92ZR 92NB EC DECAY (10.15 D) 1985HE18,1962BU16,1959WE3012NDS 201210
92ZR H TYP=FUL$AUT=CORAL M. BAGLIN$CIT=NDS 113, 2187 (2012)$CUT=15-Sep-2012$
92ZR C Others: 1993BE08, 1983HE12, 1978CO01, 1972EI01, 1969BE07, 1967BL03,
92ZR2C 1953ST42.
92ZR CE IB(D) Weighted average of 0.056% 6 (1959WE30) and 0.060% 6
92ZR2CE (1962BU16) gives 0.058% 4 (from I(|g{+|+}) and I(|g{+|+})-I(934G)
92ZR3CE coin).
92ZR CE IB(G) From comparison of G{+|+} and (G{+|+})(934G) coin data,
92ZR2CE 1959WE30 deduce that <20% of positrons feed G.S.
92ZR CE IE(K) From IB and theoretical |e/|b{++}. Other: 1959WE30 estimate
92ZR2CE I|e(g.s.)=0% 5 from (XK)-934G coin (assuming |wK=0.70 and
92ZR3CE |eL1/|eK=0.11).
92ZR DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2b (20-Jan-2009) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
92ZR CG 1962BU16 searched for, but failed to find, a 352G deexciting
92ZR2CG the 1848 level; they report I(352G)/I(934G)<0.004.
92ZR CG E From 1969BE07, unless noted otherwise.
92ZR CG RI From 1983HE12, except as noted.
92ZR CG M,MR From Adopted Gammas.
92ZR CG E(A) Weighted average of 934.51 7 (1967BL03) and
92ZR2CG 934.3 1 (1969BE07).
92ZR CG MR(B) From Adopted Gammas. 913G-934G(|q) in EC DECAY IMPLIES
92ZR2CG MR=+0.044 17 FROM A2=+0.217 13, A4=-0.001 19 (1962BU16) AND MR=-0.01 3
92ZR3CG from A2=+0.255 24, A4=-0.032 38 (1978CO01), assuming J(1847
92ZR4CG level)=2 (from Adopted Levels). Data allow J=2,3,4 but not 0 or 1;
92ZR5CG mult(913G)=^D+Q. Other: 1959WE30.
92ZR CG RI(E) Weighted average of 1.92 10 (1962BU16) and 1.69 9
92ZR2CG (1972EI01). Other: 1.8 (1959WE30).
92ZR CG RI(F) Weighted average of 0.84 10 (1959WE30), 0.90 5
92ZR2CG (1962BU16) and 0.79 8 (1972EI01).
92ZR CG E(H) From 1985HE18.
92ZR CG RI(J) From I(1132G)/I(934G) and I(1132G)/I(912G), after
92ZR2CG correction for self absorption and internal conversion (1985HE18).
92ZR3CG Uncertainty not stated.
92ZR CL E FROM LEAST-SQUARES FIT TO EG.
92ZR CL J FROM Adopted Levels.
92NB P 135.5 4 (2)+ 10.15 D 2 2005.9 18
92ZR N 0.9915 4 0.9915 4 1.0 1.0
92ZR CN NR from decay scheme, if |S(TI to GS)=100%.
92ZR PN 3
92ZR L 0.0 0+
92ZR E 0.012 LE 0.022 LE 10.3 GE 0.034 LEG ?
92ZRS E EAV=492.24 82$CK=0.5625 11$CL=0.06729 13$CM+=0.01510 3
92ZRF E FLAG=K
92ZR L 934.48 10 2+
92ZR E 0.059 3 97.30 11 6.1710 17 97.36 11D
92ZRS E EAV=87.53 81$CK=0.8704$CL=0.1053$CM+=0.02367
92ZR CE 1993BE08 measured K-capture probability =0.88 3.
92ZR G 934.44 10100 E2 AC
92ZRS G CC=0.000786 11$KC=0.000693 10$LC=7.73E-5 11$MC=1.341E-5 19$NC+=2.03E-6
92ZRS G NC=1.90E-6 3$OC=1.320E-7 19
92ZR CG M FROM ECC=0.00075 25 (1953ST42).
92ZR CG %IG=99.15 4 based on adopted IG normalization.
92ZR L 1383 0+ ?
92ZR E 3.3E-3 LT 10.2 GT 3.3E-3 LT ?
92ZRS E CK=0.8692$CL=0.1068$CM+=0.024056 3
92ZR G 449 0.0033 LT E2 S
92ZRS G CC=0.00581 9$KC=0.00509 8$LC=0.000600 9$MC=0.0001042 15$NC+=1.554E-5 22
92ZRS G NC=1.459E-5 21$OC=9.48E-7 14
92ZR L 1495 4+ ?
92ZR E 4.5E-3 LT 10.0 GT 4.5E-3 LT ?
92ZRS E CK=0.8683$CL=0.10746 2$CM+=0.024232 4
92ZR G 561 0.0045 LT E2 S
92ZRS G CC=0.00299 5$KC=0.00262 4$LC=0.000303 5$MC=5.26E-5 8$NC+=7.89E-6 11
92ZRS G NC=7.39E-6 11$OC=4.93E-7 7
92ZR L 1847.22 18 2+
92ZR E 2.64 11 6.475 19 2.64 11
92ZRS E CK=0.86107 9$CL=0.11320 7$CM+=0.02573 2
92ZR CE 1993BE08 measured K-capture probability =0.856 24.
92ZR G 912.6 2 1.8 1 (M1(+E2)) -0.002 25 BC
92ZRF G FLAG=E
92ZRS G CC=0.000819 12$KC=0.000724 11$LC=7.94E-5 12$MC=1.377E-5 20$NC+=2.10E-6
92ZRS G NC=1.96E-6 3$OC=1.400E-7 20
92ZR G 1847.5 3 0.86 4 E2 F
92ZRS G CC=0.000422 6$KC=0.0001665 24$LC=1.81E-5 3$MC=3.13E-6 5$NC+=0.000234 4
92ZRS G NC=4.46E-7 7$OC=3.18E-8 5$IPC=0.000234 4
92ZR L 2066.66 17 2+
92ZR E 5.2E-3 7.8 5.2E-3
92ZRS E CK=0.8089 23$CL=0.1544 18$CM+=0.0366 5
92ZR G 1132.17 14 0.0052 (M1+E2) -3.2 +5-4 J
92ZRF G FLAG=H
92ZRS G CC=0.000510 8$KC=0.000449 7$LC=4.96E-5 7$MC=8.59E-6 12$NC+=2.98E-6 5
92ZRS G NC=1.219E-6 17$OC=8.57E-8 12$IPC=1.67E-6 3