95Y 95SR B- DECAY 1981PFZZ,1974HE03 10NDS 201010
95Y H TYP=FUL$AUT=S. K. Basu, G. Mukherjee, A. A. Sonzogni$
95Y 2 H CIT=NDS 111, 2555 (2010)$CUT=30-Jun-2009$
95Y c 1974He03: measured |g's, |g|g-coincidences, and |g(t); Ge(Li)
95Y c 1981PfZZ: measured |g's, ce's, |g|g-coin, and |b-|g and |b-ce delayed
95Y 2c coin; Ge(Li), HPGe, and Si(Li).
95Y c 1996Gr20, 1997Gr09: measured ground state |b{+-} branching intensity as
95Y 2c well as |b{+-} decay intensity distribution for {+95}Sr and several
95Y 3c other fission product nuclides using total absorption gamma ray
95Y 4c spectrometer (TAGS).
95Y c The decay scheme is from 1981PfZZ. |?90% of the |g activity was placed
95Y cB $See 1973Jo02 for |b- strength function deduced from total |g-ray
95Y 2cB absorption
95Y cB LOGFT(A)$log| {If{+1u}t}|>8.5
95Y cG $Coincidences shown on the drawing are from 1974He03
95Y cG E,RI$From 1981PfZZ, except as noted. I|g renormalized by evaluator to
95Y 2cG I|g(686|g)=100
95Y cG E(A)$Unplaced by 1974He03; placement from 1981PfZZ
95Y cG E(B)$1722|g and 3474|g placed as deexciting 3353 and 3474 states,
95Y 2cG respectively, and 2706|g, 2750|g, and 2891|g tentatively placed as
95Y 3cG deexciting 2706, 2749, and 2891 states, respectively, by 1974He03;
95Y 4cG alternate placement from 1981PfZZ. Tentative placement of 3500|g from
95Y 5cG 3500 state by 1974He03 not confirmed by 1981PfZZ.
95Y cG E(D),RI(E)$From 1974He03
95Y cL J$From 1981PfZZ; spins and parities based on log| {Ift} values and
95Y 2cL |g-deexcitation to the known first excited state.
95Y cL T$From adopted levels
95Y D CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2a (13-Jul-2008) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
95Y N 0.226 12 1.0 1.0
95Y PN 3
95Y tN NR {TV}From %I{-|g}(686|g)=22.6 {I12}. %I{-|g}(686|g) is the
95Y +tN weighted average of the following:
95Y 3tN 21.7 {I18} {TV}1986Ok04 (Affiliation method; Ge(Li)). Revised from
95Y +tN 21.8%
95Y +tN {I18} assuming %I{-|g}({+95}Y 954|g)=15.9 {I7}
95Y 4tN {TV}using current value of 15.8% {I7}
95Y 5tN 23.3 {I25} {TV}1981PfZZ (Affiliation method; Ge(Li)). Revised from 28%
95Y +tN {I4} assuming %I{-|g}({+95}Y 954|g)=19% {I2}
95Y 6tN {TV}using current value of 15.8% {I7}
95Y 7tN 23.2 {I20} {TV}1974He03. Revised from 24% 2 assuming cumulative
95Y +tN fission yields from 1968 Nuklidkarte,
95Y 8tN {TV}T{-1/2}({+93}Sr,{+94}Sr)=444 s, 24.4 s (1966No08) and
95Y +tN T{-1/2}({+95}Sr)=24.4 s (1974He03) using
95Y 9tN {TV}T{-1/2}({+93}Sr)=445 s (1988Si07), T{-1/2}({+94}Sr)=75.3
95Y +tN s
95Y +tN (1992Tu02), and T{-1/2}({+95}Sr)=23.9 s
95SR P 0.0 1/2+ 23.90 S 14 6090 7
95Y G 3500.3 3.4 5
95Y L 0.0 1/2- 10.3 M 1
95Y B 55.7 25 6.161 20
95Y S B EAV=2748.7 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=40.3 {I2}.9 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 685.8 3 3/2-
95Y G 685.6 100 C
95Y cG $%I|g:See comment on I|g normalization
95Y B 8.9 7 6.72 4
95Y S B EAV=2418.3 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=5.35 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 826.9 4 5/2-
95Y G 826.8 12.7 14
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 0.8 4 9.56 22 1U
95Y S B EAV=2343.5 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 1087.5 7 9/2+ 52.6 US 12
95Y G 260.6 2.2 M2 0.0695
95Y S G KC=0.0605 9$LC=0.00753 11$MC=0.001299 19$NC=0.0001733 25$
95Y S G OC=1.151E-5 17$NC+=0.000185 3
95Y cG M$from |a(K)exp (1981PfZZ)
95Y B 0.385 7.9 ?
95Y S B EAV=2224.9 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.64 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 1630.9 6 (5/2-)
95Y G 543.4 0.15 ?
95Y G 945.0 9.9 12 C
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y L 1889.8 8 (3/2-,5/2-,7/2-)
95Y G 1062.8 1.9
95Y B 0.25 9.4 1U
95Y S B EAV=1835.1 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.178 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 1963.4 5 (3/2-,5/2-)
95Y G 1136.6 0.5
95Y G 1277.4 9.1 11 C
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 1.4 7.0
95Y S B EAV=1804.1 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.00 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2021.0 5 (3/2-)
95Y G 1194.0 0.3
95Y G 1335.4 3.0 4
95Y F G FLAG=AE
95Y G 2020.0 1.2
95Y B 0.59 7.4
95Y S B EAV=1776.4 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.42 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2046.6 7 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 1360.9 2.4 4
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y G 2046.4 1.54 23
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 0.89 10 7.16 5
95Y S B EAV=1764.2 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.64 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2207.6 6 (5/2-,7/2-)
95Y G 576.6 3.3 4
95Y F G FLAG=AE
95Y G 1120.0 0.5 ?
95Y B 0.42 11 9.01 12 1U
95Y S B EAV=1684.1 34
95Y cB $log| {Ift}>7.6 (1981PfZZ)
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.0 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2408.5 6 (3/2-,5/2-)
95Y G 1581.4 0.5
95Y G 1722.5 2.3 3
95Y F G FLAG=BE
95Y B 0.49 7.2
95Y S B EAV=1591.0 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.05 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2557.6 7 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 1872.0 1.0
95Y G 2557.2 0.4
95Y B 0.32 7.4
95Y S B EAV=1519.8 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.69 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2614.6 5 (3/2-,5/2-)
95Y G 406.9 0.5
95Y G 651.3 0.3
95Y G 724.6 0.8
95Y G 983.8 5.2 7
95Y F G FLAG=AE
95Y G 1928.5 0.4
95Y B 0.63 20 7.03 14
95Y S B EAV=1492.6 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.37 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2684.0 6 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 2684.0 5.2 7
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 0.88 6.8
95Y S B EAV=1459.5 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.13 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2717.2 6 (1/2+,3/2+)
95Y G 2031.5 2.1 3
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y G 2717.3 20.4 24
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 4.9 6 6.08 6
95Y S B EAV=1443.7 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=6.21 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2781.8 6 (3/2-)
95Y G 1954.8 0.4
95Y G 2096.1 0.54 24
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y G 2781.8 4.7 7
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 1.27 17 6.63 6
95Y S B EAV=1412.9 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.61 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 2933.3 5 (3/2+)
95Y G 970.0 0.3
95Y G 1302.5 0.4
95Y G 2106.3 0.4
95Y G 2247.6 16.8 20 C
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y G 2933.1 18.0 22
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 7.8 8 5.75 5
95Y S B EAV=1340.9 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=8.45 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3116.8 7 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 2430.8 1.1
95Y G 3116.8 2.5 4
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 0.81 6.6
95Y S B EAV=1253.9 34
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.18 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3352.9 5 (3/2)
95Y G 419.5 0.4
95Y G 668.6 0.6
95Y G 1145.4 0.5
95Y G 2667.4 0.8
95Y G 3352.8 4.2 6
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 1.5 6.2
95Y S B EAV=1142.4 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=3.21 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3391.8 5 (3/2)
95Y G 458.4 0.8
95Y G 708.4 0.5
95Y G 777.3 2.6 4
95Y F G FLAG=AE
95Y G 1184.0 0.7
95Y G 1370.5 0.4
95Y G 1428.3 1.5
95Y G 2564.9 0.15
95Y G 2705.8 1.01 17
95Y F G FLAG=BE
95Y B 1.7 6.1
95Y S B EAV=1124.0 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=3.64 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3507.4 7 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 2821.4 0.8
95Y G 3507.5 1.0
95Y B 0.41 6.7
95Y S B EAV=1069.7 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=2.14 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3576.6 5 (3/2+)
95Y G 961.6 1.8
95Y G 1612.7 1.0
95Y G 2749.7 1.40 23
95Y F G FLAG=BE
95Y G 2891.0 4.0 6
95Y F G FLAG=BE
95Y G 3577.0 1.8
95Y B 2.3 5.9
95Y S B EAV=1037.2 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=4.07 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3616.1 5 (1/2+,3/2+)
95Y G 899.2 0.8
95Y G 931.9 0.2
95Y G 1207.3 0.6
95Y G 2930.5 1.7
95Y G 3616.1 7.6 10
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 2.46 5.8
95Y S B EAV=1018.7 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=2.89 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3651.3 7 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 2965.0 0.8
95Y G 3651.6 0.5
95Y B 0.29 6.7
95Y S B EAV=1002.2 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.32 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3743.3 10 (1/2,3/2)
95Y G 3743.2 3.7 6
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 0.84 14 6.17 8
95Y S B EAV=959.3 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.07 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 3943.5 6 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 3116.6 0.5
95Y G 3257.6 0.2
95Y G 3943.4 0.3
95Y B 0.23 6.6
95Y S B EAV=866.2 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.49 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4075.1 6 (1/2+,3/2+)
95Y G 2112.0 0.2
95Y G 3388.9 0.6
95Y G 4075.1 5.4 8
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 1.40 19 5.68 6
95Y S B EAV=805.4 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=2.46 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4160.7 8 (3/2)
95Y G 3334.2 0.6
95Y G 3474.3 1.02 19
95Y F G FLAG=BE
95Y B 0.37 4 6.18 5
95Y S B EAV=766.1 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.67 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4190.4 8 (1/2,3/2)
95Y G 2168.7 1.5
95Y G 4191.0 0.3
95Y B 0.41 6.1
95Y S B EAV=752.5 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.75 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4214.3 6 (1/2,3/2)
95Y G 2251.0 0.3
95Y G 3528.0 0.4
95Y G 4214.4 0.4
95Y B 0.25 6.3
95Y S B EAV=741.6 33
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.46 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4268.1 7 (1/2+,3/2+)
95Y G 3582.2 0.3
95Y G 4268.0 2.0 4
95Y F G FLAG=E
95Y B 0.52 9 5.93 8
95Y S B EAV=717.0 32
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=1.31 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4348.3 10 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 4348.2 0.7
95Y B 0.16 6.4
95Y S B EAV=680.5 32
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.37 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4360.3 7 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 3674.5 0.15
95Y G 4360.0 0.12
95Y B 0.061 6.8
95Y S B EAV=675.1 32
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=00.139 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4420.6 10 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 4420.5 0.8
95Y B 0.18 6.2
95Y S B EAV=647.8 32
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.40 on simulation of TAGS spectrum
95Y L 4563.4 10 (1/2-,3/2-)
95Y G 3877.5 0.3
95Y B 0.068 6.5
95Y S B EAV=583.6 32
95Y cB $I(|b{+-})%=0.146 on simulation of TAGS spectrum