76SE 76AS B- DECAY (26.254 H) 1998DE26,1982WE14,1980KA3624NDS 202401
76SE H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh, Jun Chen and Ameenah R. Farhan$
76SE2 H CIT=NDS 194, 3 (2024)$CUT=8-Jan-2024$
76SE DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3e (17-Jun-2020) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
76SE DB EAV,LOGFT$FROM BetaShape v2.3.1 (Dec-2023) 2023MO21.
76SE c 2000Ma57: measured precise emission probabilities of six |g rays,
76SE2c using 4|p|b|g coin method, and relative intensities of a total of
76SE3c 22 |g rays
76SE c 1998De26: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin with Ge-Ge detector system.
76SE2c A total of 45 |g rays reported, all incorporated in a decay scheme
76SE2c with 14 excited states
76SE c 1982We14: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin with Ge-Ge detector system.
76SE2c A total of 42 |g rays reported
76SE c 1980Ka36: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g|g(|q) with Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl)
76SE2c system. A total of 56 |g rays reported, 53 of which assigned in a level
76SE3c scheme with 19 levels
76SE c 1973Na04: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g|g(|q) with Ge(Li)-Ge(Li),
76SE2c and Ge(Li)-NaI(Tl) systems. A total of 44 |g rays reported, 43 of which
76SE3c incorporated amongst 16 levels
76SE c 1972Ar03: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g|g(|q). A total of 42 |g rays
76SE2c reported, all but one assigned in a level scheme of 16 levels
76SE c 1972Fu03, 1971Fu03: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin
76SE c Other studies:
76SE c |g(|q,TEMP): 1987Su05, 1978Mo11, 1976Ba15
76SE c |g|g(|q) (Ge-Ge system): 1989Za03
76SE c |g|g(|q)(Ge(Li)-NaI system): 1977CoZK and 1977CoZO, 1973Na04.
76SE2c Others (NaI-NaI system): 1960Gr07, 1958Fu62, 1958Co65, 1957Li35
76SE c |g|g(|q,H) (g factor): 1967Mu10
76SE c |b|g(|q): 1982JoZZ (1976JoZZ), 1972Kh02, 1965Ra03, 1964Ra06, 1963Gr37,
76SE2c 1963Fi01, 1961Pi05, 1960Sp02, 1960Sp01. Theory: 1970Ba45, 1970Ko20
76SE c |b|g(circ pol,|q): 1978Pr06, 1971Sm03, 1962De06
76SE c |b|g(lin pol,|q): 1953Ha40
76SE c |b{+-} data: 1971Mo25, 1971Mc18, 1969Na11, 1962Ku06, 1957Gr76,
76SE2c 1956Po07, 1955Co55, 1955Ku10, 1953Hu47, 1952To18 (spectral shape),
76SE3c 1949Ma03, 1943Ma11, 1942We01
76SE c ce data: 1957Gr76, 1952To18
76SE c Internal conversion (pair): 1963Ba30. Coefficients given for 1220,
76SE2c 1420, 1788, 1970, and 2060 |g rays. All these correspond to unresolved
76SE3c multiplets; therefore, no conclusion can be drawn about multipolarities
76SE c T{-1/2} and production of {+76}As: 1972Em01, 1970Mc01, 1969Na11,
76SE2c 1968Da24, 1967Or04, 1966La22, 1957Wr37, 1955Dz48, 1953Hu47, 1948Ph08,
76SE3c 1943Ma11, 1942We01, 1940Mi04, 1935Am01.
76SE c Others (mainly |g, |g|g-coin): 1979Ch35, 1977CoZK, 1972MoZD, 1971Mo25,
76SE2c 1971Mc18, 1971Ii01, 1971Dz08, 1971McYH, 1971FuZP, 1969GuZV, 1967Mu10,
76SE3c 1967At05, 1966La22, 1964Vi03, 1962Ku06, 1960Ba13, 1960De09, 1960Cr06,
76SE4c 1959Gi45, 1958Bo72, 1958Gu14, 1957Ma16, 1957Ba04, 1957Gr76, 1957Wr37,
76SE5c 1955Dz48, 1955Ku10, 1955Dz48, 1953Ro10, 1953Hu47, 1952Hu02, 1949Ma03,
76SE6c 1948Ph08, 1943Ma11, 1940Mi04, 1935Am01
76SE c List of references prior to 1960 may not be complete; however,
76SE2c no essential experimental information has been omitted
76SE cB IB$From |g+ce intensity balance at each level
76SE cG $The following |g rays reported in different studies have
76SE2cG been omitted here for lack of sufficient evidence. 1998De26 give
76SE3cG upper limits for some of these |g rays: I|g<0.0052 for 466|g,
76SE4cG <0.0007 for 640|g, <0.001 for 797|g, <0.0008 for 1031|g, <0.00006 for
76SE5cG 1393|g, <0.0004 for 1805|g and 1881|g
76SE cG $1982We14: E|g(I|g): 463.7(0.002), 602.5(0.002), 921.6(0.002),
76SE cG $1980Ka36: E|g(I|g): 467 (0.003), 640(0.008) from 2429 level,
76SE2cG 754.9(0.001), 776.5(0.002), 797.0(0.004) from 2127 level, 852.8(0.005),
76SE3cG 857.0(0.002), 907.5(0.004), 957.6(0.004), 1031(0.002), 1060.6(0.004),
76SE4cG 1564.3(0.003), 1881.3(0.002) from 1881 level
76SE cG $1973Na04: E|g(I|g): 466(0.018) from 2347 level, 1029(0.003) from 2363
76SE2cG level, 1130(0.04) from 2347 level, 1805(0.003) from 2363 level
76SE cG $1972Ar03: E|g: 1393 from 2514 level
76SE cG $1971Mo25: E|g(I|g): 448.2(0.05), 530.1(0.05), 543.2(0.05),
76SE2cG 554.5(3.6), 641.4(0.07), 654.5(0.52), 675.8(0.04), 733.6(0.06),
76SE3cG 765.6(0.08), 780.4(0.04), 847.9(0.09), 850.8(0.10), 908.9(0.10),
76SE4cG 1094.4(0.15), 1097.1(0.13), 1112.4(0.06), 1122.0(0.07), 1204.2
76SE5cG (0.10), 1219.8(0.21), 1238.3(0.15), 1325.1(0.07), 1330.8(0.06),
76SE6cG 1542.8(0.08), 1689.4(0.08), 1778.2(0.05), 1792.8(0.60),
76SE7cG 1884.2(0.04), 2443.7(0.07), 2517.8(0.09).
76SE cG $1971Mc18: E|g: 1177, 1550, 1585, 1743, 2306.
76SE cG $1971Ii01: E|g: 546.0, 1051.0, 1907.5, 2173.2, 2370.1.
76SE cG $E|g from others: 1117.2 (1971Fu03); 1583.2 (1967At05); 1074.4,
76SE2cG 1089.9 (1965Wh01); 624, 708, 820, 972 (1964Vi03)
76SE cG E$From 1998De26, unless otherwise stated. Quoted uncertainties are too
76SE2cG low to be realistic for data from Ge detectors, and are probably
76SE3cG statistical only. These result in a poor least-squares fit of the
76SE4cG level scheme. Evaluators have adopted a minimum uncertainty of 0.01
76SE5cG keV for strong |g rays (I|g>1), and 0.02 keV for I|g=0.1-1, and 0.05
76SE6cG keV for I|g<0.1 to account for systematic effects, and to get an
76SE7cG acceptable least-squares fit (with reduced |h{+2}=1.8 as compared to
76SE8cG critical |h{+2}=1.7). In addition, uncertainties of 1216, 1228 and
76SE9cG 2096 keV gamma rays were increased to 0.02 keV due to their poor fits
76SEAcG using 0.01 keV uncertainty. Using uncertainties as quoted by 1998De26
76SEBcG gives a reduced |h{+2}=28. Values from several other studies (e.g.
76SECcG 1982We14, 1980Ka36, 1973Na04) are in good agreement with those from
76SEDcG 1998De26, but are less precise, and with differences in isotopic
76SEEcG assignments and placements in level scheme for very weak (I|g<0.01
76SEFcG or so) |g rays.
76SE cG RI$Unweighted average of values from 1998De26 and 2000Ma57, when a
76SE2cG value is available from the latter. Values from many other studies e.g.
76SE3cG (1980Ka36, 1973Na04) are in good agreement with those from 1998De26
76SE4cG and 2000Ma57, but are less precise, and with differences in isotopic
76SE5cG assignments and placements in level scheme for very weak |g rays.
76SE6cG Some of the intensities in 2000Ma57 are quoted too precisely to be
76SE7cG realistic, for example 0.2-0.3% accuracy for 657, 1212, 1216, 1228
76SE8cG keV |g rays. Uncertainties in 1998De26 are generally not lower than
76SE9cG 1%, but some of the weak lines seem to be quoted with too high a
76SEAcG precision. That is one reason evaluators decided to take an unweighted
76SEBcG of the two results.
76SE cG RI(B)$Gamma intensity is measured in 2000Ma57
76SE cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas. Some adopted |d values are taken from
76SE2cG this dataset, as indicated under comments
76SE cG E(A)$The |g ray from 1998De26 only
76SE cL $Level scheme here is taken from 1998De26 which is based on numerous
76SE2cL studies in the past. Differences between their level scheme and in
76SE3cL others are discussed in |g-ray and level tables
76SE cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data. With evaluators' adjusted
76SE2cL uncertainties, as listed in E|g comment in |g table, reduced |h{+2}=1.8
76SE3cL is about the same as critical |h{+2}=1.7
76SE cL J,T$From Adopted Levels. Values from this dataset are given under
76SE2cL comments
76SE cL $The following levels proposed by different groups of
76SE2cL experimenters have been discarded by the evaluators for lack of
76SE3cL confirmatory evidence: 1881, 2080, 2124, 2183, 2347, 2363 (from
76SE4cL 1980Ka36); 2347, 2363 from 1973Na04 and 1980Ka36;
76SE5cL 2448, 2527, 2542 (from 1972Fu03,1971Fu03); 2088, 2542 (from 1971Ii01);
76SE6cL 2059, 2866 (from 1971Mc18); 1113.9, 1779.7, 2443.7, 2454.5
76SE7cL (from 1971Mo25). Gamma rays from these levels have either not been
76SE8cL seen in other studies including 1998De26 or assigned elsewhere.
76SE cL $An 1881 level from 1980Ka36 and 1973Na04 is omitted since 665|g was
76SE2cL not confirmed as a doublet, and 1881|g was not seen in 1998De26
76SE3cL (I|g<0.0004). A 2346 level proposed by 1973Na04 and 1980Ka36 is omitted
76SE4cL since the 466|g was not seen (I|g<0.0052), and 1130|g doublet was
76SE5cL not confirmed by 1998De26. Also omitted is a 2363 level from 1973Na04
76SE6cL and 1980Ka36 since 575|g was reassigned (based on |g|g-coin data) from
76SE7cL 1791 level, and 1030|g and 1805|g were not seen by 1998De26 (I|g<0.0008
76SE8cL for 1030|g, I|g<0.0004 for 1805|g).
76AS P 0.0 2- 26.254 H 11 2960.6 9
76AS cP J,T$From {+76}As Adopted Levels
76AS cP QP$ From 2021Wa16
76SE N 0.4067 29 1.0 1.0
76SE cN NR$From absolute intensity of 559|g=40.67 {I29} (2000Ma57, using |b|g
76SE2cN coin method). Other: 0.45 {I2} deduced from I|b=51 {I2} to g.s.
76SE3cN (from |b measurements in 1969Na11, 1955Ku10, 1953Hu47 and 1952To18),
76SE4cN and ce(K)/I(|b{+-})<0.0002 (1957Sc23). Others: 1963Ba30, 1954Mu22,
76SE5cN 1951Mi16, 1949Ma03, 1948Wu02, 1947Ba08. For %|e<0.02 to 2+ level in
76SE6cN {+76}Ge, log| {Ift}|>7.5
76SE PN 3
76SE L 0.0 0+
76SE B 55.8 3 9.7003 33 1U
76SES B EAV=1236.1 4
76SE DB $C1=-0.027 8 (1969NA11)
76SE DB $Cexp(W)=(1+C{-1}W)|*(q{+2}+|l{-2}p{+2})
76SE cB $EB=2970 {I2} from 1969Na11.
76SE cB IB$from 100-|S%I(|b{+-} to excited states). Other: 51 {I2} from
76SE2cB average of 1969Na11, 1955Ku10, 1953Hu47, 1952To18; |b spectra using
76SE3cB magnetic spectrometers
76SE L 559.100 9 2+ 11.98 PS +16-40
76SE2 L G=+0.40 12
76SE cL $g-factor: (|g|g(|q,H), 1967Mu10)
76SE cL T$other: 23 ps {I15} from |b|g(t) (1955Co55)
76SE B 31.7 3 8.174 5 C
76SES B EAV=988.3 4
76SE DB $C1=-0.007 10 (1969NA11)
76SE DB $Cexp(W)=1+C{-1}W
76SE cB $E(B)=2410 {I4} from 1969Na11 (|b|g-coin data). I|b=31 (1969Na11)
76SE G 559.086 10 100 E2 1.97E-3 3 BC
76SE2 G %IG=40.67 29
76SE cG E$uncertainty=0.002 keV (1998De26)
76SE cG RI$measured I|g/100 decays=40.67 {I29} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method)
76SE cG $559|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.472 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.75 {I6} (1976Ba15)
76SE2 G EKC=0.0018 3 (1957Gr76)$ EKC=0.0020 2 (1952To18)
76SES G KC=0.001748 24$LC=0.0001872 26$MC=2.91E-5 4
76SES G NC=2.452E-6 34
76SE cG RI$1957Ma16 give absolute intensity as 0.446 per decay, which is most
76SE2cG likely the value for all |g rays near 559, i.e. 559, 563, 571 and 575.
76SE L 1122.257 12 0+
76SE B 0.69 3 10.371 +21-20 1U
76SES B EAV=742.7 4
76SE G 563.147 10 2.69 6 E2 1.92E-3 3 B
76SES G KC=0.001711 24$LC=0.0001832 26$MC=2.85E-5 4
76SES G NC=2.400E-6 34
76SE2 G %IG=1.094 26
76SE cG E$uncertainty=0.002 keV (1998De26)
76SE cG RI$measured I|g/100 decays=1.108 {I43} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method)
76SE cG $(563G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.23 6, A4=1.11 10 (1989Za03)
76SE cG $(563G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.26 9, A4=1.15 15 (1980Ka36);
76SE2cG A2=+0.34 3, A4=+0.96 4 (1977CoZK); A2=+0.25 5, A4=1.09 9 (1973Na04)
76SE cG $563|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.046 {I54} (1976Ba15)
76SE L 1216.153 10 2+
76SE B 6.91 14 8.262 10 C
76SES B EAV=686.1 4
76SE cB $E(|b)=1785 {I7} from 1969Na11 (|b|g-coin data). I|b=7 (1969Na11)
76SE G 657.042 10 14.0 3 E2+M1(+E0) +5.2 2 1.23E-3 2 BC
76SES G KC=0.001090 15$LC=0.0001159 16$MC=1.802E-5 25
76SES G NC=1.524E-6 21
76SE2 G %IG=5.69 13
76SE cG E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26)
76SE cG RI$measured I|g/100 decays=5.550 {I31} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method)
76SE cG $(657|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.225 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.31 {I3} (1989Za03)
76SE cG $(657|g)(559|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.22 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I1} (1980Ka36);
76SE2cG A{-2}=-0.20 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.29 {I3} (1977CoZK); A{-2}=-0.18 {I2},
76SE3cG A{-4}=+0.30 {I2} (1973Na04)
76SE cG $657|g(|q): A{-2}=-0.182 {I16} (1987Su05); A{-2}=-0.111 {I9},
76SE2cG A{-4}=-0.40 {I26} (1976Ba15)
76SE cG MR$+5.2 {I2} (1976Ba15), +4.15 {I20} (1987Su05), +5.3 {I5} (1989Za03)
76SE G 1216.200 20 7.60 12 E2 BC
76SES G CC=0.000281 4$KC=0.0002408 34$LC=2.508E-5 35$MC=3.90E-6 5
76SES G NC=3.33E-7 5$IPC=1.091E-5 15
76SE2 G %IG=3.09 6
76SE cG E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26)
76SE cG RI$measured I|g/100 decays=3.012 {I88} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method)
76SE CG $(1213G+1216G)(|q): A2=-0.311 14, A4=-1.06 33 (1976Ba15)
76SE L 1330.855 18 4+
76SE B 0.0596 19 11.132 +16-15 1U
76SES B EAV=649.8 4
76SE G 771.762 20 0.265 4 E2 BC
76SES G CC=0.000800 11$KC=0.000712 10$LC=7.52E-5 11$MC=1.170E-5 16
76SES G NC=9.93E-7 14
76SE2 G %IG=0.1078 18
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $(772G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.105 19, A4=-0.01 3 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(772G)(559G)(|q): A2=0.00 6, A4=+0.03 9 (1977CoZK)
76SE CG $MR(M3/E2) LT +0.02 (1989Za03)
76SE L 1689.003 14 3+
76SE B 0.011 9 10.5 +7-3 ?
76SES B EAV=474.4 4
76SE G 358.21 6 0.0112 4
76SE2 G %IG=0.00456 17
76SE G 472.838 20 0.111 4 M1+E2 +3.20 +27-240.0026 7 C
76SES G KC=0.0023 6$LC=2.5E-4 6$MC=3.9E-5 10
76SES G NC=3.3E-6 8
76SE2 G %IG=0.0451 17
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $473|g(|q): A2=-0.28 44 (1987Su05)
76SE CG MR$values from this dataset: +0.01 to +0.73, GT +2.5 or LT -6.7
76SE2CG (1987Su05)
76SE G 1129.909 20 0.271 20 M1+E2 +1.08 10 BC
76SES G CC=0.000309 4$KC=0.000275 4$LC=2.85E-5 4$MC=4.44E-6 6
76SES G NC=3.80E-7 5$IPC=1.575E-6 33
76SE2 G %IG=0.110 8
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.005 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $1130|g(|q): A2=-0.73 15 (1987Su05)
76SE CG MR$from (1130G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.240 19, A4=-0.06 3 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(1130G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.26 6, A4=+0.04 8 (1980Ka36);
76SE2DG A2=-0.1 1, A4=+0.09 20 (1977CoZK); A2=-0.1 1, A4=+0.1 1 (1973Na04)
76SE CG MR$+0.57 to +3.55 (1987Su05), +1.08 10 (1989Za03)
76SE L 1787.648 11 2+
76SE B 1.69 3 8.192 9 C
76SES B EAV=431.5 4
76SE CB $E(B)=1184 20 from 1969Na11 (BG data). IB=3 (1969Na11)
76SE G 456.777 50 0.081 2
76SE2 G %IG=0.0329 9
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26)
76SE G 571.478 20 0.306 5 (M1(+E2)) +0.13 12 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.1245 22
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $(572G)(1216G)(|q): A2=+0.145 22, A4=+0.05 3 (1989Za03)
76SE CG $(572G)(657G)(|q): A2=+0.04 7, A4=+0.1 1 (1977CoZK)
76SE CG $572|g(|q): A2=-0.25 40 (1987Su05)
76SE CG MR$GT +1.37 or -0.13 34 (1987Su05), +0.13 12 (1989Za03)
76SE G 665.358 20 0.94 1 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.382 5
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $665|g(|q): A2=-0.65 10 (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(665G)[563G](559G)(|q): A2=-0.013 6, A4=+0.046 10 (1989Za03)
76SE G 1228.589 20 2.65 5 M1+E2 -0.51 5 BC
76SES G CC=0.000264 4$KC=0.0002259 32$LC=2.340E-5 33$MC=3.64E-6 5
76SES G NC=3.12E-7 4$IPC=1.041E-5 18
76SE2 G %IG=1.078 22
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26)
76SE cG RI$measured I|g/100 decays=1.037 {I31} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method)
76SE CG MR$weighted average of results from |g(|q) and |g|g(|q)
76SE CG $(1229G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.471 7, A4=+0.097 11 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(1229G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.46 1, A4=+0.10 1 (1980Ka36);
76SE2DG A2=+0.41 3, A4=+0.08 5 (1977CoZK); A2=+0.46 2, A4=+0.15 3 (1973Na04)
76SE CG $1229|g(|q): A2=+0.21 5 (1987Su05), 0.17 4 (1976Ba15)
76SE G 1787.62 2 0.639 18 B
76SE2 G %IG=0.260 8
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.01 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $1788|g(|q): A2=-0.61 14 (1976Ba15)
76SE L 1791.457 25
76SE cL E$level from 1998De26
76SE B 0.0593 14 9.641 12
76SES B EAV=429.8 4
76SE G 575.28 3 0.148 3 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.0602 13
76SE cG E$placement from 1998De26; earlier placement from 2363 level was
76SE2cG rejected based on |g|g-coin data
76SE CG $575|g(|q): A2=+0.16 15 (for 2+ to 2+); 0.20 18
76SE2CG (for 3+ to 2+) (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(575G)(1228G)(|q): A2=+0.35 3, A4=+0.01 5 (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$for 2+ to 2+; MR=-0.48 15, GT +10 or LT -6. For 3+ to 2+;
76SE2CG MR=+0.07 10 or -3.7 to -13.8 (1987Su05). MR=-1.18 35 (1989Za03)
76SE G 1232.40 5 0.0201 5 AC
76SE2 G %IG=0.00818 21
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.02 (1998De26)
76SE L 2026.03 3 4+
76SE B 0.0010 10 11.3 GE 1U?
76SES B EAV=352.3 4
76SE G 695.17 5 0.0193 8
76SE2 G %IG=0.00785 33
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.02 (1998De26)
76SE G 809.85 5 0.0410 9 C
76SE2 G %IG=0.0167 4
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.01 keV (1998De26)
76SE G 1466.6 3 0.0012 3
76SE2 G %IG=4.9E-4 12
76SE L 2127.23 3 (2)+
76SE G 438.290 50 0.0081 3
76SE2 G %IG=0.00329 13
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.009 keV (1998De26)
76SE G 1568.22 7 0.0150 2 C
76SE2 G %IG=0.00610 9
76SE G 2127.0 1 0.0027 2
76SE2 G %IG=0.00110 8
76SE L 2170.67 5 (0+)
76SE B 0.0013 4 11.06 +16-12 1U
76SES B EAV=293.6 4
76SE G 954.7 2 0.0021 3 C
76SE2 G %IG=8.5E-4 12
76SE G 1611.5 3 0.0158 6 C
76SE2 G %IG=0.00643 25
76SE L 2429.146 12 3-
76SE B 1.52 3 6.978 11 C
76SES B EAV=169.63 34
76SE CB $E(B)=540 25 from 1969Na11 (BG data). IB=3 (1969Na11)
76SE G 301.96 5 0.0214 9
76SE2 G %IG=0.0087 4
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.02 (1998De26)
76SE G 403.094 50 0.059 2
76SE2 G %IG=0.0240 8
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.009 keV (1998De26)
76SE cG RI$0.59 in 1998De26 seems a misprint
76SE G 740.132 20 0.264 4 (E1+M2) -0.21 12 B
76SE2 G %IG=0.1074 18
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $740|g(|q): A2=-0.49 13 (1987Su05), -0.20 12 (1976Ba15)
76SE CG $(740G)[1130G](559G)(|q): A2=+0.143 20, A4=-0.03 3
76SExCG (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$from 1989Za03. Other: +0.08 16 (1987Su05)
76SE G 1098.323 50 0.0071 5
76SE2 G %IG=0.00289 21
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.007 keV (1998De26)
76SE G 1212.986 10 3.18 6 (E1+M2) +0.025 20 BC
76SE2 G %IG=1.293 26
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.003 keV (1998De26)
76SE cG RI$measured I|g/100 decays=1.296 {I65} (2000Ma57, |b|g coin method)
76SE CG $1213|g(|q): A2=+0.12 17 (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(1213G)(657G)(|q): A2=-0.011 8, A4=+0.020 13 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(1213G)(657G)(|q): A2=+0.01 4, A4=+0.05 5 (1977CoZK)
76SE CG $(1213G)(1216G)(|q): A2=-0.058 8, A4=+0.13 13 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(1213G)(1216G)(|q): A2=+0.07 5, A4=-0.1 1 (1977CoZK)
76SE CG $(1213G)[657G](559G)(|q): A2=-0.051 8, A4=+0.081 12 (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$+0.11 10 (1987Su05), +0.025 20 (1989Za03)
76SE G 1870.01 2 0.119 4 (E1+M2) +0.17 3 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.0484 17
76SE CG $1870|g(|q): A2=+0.34 15 (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(1870G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.05 4, A4=+0.01 6 (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$values from this dataset: +0.00 8 (1987Su05), +0.17 3 (1989Za03)
76SE G 2429.07 5 0.0768 11 [E3]
76SES G CC=0.000437 6$KC=9.91E-5 14$LC=1.026E-5 14$MC=1.596E-6 22
76SES G NC=1.367E-7 19$IPC=0.000326 5
76SE2 G %IG=0.0312 5
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.03 (1998De26)
76SE L 2514.63 4 2+
76SE B 0.0268 5 8.468 11
76SES B EAV=138.19 32
76SE G 727.003 50 0.043 1 C
76SE2 G %IG=0.0175 4
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.009 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $727|g(|q): A2=-1.4 6 (1987Su05)
76SE CG MR$GT +3.0 or LT -0.10 (1987Su05)
76SE G 1955.48 5 0.0228 6 C
76SE2 G %IG=0.00927 25
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.03 (1998De26)
76SE L 2655.347 14 1
76SE B 0.955 15 6.363 11 C
76SES B EAV=89.25 30
76SE CB $E(B)=320 30 from 1969Na11 (BG data). This B- component most
76SE2CB likely feeds both levels at 2655 and 2670
76SE G 484.69 5 0.0148 5
76SE2 G %IG=0.00602 21
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.02 (1998De26)
76SE G 528.15 6 0.0077 3 A
76SE2 G %IG=0.00313 13
76SE G 863.88 5 0.0224 8
76SE2 G %IG=0.00911 33
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.02 (1998De26)
76SE cG $Placement from 1998De26
76SE G 867.701 20 0.298 5 D(+Q) +0.013 20 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.1212 22
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.004 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $868|g(|q): A2=+0.42 26 (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(868G)(1228G)(|q): A2=+0.133 23, A4=0.00 4 (1989Za03)
76SE CG $(868G)[1228G](559G)(|q): A2=-0.095 18, A4=-0.016 27 (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$values from this dataset: +0.4 +6-3 (1987Su05), +0.08 7 (1989Za03)
76SE G 1439.214 20 0.603 10 D+Q -0.043 19 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.245 5
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $1439|g(|q): A2=+0.06 10 (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(1439G)(1216G)(|q): A2=-0.27 4, A4=+0.01 6 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(1439G)(1216G)(|q): A2=-0.38 8, A4=+0.07 11 (1980Ka36)
76SE CG $(1439G)[657G](559G)(|q): A2=-0.028 19, A4=+0.01 3 (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$values from this dataset: -0.02 10 (1987Su05), +0.01 3 (1989Za03),
76SE2CG +0.13 9 (1980Ka36)
76SE G 1533.07 5 0.0518 7 D C
76SE2 G %IG=0.02107 32
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.01 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $1533|g(|q): A2=+0.2 7 (1987Su05)
76SE CG MR$0.0 (1987Su05)
76SE G 2096.16 2 1.25 3 D(+Q) -0.043 +43-42 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.508 13
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.01 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $2096|g(|q): A2=+0.07 8 (1987Su05), 0.09 8 (1976Ba15)
76SE CG $(2096G)(559G)(|q): A2=-0.258 12, A4=-0.034 19 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(2096G)(559G)(|q): A2=-0.20 1, A4=-0.04 1 (1980Ka36);
76SE2DG A2=-0.21 5, A4=-0.17 8 (1977CoZK)
76SE CG MR$0.00 8 (1987Su05), +0.02 6 (1989Za03)
76SE G 2655.43 8 0.100 1
76SE2 G %IG=0.0407 5
76SE L 2669.875 17 2-
76SE B 0.477 8 6.595 12
76SES B EAV=84.41 30
76SE G 882.212 20 0.122 9 (E1) BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.050 4
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $882|g(|q): A2=-0.5 4 (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(882G)(1228G)(|q): A2=0.00 3, A4=0.00 6 (1989Za03)
76SE CG $(882G)[1228G](559G)(|q): A2=+0.010 25, A4=-0.08 4 (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$|d(Q/D)=+0.26 {I15} from 1989Za03. Other: LT +5.3 or GT -0.24
76SE2CG (1987Su05)
76SE G 980.921 50 0.095 6 (E1) B
76SE2 G %IG=0.0386 25
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.008 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $981|g(|q): A2=-0.3 7 (1987Su05)
76SE CG MR$GT +16.4 or LT +0.24 (1987Su05)
76SE G 1453.713 20 0.234 6 (E1+M2) +0.045 19 BC
76SE2 G %IG=0.0952 25
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.006 keV (1998De26)
76SE CG $1454|g(|q): A2=-0.28 15 (1987Su05)
76SE CG $(1454G)(1216G)(|q): A2=+0.22 4, A4=-0.04 7 (1989Za03)
76SE CG $(1454G)[657G](559G)(|q): A2=-0.05 3, A4=-0.05 5 (1989Za03)
76SE CG MR$values from this dataset: -0.11 12 (1987Su05), +0.05 2 (1989Za03)
76SE G 2110.6 1 0.721 14 (E1+M2) +0.047 12 C
76SE2 G %IG=0.293 6
76SE CG $2111|g(|q): A2=-0.39 20 (1987Su05), -0.29 9 (1976Ba15)
76SE CG $(2111G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.320 16, A4=-0.047 26 (1989Za03)
76SE DG $(2111G)(559G)(|q): A2=+0.26 1, A4=+0.067 13 (1980Ka36);
76SE2DG A2=+0.22 12, A4=+0.04 2 (1977CoZK)
76SE CG MR$values from this dataset: -0.02 16 (1987Su05), -0.09 2 (1989Za03)
76SE G 2669.67 5 0.0007 1 [M2]
76SE2 G %IG=2.9E-4 4
76SE dG E$uncertainty=0.02 (1998De26)
76SEF G FL=0.0
76SES G CC=0.000460 6$KC=8.80E-5 12$LC=9.08E-6 13$MC=1.413E-6 20
76SES G NC=1.213E-7 17$IPC=0.000362 5
76SE cG E$level-energy difference=2669.88
76SE CG RI$0.0007 {I1} in 1998De26, 0.003 1 (1982We14), 0.0006 1 (1980Ka36),
76SE2CG 0.006 1 (1972Ar03). Large discrepancy in I|g may be due to contribution
76SE3CG from coincidental summing of 2110G and 559G.