80KR 80RB EC DECAY (34 S) 1973BR32 05NDS 200508
80KR H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 105, 223 (2005)$CUT=22-Jun-2005$
80KR c 1973Br22: Measured |g, |g|g. Source obtained from {+71}Ga({+12}C,3n|g)
80KR2c reaction and from successive |e decay of {+80}Y formed in
80KR3c {+65}Cu({+20}Ne,5n|g) reaction
80KR c 1993Gi01: Measured E|g, I|g, ce. Deduced
80KR2c electric monopole strength |r{+2}. See also (p,p'g), where
80KR3c lifetime of the first excited 0+ state was measured
80KR c 1993Al03: Measured Q value by total absorption |g (TAGS) spectrum
80KR c Others:
80KR c |b{++}, |b{++}|g data (Q value): 1980DeZB, 1975We23, 1976ReZU, 1961Ho13
80KR c |g, |g|g, T{-1/2}: 1961Ho13, 1972JaYZ
80KR c Yield and production of {+80}Rb: Ir(p,X) reaction (1986Be43),
80KR2c ({+32}S,X) reaction (1985Hu06)
80KR c 1993Gi01 made an attempt to identify third 0+ state
80KR2c around 2 MeV from their ce data. From the absence of any conversion
80KR3c electron line in the range 1900-2100 keV, 1993Gi01 deduced
80KR4c Ice(K)(third 0+ to g.s)/Ice(K)(second 0+ to g.s.)<0.05 (95%
80KR5c confidence limit)
80KR cL J$From 'adopted levels'
80RB P 0 1+ 34 S 4 5720 7
80KR N 0.25 3 1.0 1.0
80KR cN NR$1973Br32 deduced this from I|g(|g{+|+})/I|g(617|g)=7.95 {I80}
80KR2cN (1973Br32) and total expected |e branch of 1.5%. 1973Br32 assumed that
80KR3cN all the intensity of annihilation radiation was from {+80}Rb decay.
80KR4cN Since the authors studied {+80}Sr and {+80}Rb in equilibrium, part of
80KR5cN |g{+|+} radiation may be from {+80}Sr |e decay. It is estimated
80KR6cN (evaluator) that |?8% may arise from {+80}Sr |e decay but the
80KR7cN normalization factor has not been corrected for this contribution
80KR PN 4
80KR G 1343.09 6 M1,E2
80KR CG E,M$ FROM CE LINE AT 1328.76 20 AND STRONG G LINE (1993GI01);
80KR2CG G NOT FROM THE DECAY OF OTHER ^Kr ISOTOPES
80KR2 G EKC=0.000209 25 (1993GI01)
80KR L 0.0 0+
80KR E 5.63E3 16 73 3 1.01 4 4.93 6 74.4 30
80KRS E EAV=2167.9 34$CK=0.01194 6$CL=0.001378 6$CM+=0.0002828 1
80KR cE E$from 1980DeZB. Others: 5720 (1975We23), 5.12E3 50
80KR L 616.8 5 2+
80KR E 4.88E3 35 21.2 25 0.44 5 5.19 8 21.6 26C
80KRS E EAV=1870.5 34$CK=0.01801 9$CL=0.002080 11$CM+=0.0004268 2
80KR cE E$from |b{++}|g, E|b+=3.86 MeV {I35} (1975We23)
80KR G 616.7 5 100 C
80KR L 1256.5 7 2+
80KR E 2.0 3 0.071 10 5.87 8 2.1 3
80KRS E EAV=1564.3 34$CK=0.02954 18$CL=0.003415 21$CM+=0.000701 5
80KR G 639.6 5 6.0 6 C
80KR2 G EKC=0.00131 7 (1993GI01)
80KR CG M$ I(E0)/I(E2)<0.07 (from ce data with 95% confidence limit,1993Gi01)
80KR cG $ |r{+2}(E0: to 617,2+)<0.05; X(E0/E2)<0.028
80KR2cG (1993Gi01,95% confidence limit)
80KR G 1257.1 15 2.3 3
80KR L 1321.1 7 0+
80KR E 1.8 3 0.068 11 5.88 9 1.9 3
80KRS E EAV=1533.6 34$CK=0.03121 19$CL=0.003607 22$CM+=0.000740 5
80KR G 704.3 5 7.5 8 C
80KR CG $ CEK AND CEL LINES SEEN BY 1993GI01
80KR G 1320.5 E0
80KR CG E$ CEK AND CEL FROM 1993GI01.
80KR cG $ |r{+2}(E0: to g.s.)=0.021 {I9};
80KR2cG X(B(E0):E0 to g.s.)/(BE2:E2 to 617,2+)=0.022 {I2} (1993Gi01)