95MO 95TC EC DECAY (61 D) 1977ME12,1974AN05 10NDS 201010
95MO H TYP=FUL$AUT=S. K. Basu, G. Mukherjee, A. A. Sonzogni$
95MO2 H CIT=NDS 111, 2555 (2010)$CUT=30-Jun-2009$
95MO C 1970Bo28 measured |g's and |g{+|+}'s (Ge(Li)), |g(|q) (NaI,Ge(Li)),
95MO2C |g|g-coincidences (NaI,Ge(Li)), |g|g(|q,H,t) (NaI), and |g|g(t) (scin)
95MO C 1973Be34 measured |g|g(|q) and linear polarization; Ge(Li)
95MO C 1974An05 measured |g's and |g|g-coincidences (Ge(Li)) and |b{++}'s
95MO2C and ce's; |b spectrometer
95MO C 1977Me12: see {+95}Tc |e decay (20.0 h) for experimental details
95MO C 1978He21 reevaluated their earlier measurements (1971He20. Ge(Li)) to
95MO2C be consistent with an energy scale based on E|g({+198}Au)=411.80441
95MO3C {I108} (1978Ke02) and the fundamental constants of 1973CoTA
95MO C The level scheme is from 1977Me12. It is in good agreement with the
95MO2C results of 1974An05. See 1983Lu03 for other references
95MO CE LOGFT(A)$log| {If{+1u}t}|>8.5
95MO CE E(B)$From E|b=710 {I6} and 506 {I6} (1974An05)
95MO CE IB(D)$From I|b(to g.s.)/I|b(to 204)=1.2 {I2} and the adopted decay
95MO2CE scheme; see the comment on I|g normalization. Others for I|b(to
95MO3CE g.s.+204): 0.47% {I6} (1970Bo28), 0.31% {I4} (1974An05), and 0.24%
95MO4CE {I3} (1977Me12). From |g{+|+} and decay scheme
95MO CE IE(E)$From I|b and theoretical |e/|b{++} ratios
95MO CG $Coincidences shown on the drawing are from 1974An05
95MO CG $|a(K)exp: from 1974An05, except as noted. Values were normalized by
95MO2CG assuming |a(K)(204|g)=0.046
95MO CG $|a(L)exp,|a(M)exp,K/L,K:L:M: from 1977Me12. See also 20-h {+95}Tc |e
95MO2CG decay
95MO CG E,RI$From 1977Me12, except as noted
95MO CG MR,M(A)$From |g|g(|q) and linear polarization (1973Be34) assuming
95MO2CG J(786)=1/2,3/2, J(821)=1/2,3/2,5/2, and J(1039)=1/2,3/2, except as
95MO3CG noted
95MO CG CC,M(B),MR(D)$From the adopted gammas
95MO CG E(E)$From 1978He21. Other relatively precise energies are 204.12 {I1}
95MO2CG (1977Me12) and 204.12 {I2} (1974An05), 252.95 {I1} (1977Me12) and
95MO3CG 253.00 {I3} (1974An05), 582.07 {I1} (1977Me12), 786.18 {I2}
95MO4CG (1977Me12) and 786.18 {I5} (1974An05), 820.61 {I1} (1977Me12), 835.13
95MO5CG {I1} (1977Me12), and 1039.25 {I2} (1977Me12), respectively
95MO CG RI(F)$I|g(219|g)=1.00 {I15} and I|g(1416|g)=0.07 {I2} (1974An05) are
95MO2CG discrepant
95MO CG E(G),RI(H)$From 1974An05. Not reported by 1977Me12
95MO CL J$From the adopted levels.
95MO D CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2a (13-Jul-2008) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
95MO D 1994: UPDATED QP ON PARENT RECORD TO VALUE FROM 1993Au05. RERAN LOGFT.
95MO D 1983Lu03 NOTED THAT 1977Me12 PROBABLY UNDERESTIMATED SOME
95MO2D UNCERTAINTIES IN G-ENERGIES SINCE G-RAYS WITH DE=10 EV OR LESS DO NOT
95MO3D FIT WELL IN THE LEVEL SCHEME. HOWEVER, THERE IS EXCELLENT AGREEMENT
95MO4D WITH THE EQUALLY PRECISE DATA OF 1978He21 AND 1974An05
95MO D NR AS NOTED BY 1983Lu03, WITH THE NORMALIZATION AND BRANCHING
95MO2D RATIOS GIVEN IN THAT EVALUATION THERE IS AN INCONSISTENCY WITH IB(to
95MO3D 204) AND THE TOTAL DIRECT FEEDING TO THE 204-KEV STATE. FROM THEORY
95MO4D (1971Go40) EC/B+=37.2 18 ASSUMING Q+=1691 6 WHILE 1983Lu03 OBTAINED
95MO5D 54 16 FROM THEIR DECAY SCHEME AND NORMALIZATIONS. THERE APPEARED TO
95MO6D BE TWO POSSIBLE PROBLEMS: 1) IB(TO GS)+IB(T0 204) SEEMS TO BE
95MO7D DEPENDENT ON THE NORMALIZATION AND THE DECAY SCHEME. 2) THE BRANCHING
95MO8D RATIO IS DEPENDENT ON THE NORMALIZATION ASSUMED AND BOTH THE 20-H AND
95MO9D 61-D DECAY SCHEMES.
95MO D NR,BR DETAILS OF THE CALCULATIONS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE
95MO2D EVALUATOR (REQUEST THE FILE 95TCNORM.TEX)
95TC P 38.91 4 1/2- 61 D 2 1691 5
95MO N 0.0658 8 0.9612 321.040366
95MO CN BR$See comment on I|g normalization
95MO cN NR${TV}I{-|b}(to g.s), I{-|b}(to 204), %IT, %|e+%|b{++}, and the
95MO2cN I{-|g}-normalization were derived by three {TV}somewhat independent
95MO3cN methods:
95MO PN 0.0632 8 1.00 3
95MO tN ({TV}1), I{-|b}(to g.s)/I{-|b}(to 204)=1.2 {I2} (1974An04),
95MO+tN I{-|g}(20-h 948|g)/I{-|g}(61-d 204|g)=0.12% {I1} (1966Ce04)
95MO4tN {TV}[I{-|g}-normalization(20-h |e decay)=0.09382 {I19}],
95MO+tN |SI{-|g}(to g.s.)=100-%IT-I{-|e+|b+}(to g.s.),
95MO5tN {TV}and
95MO+tN I{-|g+ce}(204|g)-|SI{-|g}(1+|a)(to 204)=I{-|e+|b+}(to 204).
95MO6tN {TV}2) I{-|b}(to g.s)/I{-|b}(to 204)=1.2 {I2},
95MO+tN I{-|g}(20-h 948|g)/I{-|g}(61-d 204|g)=0.12% {I1} (1966Ce04)
95MO7tN {TV}[I{-|g}-normalization(20-h |e decay)=0.09382 {I19}],
95MO+tN |SI{-|b}=6.99 {I7} relative to I{-|g}(204|g)=1000 {I2}
95MO8tN {TV}(1977Me12), and
95MO+tN |SI{-|g}(1+|a)(to g.s.)=100-%IT-I{-|e+|b+}(to g.s.).
95MO9tN {TV}3) I{-|g}(20-h 948|g)/I{-|g}(61-d 204|g)=0.12% {I1} (1966Ce04)
95MO+tN [I{-|g}-normalization(20-h |e decay)=0.09382 {I19}],
95MOAtN {TV}|SI{-|b}=6.99 {I7} relative to I{-|g}(204|g)=1000 {I2},
95MO+tN |SI{-|g}(1+|a)(to g.s.)=100-%IT-I{-|e+|b+}(to g.s.),
95MOBtN {TV}and I{-|g+ce}(204g)-|SI{-|g}(1+|a)(to 204)=I{-|e+|b+}(to 204).
95MOCtN {TV}The results from the three calculations are consistent:
95MODtN {TV}1) I{-|b}(to g.s)=0.274 {I39}, I{-|b}(to 204)=0.223 {I27},
95MO+tN I|g-normalization|*(%|e+%|b{++})=0.0621 {I11}, %IT=3.82 {I16},
95MOEtN {TV}%|e+%|b{++}=96.18 {I16}, and
95MO+tN I{-|g}-normalization=0.0646 {I15}.
95MOFtN {TV}2) I{-|b}(to g.s)=0.242 {I17}, I{-|b}(to 204)=0.201 {I21},
95MO+tN I|g-normalization|*(%|e+%|b{++})=0.0632 {I8}, %IT=3.88 {I32},
95MOGtN {TV}%|e+%|b{++}=96.12 {I32}, and
95MO+tN I{-|g}-normalization=0.0658 {I8}.
95MOHtN {TV}3) I{-|b}(to g.s)=0.218 {I12}, I{-|b}(to 204)=0.230 {I16},
95MO+tN I|g-normalization|*(%|e+%|b{++})=0.04641 {I15}, %IT=3.94 {I33},
95MOItN {TV}%|e+%|b{++}=96.06 {I33}, and I{-|g}-normalization=0.0667 {I16}.
95MOJtN {TV}Since the uncertainties in the quantities derived by the three
95MO+tN methods are correlated, averages
95MOKtN {TV}may not be taken. The results of the second method have been
95MO+tN adopted since, with the exception
95MOLtN {TV}of I{-|b}(to 204), they appear to be the median values.
95MO G 291.67 4 0.088 8
95MO G 589.29 25 0.016 4
95MO G 623.29 15 0.09 3
95MO G 844.1 7 0.18 5
95MO L 0.0 5/2+ STABLE
95MO E 1732 6 0.242 1713.32 9 9.26 2 13.56 9 1U
95MOF E FLAG=BDE
95MOS E EAV=336.8 23$CK=0.851$CL=0.106$CM+=0.0246
95MO CE $First-forbidden unique spectrum shape (1974An05)
95MO L 204.1177 18 3/2+ 751 PS 9
95MO2 L G=-0.26 2 (1970Bo28)
95MO CL T$weighted av of 742 ps {I14} (1958Qu01. |g|g(t); NaI), 755 ps {I15}
95MO2CL (1965Me08. |g|g(t); scin) and 756 ps {I14} (1970Bo28)
95MO CL G$Niobium-foil source; -0.30 {I4} for liquid source
95MO G 204.117 2 1000 2 M1+E2 -0.62 7 0.052 3 C
95MOF G FLAG=DE
95MOS G KC=0.0449 23$LC=0.0058 4$MC=0.00103 7$NC=0.000154 9$OC=7.5E-6 4$
95MOS G NC+=0.000161 10
95MO CG M$from L1/L23
95MO E 1528 6 0.201 217.48 108.35 2 7.68 10
95MOF E FLAG=ABDE
95MOS E EAV=225.8 22$CK=0.8465 10$CL=0.10353 13$CM+=0.02384 3
95MO L 786.2017 25 1/2+
95MO CL J$1/2+ from |g|g(|q) and linear polarization (1973Be34) assuming
95MO2CL J(786)=1/2,3/2, J(821)=1/2,3/2,5/2, and J(1039)=1/2,3/2
95MO G 582.082 3 473.7 8 M1+E2 +0.266 +52-400.002734 C
95MOF G FLAG=AE
95MOX G EKC=0.00234 7$ELC=0.00026 1
95MOS G KC=0.00240 4$LC=0.000272 4$MC=4.85E-5 8$NC=7.39E-6 11$OC=4.19E-7 6$
95MOS G NC+=7.81E-6 12
95MO CG EKC$Unweighted av of 0.00241 {I10} (1974An05) and 0.00228 {I8}
95MO2CG (1977Me12)
95MO G 786.198 4 136.9 7 C
95MOF G FLAG=E
95MOX G EKC=0.00122 6$ELC=0.00014 1$EMC=0.007E-3 1
95MO CG EKC$Unweighted av of 0.00127 {I5} (1974An05) and 0.00116 {I4}
95MO2CG (1977Me12)
95MO E 38.0 5 7.22 2 38.0 5
95MOS E CK=0.868$CL=0.1076$CM+=0.0248
95MO L 820.627 5 3/2+
95MO CL J$3/2+ from |g|g(|q) and linear polarization (1973Be34) assuming
95MO2CL J(786)=1/2,3/2, J(821)=1/2,3/2,5/2, and J(1039)=1/2,3/2
95MO G 616.49 2 20.3 2 M1+E2 -2.00 22 0.002564 C
95MOF G FLAG=A
95MOX G EKC=0.00234 9$ELC=0.00019 1
95MOS G KC=0.00224 4$LC=0.000261 4$MC=4.67E-5 7$NC=7.06E-6 11$OC=3.83E-7 6$
95MOS G NC+=7.44E-6 11
95MO CG E$other: 616.45 {I5} (1974An05)
95MO CG EKC$Weighted av of 0.00236 {I11} (1974An05) and 0.00231 {I12}
95MO2CG (1977Me12)
95MO G 820.624 5 74.5 1 C
95MOF G FLAG=E
95MOX G EKC=0.00110 6$ELC=0.00014 2
95MO CG EKC$Other: 0.00106 (1977Me12)
95MO E 5.95 8 7.99 2 5.95 8
95MOF E FLAG=A
95MOS E CK=0.867$CL=0.108$CM+=0.0249
95MO L 1039.270 4 1/2+
95MO CL J$1/2+ from |g|g(|q) and linear polarization (1973Be34) assuming
95MO2CL J(786)=1/2,3/2, J(821)=1/2,3/2,5/2, and J(1039)=1/2,3/2
95MO G 218.66 8 0.68 3 M1+E2 0.73 5 0.044915 C
95MOF G FLAG=BF
95MOX G EKC=0.040 1
95MOS G KC=0.0389 13$LC=0.00499 19$MC=0.00089 4$NC=0.000133 5$OC=6.47E-6 19$
95MOS G NC+=0.000140 5
95MO CG MR$from |a(K)exp
95MO G 253.068 4 9.66 7 M1 0.0208 C
95MOF G FLAG=E
95MOX G EKC=0.0150 30
95MOS G KC=0.0182 3$LC=0.00211 3$MC=0.000378 6$NC=5.74E-5 8$OC=3.22E-6 5$
95MOS G NC+=6.06E-5 9
95MO CG MR$29% E2 admixture (1977Me12) would require |a(K)=0.023 in
95MO2CG disagreement with |a(K)exp=0.0120 {I4} (1977Me12)
95MO CG EKC$Unweighted av of 0.0179 {I10} (1974An05) and 0.0120 {I4}
95MO2CG (1977Me12)
95MO G 835.149 5 421 3 M1+E2 +0.038 19 C
95MOF G FLAG=AE
95MOX G EKC=0.00105 3$ELC=0.0000152 8$EMC=0.046E-3 2
95MOS G CC=0.001191 17$KC=0.001049 15$LC=0.0001174 17$MC=2.09E-5 3$
95MOS G OC=1.83E-7 3$NC+=3.38E-6
95MO CG EKC$Weighted av of 0.00105 {I4} (1974An05) and 0.00105 {I4} (1977Me12)
95MO G 1039.264 6 43.9 4
95MOF G FLAG=E
95MOX G EKC=0.00063 3
95MO CG EKC$Other: 0.0006 {I1} (1977Me12)
95MO E 30.1 5 7.04 2 30.1 5
95MOS E CK=0.866$CL=0.109$CM+=0.0252
95MO L 1056.753 14 5/2+
95MO G 852.60 2 0.33 1 ?
95MO G 1056.79 2 0.140 5
95MO E 0.0185 1610.45 5 0.0185 16 1U
95MOF E FLAG=A
95MOS E CK=0.856$CL=0.1165 2$CM+=0.0272
95MO L 1302.31 7 1/2+
95MO G 245.83 9 0.028 7
95MO G 263 0.002 LE ?
95MO G 515.6 4 0.005 5 ?
95MO G 1098 0.0003 LE ?
95MO G 1302 0.0003 LE ?
95MO E 0.0013 7 11.0 3 0.0013 7 ?
95MOF E FLAG=A
95MOS E CK=0.862$CL=0.11193 12$CM+=0.02598 4
95MO L 1369.76 15 (3/2)
95MO G 1165.5 0.0015 LE ?
95MO G 1369.75 15 0.0021 5
95MO E 0.00018 6 11.7 2 1.8E-4 6
95MOF E FLAG=A
95MOS E CK=0.860$CL=0.1135 2$CM+=0.02639 5
95MO L 1426.13 3 (5/2)+
95MO G 1222.00 3 0.132 3 C
95MOX G EKC=0.00050 25
95MO G 1426.11 15 0.0004 3
95MO E 0.00837 229.36 4 0.00837 22 1U
95MOS E CK=0.825 2$CL=0.141 1$CM+=0.0339 3
95MO L 1620.25 3 3/2+
95MO G 318.27 10 0.016 6 ?
95MO G 563.48 6 0.15 2
95MO G 799.60 15 0.023 8
95MO G 1416.09 8 0.029 1
95MOF G FLAG=F
95MO G 1620.20 4 0.603 26
95MOX G EKC=0.00038 8
95MO CG RI$weighted av of 0.59 {I3} (1977Me12) and 0.64 {I5} (1974An05)
95MO E 0.0511 258.09 6 0.0511 25
95MOS E CK=0.826 3$CL=0.140 3$CM+=0.0336 6
95MO L 1660.29 25 (LE 5/2) ?
95MO G 1660.27 25 0.000085 ?
95MO E 0.0000054 11.6 4 5.E-6 4 ?
95MOF E FLAG=A
95MOS E CK=0.788 10$CL=0.170 8$CM+=0.042 3