98Y 98SR B- DECAY (0.653 S) 2017UR03,2002PFZZ,1987MA5820NDS 202004
98Y H TYP=FUL$AUT=Jun Chen, Balraj Singh$CIT=NDS 164, 1 (2020)$
98Y 2 H CUT=15-Feb-2020$
98Y c 2017Ur03: {+98}Sr source obtained as a fission fragment and using
98Y 2c Lohengrin separator. Measured E|g, I|g, |b|g-coin |g|g-coin, |g|g(|q)
98Y 3c using two clover Ge detectors for |g detection and three |b detectors.
98Y 4c The A=98 ions were deposited on a tape whose movement was correlated
98Y 5c with the beam ON and beam OFF cycles. Deduced levels, J|p, total
98Y 6c conversion coefficients, multipolarities, and |b feedings.
98Y c 2002PfZZ: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |b|g(t), |g|g(t) at the isotope
98Y 2c separators JOSEF, OSTIS and TRISTAN. (circa 1987 work, results
98Y 3c of which were made available to the evaluators in August 2002,
98Y 4c courtesy of B. Pfeiffer, as an unpublished manuscript
98Y 5c by K. Sistemich et al.)
98Y c 1987Ma58: source from {+98}Rb |b{+-} decay produced by mass-separation
98Y 2c in {+235}U(n,F). Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, absolute I|g. See
98Y 3c 1988MaYY (from the same group) for ce and |g|g(|q) data
98Y c Others:
98Y c |g: 1979Bo26, 1977Wo07, 1975Si23
98Y c ce: 1982Ka03, 1980JuZY
98Y c T{-1/2}({+98}Sr decay): 1986Wa17, 1982Ga24, 1981En05, 1979Pe17,
98Y 2c 1979En02, 1978Wo09, 1971Tr02
98Y c |g|g(|q): 1989BeZG
98Y c |g|g(t): 1979ScZV
98Y c |b, |b|g (Q value for decay): 1988GrZX (and 1978St02), 1984BlZN,
98Y 2c 1983MaYZ, 1979Pe17, 1978St02.
98Y d Theory (|b{+-} strength functions and syst): 1983Be56, 1981Al25
98Y cB $|b|g-coin with 119|g, 428|g, 445|g, 564|g (1978St02) gives
98Y 2cB Q(|b{+-})=5880 {I120}. Other: Q(|b{+-})=5903 {I40} (1983MaYZ)
98Y cB IB,LOGFT$Beta feedings deduced from |g-transition intensity balances.
98Y 2cB The log| {Ift} values were deduced using the LOGFT code. Values for
98Y 3cB weak |b feedings (<2% or so) and for those with large uncertainties
98Y 4cB are considered as approximate, since Q value of 5872 keV (and the
98Y 5cB highest populated level at 1899 keV) allows possible |b feedings to
98Y 6cB higher unobserved levels. The J|p assignments based on such log| {Ift}
98Y 7cB values are considered tentative.
98Y cG $A 595.4 {I2} |g from 595 level with renormalized intensity of 1.8 {I3}
98Y 2cG is reported only by 2002PfZZ. It is omitted here as a gamma ray of such
98Y 3cG an intensity should have been detected in 2017Ur03 and 1987Ma58
98Y cG E,RI$From 2017Ur03, unless otherwise stated. Corresponding values
98Y 2cG from 2002PfZZ are in general agreement, but with several differences.
98Y 3cG Intensities in 2002PfZZ should be multiplied by 0.45 to have these on
98Y 4cG the relative scale as in 2017Ur03, the multiplicative factor deduced
98Y 5cG from relative intensities of 221 in 2002PfZZ and 99.5 in 2017Ur03 for
98Y 6cG 119.3|g. Corresponding factor would be 0.40 if the intensities from
98Y 7cG the two studies are normalized to that of the 444.6|g. Values available
98Y 8cG from 1987Ma58 are also in general agreement with those in 2017Ur03,
98Y 9cG although, no uncertainties are provided in this work.
98Y AcG Intensities in 1987Ma58 are on the same scale as those in 2017Ur03
98Y cG M,MR$From Adopted Levels, Gammas dataset, based mainly on ce data in
98Y 2cG {+235}U(n,F), unless otherwise stated. Other: 1982Ka03
98Y cG E(A)$From curved-crystal measurement (1979Bo26)
98Y cG E(X),RI(X)$From 2002PfZZ only. Intensities are renormalized to
98Y 2cG 99.5 for 119.3|g. These |g rays are not included in the Adopted
98Y 3cG dataset, due to its uncertain existence, and non-confirmation in
98Y 4cG 2017Ur03 and 1987Ma58
98Y cL $According to 2017Ur03, upper limit for the population of a level at
98Y 2cL 446.2 keV is less than 0.2% based on a spectrum gated on the 275.2-keV.
98Y cL $A tentative 586 level decaying by a 211.3|g with relative intensity
98Y 2cL of |?0.2 in 2002PfZZ and 1987Ma58 is omitted here as it is not
98Y 3cL confirmed by 2017Ur03
98Y cL E$From a least-squares fit to E|g data. Reduced |h{+2}=1.67 is below
98Y 2cL the critical |h{+2} at 95% confidence level, with no significant
98Y 3cL deviations of experimental |g-energies with fitted values.
98Y cL J,T$From Adopted Levels. For certain levels, additional comments
98Y 2cL for half-life measurements are given
98Y cL J(A)$0-,1,2- from possible |b feeding (allowed, first-forbidden
98Y 2cL or second forbidden unique) from 0+ parent
98SR P 0 0+ 0.653 S 2 5872 9
98SR cP T$From {+98}Sr Adopted Levels
98SR cP QP$From 2017Wa10
98Y N 0.74 3 1.00
98Y cN NR$From |SI(|g+ce to g.s.)=98.3 {I15}, allowing for possible <3% |b
98Y 2cN feeding to the {+98}Y g.s. (consistent with log| {Ift}>5.9 for the
98Y 3cN first forbidden transitions), and adopted %|b{+-}n=0.23 {I3} for
98Y 4cN {+98}Sr decay. This value agrees well with absolute I|g=73% {I6} for
98Y 5cN 119.3|g measured by 1987Ma58, but does not agree with |g normalization
98Y 6cN factor of 0.95 {I8} if measured absolute I|g=38 {I3} for 444.6|g
98Y 7cN (1987Ma58) is used. The reason for the latter disagreement is the much
98Y 8cN larger measured relative intensity of 54 measured in 1987Ma58, as
98Y 9cN compared to 40.0 {I15} in 2017Ur03 and 45 in 2002PfZZ. 2017Ur03 deduced
98Y AcN a |g-normalization factor of 0.79 {I3}, using absolute I|g values of
98Y BcN 428.6 and 444.7 |g rays from the previous evaluation (2003Si07).
98Y PN 3
98Y G 280.3 2 0.27 5 X
98Y 2 G %IG=0.20 4
98Y cG $In |g|g coin with 119|g
98Y G 961.4 2 0.23 14 X
98Y 2 G %IG=0.17 11
98Y L 0.0 0- 0.548 S 2
98Y cL J$from (428|g)(119|g)(|q) and |a(K)exp values 1-1-0 or 1-2-2 spin
98Y 2cL sequences are possible (1988MaYY,1989BeZG) for 548-119-0 levels, but
98Y 3cL (428|g)(119|g)(|q) data in SF decay (2017Ur03) supports
98Y 4cL 1-1-0 spin sequence
98Y B 3 LT 5.8 GT ?
98Y S B EAV=2643.4 44
98Y L 119.353 3 1- 0.14 NS 5
98Y cL J$see J|p comment for g.s. about |g|g(|q) data
98Y cL T$from |g(t) in 1987Oh05. Other: |?11 ns from |b|g(t) or |g|g(t)
98Y 2cL (1979ScZV), details of this measurement are not available
98Y B 11 4 5.2 2
98Y S B EAV=2585.9 44
98Y cB IB,LOGFT$too low for a first-forbidden |b transition, which suggests
98Y 2cB excessive |b feeding for 119.3 level. For log| {Ift}>5.9 for such
98Y 3cB transitions, |b feeding should be <3%.
98Y G 119.353 3 99.5 38 M1 0.1115 AC
98Y 2 G %IG=74.0 13
98Y S G KC=0.0980 14$LC=0.01126 16$MC=0.00193 3
98Y S G NC=0.000258 4$OC=1.763E-5 25
98Y cG $E|g=119.3 {I1} (2017Ur03). I|g=221 {I10} (2002PfZZ), 100 for 119.4|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58). Measured absolute intensity=73 {I6} per 100 decays of
98Y 3cG {+98}Sr (1987Ma58)
98Y L 170.78 5 2- 0.63 US 2 M1
98Y cL T$other: 0.62 |ms from |b|g(t) or |g|g(t) (1979ScZV), details of this
98Y 2cL measurement are not available.
98Y B 2.5 12 7.7 2 1U
98Y cB $The log| {Ift} value is low for first-forbidden unique transition,
98Y 2cB implying that |b feeding is overestimated
98Y S B EAV=2554.2 44
98Y G 51.5 1 1.0 3 M1+E2 0.26 +7-8 1.9 4 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.74 22
98Y S G KC=1.5 3$LC=0.28 9$MC=0.048 15
98Y S G NC=0.0059 18$OC=0.00025 4
98Y cG $E|g=51.4 {I1}, I|g=2.5 {I4} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.7 for 51.5|g (1987Ma58)
98Y G 170.8 1 5.2 3 E2 0.1507 C
98Y 2 G %IG=3.9 3
98Y S G KC=0.1296 19$LC=0.0177 3$MC=0.00302 5
98Y S G NC=0.000388 6$OC=2.05E-5 3
98Y cG $E|g=170.8 {I1}, I|g=8.3 {I7} (2002PfZZ). I|g=4.2 for 170.7|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 358.12 7 (1,2-)
98Y cL J$(2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 1.0 7 6.1 3 ?
98Y S B EAV=2470.9 44
98Y G 187.1 2 2.0 5 [D,E2] 0.06 4 C
98Y 2 G %IG=1.5 4
98Y cG $E|g=187.6 {I2}, I|g=1.2 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.7 for 187.2|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 238.8 1 1.5 3 C
98Y 2 G %IG=1.12 23
98Y cG $E|g=238.8 {I1}, I|g=3.7 {I3} (2002PfZZ). I|g=2.1 for 238.7|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 357.9 2 0.25 5
98Y 2 G %IG=0.19 4
98Y cG $E|g=358.2 {I2}, I|g=0.4 {I2} (2002PfZZ)
98Y L 374.98 16 4- 35.2 NS 5
98Y cL E$level required by 240.2|g from 615 level in Table V of 2017Ur03,
98Y 2cL although 2017Ur03 stated that this level was not populated in this
98Y 3cL decay, and was not listed in their Table V. 2002PfZZ and 1987Ma58 show
98Y 4cL a weak population of this level.
98Y G 204.2 2 0.54 5 E2 0.0791 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.40 4
98Y S G KC=0.0684 10$LC=0.00892 13$MC=0.001525 22
98Y S G NC=0.000197 3$OC=1.102E-5 16
98Y cG E,RI$from 2002PfZZ, intensity is renormalized to 99.5 for 119.3|g.
98Y 2cG I|g=0.6 for 204.0|g (1987Ma58)
98Y L 496.27 19 (4)- 6.90 US 5 M2?
98Y cL $Level not listed by 2017Ur03, who deduced that population of this
98Y 2cL level is <0.2%. With J|p=4-, this level is not expected to be populated
98Y 3cL in |b{+-} decay from 0+ parent
98Y B 0.22 8 6.8 2 ?
98Y S B EAV=2404.4 44
98Y cB IB$apparent |b feeding, as no feeding is expected from 0+ parent.
98Y G 121.3 1 0.27 9 M1+E2 -0.8 2 0.27 6 C ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.20 7
98Y S G KC=0.23 5$LC=0.033 8$MC=0.0057 13
98Y S G NC=0.00073 16$OC=3.7E-5 7
98Y cG E,RI$from 2002PfZZ, intensity is renormalized to 99.5 for 119.3|g.
98Y 2cG I|g=0.1 for 120.9|g (1987Ma58)
98Y L 547.87 6 1+
98Y B 14 3 4.9 1 C
98Y S B EAV=2379.5 44
98Y cB E$5130 {I40} from |b(428|g) (1979Pe17)
98Y G 189.7 2 0.37 5 [D,E2] 0.06 4 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.28 4
98Y cG $E|g=189.6 {I1}, I|g=0.7 {I1} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.3 for 189.5|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 428.6 1 36.5 15 E1 0.00177 C
98Y 2 G %IG=27.2 13
98Y 2 G EKC=0.016 3 (2002PFZZ,1988MAYY)
98Y cG $E|g=428.5 {I1}, I|g=84 {I4} (2002PfZZ). I|g=42 for 428.4|g (1987Ma58)
98Y cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.17
98Y cG $(428|g)(119|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.09 {I8} (2002PfZZ,
98Y 2cG 1988MaYY,1989BeZG); A{-2}=-0.23 {I6}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I10} (2002PfZZ)
98Y G 547.9 1 2.9 1 [E1] C
98Y 2 G %IG=2.16 11
98Y cG $E|g=547.7 {I2}, I|g=6.0 {I16} (2002PfZZ). I|g=3.7 for 547.6|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 563.999 19 (1-,2-) 2.4 NS 12
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03. The (36|g)(445|g)(|q) data in {+252}Cf SF decay
98Y 2cL (2017Ur03) support J=1 or 2 for 564 level
98Y cL T$|b|g(t) (2004Br14). Other: |?4 ns (1979ScZV). Same value in Adopted
98Y 2cL Levels
98Y B 11 LT 5.0 GT ?
98Y S B EAV=2371.8 44
98Y cB IB$limit is from I|b=4 {I7} from intensity balance
98Y G 393.3 1 1.2 3
98Y 2 G %IG=0.89 23
98Y cG $E|g=393.5 {I2}, I|g=0.8 {I2} (2002PfZZ)
98Y G 444.628 20 40.0 15 M1(+E2) 0.9 LT 0.0046 8 AC
98Y 2 G %IG=29.8 13
98Y 2 G EKC=0.0037 4 (2002PFZZ,1988MAYY)
98Y cG $E|g=444.7 {I1} (2017Ur03). I|g=100.0 {I10} (2002PfZZ), 54 for 444.6|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58). Measured absolute intensity=38 {I3} per 100 decays of
98Y 3cG {+98}Sr (1987Ma58)
98Y cG $(445|g)(119|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.33 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I8} (2002PfZZ,
98Y 2cG TRISTAN); A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.06 {I3} (2002PfZZ,OSTIS)
98Y G 564.0 1 8.9 4 M1,E2 C
98Y 2 G %IG=6.6 4
98Y 2 G EKC=0.0025 7 (2002PFZZ,1988MAYY)
98Y cG $E|g=563.9 {I1}, I|g=25.1 {I16} (2002PfZZ). I|g=16 for 563.8|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 564.0+X (3-,4-) 180 NS 7 M3?
98Y dL E level energy held fixed in least-squares adjustment
98Y cL $See level population in {+248}Cm SF decay (2017Ur03)
98Y G X
98Y F G FL=563.999
98Y cG $2017Ur03 discuss a 26.3-keV |g line seen in the decay of {+98}Sr
98Y 2cG in connection with the decay of the 564.0+x level, but did
98Y 3cG not conclude anything due to spin mismatches
98Y L 595.78 8 (1,2-)
98Y cL $A 595.4 {I2} |g with renormalized intensity of 1.8 {I3} is
98Y 2cL reported from this level only by 2002PfZZ. It is omitted here as
98Y 3cL a gamma ray of such an intensity should have been seen in 2017Ur03
98Y 4cL and 1987Ma58
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 1.8 4 5.8 1
98Y S B EAV=2356.5 44
98Y G 237.7 2 1.0 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.7 4
98Y cG $E|g=237.9 {I2}, I|g=0.7 {I4} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.3 for 237.4|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 476.7 1 1.9 1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=1.41 9
98Y cG $E|g=476.5 {I1}, I|g=4.6 {I5} (2002PfZZ). I|g=1.8 for 476.4|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 600.30 4 1+ 7.5 NS 7
98Y cL T$|b|g(t) (2004Br14). Other: 9 ns (1979ScZV)
98Y B 49 8 4.4 1 C
98Y S B EAV=2354.3 44
98Y cB $|b|g-coin reported (1984BlZN)
98Y G 36.2 1 14.0 30E1 2.02 4 C
98Y 2 G %IG=10.4 14
98Y F G FL=563.999
98Y cG $E|g=36.3 {I1}, I|g=32 {I5} (2002PfZZ). I|g=28 for 36.5|g (1987Ma58)
98Y 2 G ECC=1.9 3 (2017Ur03) $ EKC=1.6 4 (2002PFZZ)$ ECC=1.9 2 (2002PFZZ)
98Y 2 G ECC=1.0 3 (1987Ma58)
98Y S G KC=1.76 3$LC=0.213 4$MC=0.0359 6
98Y S G NC=0.00457 8$OC=0.000247 4
98Y cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.04 (2017Ur03,2002PfZZ)
98Y G 52.4 1 5.0 5 M1+E2 0.43 10 2.7 7 C
98Y 2 G %IG=3.7 4
98Y cG $E|g=52.5 {I1}, I|g=11.2 {I9} (2002PfZZ). I|g=8 for 52.5|g (1987Ma58)
98Y 2 G ECC=2.7 6 (2017Ur03)$EKC=1.2 6 (2002PFZZ)$ECC=1.3 3 (2002PFZZ,1987MA58)
98Y S G KC=2.1 5$LC=0.47 15$MC=0.081 25
98Y S G NC=0.010 3$OC=0.00032 6
98Y cG M,MR$from |a(total)exp (2017Ur03). Other: |d(E2/M1)<0.22
98Y 2cG (2002PfZZ,1987Ma58)
98Y G 242.1 2 0.18 5 X? ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.13 4
98Y G 429.6 1 2.5 4 [E1] C
98Y 2 G %IG=1.9 3
98Y cG $E|g=429.3 {I2}, I|g=3.4 {I12} (2002PfZZ). I|g=5 for 429.3|g (1987Ma58)
98Y G 481.1 1 10.0 10 E1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=7.4 8
98Y cG $E|g=480.8 {I1}, I|g=24.7 {I18} (2002PfZZ). I|g=13 for 480.9|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y 2 G EKC=0.0013 8 (1988MAYY,2002PFZZ)
98Y cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.35
98Y G 600.2 1 2.8 4 [E1] C
98Y 2 G %IG=2.1 3
98Y cG $E|g=600.1 {I2}, I|g=9.2 {I8} (2002PfZZ). I|g=6 for 600.2|g (1987Ma58)
98Y L 601.92 8 (0,1,2) A
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.7 6 6.2 4 ?
98Y S B EAV=2353.5 44
98Y G 243.7 2 1.0 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.7 4
98Y cG $E|g=243.7 {I3}, I|g=0.7 {I1} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.3 for 243.7|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 482.7 2 1.0 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.7 4
98Y cG $E|g=482.5 {I2}, I|g=3.7 {I5} (2002PfZZ). I|g=1.8 for 482.5|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 615.18 16
98Y cL E$level from 2017Ur03 only with proposed J=(2,3)
98Y G 240.2 1 1.0 5
98Y 2 G %IG=0.7 4
98Y L 666.28 7 (1+)
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 3.2 9 5.5 1
98Y S B EAV=2322.5 44
98Y G 51.1 2 1.0 5 1.0 2
98Y 2 G %IG=0.7 4
98Y cG $|g from 2017Ur03 only
98Y G 64.0 3 0.05 5 X ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.04 4
98Y G 66.0 1 2.7 2 D 0.5 1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=2.01 17
98Y cG $E|g=66.0 {I1}, I|g=3.6 {I6} (2002PfZZ). I|g=2.1 for 66.0|g (1987Ma58)
98Y 2 G ECC=0.3 1 (2017Ur03) $ ECC=1.5 7 (2002PFZZ)
98Y cG M$from |a(total)exp in 2017Ur03. Other: |d(E2/M1)=0.53 {I16} from
98Y 2cG |a(total)exp in 2002PfZZ, factor of |?5 higher than in 2017Ur03
98Y G 70.8 10 0.05 5 XC ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.04 4
98Y G 102.3 1 0.27 5 [E1] 0.1006 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.20 4
98Y F G FL=563.999
98Y S G KC=0.0887 13$LC=0.00992 15$MC=0.001682 24
98Y S G NC=0.000222 4$OC=1.402E-5 20
98Y cG $E|g=102.3 {I1}, I|g=0.3 {I1} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.3 for 101.8|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 713.04 10 (0-,1,2-) A
98Y cL J$(2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.37 8 6.5 1
98Y S B EAV=2300.0 44
98Y G 165.3 1 0.85 5 [D,E2] 0.10 8 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.63 5
98Y cG $E|g=165.1 {I1}, I|g=1.4 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.6 for 164.9|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 824.40 6 (0-,1,2-) A
98Y cL J$(2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.91 24 6.0 1
98Y S B EAV=2246.4 44
98Y G 158.5 3 0.09 5 C ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.07 4
98Y cG E,RI$from 2002PfZZ, intensity is renormalized to 99.5 for 119.3|g.
98Y 2cG I|g=0.2 for a tentative 157.7|g in 1987Ma58. This |g is not reported
98Y 3cG by 2017Ur03, and is not included in Adopted Gammas
98Y G 222.5 1 0.4 1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.30 8
98Y cG $E|g=222.4 {I1}, I|g=0.7 {I1} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.4 for 222.4|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 224.1 1 0.36 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.27 4
98Y cG E,RI$from 2002PfZZ, intensity is renormalized to 99.5 for 119.3|g.
98Y 2cG I|g=0.4 for 224.0 in 1987Ma58. This |g is not reported by 2017Ur03
98Y G 228.9 1 0.5 1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.37 8
98Y cG $E|g=228.5 {I1}, I|g=0.4 {I1} (2002PfZZ).
98Y G 260.3 1 1.4 1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=1.04 9
98Y F G FL=563.999
98Y cG $E|g=260.4 {I1}, I|g=2.1 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=1.1 for 260.2|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 908.41 15 (0-,1,2-) A
98Y cL J$(2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.63 12 6.1 1
98Y S B EAV=2206.0 44
98Y G 306.3 2 0.2 1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.15 8
98Y cG $E|g=305.8 {I2}, I|g=0.8 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.2 for 305.5|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 308.3 2 0.64 12 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.48 9
98Y cG $E|g=307.4 {I2}, I|g=0.7 {I3} (2002PfZZ). I|g=1.0 for 307.0|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 311.8 4 0.14 9 XC ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.10 7
98Y G 343.8 2 0.23 9 C ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.17 7
98Y cG E,RI$from 2002PfZZ, intensity is renormalized to 99.5 for 119.3|g.
98Y 2cG I|g=0.4 for a tentative 344.1|g in 1987Ma58. This |g is not reported
98Y 3cG by 2017Ur03
98Y L 986.39 6 1+
98Y cL J$1 in 2017Ur03
98Y cL $2017Ur03 place an 864.2 {I2} |g from this level with an intensity of
98Y 2cL 0.25 {I5}, but this |g ray fits poorly in the decay scheme, with a
98Y 3cL deviation of 3 keV. Evaluators note that an 864.0 {I2} |g with the same
98Y 4cL relative intensity is placed by 2017Ur03 from 1464 level, in agreement
98Y 5cL with previous studies 2002PfZZ and 1987Ma58. Evaluators omit the
98Y 6cL 864.2|g from 986 level
98Y B 6.9 5 5.07 4
98Y S B EAV=2168.5 44
98Y G 162.2 1 1.3 2 [D,E2] 0.11 8 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.97 16
98Y cG $E|g=162.0 {I1}, I|g=2.5 {I4} (2002PfZZ). I|g=1.2 for 161.8|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 320.1 1 1.9 2 C
98Y 2 G %IG=1.41 16
98Y cG $E|g=320.2 {I1}, I|g=4.7 {I4} (2002PfZZ). I|g=2.4 for 320.0|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 384.5 1 0.5 2 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.37 15
98Y cG $E|g=384.3 {I2}, I|g=1.2 {I3} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.2 for 384.0|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 386.0 1 3.9 2 C
98Y 2 G %IG=2.90 18
98Y cG $E|g=386.0 {I1}, I|g=10.0 {I10} (2002PfZZ). I|g=6.0 for 386.0|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y dG RI$uncertainty of 0.1 seems a misprint in 2002PfZZ
98Y G 422.3 1 0.70 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.52 5
98Y F G FL=563.999
98Y cG $E|g=422.2 {I1}, I|g=1.2 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=1.2 for 422.2|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y G 986.1 2 0.70 8
98Y 2 G %IG=0.52 7
98Y cG $E|g=986.2 {I3}, I|g=0.5 {I2} (2002PfZZ).
98Y L 1199.72 9 (1+)
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 1.7 3 5.6 1
98Y S B EAV=2065.9 44
98Y G 599.3 2 0.18 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.13 4
98Y cG $E|g=599.2 {I2}, I|g=0.5 {I3} (2002PfZZ).
98Y G 603.7 2 0.2 1 XC ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.15 8
98Y cG $This |g is not confirmed by 2017Ur03, thus treated as uncertain by
98Y 2cG evaluators, and not included in the Adopted dataset
98Y G 651.9 1 0.61 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.45 4
98Y cG $E|g=651.9 {I1}, I|g=1.1 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.7 for a tentative
98Y 2cG 651.7|g (1987Ma58)
98Y G 1080.3 2 1.2 1 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.89 8
98Y cG $E|g=1080.1 {I2}, I|g=1.3 {I4} (2002PfZZ). I|g=1.2 for 1080.2|g
98Y 2cG (1987Ma58)
98Y L 1348.51 11 (0-,1,2-) A
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.68 7 5.93 5
98Y S B EAV=1994.4 44
98Y G 635.6 1 0.44 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.33 4
98Y cG $E|g=635.2 {I2}, I|g=0.5 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.4 for a tentative
98Y 2cG 635.2|g (1987Ma58)
98Y G 752.2 2 0.23 9 XC ?
98Y 2 G %IG=0.17 7
98Y cG $This |g is not confirmed by 2017Ur03, thus treated as uncertain by
98Y 2cG evaluators, and is not included in the Adopted dataset
98Y G 800.3 2 0.31 6 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.23 5
98Y cG $E|g=800.1 {I3}, I|g=0.9 {I3} (2002PfZZ)
98Y G 990.2 2 0.15 3 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.112 23
98Y cG $E|g=990.1 {I3}, I|g=0.4 {I2} (2002PfZZ)
98Y L 1464.45 15 (0-,1,2-) A
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.37 5 6.14 6
98Y S B EAV=1938.7 44
98Y G 798.3 2 0.24 4 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.18 3
98Y cG $E|g=798.4 {I2}, I|g=0.9 {I2} (2002PfZZ). I|g=0.8 for a tentative
98Y 2cG 799.2|g (1987Ma58)
98Y G 864.0 2 0.25 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.19 4
98Y cG $E|g=864.4 {I3}, I|g=0.9 {I3} (2002PfZZ)
98Y L 1680.07 15 (0-,1,2-) A
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.41 6 6.0 1
98Y S B EAV=1835.3 44
98Y G 1132.4 2 0.21 6 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.16 5
98Y cG $E|g=1131.9 {I4}, I|g=0.3 {I1} (2002PfZZ)
98Y G 1560.5 2 0.34 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.25 4
98Y cG $E|g=1560.4 {I4}, I|g=0.9 {I5} (2002PfZZ)
98Y L 1898.51 15 (0-,1,2-) A
98Y cL J$(1-,2) in 2017Ur03
98Y B 0.34 6 6.0 1
98Y S B EAV=1730.6 44
98Y G 1298.5 2 0.18 6
98Y 2 G %IG=0.13 5
98Y cG $E|g=1301.2 {I6}, I|g=0.5 {I2} (2002PfZZ)
98Y G 1334.2 2 0.27 5 C
98Y 2 G %IG=0.20 4
98Y F G FL=563.999
98Y cG $E|g=1333.0 {I3}, I|g=0.6 {I3} (2002PfZZ)
98Y L 4245+Y R
98Y cL E$y<1627 {I14}, from Q(|b{+-})({+98}Sr)=5872 {I9} and
98Y 2cL S(n)({+98}Y)=4245 {I10} (2017Wa10)
98Y B 0.23 3
98Y cB IB$from %|b{+-}n=0.23 {I3} for {+98}Sr decay.