93Y 93SR B- DECAY 1977BI01,1974AC04,1972HE4111NDS 201105
93Y H TYP=FUL$AUT=CORAL M. BAGLIN$CIT=NDS 112, 1163 (2011)$CUT=15-Dec-2010$
93Y C Others: 1997Gr09, 1996Gr20, 1986Ka20, 1983Ia02, 1979Bo26, 1978St02,
93Y 2C 1976BiZL, 1975Ca01, 1974Sc39, 1972Am01, 1971Ca07, 1970MaZC, 1965Ba04.
93Y C 1996Gr20, 1997Gr09: total absorption |g spectrometer (^TAGS) (NaI(Tl)
93Y 2C well detector with Si e-detector in well) operated in singles or in
93Y 3C 4|p|g-|b coin mode, summed-EG resolution AP 5%; deduced B-
93Y 4C feeding to (GS+759 level) (1996Gr20; SUPERSEDES 1996GRZZ), B- feeding
93Y 5C to excited states (1997GR09; SUPERSEDES 1996GrZY).
93Y C 1979Bo26: curved crystal spectrometer; measured EG (4 lines)
93Y C 1977Bi01: GELI; measured EG, IG (161 lines), GG coin;
93Y 2C see also 1976BiZL for detailed GG coin data.
93Y C 1974Ac04: GELI and Si(Li); measured EG, IG (77 lines), GG coin,
93Y 2C EKC (relative to 85KR(304G) and 85RB(151G)).
93Y C 1974Sc39: EG, IG, GG coin, BG coin,
93Y 2C internal conversion from XKA.
93Y C 1972He41: GELI, scin; measured EG, IG (74 lines), GG coin,
93Y 2C B- spectra, BG coin.
93Y C The adopted decay scheme is based on that of 1977Bi01 and, for
93Y 2C E(level)<2850, it is supported by extensive coin information. The
93Y 3C schemes proposed by 1977Bi01 and 1972He41 are in excellent agreement;
93Y 4C schemes from 1977Bi01 and 1974Ac04 have nothing in common for
93Y 5C E(level)>2900, but are reasonably consistent for lower E(level).
93Y 6C The evaluator has relocated the 776G and placed the 1786G,
93Y 7C based on level energy differences. The level proposed by 1977Bi01 at
93Y 8C 4263.67 15 KEV (IB=0.49% 5, EG=1609.8, 1899.5, 2172.0, 2985.7) has an
93Y 9C energy exceeding Q- in 2003AU03, and that at 4119.68 23 (IB=0.14% 2,
93Y 9C EG=2983.5, 2811.3, 2472.7) has an energy so close to Q- that LOGFT
93Y AC would be unrealistically low; the evaluator assumes that the associated
93Y BC gammas are misplaced in 1977Bi01. The total unplaced IG is then AP
93Y CC 2.1%. Placement of the 2688G is now shown as tentative (see comment on
93Y DC that transition).
93Y C Some further modification of the decay scheme of 1977Bi01
93Y 2C is required in order to obtain consistency with the total absorption
93Y 3C G spectrometer (^TAGS) data of 1997GR09. Specifically,
93Y 4C the ^TAGS data indicate that:
93Y 5C (i) the 590 level is fed by a branch of AP 2%; (ii) there is AP 1.5%
93Y 6C feeding of an unknown level (or levels) near 2200 KEV; (iii) the
93Y 7C present level scheme significantly overestimates feeding to levels
93Y 8C having E>3800; (iv) significant feeding (AP 2.0%) exists to levels with
93Y 9C E=3200-3800, none of which is present in the level scheme of 1977Bi01.
93Y AC The evaluator is unable to devise a unique set of new levels
93Y BC deexcited by presently unplaced gammas which would remove the above
93Y CC inconsistencies. However, levels with E>3800 (and their deexciting
93Y DC gammas) are now indicated as tentative since the ^TAGS data
93Y EC imply negligible feeding to E>3800 levels. NOTE THAT THE ADOPTED
93Y FC DECAY SCHEME IMPLIES A TOTAL ENERGY DEPOSIT OF 4290 80 cf. 4140 12
93Y GC FROM Q|xBR.
93Y cB =950 40 (1990Ru05), 900 30 (1982Al01);
93Y 2CB FOR THE ADOPTED DECAY SCHEME, =801 40 IS CALCULATED USING THE
93Y 3CB CODE ^RADLST AND THE DECAY SCHEME ADOPTED HERE.
93Y CB E B END-POINT ENERGIES from |g-gated B spectra (1978St02) ARE
93Y 2CB GIVEN IN COMMENTS. END-POINT ENERGIES ARE ALSO REPORTED BY 1983Ia02,
93Y 3CB 1974Sc39, 1972He41, 1970MAZC, 1965Ba04.
93Y CB IB From TI intensity balance, except as noted. Independent IB
93Y 2CB values (uncertainty unstated) are available, as a function of
93Y 3CB excitation energy, from the total absorption GAMMA spectrometry data
93Y 4CB of 1997Gr09, and these are given in comments; agreement is,
93Y 5CB in general, good, with several noted exceptions.
93Y CB IB(D) No GS B- feeding confirmed. IB(GS)<1% estimated by 1974Sc39
93Y 2CB from difference between direct B- spectrum and B- spectrum gated by
93Y 3CB EG>50 KEV. IB(GS) AP 4.5% from multi-branch fit to total B- spectrum
93Y 4CB (1983Ia02); however, branches to other levels included in fit do not
93Y 5CB agree well with decay scheme adopted here. THE EVALUATOR ADOPTS
93Y 6CB IB(GS) LE 4.5.
93Y CB IB(E) IB(GS+759)=5.8% 14 from 4|p|g-|b coin (1996Gr20). Combining
93Y 2CB this with IB(GS) LE 4.5%, evaluator adopts IB(759) LE 7.2%. From
93Y 3CB |g-intensity balance, IB(759)=7.3% 24 is obtained; EVEN IF ALL THE
93Y 4CB UNPLACED IG FED THE 759 LEVEL (WHICH SEEMS EXTREMELY UNLIKELY) IB(759)
93Y 5CB WOULD BE 5.1% 24, FURTHER SUPPORTING 1974SC39's
93Y 6CB ESTIMATE OF LITTLE, IF ANY, B FEEDING TO G.S. NOTE THAT LOGFT>11.0,
93Y 7CB EXPECTED FOR A DJ=2, DPI=NO TRANSITION, WOULD IMPLY IB(759)<0.001%, A
93Y 8CB VALUE THAT IS DIFFICULT TO RECONCILE WITH OBSERVED TI IMBALANCE.
93Y CB IB(J) From ^TAGS data (1997Gr09); may represent feeding to one
93Y 2CB level or to several levels of undetermined energy, lying within an
93Y 3CB energy bin typically AP 100 KEV wide and centered at the level energy
93Y 4CB indicated.
93Y CG EG for several placed G rays deviates significantly from
93Y 2CG the least-squares adjusted value; this may indicate the existence of
93Y 3CG doublets.
93Y CG 1977Bi01 observe more than twice as many G rays as 1972He41
93Y 2CG or 1974Ac04 and resolve nine multiplets reported as single lines in
93Y 3CG prior studies. The evaluator, therefore, omits G rays reported
93Y 4CG by 1974Ac04 alone (EG=814.64, 843.93, 935.11, 1006.2, 1803.7, 2196.1,
93Y 5CG 2359.5, 3414.2, 3972.9).
93Y cG =1760 70 (1990Ru05) cf.
93Y 2CG 2264 40 CALCULATED FOR THE DECAY SCHEME PRESENTED HERE USING THE
93Y 3CG ^RADLST CODE.
93Y CG M,MR From EKC.
93Y CG E,RI From 1977Bi01, except as noted. In general, data from
93Y 2CG 1974Ac04 and 1972He41 agree well with those from 1977Bi01.
93Y CG E(A),RI(A)$Also observed in studies other than that of 1977Bi01.
93Y CG E(F) Placed by evaluator based on level energy difference.
93Y 2CG 1977Bi01 either left G unplaced or placed it such that EG was 4|s from
93Y 3CG least-squares adjusted level energy difference.
93Y CG E(G) Differs by 3|s or 4|s from least-squares adjusted level
93Y 2CG energy difference.
93Y CG E(H) Placed by 1977Bi01 from 2688 level, but EG is 5|s from
93Y 2CG least-squares adjusted value. EG is correct for placement from 3825
93Y 3CG level of 1977Bi01, but such a placement would imply IB(1136 level)=0.5
93Y 4CG 5 (cf. 2.6 5 based on authors' placement of 2688G, and 1.9 from ^TAGS
93Y 5CG data (1997Gr09)); more importantly, the ^TAGS data of 1997Gr09 question
93Y 6CG the existence of a 3825 level and definitely rule out such strong |b
93Y 7CG feeding to it as the level scheme of 1977Bi01 implies. Since 1978St02
93Y 8CG report 2875B-260G coin (further supporting |b feeding of the 1136
93Y 8CG level) and no G-2688G coin is observed (1977Bi01,
93Y 9CG 1974Ac04), the evaluator tentatively adopts the placement proposed in
93Y ACG 1977Bi01. However, the 2688G may well be a doublet. The other component
93Y BCG could feed the long-lived 759 level, consistent both with the absence
93Y CCG of G-2688G coin and with the B- branching implied by ^TAGS data
93Y DCG (1997Gr09) for the 759, 2688 levels and in the vicinity of 3400 KEV
93Y ECG 100; unfortunately, no other transition(s) from the implied 3447 level
93Y FCG can be identified. Alternatively, a close doublet of 2688 levels could
93Y GCG exist.
93Y CL E From least-squares fit to EG, omitting 2688G
93Y 2CL (5|s from expected value), 910G, 1122G (4|s from expected EG) and
93Y 3CL 1104G, 927G (3|s from expected EG).
93Y 4CL Based on the ^TAGS data of 1997Gr09, additional levels with E AP 2200
93Y 5CL and 3200-3800 KEV are fed in this decay, but the summed-EG resolution
93Y 6CL was inadequate to determine specific level energy values, and their
93Y 7CL deexcitation gammas are unknown. These levels are designated here
93Y 8CL by the centroid energy for AP 100 KEV wide energy bins within which
93Y 9CL at least one level lies, for the purpose of indicating the BETA
93Y ACL strength feeding them.
93Y CL J,T From Adopted Levels.
93Y CL E(I) Not a discrete level. The energy indicated here is the
93Y 2CL centroid of an energy bin of
93Y 3CL typically AP 100 KEV width which encompasses a level or levels fed
93Y 4CL in B- decay with the summed IB indicated; from total absorption
93Y 5CL |g spectroscopy (1997Gr09). Neither specific level energies nor
93Y 6CL deexcitation |g energies are presently known.
93SR P 0.0 5/2+ 7.43 M 3 4140 12
93Y N 0.068 3 1 1
93Y CN NR From |S(TI to GS)=99.5% 5, based on IB(GS)<1% (1974Sc39).
93Y PN 3
93Y G 831.3 5 0.7 3
93Y G 837.85 19 1.73 24
93Y G 1200.5 7 0.38 17
93Y G 1609.77 20 2.9 3
93Y G 1652.2 7 0.52 20
93Y G 1899.5 10 0.52 19
93Y G 1935.6 7 0.50 17
93Y G 1952.4 3 1.46 25
93Y G 1978.2 9 0.39 18
93Y G 2054.68 25 2.0 3
93Y G 2076.6 7 0.88 24
93Y G 2094.1 6 1.1 3
93Y G 2104.78 15 4.6 4 A
93Y G 2172.0 4 1.05 19
93Y G 2203.5 7 1.3 3
93Y G 2222.0 8 0.6 3
93Y G 2472.7 3 1.12 15
93Y G 2614.7 3 1.32 17
93Y G 2765.3 6 0.61 20
93Y G 2781.6 4 0.76 11
93Y G 2811.3 7 0.31 7
93Y G 2828.54 20 2.52 25 A
93Y G 2983.5 4 0.66 21
93Y G 2985.72 21 2.9 4
93Y L 0.0 1/2- 10.18 H 8
93Y B 4.5 LE 9.4 GE D1U?
93Y S B EAV=1806.4 58
93Y CB E B- END-POINT ENERGY: 4150 70 (1970MAZC), 4150 120 (1978ST02)
93Y CB LOGFT>8.5 IMPLIES IB<37%.
93Y L 590.219 21 (3/2)- 0.13 NS LT
93Y CL T from 1972Mc04.
93Y B 2.1 AP 7.8 AP ?
93Y S B EAV=1528.1 58
93Y CB IB 2.05% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09); -1 5 from TI balance.
93Y G 590.238 23 1000 55 M1 0.00197 3 AC
93Y 3 G EKC=0.0016 4
93Y S G KC=0.001743 25$LC=0.000191 3$MC=3.27E-5 5$NC+=4.71E-6 7
93Y S G NC=4.40E-6 7$OC=3.09E-7 5
93Y CG EKC: from 1974Ac04; implies mult.=M1(+E2), MR<1.4.
93Y CG E from 1979Bo26. Others: 590.28 5 (1977Bi01), 590.18 6
93Y 2CG (1974Ac04).
93Y CG %IG=67.7 17 ASSUMING RECOMMENDED DECAY SCHEME NORMALIZATION.
93Y L 758.719 21 (9/2)+ 0.82 S 4 M1
93Y B 7.2 LE 7.2 GE E
93Y S B EAV=1447.8 58
93Y CB LOGFT LOGFT>11.0 EXPECTED FOR A 5/2+ TO 9/2+ TRANSITION.
93Y G 168.499 4 271 15 E3 0.952 AC
93Y 3 G EKC=0.73 3
93Y S G KC=0.755 11$LC=0.1649 23$MC=0.0287 4$NC+=0.00361 5
93Y S G NC=0.00349 5$OC=0.0001144 16
93Y CG E from 1979Bo26. Others: 168.69 5 (1977Bi01), 168.45 6
93Y 2CG (1974Ac04; for doublet).
93Y CG EKC: weighted average of 0.72 7 (1972Mc04), 0.73 5
93Y 2CG (1974Sc39), 0.67 7 (1974Ac04), 0.81 7 (1986Ka20); K/(L+...)=3.62 23
93Y 3CG (1974Ac04).
93Y L 875.85 3 5/2-
93Y B 2.2 15 7.6 3 C
93Y S B EAV=1392.0 57
93Y CB E 3180 250 (1978St02).
93Y CB IB 2.26% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 285.65 7 4.0 3 AC
93Y G 875.73 6 360 20 AC
93Y CG %IG=24.4 14 ASSUMING RECOMMENDED DECAY SCHEME NORMALIZATION.
93Y L 1135.99 4 (3/2+,5/2-)
93Y B 2.6 5 7.41 9 C
93Y S B EAV=1268.5 57
93Y CB E 2875 200 (1978St02).
93Y CB IB 1.90% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y 2CB See also the comment on 2688G from 2688 level.
93Y G 260.12 5 109 6 AC
93Y CG E others: 260.12 4 (1979Bo26), 260.14 6 (1974Ac04).
93Y G 377.36 6 21.8 14 AC
93Y G 545.81 7 5.8 4 AC
93Y L 1277.94 6 (1/2-,3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 0.64 11 7.93 8 ?
93Y S B EAV=1201.4 57
93Y CB IB 0.65% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 687.79 11 9.8 9 AC
93Y G 1277.99 9 12.8 9 A
93Y L 1300.521 25 (3/2+,5/2-)
93Y B 3.9 13 7.13 15 C
93Y S B EAV=1190.7 57
93Y CB E 2710 200 (1978St02).
93Y CB IB 4.0% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 424.70 13 3.8 5 C
93Y G 541.89 6 10.7 6 AC
93Y G 710.312 17 320 17 AC
93Y CG E from 1979Bo26. Others: 710.40 5 (1977Bi01), 710.19 10
93Y 2CG (1974Ac04).
93Y L 1308.56 5(1/2-,3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 1.5 3 7.54 9 ?
93Y S B EAV=1186.9 57
93Y CB IB 1.47% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 432.67 6 21.8 13 AC
93Y G 718.33 12 22 3 C
93Y G 1308.60 9 5.9 4 A
93Y L 1542.73 10(1/2,3/2,5/2-)
93Y G 406.71 10 6.3 6 AC
93Y G 952.58 23 1.6 3
93Y G 1543.4 6 0.60 22
93Y L 1646.98 4 3/2,5/2,7/2
93Y B 15.7 14 6.28 4 C
93Y S B EAV=1027.7 57
93Y CB E 2500 200 (1978ST02), 2490 50 (1983Ia02).
93Y CB IB 14.05% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 346.49 5 48.2 25 AC
93Y G 771.19 6 17.1 10 AC
93Y G 888.13 5 325 17 AC
93Y L 1695.91 9 (1/2-,3/2,5/2)
93Y B 0.35 4 7.90 5
93Y S B EAV=1004.8 57
93Y CB IB 0.56% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 559.92 8 3.0 3 C
93Y G 1104.69 23 2.2 4 G
93Y F G FL=590.219
93Y L 1786.47 5(1/2-,3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 0.37 12 7.81 15
93Y S B EAV=962.5 56
93Y CB IB 0.51% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y DB IB NEGATIVE FEEDING IF MISFIT 910G OMITTED
93Y G 650.56 15 2.8 3
93Y G 910.18 8 12.1 7 GC
93Y F G FL=875.85
93Y G 1196.23 6 14.4 8 AC
93Y G 1786.6 3 1.16 18 F
93Y L 1852.67 5
93Y G 716.8 5 4.3 23 C
93Y G 1094.00 7 25.9 15 AC
93Y L 1911.46 4 (1/2-,3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 0.95 20 7.30 10
93Y S B EAV=904.3 56
93Y CB IB 0.96% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 610.93 6 16.0 10 AC
93Y G 633.5 3 1.6 3
93Y G 1035.5 3 3.0 5
93Y G 1321.24 7 38.4 20 AC
93Y L 2056.57 9 (1/2-,3/2,5/2-)
93Y CL IB to this level is -0.13 7 from intensity balance.
93Y G 1180.76 17 3.6 4
93Y G 1466.2 3 1.5 3
93Y L 2091.35 5
93Y G 782.83 15 3.2 4
93Y G 791.10 14 3.8 4 C
93Y G 1215.48 7 36.7 20 AC
93Y CG 1974Ac04 report EG=1214.4 4 (IG=23 10) and EG=1216.7 4
93Y 2CG (IG=12 6)
93Y G 1332.5 5 7 4 C
93Y L 2093.25 5
93Y G 446.20 6 34.7 19 AC
93Y G 785.4 4 1.1 3
93Y G 1334.50 10 10.0 7 AC
93Y L 2129.11 14 (1/2-,3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 0.41 18 7.48 19
93Y S B EAV=803.6 56
93Y CB IB 0.46% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 586.5 4 6.6 23
93Y G 1538.71 25 1.5 3
93Y G 2129.2 5 1.5 5
93Y L 2200 AP I
93Y B 1.54 J
93Y L 2355.58 6 (3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 1.15 10 6.82 4
93Y S B EAV=699.9 55
93Y CB IB 1.40% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 1055.13 11 5.1 4 AC
93Y G 1077.86 16 3.5 4
93Y G 1765.36 9 15.7 8 AC
93Y L 2364.88 7(3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 2.09 25 6.55 6
93Y S B EAV=695.7 55
93Y CB IB 4.56% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 1064.37 9 5.5 4 C
93Y G 1774.83 16 2.4 3 A
93Y G 2364.72 11 23.2 13 A
93Y L 2543.93 7 3/2-
93Y B 3.8 3 6.11 4
93Y S B EAV=614.8 54
93Y CB IB 3.45% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 486.7 4 1.8 7
93Y G 1243.41 8 11.8 7 A
93Y G 1668.7 5 2.4 13 C
93Y G 2543.84 11 44.5 24 A
93Y L 2569.95 5 3/2+,5/2+,7/2+
93Y B 11.6 7 5.59 3 C
93Y S B EAV=603.1 54
93Y CB E 1560 250 (1978St02).
93Y CB IB 10.35% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 440.80 18 2.9 6
93Y G 658.56 11 6.2 6
93Y G 922.70 11 4.9 4
93Y G 1261.3 6 1.2 5
93Y G 1269.47 7 105 5 AC
93Y G 1434.01 8 13.3 8 AC
93Y G 1694.07 9 38.0 21 AC
93Y L 2575.04 4 (3/2+)
93Y B 11.4 7 5.60 3
93Y S B EAV=600.8 54
93Y CB IB 10.17% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 481.96 10 16.7 15 C
93Y G 483.73 8 24.5 18 AC
93Y G 518.50 15 1.9 3
93Y G 663.58 6 24.2 14 AC
93Y G 788.68 8 11.3 7 AC
93Y G 927.69 8 9.4 7 G
93Y F G FL=1646.98
93Y G 1032.4 5 1.5 5
93Y G 1266.38 10 16.4 12 C
93Y G 1438.93 9 7.4 5 AC
93Y G 1699.06 9 49 3 AC
93Y G 1816.12 19 3.4 4 A
93Y G 1984.8 3 1.20 19
93Y G 2574.2 3 1.9 3
93Y L 2653.91 11 (1/2,3/2,5/2)
93Y G 2063.64 12 9.2 6 AC
93Y L 2687.55 4 3/2+,5/2+,7/2+
93Y B 17.3 14 5.29 4
93Y S B EAV=550.6 54
93Y CB IB 15.93% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 332.04 7 5.2 4 C
93Y G 593.81 18 16.4 21 C
93Y G 596.15 13 19.6 22 C
93Y G 630.97 16 2.9 4
93Y G 776.07 13 3.9 4 F
93Y CG Placed by 1977Bi01 from 1912 level, but EG too low for that
93Y 2CG placement.
93Y G 834.89 5 24.6 13 AC
93Y G 900.98 7 10.2 6 AC
93Y G 1040.63 6 47 3 AC
93Y G 1378.98 10 5.2 4
93Y G 1387.11 7 51 3 AC
93Y G 1551.59 9 15.0 9 AC
93Y G 1811.45 10 20.7 12 AC
93Y G 1928.79 10 17.2 10 A
93Y G 2688.65 12 31.3 18 A ?
93Y L G FL=0.0
93Y F G FLAG=H
93Y L 2769.99 5 (3/2+)
93Y B 7.7 5 5.54 4
93Y S B EAV=514.2 53
93Y CB IB 6.92% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 858.47 7 10.7 7 AC
93Y G 1122.48 6 59 3 AC
93Y L G FL=1646.98
93Y F G FLAG=G
93Y G 1469.50 12 7.7 5 AC
93Y G 1492.13 12 8.1 5 AC
93Y G 1634.05 8 21.3 12 AC
93Y G 1894.1 3 1.8 3
93Y G 2179.49 20 4.3 6 AC
93Y L 2778.06 21
93Y G 991.59 21 1.8 3
93Y G 1642.0 6 0.64 21 C
93Y L 2783.54 63/2(+) TO 7/2(+)
93Y B 3.16 19 5.91 3
93Y S B EAV=508.2 53
93Y CB IB 2.83% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 428.03 21 2.2 4
93Y G 690.06 12 14.9 12 AC
93Y G 692.0 4 3.3 9 C
93Y G 930.91 10 6.0 5 C
93Y G 1136.77 20 2.9 3
93Y G 1483.3 3 1.5 3
93Y G 1647.53 8 13.1 8 AC
93Y G 1907.73 23 2.6 3 C
93Y L 2820.65 7 (3/2+)
93Y B 3.8 3 5.78 4
93Y S B EAV=491.9 53
93Y CB IB 3.86% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 166.6 3 9.2 24
93Y G 764.8 5 0.44 17
93Y G 1511.8 4 0.81 20
93Y G 1520.1 5 4.7 10 C
93Y G 1684.84 13 10.5 8 AC
93Y G 1944.75 12 8.2 6 AC
93Y G 2230.27 12 22.8 13 AC
93Y L 2886.52 9 (3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 1.29 9 6.16 4
93Y S B EAV=463.2 53
93Y CB IB 1.30% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 342.9 4 1.1 4
93Y G 795.29 12 3.4 3 C
93Y G 1239.15 25 1.8 4
93Y G 2010.80 25 1.79 25 A
93Y G 2296.13 14 10.9 7 AC
93Y L 3007.05 9 (3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 1.33 10 5.98 4
93Y S B EAV=411.2 52
93Y CB IB 0.82% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 1706.59 10 16.3 10 A
93Y G 2416.3 3 1.6 3 C
93Y G 3006.86 22 1.73 17 A
93Y L 3116.05 14 (3/2,5/2-)
93Y B 0.39 4 6.35 5
93Y S B EAV=364.9 51
93Y CB IB 0.154% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 571.96 16 3.1 4
93Y G 1329.6 3 1.01 20
93Y G 1981.4 8 0.54 20
93Y G 3116.6 4 1.02 13 A
93Y L 3200 AP I
93Y B 0.103 J
93Y L 3300 AP I
93Y B 0.41 J
93Y L 3400 AP I
93Y B 1.03 J
93Y L 3500 AP I
93Y B 0.28 J
93Y L 3600 AP I
93Y B 0.092 J
93Y L 3700 AP I
93Y B 0.067 J
93Y L 3800 AP I
93Y CL E may include the 3825 level of 1977Bi01; however, only the
93Y 2CL 1972G placed from that level is weak enough to be consistent with
93Y 3CL the B- feeding deduced in 1997Gr09.
93Y B 0.046 J
93Y L 3824.5 4 ?
93Y CL See comment on 2688G from 2688 level.
93Y CL E may be included in E AP 3800 energy bin of ^TAGS data.
93Y B 0.10 7 5.1 3 ?
93Y S B EAV=92.5 40
93Y CB IB AP 0% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 1046.4 5 1.4 4 ?
93Y CG EG similar to that required for a 2356 to 1309 transition.
93Y G 1249.2 7 1.1 4 ?
93Y G 1972.2 7 0.49 18 ?
93Y L 3871.31 22 ?
93Y B 0.10 6 4.9 3 ?
93Y S B EAV=77.1 39
93Y CB IB AP 0% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 1050.6 3 0.50 21 ?
93Y G 1506.5 6 0.71 23 ?
93Y G 1742.1 4 1.28 23 ?
93Y G 2995.7 6 0.29 7 ?
93Y L 3894.9 3 ?
93Y B 0.12 7 4.7 3 ?
93Y S B EAV=69.6 39
93Y CB IB AP 0% from ^TAGS data (1997Gr09).
93Y G 1117.1 7 1.0 4 ?
93Y G 1324.8 7 0.8 3 ?
93Y G 2108.6 4 1.30 23 ?
93Y G 2585.9 6 0.40 12 ?