71GA 71ZN B- DECAY (4.140 H) 2017KR01,1970ZO01,1970TA07NDS23 202303
71GA H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh and Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 188, 1 (2023)$
71GA2 H CUT=17-Jan-2023$
71GA c 2017Kr01: {+71m}Zn source produced in {+70}Zn(n,|g),E=thermal neutrons
71GA2c from TRIGA reactor at Oregon State. Measured E|g, I|g, half-life of
71GA3c {+71m}Zn decay. Counting was done at different distances to account
71GA4c for sum lines from cascading transitions. Deduced levels, beta feedings
71GA5c and log| {Ift} values. Comparison with previous experimental and
71GA6c evaluated data
71GA c 1970Zo01: {+71}Zn source was produced by {+70}Zn(n,|g) with
71GA2c neutrons from the MIT reactor on an enriched {+70}Zn target. Measured
71GA3c E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin with NaI and Ge(Li) detectors. Deduced levels,
71GA4c J, |p, |b-decay branching ratios, log {Ift}. Comparisons with available
71GA5c data and theoretical calculations.
71GA c 1970Ta07: {+71}Zn source was produced by {+70}Zn(n,|g) with thermal
71GA2c neutrons from McMaster University. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin with
71GA3c NaI(Tl) and Ge(Li) detectors. Deduced levels
71GA c 1969Co20: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |g|g(t). Total of 17 |g rays
71GA2c reported
71GA c 1967Li01: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |b|g(t), |g|g(t). Total of
71GA2c 14 |g rays reported
71GA c |g|g(|q) and |g|g(t) measurements:
71GA c 1978Kr06: measured |g|g(|q) for 15 |g|g-cascades using combinations
71GA2c of two Ge(Li) detectors, a NaI(Tl) detector, and a small Ge(Li)
71GA3c detector for low-energy |g rays.
71GA c 1976Sa39: measured |g|g(|q) for 11 |g|g-cascades using Ge(Li) and
71GA2c NaI(Tl) detectors.
71GA c 1975BeYD: measured |g|g(|q) for four |g|g-cascades, and also |g|g(|q,H)
71GA2c using Ge(Li) and NaI(Tl) detectors.
71GA c 1969Kh10: measured level lifetimes by |g|g(t) and |b|g(t)
71GA c Other measurements:
71GA c E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin: 1969SiZT, 1964Ta08, 1964So01, 1962Gh01, 1955Le03
71GA c |b: 1964So01, 1961Th04
71GA c |b|g-coin: 1964So01, 1955Le03
71GA c |g|g(|q): 1962Gh01
71GA c 1962Ma24: half-life of {+71m}Zn decay and production yield
71GA c The decay scheme given here is from 2017Kr01, 1970Zo01 and 1970Ta07,
71GA2c enhanced based on earlier decay schemes of 1969Co20 and 1967Li01
71GA cB IB$Deduced by evaluators from |g-transition intensity balances. Values
71GA2cB are nearly the same in 2017Kr01, except in a few cases, small
71GA3cB differences are commented.
71GA4cB Note: |g-transition intensity balances give apparent |b feedings of
71GA5cB 0.14 {I6} for the 390, 1/2- level; 0.9 {I6} for the 511 level; and
71GA6cB 0.040 {I5} for the 910 level, whereas none is expected from
71GA7cB 9/2+ parent to 1/2- or 3/2- daughter states. 2017Kr01 discussed
71GA8cB possible scenarios for these imbalances, most likely being the
71GA9cB unobserved |g feeding from higher levels. Note also that
71GAAcB a total |g-intensity of |?0.12 units is still unassigned.
71GA cG $A weak 1392.1 {I9} |g ray with I|g=0.06 {I3} in 1970Ta07 and
71GA2cG tentatively placed from a 2787.8 level is not confirmed in
71GA3cG 2017Kr01, thus this |g and the level have been omitted
71GA cG E,RI$From 2017Kr01. Values from 1970Zo01, 1970Ta07, 1969Co20
71GA2cG and 1967Li01 are listed under comments, but not used in the
71GA3cG evaluation, as data from 2017Kr01 are much more precise than
71GA4cG in any of the previous studies
71GA cG RI(K)$Intensities of the 964.7|g, 1107.3|g and 1493.8|g doublets
71GA2cG divided in two components each based on level and gamma energies, as
71GA3cG well as compared with |g|g-coin data from 1970Zo01
71GA cG E(N)$This |g ray reported by 2017Kr01 only
71GA cG E(P)$Revised placement of |g transition in 2017Kr01
71GA cG E(x)$E|g value not included in the least-squares fit procedure due to
71GA2cG poor agreement. Note that this |g is doubly placed
71GA cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas. Arguments and values from decay studies in
71GA2cG this dataset are given under comments, which are mainly from |g|g(|q)
71GA3cG in 1978Kr06
71GA cG M(B)$1978Kr06 assumed E1 for 386|g and E2 for 596|g in the analysis of
71GA2cG their |g|g(|q) data. Measured A{-2}=-0.071 for 386-596 cascade supports
71GA2cG these assumptions
71GA cL $Note that a 1702-keV, 1/2+ level proposed by 1970Zo01 is omitted here
71GA2cL due to disagreement of energy and branching ratio of 1190.6-keV |g
71GA3cL with data from a 1700-keV, 1/2+ level populated in (n,n'|g), as pointed
71GA4cL out by Prof. K. Krane (University of Oregon) on April 29, 2016
71GA cL E$From a least-squares fit to E|g data, excluding the energies
71GA2cL of four |g rays as indicated, each of which has double placements.
71GA3cL Reduced |h{+2}=2.3 is somewhat larger than critical |h{+2}=1.6, with
71GA4cL only the 988.640|g and 1485.8|g deviating by about 3|s.
71GA cL J,T$From the Adopted Levels. Values of T{-1/2} from decay studies
71GA2cL mainly from |b|g(t) and/or |g|g(t) (1967Li01) in this dataset are given
71GA3cL under comments or are the adopted values where indicated.
71ZN P 155.62 6 9/2+ 4.140 H 15 2810.3 28
71ZN cP E,J,T$From Adopted Levels of {+71}Zn
71ZN cP QP$From 2021Wa16
71GA N 0.8903 69 1.0 1.0
71GA cN NR$Deduced from summed I(|g+ce) to g.s.=100%. %IT|<0.05 (1970Zo01),
71GA2cN from an upper limit on I|g(158|g)
71GA PN 3
71GA G 834.59 4 0.020 1 N
71GA2 G %IG=0.0178 9
71GA G 977.466 23 0.049 2 N
71GA2 G %IG=0.0436 18
71GA G 1083.58 6 0.009 1 N
71GA2 G %IG=0.0080 9
71GA G 1190.63 4 0.018 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0160 9
71GA cG $E|g=1190.6 {I8}, I|g=0.012 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $This |g was placed by 1970Zo01 from a 1702.1, 1/2+ level based on a
71GA2cG comparison with the decay of a 1700-keV level in (n,n'|g) work of
71GA3cG 1969Ve03 where a strong 1188|g and a weaker 1700|g from this level
71GA4cG were reported. As noted in 2017Kr01, later (n,n'|g) data from 1984Ar09
71GA5cG are inconsistent with those in 1969Ve03, reporting gamma rays of 1188.2
71GA6cG and 1699.2 keV, with a larger intensity for the latter, and that the
71GA7cG energy and intensity of the 1190.6 |g ray in {+71}Zn |b{+-} decay were
71GA8cG inconsistent with improved (n,n'|g) data from 1984Ar09 (also 1977SmZI).
71GA9cG For this reason 1190.6|g is kept as an unplaced |g ray
71GA G 1409.26 4 0.011 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0098 9
71GA cG $E|g=1409.1 {I10}, I|g=0.007 {I2} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $Earlier placement from 2805 level by 1970Zo01 is not supported
71GA2cG by 2017Kr01, based on level-energy differences
71GA G 1503.44 4 0.015 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0134 9
71GA cG $E|g=1503.8 {I5}, I|g=0.013 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA L 0.0 3/2- STABLE
71GA L 389.978 7 1/2- 0.40 PS +28-12
71GA G 389.979 10 2.99 3 (M1+E2) 0.0047 +35-300.00221 C
71GA2 G %IG=2.66 3
71GA cG $E|g=389.87 {I5}, I|g=2.8 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=389.6 {I5}, I|g=2.5 {I10} (1970Ta07)
71GAS G KC=0.00198 3$LC=0.000202 3$MC=2.96E-5 5
71GAS G NC=1.597E-6 23
71GA L 487.389 6 5/2- 62 PS 38
71GA cL T$values from this dataset: <0.1 ns (1967Li01), <0.5 ns (1969Co20)
71GA B 4.6 9 9.46 8 1U
71GAS B EAV=1045.1 13
71GA G 487.402 10 69.5 7 (M1+E2) -0.024 13 1.32E-3 C
71GA2 G %IG=61.9 4
71GA cG $E|g=487.34 {I5}, I|g=67 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=487.3 {I2}, I|g=65 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=488.0 {I2}, I|g=63 {I13} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=488.0 {I10}, I|g=69 {I5} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.001180 17$LC=0.0001202 17$MC=1.760E-5 25
71GAS G NC=9.51E-7 14
71GA cG MR$-0.024 {I13} or -3.1 {I2} from |g|g(|q) (1978Kr06); <0.12 deduced
71GA2cG (1978Kr06) from known level lifetime and measured B(E2).
71GA cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.5 {I1} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2 |) 5/2 |) 3/2 sequence
71GA2cG for 620-487 cascade
71GA L 511.558 6 3/2- 1.5 PS 7
71GA cL T$values from this dataset: <0.1 ns (1967Li01), <0.5 ns (1969Co20)
71GA cL $|m=0.95 {I5} (1975BeYD), but no details are provided
71GA G 121.591 10 2.58 5 (M1(+E2)) -0.01 +13-16 0.041 9 C
71GA2 G %IG=2.30 5
71GA cG $E|g=121.48 {I5}, I|g=3.1 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=121.2 {I2}, I|g=3.4 {I10} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=122.2 {I2}, I|g=2.3 {I5} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=122.0 {I5}, I|g=3 {I1} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.037 8$LC=0.0039 9$MC=0.00057 13
71GAS G NC=3.0E-5 6
71GA cG MR$-0.01 {I+13-16} or -1.7 {I+5-6} from |g|g(|q) (1978Kr06), but
71GA2cG intensity balance at 389 level is in agreement with the lower value
71GA G 511.556 12 31.5 3 M1+E2 -0.37 6 0.001284 C
71GA2 G %IG=28.1 3
71GA cG $E|g=511.55 {I5}, I|g=30.5 {I20} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=511.4 {I2}, I|g=33 {I3} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=511.7 {I2}, I|g=28 {I6} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=512.0 {I10}, I|g=32 {I2} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.00115 3$LC=0.000117 4$MC=1.71E-5 5
71GAS G NC=9.21E-7 25
71GA cG MR$-0.37 {I6} or -10 {I+3-10} from |g|g(|q) (1978Kr06); 0.09 {I3}
71GA2cG deduced (1978Kr06) from known level lifetime and measured B(E2); thus a
71GA3cG preference for a lower |d value. Other: 0.28 {I1} (1975BeYD) with
71GA3cG |d(M3/E2)=0.45 {I5} for 512|g, which seems unrealistic
71GA L 910.162 11 3/2- 0.46 PS 22
71GA G 398.69 5 0.031 2 [M1+E2] 0.0033 12 N
71GAS G KC=0.0029 11$LC=0.00031 12$MC=4.5E-5 17
71GAS G NC=2.3E-6 9
71GA2 G %IG=0.0276 18
71GA G 520 0.01 LT ?
71GA2 G %IG LT 0.0089
71GA cG E$from 1970Zo01 only, with I|g|<0.02. This |g not seen by 2017Kr01,
71GA2cG upper limit of I|g<0.01 was given. As mentioned in 1970Zo01, this line
71GA3cG may be contributed by the {+71}Zn g.s. decay, where 910-keV level in
71GA4cG {+71}Ga is also populated
71GA G 910.181 21 0.276 3 (M1+E2) 0.09 5 3.39E-4 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.246 3
71GA cG $E|g=910.1 {I2}, I|g=0.33 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=909.5 {I2}, I|g=0.32 {I6} (1970Ta07)
71GAS G KC=0.000303 5$LC=3.06E-5 5$MC=4.48E-6 7
71GAS G NC=2.43E-7 4
71GA L 964.689 6 5/2- 1.3 PS 2
71GA B 0.7 4 9.7 3 1U
71GAS B EAV=825.2 13
71GA G 453.145 10 1.31 1 [M1+E2] 0.0023 7 C
71GA2 G %IG=1.166 13
71GA cG $E|g=453.08 {I7}, I|g=1.2 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=453.2 {I2}, I|g=1.6 {I2} (1970Ta07)
71GAS G KC=0.0020 7$LC=0.00021 7$MC=3.0E-5 10
71GAS G NC=1.6E-6 5
71GA G 477.316 26 0.062 2 [M1+E2] 0.0019 6 N
71GAS G KC=0.0017 5$LC=0.00018 6$MC=2.6E-5 8
71GAS G NC=1.4E-6 4
71GA2 G %IG=0.0552 18
71GA G 574.684 17 0.149 2 [E2] 1.42E-3 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.1327 21
71GA cG $E|g=574.9 {I2}, I|g=0.12 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=575.0 {I3}, I|g=0.21 {I6} (1970Ta07)
71GAS G KC=0.001266 18$LC=0.0001306 19$MC=1.91E-5 3
71GAS G NC=1.007E-6 14
71GA G 964.670 10 4.95 40 M1+E2 +1.3 3 3.33E-49 @C
71GAF G FLAG=K
71GA2 G %IG=4.4 4
71GA cG $E|g=964.7 {I1}, I|g=4.6 {I5} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=964.6 {I1}, I|g=5.0 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=964.5 {I5}, I|g=3.9 {I12} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=963.0 {I15}, I|g=5 {I1} (1967Li01)
71GA cG $E|g=964.693 {I8}, deduced from level-energy difference, in good
71GA2cG agreement with the measured E|g value for the doublet
71GA cG $Total I|g=5.35 {I5} for the doublet
71GAS G KC=0.000298 8$LC=3.02E-5 8$MC=4.41E-6 11
71GAS G NC=2.38E-7 6
71GA cG MR$+4.2 {I+14-10} or +0.58 {I+9-8} from 1978Kr06. From lifetime
71GA2cG arguments for 965 level given by 1978Kr06, larger value is somewhat
71GA3cG preferred
71GA L 1107.490 7 7/2- 0.48 PS +14-10
71GA cL T$values from this dataset: <0.1 ns (1967Li01), <0.5 ns (1969Co20)
71GA B 0.2 LT 9.1 GT ?
71GAS B EAV=743.8 13
71GA cB IB$other: <0.6 (2017Kr01)
71GA G 142.820 10 5.16 10 (M1(+E2))-0.05 4 0.0274 10 C
71GA2 G %IG=4.59 10
71GA cG $E|g=142.60 {I5}, I|g=6.0 {I6} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=142.7 {I2}, I|g=5.7 {I20} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=143.4 {I3}, I|g=5.1 {I11} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=143.0 {I5}, I|g=7 {I2} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.0244 9$LC=0.00257 10$MC=0.000375 14
71GAS G NC=2.00E-5 7
71GA cG $(143|g)(965|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.17 {I4}, A{-4}=-0.03 {I5}; A{-2}=-0.18
71GAxcG {I4} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG MR$-0.05 {I4} (1978Kr06) is the average of +0.01 {I6} and -0.11 {I6}
71GA2cG from two different cascades. |d=-4.9 {I+12-22} or >12 are also possible
71GA3cG solutions but the lower values are in better agreement
71GA G 595.916 10 31.4 3 E2 1.27E-3 BC
71GA2 G %IG=28.0 4
71GA cG $E|g=596.07 {I7}, I|g=30 {I2} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=595.9 {I2}, I|g=29 {I3} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=596.2 {I2}, I|g=28 {I6} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=596.0 {I10}, I|g=31 {I2} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.001138 16$LC=0.0001172 17$MC=1.711E-5 24
71GAS G NC=9.05E-7 13
71GA cG $(596|g)(122|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I5}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I6}; A{-2}=-0.11
71GA2cG {I4} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $(596|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.018 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.012 {I23};
71GA2cG A{-2}=-0.012 {I13} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $(596|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.003 {I13}, A{-4}=+0.006 {I20} (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(596|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.16 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I4} (1975BeYD)
71GA2cG gives |d(M3/E2)=0.45 {I5}, which is unrealistic
71GA G 620.084 10 61.2 6 M1+E2 +0.96 24 8.93E-422 C
71GA2 G %IG=54.5 7
71GA cG $E|g=620.19 {I5}, I|g=61 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=620.1 {I2}, I|g=57 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=620.4 {I2}, I|g=64 {I13} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=620.0 {I10}, I|g=62 {I4} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.000799 20$LC=8.16E-5 21$MC=1.19E-5 3
71GAS G NC=6.40E-7 16
71GA cG $(620|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.192 {I10}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I16};
71GA2cG A{-2}=-0.187 {I8} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $|d(E2/M1)=-1.4 {I1} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2 |) 7/2 |) 5/2 sequence
71GA2cG for 387-620 cascade
71GA cG $|d(E2/M1)=+7.7 {I13} or +0.4 {I2} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2|)5/2|)3/2
71GA2cG sequence for 620-487 cascade
71GA cG $(620|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.199 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.007 {I10} (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(620|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.22 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I4} (1969Kh10)
71GA cG MR$+0.72 {I+8-6} or +2.3 {I3} (1978Kr06). The smaller value is
71GA2cG preferred from comparison of |d values deduced from different
71GA3cG |g|g cascades. Other: 0.07 {I2} (1975BeYD)
71GA G 1107.334 10 2.06 9 [E2] 2.56E-4 @C
71GA2 G %IG=1.83 8
71GA cG $E|g=1107.4 {I2}, I|g=2.2 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1107.2 {I2}, I|g=2.9 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=1108.2 {I10} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=1107.0 {I15}, I|g=3 {I1} (1967Li01)
71GAF G FL=0.0
71GAF G FLAG=Kx
71GA cG $E|g=1107.480 {I7}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates
71GA2cG by 0.154 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet
71GAS G KC=0.000228 4$LC=2.31E-5 4$MC=3.37E-6 5
71GAS G NC=1.82E-7 3$IPC=1.001E-6 14
71GA cG $Total I|g=2.99 {I3} for the doublet
71GA L 1395.267 13 7/2- 0.77 PS 6
71GA B 0.096 5 9.07 3
71GAS B EAV=612.3 13
71GA G 430.52 7 0.015 2 [M1+E2] 0.0026 9 N
71GAS G KC=0.0023 8$LC=0.00024 9$MC=3.5E-5 12
71GAS G NC=1.9E-6 6
71GA2 G %IG=0.0134 18
71GA G 883.80 7 0.010 1 [E2] 4.37E-4 N
71GAS G KC=0.000391 6$LC=3.97E-5 6$MC=5.81E-6 9
71GAS G NC=3.11E-7 5
71GA2 G %IG=0.0089 9
71GA G 907.92 3 0.089 2 [M1+E2] 0.000374 N
71GAS G KC=0.00034 3$LC=3.4E-5 4$MC=5.0E-6 5
71GAS G NC=2.67E-7 24
71GA2 G %IG=0.0792 19
71GA G 1395.254 19 0.093 1 E2 2.06E-4
71GA2 G %IG=0.0828 11
71GA cG $E|g=1395.2 {I4}, I|g=0.09 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1396.4 {I9}, I|g=0.10 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GAS G KC=0.0001381 20$LC=1.391E-5 20$MC=2.03E-6 3
71GAS G NC=1.099E-7 16$IPC=5.20E-5 8
71GA L 1476.006 7 5/2- 0.6 PS GT
71GA B 0.2 LT 9.5 GT 1U?
71GAS B EAV=595.6 13
71GA cB IB$other: <0.11 (2017Kr01)
71GA G 368.499 22 0.085 4 [M1+E2] 0.0042 17 N
71GAS G KC=0.0037 15$LC=0.00039 16$MC=5.7E-5 23
71GAS G NC=3.0E-6 12
71GA2 G %IG=0.076 4
71GA G 565.854 12 0.256 3 [M1+E2] 0.0012 3 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.228 3
71GA cG $E|g=566.2 {I2}, I|g=0.21 {I2} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=566.0 {I3}, I|g=0.24 {I6} (1970Ta07)
71GAS G KC=0.00108 25$LC=0.00011 3$MC=1.6E-5 4
71GAS G NC=8.7E-7 19
71GA G 964.670 10 0.40 40 @C
71GA2 G %IG=0.4 4
71GA cG $E|g=964.6 {I3}, I|g=0.5 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GAF G FL=511.558
71GAF G FLAG=Kx
71GA cG $E|g=964.441 {I7}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates by
71GA2cG 0.230 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet
71GA cG $(965|g)(512|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.020 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.07 {I3};
71GA2cG A{-2}=+0.018 {I14} if A{-4}=0
71GA G 988.640 10 1.46 1 (M1+E2) +0.17 5 2.87E-4 C
71GA2 G %IG=1.300 14
71GA cG $E|g=988.6 {I2}, I|g=1.3 {I1} (1970Zo01, E|g=998.6 in Table 1 is
71GA2cG a misprint)
71GA cG $E|g=988.6 {I1}, I|g=1.2 {I2} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=987.8 {I5}, I|g=0.9 {I2} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=987.0 {I15}, I|g=1.0 {I5} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.000257 4$LC=2.59E-5 4$MC=3.79E-6 6
71GAS G NC=2.06E-7 3
71GA cG MR$+0.20 {I3} or -2.8 {I2} (1978Kr06) for J(1476 level)=5/2
71GA cG $(989|g)(487|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.085 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.030 {I16};
71GA2cG A{-2}=-0.073 {I13} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA G 1475.972 14 0.68 1 (M1+E2) C
71GA2 G %IG=0.605 10
71GA cG $E|g=1476.0 {I2}, I|g=0.65 {I6} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1475.9 {I3}, I|g=0.57 {I11} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=1475.6 {I10}, I|g=0.5 {I2} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=1475.0 {I20}, I|g: weak (1967Li01)
71GA L 1493.856 6 9/2+ 154 PS 15
71GA cL T$from the Adopted Levels
71GA cL $|m=2.1 {I3} (1975BeYD), but no details are provided
71GA B 85.2 12 6.009 6
71GAS B EAV=567.9 13
71GA cB E$measured endpoint=1460 {I40}, average of values from 1964So01
71GA2cB and 1961Th04
71GA G 98.611 25 0.063 3 [E1] 0.0670
71GA2 G %IG=0.056 3
71GA cG $E|g=98.5 {I1}, I|g=0.067 {I7} (1970Zo01)
71GAS G KC=0.0599 9$LC=0.00612 9$MC=0.000888 13
71GAS G NC=4.51E-5 7
71GA G 386.371 10 100 1 (E1) 1.25E-3 BC
71GA2 G %IG=89.0 11
71GA cG $E|g=386.28 {I5}, I|g=100 (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=386.3 {I2}, I|g=100 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=386.8 {I2}, I|g=100 (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=387.0 {I10}, I|g=100 (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.001122 16$LC=0.0001134 16$MC=1.655E-5 24
71GAS G NC=8.82E-7 13
71GA cG $(386|g)[143|g](965|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.079 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.016 {I15};
71GA2cG A{-2}=-0.072 {I11} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $|d(E2/M1)=-1.4 {I1} (1969Kh10) for J=7/2- for 1494 level
71GA cG $|d(E2/M1)=+0.5 {I1} (1969Kh10) based on 7/2 |) 7/2 |) 5/2 sequence
71GA2cG for 387-620 cascade
71GA cG $(386|g)[143|g](965|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I5}
71GA2cG (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)[596|g](512|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.026 {I12}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I18};
71GA2cG A{-2}=+0.028 {I10} if A{-4}=0
71GA cG $(386|g)[596|g](512|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.042 {I13}, A{-4}=-0.012 {I35}
71GA2cG (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)[596|g](122|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.004 {I20}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I24};
71GA2cG A{-2}=+0.002 {I17} if A{-4}=0
71GA cG $(386|g)[596|g](122|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.031 {I14}, A{-4}=+0.165 {I25}
71GA2cG (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)[620|g](487|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.029 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.020 {I12};
71GA2cG A{-2}=+0.037 {I6} if A{-4}=0
71GA cG $(386|g)[620|g](487|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.023 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.039 {I10}
71GA2cG (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)(1107|g)+(1107|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.016 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.003
71GA2cG {I13}; A{-2}=-0.020 {I8} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $(386|g)(1107|g)+(1107|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I4},
71GA2cG A{-4}=+0.06 {I6} (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)(1107|g)+(1107|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.017 {I19},
71GA2cG A{-4}=+0.096 {I19} (1969Kh10)
71GA cG $(386|g)(143|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.047 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I27};
71GA2cG A{-2}=+0.042 {I16} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $(386|g)(143|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.039 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.116 {I19} (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.066 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I11};
71GA2cG A{-2}=-0.069 {I6} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $(386|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.062 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.032 {I13} (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)(596|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.121 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.03 {I3} (1975BeYD)
71GA2cG gives |d(M2/E1)=0.12 {I2} for 386|g with |d(M3/E2)=0.45 {I5} for 596|g
71GA cG $(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.108 {I7}, A{-4}=+0.024 {I10};
71GA2cG A{-2}=-0.098 {I6} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.107 {I6}, A{-4}=-0.043 {I10} (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.205 {I17}, A{-4}=-0.06 {I3} (1969Kh10)
71GA cG $(386|g)(620|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.131 {I12}, A{-4}=-0.031 {I20} (1975BeYD)
71GA2cG giving |d(M2/E1)=0.12 {I2} for 386|g with |d(E2/M1)=0.07 {I2} for 620|g
71GA G 982.292 10 0.012 5 [E3] 7.09E-4 N
71GAS G KC=0.000633 9$LC=6.57E-5 10$MC=9.60E-6 14
71GAS G NC=5.10E-7 8
71GA2 G %IG=0.011 5
71GA G 1006.439 10 0.85 1 [M2] 6.28E-4 PC
71GA2 G %IG=0.757 11
71GA cG $E|g=1006.5 {I2}, I|g=0.8 {I2} (1970Zo01, tentatively from 1494 level)
71GA cG $E|g=1006.5 {I1}, I|g=0.81 {I20} (1970Ta07, from 1494 level)
71GA cG $E|g=1007.0 {I10} (1969Co20, from 1494 level)
71GAS G KC=0.000562 8$LC=5.74E-5 8$MC=8.40E-6 12
71GAS G NC=4.55E-7 7
71GA G 1493.802 19 0.070 4 [E3] 2.72E-4 @C
71GAF G FLAG=K
71GA2 G %IG=0.062 4
71GA cG $E|g=1493.8 {I4}, I|g=0.054 {I6} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1493.6 {I8}, I|g=0.05 {I3} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=1493.848 {I8}, deduced from level-energy difference, in good
71GA2cG agreement with the measured E|g value for the doublet
71GAS G KC=0.000215 3$LC=2.19E-5 3$MC=3.20E-6 5
71GAS G NC=1.725E-7 25$IPC=3.21E-5 5
71GA cG $Total I|g=0.076 {I2} for the doublet
71GA L 1498.325 13 9/2-
71GA B 0.279 9 8.49 2
71GAS B EAV=565.9 13
71GA G 1010.926 15 0.506 9 Q C
71GA2 G %IG=0.451 9
71GA cG $E|g=1011.4 {I2}, I|g=0.73 {I7} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1011.4 {I2}, I|g=0.67 {I20} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=1008.0 {I25}, I|g=2 {I1} (1967Li01, possible doublet)
71GA L 1719.568 12 5/2- 0.12 PS +5-2
71GA B 0.026 4 9.97 7 1U
71GAS B EAV=489.3 12
71GA G 1208.005 22 0.037 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0329 9
71GA cG $E|g=1208.0 {I5}, I|g=0.023 {I4} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 1232.181 24 0.035 1 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.0312 9
71GA cG $E|g=1232.80 {I6}, I|g=0.030 {I4} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 1719.574 23 0.049 1 M1+E2 +1.4 5 2.67E-410
71GA2 G %IG=0.0436 10
71GA cG $E|g=1719.2 {I7}, I|g=0.04 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GAS G KC=8.97E-5 15$LC=9.00E-6 16$MC=1.315E-6 23
71GAS G NC=7.14E-8 12$IPC=0.000167 8
71GA L 2082.451 17 (13/2+)
71GA cL $Level from 2017Kr01
71GA G 588.602 17 0.134 2 [E2] 1.32E-3 P
71GA2 G %IG=0.1193 20
71GA cG $E|g=588.60 {I2}, I|g=0.054 {I5} (1970Zo01, from 1498 level)
71GAS G KC=0.001180 17$LC=0.0001216 17$MC=1.775E-5 25
71GAS G NC=9.38E-7 14
71GA L 2247.264 7 7/2+ 0.021 PS +6-5
71GA B 5.84 6 5.98 1
71GAS B EAV=244.8 12
71GA G 527.71 4 0.050 3 [E1] P
71GA2 G %IG=0.045 3
71GA cG $E|g=528.6 {I3}, I|g=0.05 {I2} (1970Zo01, from 1494 level)
71GA cG $E|g=529.1 {I5}, I|g=0.07 {I3} (1970Ta07, from 1494 level)
71GA G 753.395 10 3.57 4 M1+E2 -0.085 15 5.05E-4 C
71GA2 G %IG=3.18 4
71GA cG $E|g=753.41 {I7}, I|g=3.5 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=753.2 {I1}, I|g=3.4 {I4} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=753.2 {I5}, I|g=2.6 {I6} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=752.0 {I10}, I|g=4 {I1} (1967Li01)
71GAS G KC=0.000452 7$LC=4.57E-5 7$MC=6.69E-6 10
71GAS G NC=3.63E-7 5
71GA cG MR$-0.085 {I15} or +12 {I2} (1978Kr06). The lower value is preferred
71GA2cG based on the systematics of hindrance of M1 transitions in this mass
71GA3cG region
71GA cG $(753|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.043 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.003 {I12};
71GA2cG A{-2}=+0.041 {I7} if A{-4}=0 (1978Kr06)
71GA cG $(753|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.09 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I5} (1976Sa39)
71GA cG $(753|g)(386|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.105 {I19}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I3} (1975BeYD)
71GA2cG giving |d(E2/M1)=0.07 {I2} for 753|g and |d(M2/E1)=0.07 {I2} for 386|g
71GA G 771.265 10 2.35 2 [E1] C
71GA2 G %IG=2.092 24
71GA cG $E|g=771.26 {I7}, I|g=2.2 {I2} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=771.2 {I1}, I|g=2.0 {I3} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=771.3 {I5}, I|g=1.2 {I3} (1969Co20)
71GA cG $E|g=772.0 {I10}, I|g=2.0 {I5} (1967Li01)
71GA G 852.02 5 0.021 3 N
71GA2 G %IG=0.019 3
71GA G 1139.752 12 0.250 3 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.223 3
71GA cG $E|g=1139.8 {I3}, I|g=0.22 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1139.8 {I8}, I|g=0.21 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=1140.4 {I10} (1969Co20)
71GA G 1282.562 15 0.284 3 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.253 3
71GA cG $E|g=1282.7 {I3}, I|g=0.29 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1282.8 {I6}, I|g=0.24 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG $E|g=1283.4 {I10}, I|g=0.2 {I1} (1969Co20)
71GA G 1759.865 18 0.104 2
71GA2 G %IG=0.0926 19
71GA cG $E|g=1759.6 {I2}, I|g=0.10 {I1} (1970Zo01, I|g=1.0 {I1} in Table 1 of
71GA2cG 1970Zo01 is a misprint as pointed out by K. Krane (Oregon) in an email
71GA3cG communication of April 29, 2016 to the evaluators, the value should be
71GA4cG 0.10 {I1}, also confirmed by W.B. Walters (Maryland) in an email reply
71GA5cG of May 6, 2016).
71GA cG $E|g=1758.4 {I15} (1969Co20)
71GA L 2450.649 9 7/2+
71GA B 0.780 8 6.35 1
71GAS B EAV=165.8 11
71GA G 952.352 29 0.039 2 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.0347 18
71GA cG $E|g=951.8 {I3}, I|g=0.011 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 956.785 15 0.282 3 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.251 3
71GA cG $E|g=956.7 {I2}, I|g=0.21 {I2} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=956.8 {I2}, I|g=0.29 {I6} (1970Ta07)
71GA G 974.659 12 0.442 4 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.394 5
71GA cG $E|g=974.7 {I2}, I|g=0.38 {I4} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=974.7 {I2}, I|g=0.36 {I7} (1970Ta07)
71GA G 1343.129 21 0.048 2 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.0427 18
71GA cG $E|g=1343.7 {I4}, I|g=0.049 {I6} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 1485.874 19 0.057 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0508 10
71GA cG $E|g=1485.8 {I4}, I|g=0.050 {I5} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1486.4 {I8}, I|g=0.05 {I3} (1970Ta07)
71GA cG E$somewhat poor fit, level-energy difference gives E|g=1485.940 {I10}
71GA G 1963.41 7 0.008 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0071 9
71GA cG $E|g=1963.8 {I7}, I|g=0.006 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA L 2488.239 12 (7/2)+
71GA B 0.686 10 6.29 1
71GAS B EAV=151.8 11
71GA G 994.395 19 0.075 3
71GA2 G %IG=0.067 3
71GA cG $E|g=994.6 {I3}, I|g=0.032 {I4} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=993.7 {I7}, I|g=0.12 {I6} (1970Ta07)
71GA G 1012.231 22 0.280 8
71GA2 G %IG=0.249 7
71GA G 1093.02 6 0.011 1 P
71GA2 G %IG=0.0098 9
71GA cG $E|g=1093.5 {I7}, I|g=0.10 {I4} (1970Ta07, unplaced)
71GA G 1380.713 15 0.391 4 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.348 5
71GA cG $E|g=1380.8 {I2}, I|g=0.39 {I4} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1380.5 {I3}, I|g=0.32 {I6} (1970Ta07)
71GA G 2000.75 10 0.006 1 [E1,M2] 6.73E-411
71GA2 G %IG=0.0053 9
71GA cG $E|g=2000.9 {I8}, I|g=0.004 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GAS G KC=3.96E-5 10$LC=3.95E-6 10$MC=5.77E-7 14
71GAS G NC=3.13E-8 8$IPC=0.000629 10
71GA G 2488.37 9 0.008 1 [M2,E3] 4.04E-425
71GA2 G %IG=0.0071 9
71GA cG $E|g=2489.4 {I8}, I|g=0.005 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GAS G KC=7.35E-5 21$LC=7.38E-6 20$MC=1.08E-6 3
71GAS G NC=5.88E-8 17$IPC=0.00032 3
71GA L 2600.873 23 (9/2)+
71GA B 0.97 8 5.74 4
71GAS B EAV=111.23 99
71GA cB IB$2017Kr01 give 0.6 {I2}
71GA G 518.430 18 0.135 2 [E2] 0.0015 4 N
71GAS G KC=0.0014 4$LC=0.00014 4$MC=2.1E-5 6
71GAS G NC=1.1E-6 3
71GA2 G %IG=0.1202 20
71GA G 1102.46 5 0.028 2 N
71GA2 G %IG=0.0249 18
71GA G 1107.334 10 0.93 9 (E2+M1) +3 +10-1 @C
71GAF G FL=1493.856
71GAF G FLAG=Kx
71GA2 G %IG=0.83 8
71GA cG $E|g=1107.008 {I22}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates by
71GA2cG 0.326 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet
71GA cG MR$+3 {I+10-1} for J(2601)=9/2 (1978Kr06). Other: +0.08 {I7} or
71GA2cG +4.3 {I+18-10} for J(2601)=11/2 (1978Kr06)
71GA G 1493.802 19 0.006 4 @ ?
71GAF G FL=1107.490
71GAF G FLAG=Kx
71GA2 G %IG=0.005 4
71GA cG $E|g=1493.366 {I23}, deduced from level-energy difference, deviates by
71GA2cG 0.435 keV from the measured E|g value for the doublet
71GA L 2720.017 13 7/2+
71GA B 0.156 4 5.96 2
71GAS B EAV=70.99 91
71GA G 472.754 22 0.068 3 N
71GA2 G %IG=0.061 3
71GA G 1226.152 30 0.026 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0232 9
71GA cG $E|g=1226.5 {I6}, I|g=0.020 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 1243.989 17 0.066 2
71GA2 G %IG=0.0588 18
71GA cG $E|g=1244.2 {I8}, I|g=0.066 {I9} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 1612.55 4 0.015 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0134 9
71GA cG $E|g=1612.2 {I5}, I|g=0.013 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA L 2804.911 12 (7/2)+
71GA B 0.372 5 4.99 3
71GAS B EAV=44.38 85
71GA G 1085.381 25 0.042 2 P
71GA2 G %IG=0.0374 18
71GA cG $E|g=1085.3 {I8}, I|g=0.044 {I7} (1970Zo01, tentatively placed from
71GA2cG 1476 level)
71GA cG $E|g=1086.9 {I7}, I|g=0.09 {I4} (1970Ta07), from 1476 level)
71GA G 1306.565 21 0.126 2 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.1122 20
71GA cG $E|g=1306.7 {I2}, I|g=0.12 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1306.7 {I10}, I|g=0.13 {I5} (1970Ta07, unplaced)
71GA G 1311.016 22 0.124 2 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.1104 20
71GA cG $E|g=1311.4 {I2}, I|g=0.11 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1311.3 {I10}, I|g=0.14 {I5} (1970Ta07)
71GA G 1697.35 6 0.008 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0071 9
71GA cG $E|g=1697.6 {I3}, I|g=0.005 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 1840.183 22 0.050 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0445 10
71GA cG $E|g=1840.0 {I4}, I|g=0.050 {I5} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 2317.54 4 0.068 2
71GA2 G %IG=0.0605 19
71GA cG $E|g=2317.7 {I6}, I|g=0.07 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA L 2815.784 12 7/2+ 0.19 PS +13-6
71GA B 0.320 5 4.96 3
71GAS B EAV=41.12 84
71GA G 1321.891 14 0.249 4 C
71GA2 G %IG=0.222 4
71GA cG $E|g=1322.2 {I2}, I|g=0.25 {I3} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1322.2 {I6}, I|g=0.26 {I3} (1970Ta07)
71GA G 1339.80 6 0.012 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0107 9
71GA cG $E|g=1339.7 {I4}, I|g=0.011 {I2} (1970Zo01)
71GA G 1708.311 19 0.092 1
71GA2 G %IG=0.0819 11
71GA cG $E|g=1708.2 {I5}, I|g=0.09 {I1} (1970Zo01)
71GA cG $E|g=1707.1 {I10}, I|g=0.07 {I3} (1970Ta07)
71GA G 1905.65 8 0.006 1 [M2] 2.57E-4
71GA2 G %IG=0.0053 9
71GA cG $E|g=1905.2 {I7}, I|g=0.0048 {I6} (1970Zo01)
71GAS G KC=0.0001304 19$LC=1.313E-5 19$MC=1.92E-6 3
71GAS G NC=1.046E-7 15$IPC=0.0001116 16