84SR 84Y EC DECAY (39.5 M) 1981FRZY,1970RE03,1969ZA0609NDS 200910
84SR H TYP=FUL$AUT=B. Singh, A. Negret, and K. Zuber$
84SR2 H CIT=NDS 110,2815 (2009)$CUT=30-Sep-2009$
84SR c 1981FrZY: source from {+70}Ge({+16}O,pn|g) reaction. Measured E|g, I|g,
84SR2c |g|g, E|b from |b|g coin using Ge(Li), Si(Li) and plastic
84SR3c scintillators. A total of 20 |g rays reported up to 1503 keV and
84SR4c confirmed another seven |g rays at higher energies from |g|g data.
84SR5c The source prepared in heavy-ion studies contained many impurities.
84SR c 1970Re03: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, E|b, ce, |g|g(|q) using Ge(Li) and
84SR2c NaI(Tl) detectors. A total of 60 |g rays reported. This work is
84SR3c the most detailed study of {+84}Y but it is a private communication,
84SR4c and the results have not appeared in open literature
84SR c 1969Za06: measured E|g, I|g. A total of 24 |g rays reported and
84SR2c level scheme proposed with 11 excited states
84SR c Other measurements:
84SR c 2000Do10: Decay of {+84}Y g.s. and isomer studied by using several
84SR2c gamma-ray detectors. The authors stated that 50 |g rays were
84SR3c observed in the decay of the high-spin isomer (assigned as g.s.
84SR4c by 2000Do10) as well as in the decay of 5.6-s activity, including
84SR5c population of a 7+ member of quasi-|g band from the decay of
84SR6c 39.5-min activity. But details of this study are not available either
84SR7c in the (conference) paper or according to an e-mail
84SR8c reply from the first author of this work on May 24, 2003
84SR c 1984Ak02: measured |g|g(|q) for four |g|g cascades using Ge(Li) and
84SR2c NaI(Tl) detector combination
84SR c 1981Li12: measured |b|g coin
84SR c 1976Ia01: measured E|g for three |g rays
84SR d 1974PoZT: measured ce for about 12 transitions, but no data
84SR2d are available. This work is from the same group as 1970Re03
84SR c 1971Do01: measured E|g, I|g for 12 |g rays
84SR c 1962Ya02: measured E|g, I|g, ce for six |g rays, T{-1/2} of {+84}Y
84SR c The level scheme given here is mostly from 1970Re03 with some
84SR2c revisions based on in-beam |g-ray studies. The level scheme given
84SR3c by 1981FrZY is quite similar to the one given in 1970Re03 with some
84SR4c minor differences
84SR c The evaluators treat the level scheme as incomplete since many
84SR2c transitions are either unplaced or questionable. In the opinion of
84SR3c the evaluators there is no complete and comprehensive study of
84SR4c this decay in the literature
84SR CE $ From intensity balance following direct |b{++}+|e feedings
84SR2CE treated as zero are as follows: 3 4 for 793 level, -3.8 9 for
84SR3CE 1454 level, -1 5 for 1767 level, 0.1 8 for 2448 level, 0.8 5 for
84SR4CE 2886 level.
84SR DE $ NEED TO RESOLVE -3.8 9 FOR 1454 LEVEL ??
84SR cE $ The |b|g coin study of 1970Re03 shows that observed |b branches
84SR2cE are in coin with 793, 974 and 1040 |g rays implying that the
84SR3cE 2808 keV level is the lowest level which has appreciable direct
84SR4cE |b{++}+|e feeding. The |b branches reported by 1970Re03 are:
84SR5cE E|b=1641 {I10} (I|b=47%); E|b=2242 {I17} (I|b=25%);
84SR6cE E|b=2637 {I20} (I|b=21%); E|b=3148 {I20} (I|b=7%)
84SR CE $ E(B+ ENDPOINT)=4.2 MEV 1 FROM 793G(B) COIN (1981FrZY) cannot
84SR2CE be accounted, it implies a direct feeding of 1454 level,
84SR3CE which is inconsistent with |g intensity balance. This |b branch may
84SR4CE be associated either with an impurity or with the decay of 4.6-s
84SR5CE activity of 84Y
84SR CE TI,LOGFT$ The decay scheme seems to be incomplete, thus all weak
84SR2CE feedings and associated LOGFT values should be regarded as tentative.
84SR CE TI(M)$ Feeding is too large for the high degree of forbiddenness
84SR2CE probably due to incompleteness of the decay scheme.
84SR CG $ 1970RE03 GIVE A2 AND A4 COEFFICIENTS FROM GG(THETA) DATA FOR 17
84SR2CG CASCADES BUT THE AUTHORS STATE THAT POOR STATISTICS MAKE MOST OF THESE
84SR3CG OF DUBIOUS NATURE. THESE ARE LISTED IN THIS DATASET UNDER DOCUMENT
84SR4CG RECORDS
84SR CG $ GG COIN INFORMATION IS FROM 1970RE03
84SR CG E$From weighted averages of values from 1970Re03, 1971Do01 and
84SR2CG 1981FrZY when possible. Values from 1969Za06 are not used due to
84SR3CG less precision in this work
84SR CG RI$From weighted averages of values from 1970Re03, 1969Za06 and
84SR2CG 1981FrZY when possible. Values from 1971Do01 are not used since
84SR3CG these values are systematically lower by about 25-50%
84SR CG M,MR$From GG(THETA) (1984Ak02). Pure quadrupole transitions and
84SR2CG transitions with significant quadrupole admixture are assigned E2 and
84SR3CG M1+E2, respectively, based on RUL.
84SR CG E(A)$ From 1981FrZY.
84SR cG E(B)$ From 1970Re03 only
84SR cG E(D)$ From 1969Za06 only
84SR cL $ Following levels proposed in different studies have been omitted:
84SR2cL 2367 and 4290 levels in 1962Ya02; 2558, 3086, 3202 and 4177 levels
84SR3cL in 1969Za06; 1833 level in 1971Do01; 3385, 3449 and 4539 levels
84SR4cL in 1981FrZY. The |g rays associated with these levels have either
84SR5cL been placed differently or not seen consistently in all studies.
84SR CL E$From least-squares fit to EG's; normalized |h{+2}=3.0 whereas
84SR2CL critical |h{+2}=1.7. Two |g rays show poor fits.
84SR CL J$ From adopted levels.
84SR CL E(A)$ Level proposed by the evaluators based on high-spin studies
84Y P 0 (6+) 39.5 M 8 6757 5
84Y cP E,J,T$ from adopted levels for {+84}Y
84Y cP QP$ from 2009AuZZ. Other: 6490 {I90} (2003Au03)
84SR N 0.983 4 1 1
84SR CN NR$ From TI(793|g+1453.4|g)=100. Direct B feeding of the GS is
84SR2CN not expected due to |DJ=6 involved
84SR PN 5
84SR G 635 1 3 LE D
84SR CG E$ TENTATIVE PLACEMENT FROM A 3086 LEVEL (1969ZA06) NOT
84SR2CG SUBSTANTIATED and |g ray not seen in 1970Re03
84SR G 658.3 2 4.5 5 B
84SR CG E$ SEE COMMENT FOR 660.6G
84SR G 705.8 2 3.8 4 B
84SR CG E$ SEE COMMENT FOR 703.6G
84SR G 1092.3 2 4.5 4
84SR DG $ EG=1092.3 2, IG=4.5 4 (1970RE03). EG=1092 1, IG=4 (1969ZA06)
84SR G 1154.9 5 0.7 A
84SR CG E$ TENTATIVE PLACEMENT FROM A 4539 LEVEL (1981FRZY) NOT
84SR2CG SUBSTANTIATED and |g ray not seen in 1970Re03
84SR G 1185.1 2 0.5 2 B
84SR G 1270.7 10 0.9 3 B
84SR G 1280.8 10 0.22 10 B
84SR G 1362.8 10 0.20 10 B
84SR G 1411.1 2 0.7 3 B
84SR G 1520.2 5 0.4 2 B
84SR G 1628 1 1 D
84SR CG E$ TENTATIVE PLACEMENT FROM A 3086 LEVEL (1969ZA06) NOT
84SR2CG SUBSTANTIATED and |g ray not seen in 1970Re03
84SR G 1711 1 1.5 5 D
84SR G 2807.8 10 0.13 13 B
84SR CG $ MOST LIKELY A SUM LINE
84SR G 2908 1 0.3 1 B
84SR G 2945 1 0.2 1 B
84SR G 2968 1 0.2 1 B
84SR G 3315 1 0.1 1 B
84SR L 0.0 0+ STABLE
84SR L 793.03 16 2+
84SR G 793.1 2 100 E2 0.00106 C
84SR CG $ ICE(K)=100 (1962YA02)
84SR DG $ EG=793.1 2 (1970RE03), 793.0 5 (1981FRZY,1971DO01), 794 1 (1969ZA06),
84SR2DG 793.0 3 (1976IA01). RI=100 USED FOR NORMALIZATION IN EACH PAPER
84SR L 1453.48 16 2+
84SR G 660.6 2 11.5 5 M1+E2 +0.59 5 0.00145 C
84SR CG E,RI$ 1970RE03 RESOLVED DOUBLET 658.3 AND 660.6 WITH RI=4.5 5 AND
84SR2CG 11.5 10, RESPECTIVELY. COMBINED EG AND RI GIVEN IN OTHER STUDIES:
84SR3CG EG=660.5 5, IG=25.9 26 (1981FRZY); EG=660.5 5, IG=12.6 10 (1971DO01);
84SR4CG EG=662 1, IG=16.5 22 (1969ZA06)
84SR DG RI$ INTENSITY OF 11.5 TAKEN FROM 1970RE03 SEEMS LOW BY AP 4 UNITS
84SR2DG FROM INTENSITY BALANCE. PERHAPS AVERAGE SHOULD BE TAKEN ??
84SR CG MR$ from evaluators' analysis of : A2=-0.161 24, A4=+0.04 4 (1984Ak02)
84SR2CG for (661|g)(793|g)|q) which is consistent with 2-2-0 cascade.
84SR3CG 1984AK02 GIVE 27% 5 E2 IMPLYING MR=0.61 7
84SR DG $ (661|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=-0.23 5, A4=+0.10 9 (1970Re03)
84SRS G KC=0.00129 $LC=0.00014
84SR G 1453.4 2 1.6 3
84SR DG $ EG=1453.4 2, IG=1.8 4 (1970RE03). EG=1453.2 5, IG=1.4 2 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1456 2, IG=3.8 10 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 1767.13 19 4+
84SR G 974.3 2 79 4 E2 C
84SR CG $ (974|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=+0.093 14, A4=+0.009 23 (1984Ak02) consistent
84SR2CG with 4-2-0 cascade. A2=+0.93 quoted by 1984Ak02 is likely a misprint.
84SR3CG EKC GIVES E2,M1
84SR2 G EKC=0.00066 6
84SR DG EKC$ AVERAGE OF 0.00063 13 (1970RE03), 0.00069 6 DEDUCED FROM
84SR2DG ICE(K)=61 6 (1962YA02) AND IG=79 4
84SR DG $ (974|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=+0.01 2, A4=-0.10 4 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=974.4 2, IG=79 4 (1970RE03). EG=974.1 5, IG=76 8 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=974.3 5, IG=62.6 20 (1971DO01). 974.3 3 (1976IA01,944.3 QUOTED IN
84SR3DG THE PAPER SEEMS A MISPRINT). EG=975 1, IG=79 6 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 2055.52 19(3)+
84SR E 4.7 8 0.17 3 7.5 4.9 8 M ?
84SRS E EAV=1678.3 24$CK=0.03026 12$CL=0.003534 14$CM+=0.000770 3
84SR G 288.3 5 0.8 2 B
84SR G 602.2 2 9.7 5 M1+E2 +0.24 8 0.00173 C
84SR CG MR$ +0.24 8 or +2.3 5, evaluators' analysis of A2=+0.032 14,
84SR2CG A4=-0.001 25 (1984Ak02) for (602|g)[661|g](793|g)(|q) which is
84SR3CG consistent with 3-2-2-0 cascade using MR(661|g)=+0.59.
84SR4CG EKC GIVES MAINLY M1. 1984AK02 GIVE LE 1.0% E2 IMPLYING MR LE 0.1
84SR2 G EKC=0.00155 7 (1970RE03)
84SR DG EKC$ 0.0036 6 DEDUCED FROM ICE(K)=39 6 (1962YA02) AND IG=9.7 5.
84SR2DG EKC=0.00155 7 IS LISTED IN 1971NDS OF A=84 FROM 1970RE03
84SR DG $ (602|g)[661|g](793|g)(|q): A2=-0.01 8, A4=-0.05 13 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=602.2 2, IG=9.9 5 (1970RE03). EG=602.2 5, IG=8.9 9 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=602.2 5, IG=5.2 10 (1971DO01). EG=603 1, IG=10 2 (1969ZA06).
84SR G 1262.6 2 2.7 3
84SR DG $ (1262|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=-0.06 13, A4=+0.09 22 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=1262.6 2, IG=2.5 2 (1970RE03). EG=1262.5 5, IG=3.5 4 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1265 1, IG=3.0 9 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 2447.85 18 3-
84SR G 994.8 2 4.1 4 C
84SR DG $ EG=994.8 2, IG=4.2 4 (1970RE03). EG=994.6 5, IG=3.9 4 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=994.6 5, IG=3.0 20 (1971DO01). EG=996, IG LE 4 (1969ZA06).
84SR DG $ (994|g)[661|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.02 14, A4=-0.17 24 (1970Re03)
84SR G 1654.6 2 2.6 2 C
84SR DG $ EG=1654.6 2, IG=2.63 25 (1970RE03). G SEEN IN GG (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1657 1, IG=2.0 7 (1969ZA06).
84SR DG $ (1654|g)(793|g)(|q): A2=+0.10 23, A4=+0.3 4 (1970Re03)
84SR L 2598.22 22(4+) ?
84SR E 1.9 7 0.11 4 7.6 2.0 7M ?
84SRS E EAV=1420.2 24$CK=0.04778 22$CL=0.00559 3$CM+=0.001217 6
84SR G 1144.2 2 3.2 3 C ?
84SR DG $ EG=1144.3 2, IG=3.3 3 (1970RE03). EG=1143.9 5, IG=3.3 3 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1144 2, IG=1.8 7 (1969ZA06).
84SR G 1805.0 10 0.15 15 BC ?
84SR L 2734.7 3 (5+) A
84SR E 5.8 5 0.38 3 7.0 6.2 5
84SRS E EAV=1355.7 24$CK=0.0542 3$CL=0.00634 3$CM+=0.001381 7
84SR G 680.6 4 4.8 4 C
84SR CG $ NOTE THAT the PLACEMENT from 2448 level in 1970Re03 and 1981FrZY
84SR2CG IS IN DISAGREEMENT WITH RESULTS FROM (P,P'G) AND (A,A'G) STUDIES OF
84SR3CG 1973RE01 and high-spin studies
84SR CG E$ LEVEL-ENERGY DIFFERENCE=679.2
84SR DG $ (680|g)[602|g][661|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.01 2, A4=+0.28 34 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=680.4 2, IG=4.5 4 (1970RE03). EG=680.4 5, IG=5.2 5 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=682.0 5, IG=3.4 6 (1971DO01). EG=682 1, IG=5.9 25 (1969ZA06).
84SR G 967.2 2 1.51 15 B
84SR cG $ Placement based on high-spin data
84SR L 2768.2 3 (5-) A
84SR E 2.4 3 0.17 2 7.3 2.6 3
84SRS E EAV=1339.9 24$CK=0.0560 3$CL=0.00654 4$CM+=0.001426 7
84SR G 1001.1 2 2.6 3
84SR CG E$ TENTATIVE PLACEMENT FROM A 3449 LEVEL (1981FRZY) NOT SUPPORTED BY
84SR2CG GG DATA OF 1970RE03. Placement based on high-spin data
84SR DG $ EG=1001.1 2, IG=2.9 3 (1970RE03). EG=1000.9 5, IG=2.1 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1001.3 5, IG=3.0 20 (1971DO01). EG=1000 4, IG=2.4 10 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 2807.28 20 6+
84SR E 28 4 2.0 3 6.2 30 4C
84SRS E EAV=1321.4 24$CK=0.0581 3$CL=0.00679 4$CM+=0.001480 8
84SR CE E$ 3.2 MEV 1 FROM 1039G(B) COIN; 3.1 MEV 1 FROM 974G(B) COIN (1981FRZY)
84SR cE $ E|b=3148 {I20}, I|b=7% (1970Re03) from |b|g. Q(|e)=6409 {I170} from
84SR2cE (2580 {I170} |b)(974|g+1040|g) coin (1981Li12)
84SR G 1039.7 2 57 3 (E2) C
84SR CG $ (1040|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.097 18, A4=+0.01 3 (1984Ak02)
84SR2CG consistent with 6-4-2-0 cascade. EKC GIVES E2,M1
84SR2 G EKC=0.00049 9
84SR DG EKC$ AVERAGE OF 0.00044 9 (1970RE03), 0.00054 11 DEDUCED FROM
84SR2DG ICE(K)=34 7 (1962YA02) AND IG=57 3.
84SR DG $ (1040|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.02 3, A4=-0.02 4 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=1039.8 2, IG=58 3 (1970RE03). EG=1039.5 5, IG=57 6 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1039.6 5, IG=37.0 20 (1971DO01). EG=1039.8 3 (1976IA01).
84SR3DG EG=1040 1, IG=50 12 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 2886.57 20 2+
84SR G 1119.6 2 2.0 2 C
84SR DG $ EG=1119.6 2, IG=2.2 2 (1970RE03). EG=1119.7 5, IG=1.7 2 (1981FRZY).
84SR G 2093.3 2 0.9 3 B
84SR L 3097.8 5 6(+) A
84SR E 2.6 3 0.26 3 7.1 2.9 3
84SRS E EAV=1184.9 24$CK=0.0778 5$CL=0.00910 5$CM+=0.001983 11
84SR G 1330.7 4 2.9 3
84SR CG E$ TENTATIVE PLACEMENT FROM A 3385 LEVEL (1981FRZY) NOT SUBSTANTIATED.
84SR2CG Placement based on high-spin data
84SR DG $ EG=1330.9 3, IG=3.1 3 (1970RE03). EG=1330.1 5, IG=2.7 3 (1981FRZY).
84SR L 3270.01 23 (4,5,6)+
84SR E 14.5 7 1.73 9 6.2 16.2 8
84SR cE $ E|b=2637 {I20}, I|b=21% (1970Re03) from |b|g
84SRS E EAV=1104.4 24$CK=0.0936 6$CL=0.01095 6$CM+=0.002388 14
84SR G 462.8 2 10.3 5 M1,E2 0.0039 8 C
84SR CG M$ FROM EKC=0.0039 16
84SR DG EKC$ AVERAGE OF 0.0022 9 (1970RE03) AND 0.0055 6 DEDUCED FROM
84SR2DG ICE(K)=63 6 (1962YA02) AND IG=10.3 5
84SR DG $ (462|g)[1040|g][974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.01 8, A4=-0.06 14 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=462.8 2, IG=10.4 5 (1970RE03). EG=462.7 5, IG=9.9 10 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=462.7 5, IG=6.2 10 (1971DO01). EG=465 1, IG=10 1 (1969ZA06).
84SR G 1502.8 2 6.4 6 C
84SR DG $ (1502|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.02 11, A4=+0.15 19 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=1502.8 2, IG=6.8 7 (1970RE03). EG=1502.9 5, IG=5.9 6 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1502.8 5, IG=3.0 20 (1971DO01). EG=1503 1, IG=7.6 18 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 3511.25 22(4+,5-)
84SR E 7.5 7 1.2 1 6.3 8.7 8
84SR cE $ E|b=2242 {I17}, I|b=25% (1970Re03) from |b|g
84SRS E EAV=992.1 24$CK=0.1234 8$CL=0.01445 9$CM+=0.003149 19
84SR G 241.2 5 0.3 2 B
84SR G 703.6 2 5.9 6 C
84SR CG E,RI$ 1970RE03 RESOLVED DOUBLET 703.6 AND 705.8 WITH RI=5.9 6 AND
84SR2CG 3.8 4, RESPECTIVELY. COMBINED EG AND RI GIVEN IN OTHER STUDIES:
84SR3CG EG=704.5 5, IG=8.6 9 (1981FRZY); EG=704.1 5, IG=7.3 15 (1971DO01)
84SR G 1063.5 3 0.77 25 B
84SR G 1744.4 2 2.24 25 C
84SR DG $ EG=1744.4 2, IG=2.24 25 (1970RE03). G SEEN IN GG (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1746 1, IG=3.2 10 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 3577.8 3 ?
84SR E 2.0 7 0.37 12 6.8 2.4 8 ?
84SRS E EAV=961.3 24$CK=0.1336 9$CL=0.01565 10$CM+=0.003411 21
84SR G 980.2 10 0.9 5 B ?
84SR G 1129.6 4 0.4 2 B ?
84SR G 1810.8 3 1.1 5 ?
84SR DG $ EG=1810.8 3, IG=0.9 3 (1970RE03). EG=1810 2, IG=2.8 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 3819.12 20 ?
84SR E 0.8 4 0.21 10 7.0 1.0 5 ?
84SRS E EAV=850.1 23$CK=0.1806 12$CL=0.02117 14$CM+=0.00462 3
84SR G 932.2 2 1.14 10 ?
84SR DG $ EG=932.2 2, IG=1.14 10 (1970RE03). EG=932.0 5, IG=0.6 (1981FRZY).
84SR G 1370.8 3 0.4 2 B ?
84SR G 1763.6 2 1.9 2 ?
84SR DG $ EG=1763.6 2, IG=1.9 2 (1970RE03). G SEEN IN GG (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1764 1, IG=3 1 (1969ZA06).
84SR G 2052.9 3 0.50 25 B ?
84SR CG E$ LEVEL-ENERGY DIFFERENCE=2052.9
84SR L 3917.64 22 ?
84SR E 2.6 4 0.80 12 6.4 3.4 5 ?
84SRS E EAV=805.0 23$CK=0.2053 14$CL=0.02407 16$CM+=0.00525 4
84SR G 1110.3 2 3.1 3 ?
84SR DG $ EG=1110.3 2, IG=3.3 3 (1970RE03). EG=1110.4 5, IG=2.9 3 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1113 1, IG=1.8 (1969ZA06).
84SR G 1469.9 2 0.9 3 B ?
84SR G 2150.9 5 0.52 25 B ?
84SR L 4062.10 20 4+
84SR E 8.0 6 3.2 3 5.7 11.2 9
84SR cE $ E|b=1641 {I10}, I|b=47% (1970Re03) from |b|g
84SRS E EAV=739.1 23$CK=0.2489 17$CL=0.02920 20$CM+=0.00637 5
84SR G 1255.0 2 6.7 7
84SR DG $(1255|g)[1040|g][974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=-0.07 7, A4=-0.09 12 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=1255.0 2, IG=6.7 7 (1970RE03). EG=1255.4 5, IG=6.7 7 (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1254.8 5, IG=2.5 15 (1971DO01).
84SR G 1463.3 2 0.4 2 B ?
84SR G 1614.5 2 1.8 2
84SR DG $ EG=1614.5 2, IG=1.85 25 (1970RE03). G SEEN IN GG (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=1617 1, IG=1.5 4 (1969ZA06).
84SR G 2006.7 5 0.3 2 B ?
84SR G 2295.3 4 2.2 3
84SR DG $ (2295|g)[974|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.03 2, A4=-0.4 4 (1970Re03)
84SR DG $ EG=2295.3 4, IG=1.92 25 (1970RE03). G SEEN IN GG (1981FRZY).
84SR2DG EG=2294 2, IG=2.5 3 (1969ZA06).
84SR L 4365.50 23 (4+)
84SR E 2.8 3 2.1 3 5.8 4.9 6
84SRS E EAV=602.0 23$CK=0.375 3$CL=0.0441 3$CM+=0.00962 7
84SR G 1479.2 2 0.9 3 B
84SR G 1557.6 3 0.6 3
84SR DG $ G SEEN IN GG (1981FRZY)
84SR G 1918.0 4 2.3 3
84SR DG $ G SEEN IN GG (1981FRZY)
84SR G 2309.5 4 1.2 2 B
84SR DG $(2310|g)[602|g][661|g](793|g)(|q): A2=+0.4 4, A4=-0.02 64 (1970Re03)
84SR L 5150.2 3 ?
84SR E 0.30 3 4.0 4 5.2 4.3 4 ?
84SRS E EAV=257.5 22$CK=0.8141 18$CL=0.09618 21$CM+=0.02099 5
84SR G 1232.9 3 1.1 1 B ?
84SR G 1330.7 4 2.9 3 ?
84SR DG $ EG=1330.9 3, IG=3.1 3 (1970RE03). EG=1330.1 5, IG=2.7 3 (1981FRZY).
84SR G 1638.6 7 0.35 25 B ?