89NB 89MO EC DECAY (2.11 M) 1985BE12,1981GA05,1983OXZZ13NDS 201302
89NB H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 114, 1 (2013)$CUT=20-Oct-2012$
89NB c 1985Be12: {+89}Mo produced by {+92,94,96}Mo(p,xn). Measured |g, |g|g
89NB c 1981Ga05: {+89}Mo produced by {+92}Mo(p,p3n). Measured |g
89NB c 1983OxZZ: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g
89NB c Energy balance: total decay energy of 5706 keV {I36} deduced
89NB2c (using RADLIST code) from proposed decay scheme is in agreement with
89NB3c the expected value of 5635 keV {I27}, suggesting that the decay scheme
89NB4c is reasonably complete. However, large Q value suggests that the
89NB5c decay scheme may not be well known
89NB cE |e+|b{++} branches and associated log| {Ift} values are
89NB2cE considered as approximate since the decay scheme does not seem
89NB3cE well established
89NB cG E$From 1985Be12. Uncertainty=0.4-1.0 keV. The evaluator assigns
89NB2cG |DE=0.5 for I|g>1, |DE=0.5 and 1.0 for others
89NB cG E(A)$From 1983OxZZ only
89NB cG RI$From 1985Be12
89NB cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data
89NB cL J,T$From Adopted Levels
89NB cL E(A)$From 1983OxZZ only
89NB cL E(B)$Level proposed by 1981Ga05 and 1983OxZZ
89MO P 0.0 (9/2+) 2.11 M 10 5635 27
89MO cP QP$From 2011AuZZ. Other: 5650 {I30} (2003Au03)
89NB N 2.1 AP 1 1
89NB cN NR$from I|g(|g{+|+})=95 {I3} (1985Be12). It is considered as
89NB2cN approximate normalization since the level scheme does not seem well
89NB3cN established and contribution of impurities in |g{+|+} intensity is not
89NB4cN known from 1985Be12
89NB PN 4
89NB L 0.0 (9/2+) 2.03 H 7
89NB E 81 AP 2.0 AP 5.4 AP 83 AP
89NBS E EAV=2126 13$CK=0.0215 4$CL=0.00257 5$CM+=0.000583 10
89NB L 35 LT (1/2)- 66 M 2 M
89NB2 L %EC+%B+=100
89NB L 658.6 2 (7/2+)
89NB E 4.3 AP 0.17 AP 6.4 AP 4.5 AP
89NBS E EAV=1810 13$CK=0.0335 7$CL=0.00400 8$CM+=0.000909 18
89NB G 658.6 2 2.78 20
89NB cG E$from 1983OxZZ. Other: 658.5 {I5} (1985Be12)
89NB cG RI$I|g=100 in 1983OxZZ normalized to 2.78 as in 1985Be12
89NB L 838 AP B ?
89NB E 0.95 LT 0.05 LT 6.9 GT 1.0 LT ?
89NBS E EAV=1699 23 $CK=0.0398 15 $CL=0.00476 18 $CM+=0.00108 5
89NB G 803.0 10 0.43 2 ?
89NB cG E$803.3 {I5} (1983OxZZ), 803 (1981Ga05)
89NB cG RI$from 1983OxZZ. I|g=0.31 (1981Ga05), <0.4 (1985Be12)
89NB L 844.0 5 (7/2,9/2,11/2)
89NB E 3.6 AP 0.17 AP 6.3 AP 3.8 AP
89NBS E EAV=1721 13$CK=0.0384 8$CL=0.00459 10$CM+=0.001043 22
89NB G 844.0 5 1.80 18
89NB cG |g not reported by 1983OxZZ
89NB L 1155.2 3 (7/2,9/2,11/2)
89NB E 1.8 AP 0.11 AP 6.5 AP 1.9 AP
89NBS E EAV=1573 13$CK=0.0490 11$CL=0.00587 14$CM+=0.00133 3
89NB G 496.4 5 0.097 8 A ?
89NB G 1155.3 3 0.88 9
89NB cG E$from 1983OxZZ. Others: 1154.0 (1985Be12), 1155.1 (1981Ga05).
89NB cG RI$others: 0.97 {I3} (1983OxZZ), 0.81 (1981Ga05)
89NB L 1272.0 3 (7/2,9/2,11/2)
89NB E 2.7 AP 0.18 AP 6.2 AP 2.9 AP
89NBS E EAV=1518 13$CK=0.0540 13$CL=0.00646 15$CM+=0.00147 4
89NB G 1272.0 3 1.38 4
89NB cG E$from 1983OxZZ. Others: 1272.6 (1985Be12), 1272.0 (1981Ga05)
89NB cG RI$from 1983OxZZ. Others: 1.80 {I16} (1985Be12), 1.31 (1981Ga05)
89NB L 1640.2 10(7/2,9/2,11/2)
89NB E 0.91 AP 0.086 AP 6.5 AP 1.0 AP
89NBS E EAV=1344 13$CK=0.0747 19$CL=0.00895 23$CM+=0.00203 6
89NB G 1640.2 10 0.47 15
89NB L 1694.0 5 A ?
89NB E 0.91 LT 0.090 LT 6.4 GT 1.0 LT ?
89NBS E EAV=1318 13$CK=0.0786 21$CL=0.00941 25$CM+=0.00214 6
89NB G 1035.4 3 0.46 2 A ?
89NB L 1789.6 10 A ?
89NB E 1.4 LT 0.15 LT 6.2 GT 1.5 LT ?
89NBS E EAV=1274 13$CK=0.0861 23$CL=0.0103 3$CM+=0.00234 7
89NB G 1131 1 0.70 3 A ?
89NB L 2221.0 10(7/2,9/2,11/2)
89NB E 1.0 AP 0.18 AP 6.0 AP 1.2 AP
89NBS E EAV=1072 13$CK=0.134 4$CL=0.0161 5$CM+=0.00365 11
89NB G 2221.0 10 0.57 15
89NB L 2420.0 10(7/2,9/2,11/2)
89NB E 0.7 AP 0.2 AP 6.0 AP 0.9 AP
89NBS E EAV=980 13$CK=0.167 6$CL=0.0200 7$CM+=0.00455 15
89NB G 2420.0 10 0.44 15