98ZR G 3016.6 2 0.8 1
98ZR G 3229.8 2 6.1 2 E1 C
98ZR cG $E|g=3227.9, I|g=13.7 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=3228.3 {I5}, I|g=11.5 {I20} (1977Si05)
98ZR G 3598.4 2 0.8 1
98ZR G 4452.4 2 17.0 6
98ZR cG $E|g=4450.2, I|g=24.8 (1984Be50)
98ZR cG $E|g=4450.1 {I5}, I|g=28.5 {I30} (1977Si05)
98ZR L 4492.35 15 1-
98ZR cL E$level proposed by 2017Ur03
98ZR B 2.29 24 5.3 1
98ZRS B EAV=1980.5 58
98ZR G 3056.3 3 0.4 1
98ZR G 3638.6 3 0.4 1
98ZR G 4492.0 2 3.6 1
98ZR L 6415+X R
98ZR cL E$x<2577 {I15} from Q(|b{+-})({+98}Y g.s.)-S(n)({+98}Zr), where
98ZR2cL Q(|b{+-})=8992 {I12} for {+98}Y g.s. decay, and S(n)=6415 {I8}
98ZR B 0.33 3
98ZR cB IB$from %|b{+-}n=0.33 {I3} for decay of {+98}Y g.s.