97RU 97RH EC DECAY (30.7 M) 1974OH07,1975PL05 10NDS 201004
97RU H TYP=FUL$AUT=N. NICA$CIT=NDS 111, 525 (2010)$CUT=19-Nov-2009$
97RU cE TI$Deduced from I|g balance in level scheme with I(|e+|b{++} to
97RU2cE g.s.)=0
97RU cG 1974Oh07: measured: t, E|g, E|b, I|g, I(ce), |g|g, |b|g,
97RU2cG C(ce)(t). Detectors: Ge(Li) for |g with 2.5 keV FWHM at 1332 keV,
97RU3cG Si(Li) for |b, ce with 2.1 keV FWHM at 624 keV. Source: {+96}Ru(p,|g),
97RU4cG {+101}Ru(p,5n) reactions.
97RU cG 1975Pl05: measured: t, E|g, I|g, I(ce), |g|g. Detector:
97RU2cG Ge(Li) for |g, Si(Li) for ce. Source: {+96}Ru(d,n), {+97}Pd decay.
97RU cG For additional unassigned gammas, see {+97}Rh |e decay (46.2
97RUxcG min)
97RU cG E$Weighted average of measurements given by 1974Oh07 and 1975Pl05,
97RU2cG unless otherwise noted. 1981Gr20 does not quote uncertainties of
97RU3cG measurements and in general, the values quoted agree exactly with
97RU4cG those of 1975Pl05.
97RU cG RI$Weighted average of measurements by 1974Oh07, 1975Pl05 and
97RU2cG 1981Gr20, unless otherwise noted.
97RU cG E(B),RI(A)$From 1974Oh07
97RU cG RI(D),E(E)$Unweighted average of measurements by 1974Oh07 and 1981Gr20
97RU cG E(G),RI(G)$From 1974Oh07, not observed by 1975Pl05 or 1981Gr20
97RU cG E(H),RI(H)$From 1981Gr20, not observed by 1974Oh07 or 1975Pl05
97RU cG RI(I)$Total intensity of the doublet divided according to the
97RU2cG intensity ratio in 1974Oh07.
97RU cG E(J),RI(N)$From 1975Pl05
97RU cG RI(K)$Average of measurements by 1975Pl05 and 1981Gr20, not observed
97RU2cG by 1974Oh07.
97RU cG E(L)$|g not observed by 1981Gr20, I|g is the average of
97RU2cG measurements by 1974Oh07, 1975Pl05
97RU cG E(M)$Assignment to g.s. or ms activity uncertain
97RU cG E(P) Assigned to g.s.? activity by 1975Pl05
97RU cL Level scheme is that proposed by 1974Oh07 and is based on
97RU2cL coincidence work and energy fit. Levels have been added at 2760
97RU3cL (1975Pl05) and 2966 (1981Gr20). Additional levels have been proposed by
97RU4cL 1975Pl05 at 2800.5 and 3101.4 keV, and by 1981Gr20 at 2037.0, 2050.0,
97RU5cL 2663.4, 2966.2, 2999.5 and 3101.2 keV. However, the existence of these
97RU6cL levels is not supported by coincidence work, and each accommodates
97RU7cL only one previously unassigned |g.
97RU cL E$From a least squares fit to E|g
97RU cL J$From adopted levels
97RH P 0.0 9/2+ 30.7 M 6 3520 40
97RU N 0.7463 1.00 1.00
97RU PN 2
97RU cN NR$|S(I|g to g.s.)=100 and I(|e+|b{++} to g.s.)=0
97RU G 311.7 5 0.4 1 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 324.6 5 0.3 2 J
97RU3 G FLAG=NP
97RU G 683.8 5 0.4 2 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 707.6 4 0.5 2
97RU G 845.8 8 0.2 1 A
97RU3 G FLAG=BM
97RU G 1162 1 0.2 1 J
97RU3 G FLAG=MN
97RU G 1301.7 9 0.10 6 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 1312 1 1.0 4 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 1322.5 8 0.4 1 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 1415.1 9 0.2 1 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 1434.7 6 0.64 12
97RU G 1469.3 10 0.2 1 J
97RU3 G FLAG=PN
97RU G 1615.0 10 0.2 1 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 1708.4 8 0.2 1 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 1722.7 13 0.20 15 J
97RU3 G FLAG=NP
97RU G 1813.4 5 0.6 2 P
97RU G 1978.2 9 0.2 1 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 2050 1 0.10 7 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 2788.9 10 0.10 6 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 2800.8 7 0.25 7 L
97RU G 2843.8 9 0.10 7 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 3000.1 9 0.10 5 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 3101.6 8 0.20 6
97RU G 3303.6 10 0.10 5 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 3400.8 10 0.10 5 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 3441.4 10 0.10 5 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU G 3494.5 10 0.10 8 G
97RU3 G FLAG=M
97RU L 0.0 5/2+
97RU L 189.19 10 3/2+
97RU E
97RU cE TI$GTOL upper limit (method 1): 0.41
97RU G 189.21 15 1.4 4 M1+E2 0.30 6 0.061 3 AC
97RUS G KC=0.0527 22$LC=0.0066 4$MC=0.00121 7$NC+=0.000203 11
97RUS G NC=0.000194 11$OC=9.5E-6 4
97RU cG M,MR$see {+97}Ru |e decay (46.2 min)
97RU L 421.54 5 7/2+
97RU E 49.1 7 19.1 7 5.184 25 68.2 4
97RUS E EAV=923 14$CK=0.243 8$CL=0.0298 10$CM+=0.00701 24
97RU cE E$E|b+=2.12 {I9} in coin with 421.5|g (1974Oh07)
97RU G 421.55 5 100 C
97RU L 840.18 7 7/2+
97RU E 4.5 5 3.6 4 5.78 5 8.1 8
97RUS E EAV=732 14$CK=0.383 13$CL=0.0471 16$CM+=0.0111 4
97RU G 651.01 10 1.30 12 C
97RU G 840.13 9 16.1 9 C
97RU L 878.76 7 (9/2)+
97RU E 3.0 3 2.6 3 5.91 6 5.6 6
97RUS E EAV=715 14$CK=0.399 13$CL=0.0491 16$CM+=0.0116 4
97RU G 457.30 10 1.22 8 C
97RU G 878.80 8 12.1 7 C
97RU L 1199.02 17 (11/2)+
97RU E 0.55 6 0.95 11 6.23 6 1.50 16
97RUS E EAV=571 14$CK=0.551 16$CL=0.0679 19$CM+=0.0160 5
97RU G 320.3 5 0.48 7 C
97RU G 777.44 18 1.93 17 C
97RU L 1229.42 8 9/2+
97RU E 1.2 1 2.2 2 5.85 5 3.4 3
97RUS E EAV=557 14$CK=0.567 16$CL=0.0699 19$CM+=0.0164 5
97RU G 351.0 4 0.50 7 C
97RU G 389.25 5 1.17 7 C
97RU G 807.7 2 1.80 12 C
97RU G 1228.7 7 1.43 23 C
97RU L 1543.01 19 (7/2,9/2,11/2+)
97RU E 0.12 3 0.56 13 6.32 11 0.68 16
97RUS E EAV=419 14$CK=0.721 14$CL=0.0891 17$CM+=0.0210 4
97RU G 664.1 8 0.11 6 BC
97RU3 G FLAG=D
97RU G 702.84 18 0.8 2 @C
97RU3 G FLAG=I
97RU L 1619.6 3 (11/2)+
97RU E 0.087 15 0.57 8 6.28 7 0.66 9
97RUS E EAV=385 14$CK=0.753 13$CL=0.0931 16$CM+=0.0219 4
97RU G 740.9 3 0.40 6 C
97RU G 1197.9 5 0.49 10 C
97RU L 1932.32 13 7/2+
97RU E 0.11 2 3.5 3 5.33 5 3.6 3
97RUS E EAV=250 13$CK=0.841 6$CL=0.1045 7$CM+=0.02461 17
97RU G 702.84 18 0.4 2 @C
97RU3 G FLAG=I
97RU G 1053.70 24 1.97 13 C
97RU G 1092.1 3 0.75 8 C
97RU G 1511.0 4 0.74 13 C
97RU G 1742.5 13 0.3 1 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 1931.7 6 0.71 15
97RU L 1990.08 22 (7/2)
97RU E 0.011 4 0.52 12 6.13 10 0.53 12
97RUS E EAV=225 13$CK=0.849 5$CL=0.1056 6$CM+=0.02488 14
97RU G 1111.49 24 0.65 8 C
97RU G 1989.2 6 0.26 8
97RU L 1998.6 3 7/2+,9/2+,11/2+
97RU E 0.022 6 1.17 15 5.77 6 1.19 15
97RUS E EAV=221 13$CK=0.850 4$CL=0.1058 6$CM+=0.02492 13
97RU G 1158.3 4 1.02 10 C
97RU G 1577.1 4 0.85 13 C
97RU L 2150.9 5 7/2+
97RU E 0.007 3 1.62 20 5.53 6 1.63 20
97RUS E EAV=155 13$CK=0.8626 15$CL=0.1076 3$CM+=0.02536 7
97RU G 1272.9 9 0.39 8 C
97RU G 1310.1 6 1.5 2 C
97RU cG E,RI$from 1974Oh07; 1975Pl05 suggests that this |g is a doublet,
97RU2cG with E|g=1310 and 1312 keV with about equal intensity, but only one
97RU3cG |g is placed in the level scheme.
97RU G 1730.4 13 0.2 1 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 1962.4 15 0.1 1 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 2152.1 6 1.4 LT ?
97RU cG E$this |g assigned to 46.2 min decay by 1974Oh07
97RU L 2185.7 6 ?
97RU cL E$level proposed by 1974Oh07, based on deexciting |g's and
97RU2cL coincidence work. However, neither 1975Pl05 nor 1981Gr20 observed
97RU3cL these gammas.
97RU E 0.0026 14 0.90 22 5.77 11 0.90 22 ?
97RUS E EAV=140 13$CK=0.8639 11$CL=0.10782 21$CM+=0.02542 5
97RU G 1345.1 10 0.2 1 G
97RU G 1764.3 9 0.6 2 GC
97RU G 2185.7 8 0.4 2 G
97RU L 2591.4 4 7/2+,9/2+,11/2+
97RU E 1.13 15 5.35 7 1.13 15
97RUS E CK=0.8648 2$CL=0.10935 14$CM+=0.02582 4
97RU G 1391.9 7 0.4 1 GC
97RU G 1712.9 5 0.55 11 C
97RU G 1751.2 6 0.56 12 C
97RU L 2754.7 4 7/2+
97RU E 0.70 13 5.38 9 0.70 13
97RUS E CK=0.8637 3$CL=0.11021 21$CM+=0.02606 6
97RU G 764.9 6 0.2 1 D
97RU3 G FLAG=E
97RU G 1876.5 5 0.4 1 AC
97RU cG E,RI$doublet, |g is assigned to both 30.7 min and 46.2 min activities.
97RU G 2563.7 0.14 H
97RU G 2753.8 8 0.2 1 B
97RU3 G FLAG=D
97RU L 2760.4 5 7/2+,9/2+,11/2+
97RU E 0.45 12 5.56 13 0.45 12
97RUS E CK=0.8637 3$CL=0.11025 21$CM+=0.02607 6
97RU G 1881.4 9 0.2 1 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 1920.0 14 0.15 10 J
97RU3 G FLAG=K
97RU G 2338.9 5 0.25 6
97RU L 2766.2 5 7/2+,9/2+,11/2+
97RU E 0.49 13 5.52 13 0.49 13
97RUS E CK=0.8636 3$CL=0.11029 21$CM+=0.02608 6
97RU G 1888.0 6 0.2 1 A
97RU cG E$1975Pl05 and 1981Gr20 assign this |g to 46.2 min decay.
97RU G 1925.1 7 0.45 14 LC
97RU L 2914.5 10
97RU E 0.22 15 5.7 3 0.22 15
97RUS E CK=0.8620 5$CL=0.1115 4$CM+=0.02642 10
97RU G 2492.9 10 0.3 2 AC
97RU cG E$|g doublet with |g in 46.2 min decay; not observed by 1981Gr20
97RU L 2966.4 6 7/2+
97RU E 0.27 9 5.50 16 0.27 9
97RUS E CK=0.8613 6$CL=0.1122 5$CM+=0.02659 12
97RU G 967.9 6 0.28 10 D
97RU3 G FLAG=E
97RU G 2777.0 10 0.08 5 B
97RU3 G FLAG=D
97RU L 3368.8 6 7/2+,9/2+,11/2+
97RU E 0.18 6 4.4 3 0.18 6
97RUS E CK=0.832 14$CL=0.135 11$CM+=0.033 3
97RU G 2947.2 6 0.24 8 C