96RB 96RB IT DECAY 2005PI13,1999GE01 08NDS 200810
96RB H TYP=FUL$AUT=D. Abriola(a), A.A. Sonzogni$CIT=NDS 109, 2501 (2008)$
96RB2 H CUT=1-Apr-2008$
96RB c All information taken from 2005Pi13, unless stated otherwise.
96RB c {+96}Rb isotope produced {+241}Pu(n,f) reaction
96RB c E=thermal. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, ce-|g coin, lifetimes using two
96RBac different setups installed at the focal plane of the Lohengrin mass
96RBac spectrometer that was used to separate fission fragments (FFs). The
96RBac first consisted of a gas detector to detect FFs, behind which were
96RBac two adjacent Si(Li) detectors for ce and x-rays, while |g rays were
96RBac detected by two Ge detectors placed perpendicular to the beam. In the
96RBac second setup, the FFs were detected in an ionization chamber. |g rays
96RBac deexciting isomeric states were detected by Clover Ge detector and
96RBac three single Ge crystals of the Miniball array.
96RB cG E$From table I of 2005Pi13, unless otherwise stated.
96RB cG M$From comparison of measured |a(K)exp's with theory.
96RB cL $Level scheme given in figure 9 of 1999Ge01 is superseded by that in
96RBacL figure 4 of 2005Pi13. Several cascades in 1999Ge01 have been
96RBacL reordered in 2005Pi13
96RB cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g's.
96RB cL $Low-lying states are expected to result from coupling of |pf{-5/2}
96RBacL orbital with one of three possible neutron states
96RBacL |ns{-1/2}, |nd{-3/2}, or |ng{-7/2}
96RB CL BAND(A)$|p3/2[431]~#|n3/2[541], KPI=3-, |a=0. |b>0.28, rotational
96RBacL band proposed for this nuclide based upon intense M1 transitions
96RBacL within the group and E2 crossover transitions.
96RB CL BAND(a)$|p3/2[431]~#|n3/2[541], KPI=3-, |a=1. |b>0.28, rotational
96RBacL band proposed for this nuclide based upon intense M1 transitions
96RBacL within the group and E2 crossover transitions.
96RB cL J$From Adopted Levels
96RB P 1134.6 11(10-) 2.00 US 10
96RB cP T$From 2005Pi13. Other: 1.65 |ms {i15} (1999Ge01)
96RB N 1 1 1
96RB PN 3
96RB L 0.0 2(-)
96RB cL $Configuration=|pf{-5/2}|ns{-1/2} (1999Ge01).
96RB L 59.31 15(3-)
96RB cL $possible member of |pf{-5/2}|ns{-1/2} multiplet.
96RB G 59.3 2 17 2 M1 0.628 11
96RBX G EKC=0.62 9
96RBS G KC=0.553 10$LC=0.0633 11$MC=0.01048 18$NC=0.001179 21$OC=4.95E-5 9$
96RBS G NC+=0.001229 21
96RB cG $Ice(K)=10.5 {i15}
96RB L 148.87 25(4-)
96RB cL $Configuration=[|pf{-5/2}|nd{-3/2}]{-4-}.
96RB G 89.5 2 8 1 M1+E2 0.8 7
96RBX G EKC=0.59 15
96RBS G KC=0.7 6$LC=0.11 9$MC=0.018 15$NC=0.0019 16$OC=5.E-5 4$NC+=0.0019 16
96RB cG $Ice(K)=4.7 {i10}
96RB G 148.8 3 7 1 (E2) 0.225
96RBS G KC=0.194 3$LC=0.0260 5$MC=0.00429 7$NC=0.000456 8$OC=1.522E-5 24$
96RBS G NC+=0.000471 8
96RB cG M$from weak ce(K) (|?7% intensity from |g(ce) coin)
96RB L 185.35 15
96RB G 38.0 5 7 2 & ?
96RB cG E$37 listed in figure 4 of 2005Pi13
96RB G 126.0 3 7 2
96RB G 185.4 2 12 2
96RB L 187.7 4
96RB G 38.0 5 7 2 & ?
96RB cG E$39 listed in figure 4 of 2005Pi13
96RB L 225.4 3
96RB G 166.1 3 7 1
96RB L 461.61 14(3-)
96RBX L FLAG=a
96RB G 276.3 3 5 1
96RB G 402.4 4 3 1
96RB G 461.6 2 48 3
96RB L 554.50 15(4-)
96RBX L FLAG=A
96RB G 92.8 2 37 2 M1 0.178
96RBX G EKC=0.23 5
96RBS G KC=0.1569 24$LC=0.0178 3$MC=0.00294 5$NC=0.000332 5$OC=1.403E-5 22$
96RBS G NC+=0.000346 6
96RB cG $Ice(K)=8.5 {i20}
96RB G 329.0 4 7 1
96RB G 366.8 3 10 1
96RB G 369.2 3 13 2
96RB G 405.5 4 4 1
96RB G 495.2 3 5 2
96RB G 554.5 3 5 1
96RB L 671.40 18(5-)
96RBX L FLAG=a
96RB G 116.8 2 36 3 M1 0.0946
96RBX G EKC=0.09 2
96RBS G KC=0.0834 13$LC=0.00940 14$MC=0.001555 23$NC=0.000176 3$OC=7.45E-6 11$
96RBS G NC+=0.000183 3
96RB cG $Ice(K)=3.0 {i9}
96RB G 209.9 2 16 2
96RB L 794.82 22(6-)
96RBX L FLAG=A
96RB G 123.5 3 36 3
96RB cG $Ice(K)=3.5 {i10} for 123.5+122.0
96RB cG $|a(K)ex=0.05 {I2} for 122.0|g+123.5|g doublet
96RB G 240.3 2 42 3 E2 0.0395
96RBX G EKC=0.040 12
96RBS G KC=0.0345 5$LC=0.00418 6$MC=0.000688 10$NC=7.52E-5 11$OC=2.82E-6 4$
96RBS G NC+=7.81E-5 12
96RB cG $Ice(K)=1.7 {i5}
96RB L 972.5 3 (7-)
96RBX L FLAG=a
96RB G 177.6 2 12 1
96RB G 301.0 4 17 3
96RBX G EKC=0.018 8
96RB cG $|a(K)exp for 300.0+301.0
96RB cG $Ice(K)(300+301)=1.2 {i5}
96RB L 1094.6 3 (8-)
96RBX L FLAG=A
96RB G 122.0 3 32 3
96RB cG $|a(K)ex=0.05 {I2} for 122.0|g+123.5|g doublet
96RB cG $Ice(K)(122+124)=3.5 {i10}
96RB G 300.0 3 68 5
96RBX G EKC=0.018 8
96RB cG $|a(K)exp for 300.0+301.0
96RB cG $Ice(K)(300+301)=1.2 {i5}
96RB L 1134.6 11(10-) 2.00 US 10
96RB cL T$From timing of 300 keV transition (2005Pi13). Other: 1.65 |ms {i15}
96RBacL (1999Ge01)
96RB cL $Configuration=[|pg{-9/2}|nh{-11/2}]{-10-} (1999Ge01).
96RB G 40 1 3.6 4 E2 27 3 100
96RB cG E$From text 0f 2005Pi13; not listed in authors' table I or ~II.
96RB cG E$Assignment of isomeric transition for this |g ray supported by E2
96RBacG character and its transition intensity.
96RB cG TI$Ice(K)=68 {i7}; Ice(L)=27 {i5}; Ice(M+) assumed (by the
96RBacG evaluators) as 9 {i2} from 0.33(Ice(L)). Summed intensity=104 {i9},
96RBacG consistent with 100
96RB cG M$From comparison of conversion electron intensity ratios with that
96RBacG predicted by theory (K/L=2.9 for E2).