71GE 71AS EC DECAY (65.30 H) 1990ME01,1972VA17,1971MU14NDS23 202303
71GE H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh and Jun Chen$CIT=NDS 188, 1 (2023)$
71GE2 H CUT=17-Jan-2023$
71GE c 1990Me01: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, isotopic half-life with Ge(Li)
71GE2c detectors at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
71GE c 1972Va17: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g with a Ge(Li) detector at the
71GE2c University of Notre Dame. A total of 14 levels reported. Results are
71GE3c in agreement with those from 1990Me01
71GE c 1971Mu14: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, isotopic T{-1/2} with a Ge(Li)
71GE2c detector at the University of Manchester. A total of 18 levels
71GE3c reported. Results are in agreement with those from 1990Me01
71GE c 1993Ha08: measured |g(|q) for oriented nuclei at low temperature,
71GE2c deduced mixing ratios. Comparisons with interacting boson-fermion
71GE3c model calculations
71GE c 1987Br24: measured |g(|q) with low temperature nuclear orientation at
71GE2c Clarendon Laboratory in Oxford. Deduced multipolarity, mixing ratio.
71GE3c Sign convention for |d not specified
71GE c 1967Vi06: measured E|g, I|g. A total of 17 |g rays were reported and
71GE2c 15 were placed amongst 8 levels, three of them tentative. The 279, 1315
71GE3c and 1495 levels were not confirmed in later studies.
71GE c Others:
71GE c 2005Se14: measured |b(|q) and |g(|q) using oriented nuclei at low
71GE2c temperature, deduced isospin mixing in the ground state of {+71}As.
71GE c 2004Br44: theoretical calculations of |b decay rates and levels
71GE2c using interacting boson-fermion model
71GE d 1993Fe03: calculated log| {Ift} values for three transitions using
71GE2d dynamical collective model
71GE c Earlier references for production, decay and T{-1/2} of {+71}As:
71GE2c 1959Re24, 1957Be46, 1955Gr08, 1954Th36, 1953St31, 1952Br90,
71GE3c 1950Me55, 1950Ho26, 1948Mc31, 1941Sa01, 1939Sa02.
71GE cE $Small negative feedings of -0.16 {I5} for 747 level and -0.038 {I12}
71GE2cE for 831 level are found from the in-out intensity balance. Either some
71GE3cE of the feeding |g rays are misplaced or their intensities are
71GE4cE underestimated
71GE cE E(A)$Calculated from E|b+=815 {I10} (1955Gr08), 813 {I10} (1954Th36)
71GE2cE and 800 20 (1953St31).
71GE cG $1972Va17 reported 73 |g rays with 43 placed amongst 14 levels.
71GE2cG All the levels are in agreement with those from 1990Me01, however,
71GE3cG placements of some of the |g rays differ. Following |g rays reported
71GE4cG by 1972Va17 have not been confirmed in 1990Me01: 480.4 (I|g=0.019),
71GE5cG 814.0 (I|g=0.046), 911.4 (I|g=0.010), 1238.3 (I|g=0.0063),
71GE6cG 1460.8 (I|g=0.093), 1593.1 (I|g=0.0057), 1730.4 (I|g=0.0021),
71GE7cG 1848.0 (I|g=0.0029). Five of these are unplaced in level scheme
71GE8cG proposed by 1972Va17. It is possible that most of these lines are
71GE9cG contributed by background or impurities.
71GE cG $1971Mu14 reported 45 |g rays placed amongst 18 levels. All levels
71GE2cG and placements are in agreement with those from 1990Me01
71GE cG $A{-2}, A{-4} and U{-2}A{-2} coefficients are from 1993Ha08
71GE cG E,RI$From 1990Me01. Uncertainties in I|g shown in 1990Me01 are
71GE2cG statistical only and an additional 2% as specified by authors arising
71GE3cG from uncertainty in overall shape of detector efficiency curve have
71GE4cG been added in quadrature by evaluators
71GE cG E(D)$Assignment to {+71}As decay is tentative
71GE cG RI(A)$Intensity derived from coincidence gate
71GE cG E(C)$Poor fit; uncertainty multiplied by a factor in the fitting as
71GE2cG noted under comments
71GE cG E(G)$Very Poor fit; gamma omitted in the fitting
71GE cG M,MR$From the Adopted Gammas. Values and/or arguments from this dataset
71GE2cG are given under comments or adopted in Adopted Gammas where noted.
71GE cG M(E)$Adopted values from |g(|q) by 1987Br24 and 1993Ha08 with
71GE2cG electric/magnetic nature from level scheme or RUL
71GE cG MR(F)$Adopted values from |g(|q) data of oriented nuclei (1993Ha08)
71GE cL E$From a least-squares fit to E|g data. Fit to the original |g-ray data
71GE2cL gave an unacceptable reduced |h{+2}=6 with 12 |g rays outside
71GE3cL three standard deviations. The evaluators have increased the
71GE4cL uncertainties of poor-fitted E|g values and omitted several very
71GE5cL poorly-fitted E|g values, as indicated under comments, resulting in
71GE6cL |h{+2}=1.9 with these adjustments
71GE cL J$From the Adopted Levels. Supporting arguments from this dataset
71GE2cL are indicated in comments
71GE cL J(A)$5/2 from |g(|q) (1987Br24)
71GE cL J(B)$3/2 from |g(|q) (1987Br24)
71GE cL T$From Adopted Levels. Values from this dataset are given under
71GE2cL comments where available.
71AS P 0.0 5/2- 65.30 H 7 2013 4
71AS cP J,T$From {+71}As Adopted Levels
71AS cP QP$From 2021Wa16
71GE N 0.825 15 0.825 15 1 1
71GE cN NR$From |SI(|g+ce to g.s.)=100. 1990Me01 give I|g normalization=0.82
71GE2cN {I3}
71GE PN 3
71GE G 315.45 9 0.003 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0025 8
71GE G 375.70 9 0.009 3
71GE2 G %IG=0.0074 25
71GE G 410.42 8 0.010 5
71GE2 G %IG=0.008 4
71GE G 470.60 16 0.002 1 D
71GE2 G %IG=0.0017 8
71GE G 741.6 3 0.0015 8
71GE2 G %IG=0.0012 7
71GE G 1009.9 3 0.004 3 D
71GE2 G %IG=0.0033 25
71GE G 1050.6 2 0.0015 6
71GE2 G %IG=0.0012 5
71GE G 1055.9 2 0.0008 5
71GE2 G %IG=0.0007 4
71GE G 1090.490 10 0.019 2 D
71GE2 G %IG=0.0157 17
71GE G 1106.93 8 0.006 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0050 8
71GE G 1297.51 5 0.024 2
71GE2 G %IG=0.0198 17
71GE G 1312.0 2 0.0011 3 D
71GE2 G %IG=0.00091 25
71GE G 1321 1 0.0006 4 D
71GE2 G %IG=0.0005 3
71GE G 1533.6 1 0.0007 3 D
71GE2 G %IG=0.00058 25
71GE G 1587.9 3 0.0004 2 D
71GE2 G %IG=0.00033 17
71GE G 1722.1 5 0.0002 1 D
71GE2 G %IG=1.7E-4 8
71GE G 1785.3 4 0.0003 2
71GE2 G %IG=0.00025 17
71GE G 1800.4 8 0.0003 1
71GE2 G %IG=2.5E-4 8
71GE L 0.0 1/2- 11.43 D 3
71GE cL T$from the Adopted Levels.
71GE L 174.954 4 5/2- 81 NS 3
71GE cL T$value from this dataset: |?70 ns (1955Gr08).
71GE E 1834 7 28.0 9 56.4 16 5.85 2 84.4 24A
71GES E EAV=352.0 18$CK=0.589 4$CL=0.0663 4$CM+=0.01244 7
71GE G 174.954 5 100.0 20 E2 0.0915 13 C
71GES G KC=0.0808 11$LC=0.00924 13$MC=0.001369 19
71GES G NC=7.91E-5 11
71GE2 G %IG=82.45 22
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.322 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.008 {I10}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.303 {I9}.
71GE cG $|a(K)exp=0.095 (1955Gr08), 0.07 (1954Th36).
71GE L 198.371 10 9/2+ 20.22 MS 12 M
71GE2 L %IT=100
71GE cL T$from the Adopted Levels.
71GE E 0.04 LT 0.5 LT 9.0 GT 0.5 LT 1U?
71GES E EAV=367.9 18$CK=0.8036 15$CL=0.09171 17$CM+=0.01721 4
71GE G 23.438 15 0.0226 14 M2 207.5 30
71GES G KC=169.5 24$LC=32.7 5$MC=5.03 7
71GES G NC=0.265 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.0186 12
71GE cG M$from |a(exp)=264 {I53} (1971Mu14), obtained from their |g-ray data
71GE2cG and ce data of 1955Gr08.
71GE cG RI$0.0226 {I13} (1990Me01, from table I, note that in authors'
71GE2cG level-scheme figure 1, value is listed as 0.011). The value in table I
71GE3cG of 1990Me01 is in agreement with 0.023 {I5} in 1971Mu14.
71GE cG $ce(K)(175|g)/ce(K)(23|g)|?10; K/(L+M)|?1 (1955Gr08).
71GE L 499.899 5 3/2-
71GE E 0.145 8 1.73 8 7.19 2 1.87 9
71GES E EAV=212.9 17$CK=0.8134 19$CL=0.09184 22$CM+=0.01722 4
71GE G 324.92 6 0.021 5 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.017 4
71GE G 499.876 10 4.42 9 M1+E2 -2.3 1 2.20E-3 3 C
71GES G KC=0.001962 29$LC=0.0002058 31$MC=3.07E-5 5
71GES G NC=1.959E-6 29
71GE2 G %IG=3.64 10
71GE cG $A{-2}=+0.221 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.018 {I21}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.208 {I17}.
71GE cG M$D+Q; |d=+0.11 {I2} or -2.3 {I1} (1987Br24).
71GE L 525.116 6 5/2+
71GE E 0.198 8 2.85 8 6.96 2 3.05 9
71GES E EAV=202.2 17$CK=0.8246 17$CL=0.09312 20$CM+=0.01746 4
71GE G 326.785 15 3.70 8 E2 0.0095513 C
71GES G KC=0.00849 12$LC=0.000913 13$MC=0.0001358 19
71GES G NC=8.41E-6 12
71GE2 G %IG=3.05 9
71GE cG $|d(M3/E2)=+0.05 {I6}.
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.178 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.014 {I25}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.165 {I20}.
71GE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=-0.155 {I9} (1987Br24).
71GE G 350.163 6 0.459 11 E1+M2 -0.19 3 0.0021613 C
71GES G KC=0.00193 11$LC=0.000200 13$MC=2.98E-5 19
71GES G NC=1.93E-6 12
71GE2 G %IG=0.378 11
71GE cG MR$deduced by 1993Ha08 using their |g(|q) data and those from 1987Br24.
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.20 {I26}, A{-4}=-0.2 {I3}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.19 {I25}.
71GE L 589.771 11 7/2+
71GE E 0.001 LT 0.03 LT 8.9 GT 0.03 LT ?
71GES E EAV=175.0 17$CK=0.8478 13$CL=0.09580 15$CM+=0.01797 3
71GE G 64.69 [M1+E2] 2.0 180.005 LE
71GES G K/T=0.57 28$L/T=0.09 9$M/T=0.013 14
71GES G N/T=6.E-4 6
71GES G KC=1.7 15$LC=0.26 24$MC=0.038 35
71GES G NC=0.0017 15
71GE cG TI$intensity deduced from 615|g gate.
71GE G 391.383 18 0.736 16 M1+E2 -0.21 +4-3 0.00257 5 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.607 17
71GES G KC=0.00230 5$LC=0.000238 5$MC=3.56E-5 7
71GES G NC=2.33E-6 5
71GE G 414.39 10 0.004 1
71GEF G FL=174.954
71GE2 G %IG=0.0033 8
71GE L 708.199 5 3/2- 10.7 PS GT
71GE E 0.0005 LT 0.05 LT 8.6 GT 0.05 LT ?
71GES E EAV=125.3 17$CK=0.8724 5$CL=0.09870 7$CM+=0.01851 2
71GE G 533.2 2 0.0230 21 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.0190 18
71GE G 708.195 5 0.327 10 M1+E2 C
71GES G CC=0.00075 11$KC=0.00067 9$LC=6.9E-5 10$MC=1.03E-5 15
71GES G NC=6.7E-7 9
71GE2 G %IG=0.270 10
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.16 {I17}, A{-4}=+0.21 {I19}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.15 {I16}.
71GE L 747.255 5 5/2-
71GE G 247.351 5 0.237 6 M1+E2 -0.18 7 0.0080 5 C
71GES G KC=0.0072 5$LC=0.00075 5$MC=0.000113 7
71GES G NC=7.3E-6 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.195 6
71GE G 572.255 15 0.321 8 M1+E2 0.0012927 C
71GES G KC=0.00116 24$LC=0.000120 26$MC=1.8E-5 4
71GES G NC=1.16E-6 23
71GE2 G %IG=0.265 8
71GE G 747.28 1 0.198 6 (E2) C
71GE2 G %IG=0.163 6
71GES G CC=0.000736 10$KC=0.000658 9$LC=6.80E-5 10$MC=1.015E-5 14
71GES G NC=6.57E-7 9
71GE L 808.230 17 1/2-
71GE E 2.5E-5 17 0.014 9 9.1 3 0.014 9
71GES E EAV=83.1 18$CK=0.8798 2$CL=0.09966 3$CM+=0.018698 5
71GE G 308.24 4 0.014 2 (M1+E2) 0.008 4 @C
71GEF G FLAG=A
71GE2 G %IG=0.0115 17
71GES G KC=0.0071 33$LC=8.E-4 4$MC=1.1E-4 5
71GES G NC=7.1E-6 32
71GE G 633.440 25 0.058 7 CC
71GEF G FL=174.954
71GE2 G %IG=0.048 6
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=633.273
71GE cG RI$0.018 {I2} based on adopted branching ratios.
71GE G 808.27 3 0.036 3 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.030 3
71GE L 831.299 8 3/2-
71GE G 306.217 25 0.030 4 (E1+M2) 0.0027417 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.025 3
71GES G KC=0.00244 15$LC=0.000251 17$MC=3.75E-5 25
71GES G NC=2.41E-6 16
71GE G 331.4 2 0.02 1 E2(+M1) 1.4 GT 0.0082 9 AC
71GES G KC=0.0073 8$LC=0.00078 9$MC=0.000116 13
71GES G NC=7.2E-6 8
71GE2 G %IG=0.017 8
71GE cG RI$from level-scheme Fig. 1 in 1990Me01, 0.002 in E|g, I|g authors'
71GE2cG Table I seems a misprint in view of comparison of branching ratios with
71GE3cG other reactions.
71GE G 831.294 10 0.105 3 (M1+E2) -0.6 +4-7 C
71GES G CC=0.00048 4$KC=0.000431 33$LC=4.4E-5 4$MC=6.6E-6 5
71GES G NC=4.33E-7 32
71GE2 G %IG=0.087 3
71GE L 886.94 10 (3/2-)
71GE E 0.0107 19 9.14 8 0.0107 19
71GES E CK=0.8812$CL=0.09993$CM+=0.01875
71GE G 711.6 3 0.008 2 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0066 17
71GE G 886.98 10 0.005 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0041 8
71GE L 1026.543 6 5/2- 1.2 PS GT A
71GE E 1.55 5 6.87 2 1.55 5
71GES E CK=0.8810$CL=0.1002$CM+=0.01880
71GE G 195.22 15 0.010 5 [M1,E2] 0.037 24 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.008 4
71GES G KC=0.033 21$LC=0.0037 24$MC=5.E-4 4
71GES G NC=3.3E-5 20
71GE G 279.379 7 0.227 8 (M1+E2) 0.011 6 GC
71GEF G FL=747.255
71GES G KC=0.010 5$LC=0.0011 5$MC=1.6E-4 8
71GES G NC=1.0E-5 5
71GE2 G %IG=0.187 8
71GE cG E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=279.287
71GE G 526.642 3 1.050 23 (M1+E2) -0.16 3 1.26E-3 2 FC
71GES G KC=0.001123 17$LC=0.0001156 18$MC=1.727E-5 26
71GES G NC=1.135E-6 17
71GE2 G %IG=0.866 25
71GE cG $A{-2}=+0.69 {I5}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I6}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.65 {I5}.
71GE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=+0.65 {I3} (1987Br24).
71GE G 828.0 1 0.004 2 [M2] 1.15E-3 2
71GES G KC=0.001023 14$LC=0.0001064 15$MC=1.591E-5 22
71GES G NC=1.046E-6 15
71GE2 G %IG=0.0033 17
71GE G 851.63 7 0.220 21 (M1+E2) +0.8 7 AC
71GEF G FLAG=F
71GES G CC=0.000469 35$KC=0.000419 31$LC=4.29E-5 34$MC=6.4E-6 5
71GES G NC=4.20E-7 30
71GE2 G %IG=0.181 18
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.4 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.2 {I3}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.4 {I3}.
71GE G 1026.512 17 0.380 13 (E2)
71GES G CC=0.000333 5$KC=0.000297 4$LC=3.05E-5 4$MC=4.54E-6 6
71GES G NC=2.97E-7 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.313 12
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.45 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.02 {I18}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.43 {I15}.
71GE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=-0.43 {I9} (1987Br24).
71GE L 1038.29 10 9/2+
71GE E 0.0033 17 10.08 23 0.0033 17 1U
71GES E CK=0.8781$CL=0.10265 2$CM+=0.019295 5
71GE G 448.52 10 0.004 2 M1+E2 +0.47 +5-6 0.00206 6
71GE2 G %IG=0.0033 17
71GES G KC=0.00184 6$LC=0.000191 6$MC=2.86E-5 9
71GES G NC=1.86E-6 6
71GE G 839.3 3 0.0014 6 (M1(+E2))+0.10 18 D ?
71GE2 G %IG=0.0012 5
71GES G CC=0.000447 9$KC=0.000400 8$LC=4.08E-5 8$MC=6.10E-6 12
71GES G NC=4.02E-7 8
71GE L 1095.512 6 3/2- 0.62 PS 14 B
71GE E 4.59 13 6.33 2 4.59 13
71GES E CK=0.8809$CL=0.1003$CM+=0.01883
71GE G 264.21 15 0.010 5 [M1,E2] 0.013 7 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.008 4
71GES G KC=0.012 6$LC=0.0013 7$MC=1.9E-4 10
71GES G NC=1.2E-5 6
71GE G 287.32 4 0.026 3 [M1,E2] 0.010 5
71GE2 G %IG=0.021 3
71GES G KC=0.009 4$LC=1.0E-3 5$MC=1.4E-4 7
71GES G NC=9.E-6 4
71GE G 348.27 5 0.058 9 [M1,E2] 0.0055 22 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.048 8
71GES G KC=0.0049 20$LC=5.2E-4 22$MC=7.7E-5 32
71GES G NC=4.9E-6 19
71GE cG RI$from table I of 1990Me01, listed as 0.048 in authors' figure 1.
71GE G 387.31 4 0.015 2 [M1,E2] 0.0039 14 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0124 17
71GES G KC=0.0035 13$LC=3.7E-4 14$MC=5.5E-5 20
71GES G NC=3.5E-6 12
71GE G 570.42 21 0.0270 21 [E1] C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0223 18
71GES G CC=0.000511 7$KC=0.000457 6$LC=4.65E-5 7$MC=6.94E-6 10
71GES G NC=4.52E-7 6
71GE G 595.6 1 0.10 1 [M1,E2] 0.0011623 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.083 8
71GES G KC=0.00104 20$LC=0.000108 22$MC=1.61E-5 32
71GES G NC=1.04E-6 20
71GE G 920.553 7 0.370 13 (M1+E2) AC
71GEF G FLAG=E
71GES G CC=0.000400 32$KC=0.000357 29$LC=3.66E-5 31$MC=5.5E-6 5
71GES G NC=3.58E-7 28
71GE2 G %IG=0.305 12
71GE cG $A{-2}=+0.40 {I11}, A{-4}=-0.20 {I12}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.38 {I10}.
71GE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=+0.31 {I12} (1987Br24).
71GE cG MR$+0.27 {I5} or +22 {I+390-11} (1987Br24); +0.36 {I14} or >+3.7
71GE2cG (1993Ha08).
71GE G 1095.490 10 4.98 12 (M1+E2) EC
71GES G CC=0.000272 15$KC=0.000243 13$LC=2.48E-5 14$MC=3.70E-6 21
71GES G NC=2.43E-7 13
71GE2 G %IG=4.11 12
71GE cG MR$-3.31 {I4} or +0.234 {I4} (1987Br24); +0.23 {I2} or -3.20 {I2}
71GE2cG (1993Ha08).
71GE cG $A{-2}=+0.077 {I21}, A{-4}=-0.020 {I24}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.072 {I20}.
71GE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=+0.048 {I5} (1987Br24).
71GE L 1096.06 20 7/2-
71GE E 0.017 8 8.76 21 0.017 8
71GES E CK=0.8809$CL=0.1003$CM+=0.01883
71GE G 921.1 2 0.02 1 M1 3.67E-4 6 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.017 8
71GE cG E$from Fig. 1b of 1990Me01; misprint in authors' Table 1.
71GE L 1139.446 8 3/2- 4.0 PS 14 B
71GE E 1.02 3 6.94 2 1.02 3
71GES E CK=0.8808$CL=0.1004$CM+=0.018849 2
71GE G 308.24 4 0.010 2 (M1+E2) 0.008 4 @C
71GEF G FLAG=A
71GE2 G %IG=0.0083 17
71GES G KC=0.0071 33$LC=8.E-4 4$MC=1.1E-4 5
71GES G NC=7.1E-6 32
71GE G 331.48 4 0.025 4 [M1,E2] 0.0064 27 G
71GEF G FL=808.230
71GE2 G %IG=0.021 3
71GES G KC=0.0057 24$LC=6.0E-4 27$MC=9.E-5 4
71GES G NC=5.7E-6 23
71GE cG E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=331.215
71GE G 392.16 5 0.042 3 (M1+E2) 0.0038 13 C
71GES G KC=0.0034 12$LC=3.6E-4 13$MC=5.3E-5 19
71GES G NC=3.4E-6 12
71GE2 G %IG=0.035 3
71GE cG MR$+0.075 {I15} or -4.3 {I+11-17} (1993Ha08).
71GE cG $A{-2}=+0.08 {I8}, A{-4}=-0.11 {I10}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.08 {I8}.
71GE G 431.281 23 0.0250 11 [M1,E2] 0.0029 9
71GE2 G %IG=0.0206 10
71GES G KC=0.0025 8$LC=2.7E-4 9$MC=4.0E-5 13
71GES G NC=2.6E-6 8
71GE G 614.26 5 0.017 3 [E1] C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0140 25
71GES G CC=0.000429 6$KC=0.000384 5$LC=3.91E-5 5$MC=5.83E-6 8
71GES G NC=3.80E-7 5
71GE G 639.477 14 0.059 3 [M1,E2] CC
71GEF G FL=499.899
71GE2 G %IG=0.049 3
71GES G CC=0.00097 17$KC=0.00086 15$LC=8.9E-5 16$MC=1.33E-5 23
71GES G NC=8.7E-7 14
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=639.543
71GE G 964.479 9 0.083 3 (M1+E2) -0.8 +9-49
71GE2 G %IG=0.068 3
71GES G CC=0.000354 30$KC=0.000317 27$LC=3.23E-5 29$MC=4.8E-6 4
71GES G NC=3.17E-7 26
71GE G 1139.461 19 0.975 20 M1+E2 E
71GES G CC=0.000252 13$KC=0.000223 11$LC=2.28E-5 12$MC=3.40E-6 18
71GES G NC=2.24E-7 11$IPC=2.06E-6 34
71GE2 G %IG=0.804 22
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.23 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I7}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.22 {I6}.
71GE cG $U{-2}A{-2}=-0.30 {I3} (1987Br24).
71GE cG MR$+0.50 {I3} or -17 {I+5-10} (1987Br24); +0.45 {I5} or -6.8 {I14}
71GE2cG (1993Ha08).
71GE L 1192.3 11/2+ 0.108 PS LT ?
71GE DL E LEVEL ENERGY HELD FIXED IN LEAST-SQUARES ADJUSTMENT
71GE G 993.9 0.0024011 M1+E2 +1.25 21 ?
71GE2 G %IG=1.98E-3 10
71GES G CC=0.000341 6$KC=0.000305 6$LC=3.12E-5 6$MC=4.66E-6 9
71GES G NC=3.05E-7 6
71GE cG E,RI$from level-scheme figure 1 of 1990Me01, incorrectly shown to decay
71GE2cG from 1205 level; |g not listed in authors' table I.
71GE L 1205.145 8 5/2+ 1.11 PS 28
71GE E 0.730 19 7.02 2 0.730 19
71GES E CK=0.8806$CL=0.10055 1$CM+=0.018883 3
71GE G 373.837 12 0.104 4 (E1) 1.49E-3 2 C
71GES G KC=0.001331 19$LC=0.0001361 19$MC=2.028E-5 28
71GES G NC=1.311E-6 18
71GE2 G %IG=0.086 4
71GE G 457.72 12 0.004 1 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0033 8
71GE G 615.365 10 0.642 14 (M1+E2) 0.0010720 C
71GES G KC=0.00095 17$LC=9.9E-5 19$MC=1.47E-5 28
71GES G NC=9.6E-7 17
71GE2 G %IG=0.529 15
71GE cG E$quoted uncertainty of 0.002 is considered by the evaluators as
71GE2cG unrealistic. It is increased to 0.010.
71GE cG MR$-0.23 {I+8-9} or -2.6 {I+5-7} (1993Ha08).
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.17 {I9}, A{-4}=+0.07 {I11}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.16 {I9}.
71GE G 680.035 9 0.118 6 (M1+E2) C
71GES G CC=0.00083 13$KC=0.00074 11$LC=7.6E-5 12$MC=1.14E-5 18
71GES G NC=7.4E-7 11
71GE2 G %IG=0.097 5
71GE G 705.1 3 0.003 2 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.0025 17
71GE G 1030.20 8 0.013 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0107 9
71GE L 1212.498 6 5/2- 1.2 PS GT
71GE E 1.09 6 6.84 3 1.09 6
71GES E CK=0.8805$CL=0.10057 1$CM+=0.018888 3
71GE G 465.228 10 0.114 3 (M1+E2) 0.0023 7 C
71GES G KC=0.0020 6$LC=2.1E-4 6$MC=3.2E-5 9
71GES G NC=2.1E-6 6
71GE2 G %IG=0.094 3
71GE cG E$quoted uncertainty of 0.001 is considered by the evaluators as
71GE2cG unrealistic. It is increased to 0.010.
71GE G 504.28 5 0.21 6 (M1+E2) 0.0018 5 C
71GES G KC=0.0016 4$LC=1.7E-4 4$MC=2.5E-5 7
71GES G NC=1.6E-6 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.17 5
71GE G 622.71 4 0.0160 11
71GE2 G %IG=0.0132 9
71GE G 712.598 5 0.396 11 (M1+E2) C
71GES G CC=0.00074 10$KC=0.00066 9$LC=6.8E-5 10$MC=1.01E-5 15
71GES G NC=6.6E-7 9
71GE2 G %IG=0.327 11
71GE cG MR$-0.19 {I+9-11} or -1.8 {I+4-5} (1993Ha08).
71GE cG $A{-2}=+0.75 {I16}, A{-4}=+0.20 {I19}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.70 {I15}.
71GE G 1037.530 15 0.246 6 (M1+E2) C
71GES G CC=0.000306 19$KC=0.000274 17$LC=2.79E-5 18$MC=4.17E-6 27
71GES G NC=2.74E-7 16
71GE2 G %IG=0.203 6
71GE cG MR$-0.10 {I6} or +2.1 {I3} (1993Ha08).
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.33 {I7}, A{-4}=-0.04 {I9}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.31 {I7}.
71GE G 1212.496 23 0.339 9 (E2)
71GES G CC=0.0002386 33$KC=0.0002040 29$LC=2.081E-5 29$MC=3.11E-6 4
71GES G NC=2.036E-7 29$IPC=1.047E-5 15
71GE2 G %IG=0.280 9
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.21 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.14 {I21}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.20 {I17}.
71GE L 1298.737 14 3/2- 0.42 PS 9 B
71GE E 0.222 11 7.43 2 0.222 11
71GES E CK=0.8802$CL=0.10083 2$CM+=0.018944 3
71GE G 551.5 1 0.005 2 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0041 17
71GE G 590.5 1 0.03 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.025 8
71GE G 1123.74 8 0.0036 6
71GE2 G %IG=0.0030 5
71GE G 1298.729 15 0.232 7 (M1+E2) E
71GES G CC=0.000214 10$KC=0.000170 6$LC=1.73E-5 7$MC=2.58E-6 10
71GES G NC=1.70E-7 6$IPC=2.43E-5 35
71GE2 G %IG=0.191 7
71GE cG MR$+0.034 {I25} or -1.87 {I11} (1987Br24); +0.04 {I3} or -1.88 {I11}
71GE2cG (1993Ha08).
71GE cG $A{-2}=+0.22 {I24}, A{-4}=+0.4 {I3}, U{-2}A{-2}=+0.21 {I23}.
71GE L 1378.70 5 5/2-
71GE cL E$doublet proposed by the evaluators based on branching ratios in
71GE2cL different datasets.
71GE E 0.21 3 7.35 7 0.21 3
71GES E CK=0.8798$CL=0.10114 2$CM+=0.019010 4
71GE G 631.52 15 0.24 4 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.20 3
71GE G 788.92 5 0.011 2
71GE2 G %IG=0.0091 17
71GE L 1379.0 5 (1/2-) ?
71GE E 0.0009 4 9.71 20 0.0009 4 ?
71GES E CK=0.8798$CL=0.10114 2$CM+=0.019011 4
71GE G 1202.26 5 0.0018 9 @ ?
71GEF G FL=174.954
71GE2 G %IG=0.0015 8
71GE cG $Placement suggested by the evaluators, intensity deduced from
71GE2cG branching ratio in (|a,n|g).
71GE G 1379.0 5 0.0011 5
71GE2 G %IG=0.0009 4
71GE L 1406.651 10 7/2-
71GE cL $An 881.8|g placed by 1972Va17 from this level is assigned elsewhere in
71GE2cL 1990Me01.
71GE E 0.215 7 7.30 2 0.215 7
71GES E CK=0.8797$CL=0.10127 2$CM+=0.019038 5
71GE G 311.15 15 0.005 2 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.0041 17
71GE G 380.08 6 0.010 2
71GE2 G %IG=0.0083 17
71GE G 659.428 19 0.083 4 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.068 4
71GE G 698.44 2 0.0240 11
71GE2 G %IG=0.0198 10
71GE G 906.696 11 0.0540 23 CC
71GEF G FL=499.899
71GE2 G %IG=0.0445 21
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=906.745
71GE G 1231.692 15 0.084 3 (M1+E2)
71GES G CC=0.000224 11$KC=0.000190 8$LC=1.93E-5 8$MC=2.88E-6 13
71GES G NC=1.90E-7 8$IPC=1.19E-5 18
71GE2 G %IG=0.069 3
71GE G 1406.5 1 0.0026 6 [M3] ?
71GE2 G %IG=0.0021 5
71GE cG RI$from table I of 1990Me01, listed as 0.026 in authors' level-scheme
71GE2cG figure 1. The value of 0.026 is less likely, since in that case it
71GE3cG would have been seen in other reactions where 1406 level is populated.
71GE cG E$the placement is treated as questionable by the evaluators since part
71GE2cG or all of it could also be contributed by coincidental summing,
71GE L 1421.97 10 9/2- 1.2 PS LT
71GE E 0.0007425 9.74 15 0.00074 25 ?
71GES E CK=0.8796$CL=0.10134 2$CM+=0.019054 5
71GE cE $Expected log| {Ift}>11 for |DJ=2, |D|p=no transition.
71GE G 1247.0 1 0.0009 3 E2
71GES G CC=0.0002313 32$KC=0.0001919 27$LC=1.957E-5 27$MC=2.92E-6 4
71GES G NC=1.915E-7 27$IPC=1.668E-5 23
71GE2 G %IG=0.00074 25
71GE cG $|d(M3/E2)=-0.06 {I6}.
71GE L 1449.8 3 ?
71GE E 0.033 17 8.04 23 0.033 17
71GES E CK=0.8794$CL=0.10149 3$CM+=0.019086 5
71GE G 702.5 3 0.04 2 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.033 17
71GE L 1506.381 14 7/2- 0.51 PS 16
71GE cL $A 480.4|g placed by 1972Va17 from this level is not seen by 1990Me01.
71GE E 0.176 6 7.22 2 0.176 6
71GES E CK=0.8790$CL=0.10184 3$CM+=0.019161 6
71GE G 674.33 8 0.007 1 G
71GEF G FL=831.299
71GE2 G %IG=0.0058 8
71GE cG E$very poor fit and omitted in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=675.078
71GE G 759.11 3 0.018 2 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0148 17
71GE G 798.4 2 0.0280 21 A
71GE2 G %IG=0.0231 18
71GE G 1006.466 17 0.0530 23 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0437 21
71GE G 1307.98 3 0.0115 7
71GE2 G %IG=0.0095 6
71GE G 1331.526 23 0.096 4 C
71GEF G FL=174.954
71GE2 G %IG=0.079 4
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=1331.413
71GE L 1558.744 14 5/2+
71GE E 0.251 7 6.97 2 0.251 7
71GES E CK=0.8785$CL=0.10225 4$CM+=0.019248 8
71GE G 727.531 22 0.0220 11 CC
71GEF G FL=831.299
71GE2 G %IG=0.0181 10
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=727.441
71GE G 1033.542 17 0.238 6 (M1+E2) +1.6 +14-19 FC
71GEF G FLAG=C
71GEF G FL=525.116
71GE2 G %IG=0.196 6
71GES G CC=0.000317 24$KC=0.000283 22$LC=2.90E-5 23$MC=4.32E-6 35
71GES G NC=2.83E-7 21
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=1033.620
71GE cG MR$-0.26 to +3.0 (1993Ha08).
71GE cG $A{-2}=-0.33 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.1 {I3}, U{-2}A{-2}=-0.31 {I24}.
71GE G 1058.817 16 0.0300 12 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0247 11
71GE G 1360.44 13 0.0104 5
71GE2 G %IG=0.0086 5
71GE G 1383.86 4 0.0042 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.0035 3
71GE L 1598.535 17 3/2- 0.55 PS 15
71GE E 0.232 18 6.93 4 0.232 18
71GES E CK=0.8780$CL=0.10263 5$CM+=0.019329 9
71GE G 851.3 2 0.05 2 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.041 17
71GE G 890.0 2 0.003 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0025 8
71GE G 1073.4 2 0.0023 5
71GE2 G %IG=0.0019 4
71GE G 1098.64 7 0.149 5 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.123 5
71GE G 1423.579 25 0.0340 12
71GE2 G %IG=0.0280 11
71GE G 1598.505 25 0.0430 22
71GE2 G %IG=0.0355 19
71GE L 1629.178 12 (3/2+,5/2-)
71GE E 0.102 9 7.21 4 0.102 9
71GES E CK=0.8776$CL=0.10297 5$CM+=0.01940 1
71GE G 533.6 2 0.004 2 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.0033 17
71GE G 798.0 2 0.02 1 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.017 8
71GE G 881.893 25 0.037 3 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.031 3
71GE G 1039.34 6 0.011 1 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0091 9
71GE G 1104.16 3 0.014 1 CC
71GE2 G %IG=0.0115 9
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=1104.053
71GE G 1129.37 5 0.007 1 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0058 8
71GE G 1454.26 15 0.0009 3
71GE2 G %IG=0.00074 25
71GE G 1629.154 15 0.0300 12
71GE2 G %IG=0.0247 11
71GE L 1743.409 18 3/2- 0.42 PS 15
71GE E 0.076 4 7.03 3 0.076 4
71GES E CK=0.8752 2$CL=0.1050 1$CM+=0.019840 23
71GE G 445.07 17 0.002 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0017 8
71GE G 935.175 14 0.034 4 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.028 3
71GE G 996.06 6 0.012 1 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0099 9
71GE G 1218.16 7 0.0030 6
71GE2 G %IG=0.0025 5
71GE G 1243.56 8 0.0021 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.0017 3
71GE G 1568.4 2 0.002 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0017 8
71GE G 1743.40 4 0.0370 13 (M1+E2)
71GE2 G %IG=0.0305 12
71GES G CC=0.000278 20$KC=9.55E-5 21$LC=9.67E-6 22$MC=1.443E-6 33
71GES G NC=9.53E-8 20$IPC=0.000172 18
71GE L 1780.746 19 5/2-,7/2-
71GE E 0.0292 23 7.31 4 0.0292 23
71GES E CK=0.8738 2$CL=0.10612 15$CM+=0.02008 3
71GE G 754.4 3 0.0018 9
71GE2 G %IG=0.0015 8
71GE G 1191.18 9 0.006 2
71GE2 G %IG=0.0050 17
71GE G 1255.76 5 0.0050 5 CC
71GE2 G %IG=0.0041 4
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=1255.618
71GE G 1280.91 7 0.0020 8 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0017 7
71GE G 1582.33 7 0.0036 3
71GE2 G %IG=0.0030 3
71GE G 1605.749 21 0.0170 11
71GE2 G %IG=0.0140 10
71GE L 1792.098 9 (3/2+,5/2-)
71GE cL $A 1593.1|g placed by 1972Va17 from this level is not seen by 1990Me01.
71GE E 0.105 4 6.71 3 0.105 4
71GES E CK=0.8733 2$CL=0.10654 16$CM+=0.02017 4
71GE G 696.575 12 0.011 2
71GE2 G %IG=0.0091 17
71GE G 765.89 7 0.007 1 C
71GEF G FL=1026.543
71GE2 G %IG=0.0058 8
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 3 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=765.551
71GE G 983.67 5 0.006 2 C
71GEF G FL=808.230
71GE2 G %IG=0.0050 17
71GE cG E$uncertainty multiplied by a factor of 2 in the fitting; level-energy
71GE2cG difference=983.860
71GE G 1044.845 19 0.0230 21 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0190 18
71GE G 1083.86 3 0.014 1
71GE2 G %IG=0.0115 9
71GE G 1202.26 5 0.0117 8 @C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0097 7
71GE cG RI$intensity divided by the evaluators.
71GE G 1267.008 20 0.0280 12 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0231 11
71GE G 1292.13 15 0.0016 5 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.0013 4
71GE G 1617.12 3 0.0247 8
71GE2 G %IG=0.0204 8
71GE G 1792.0 4 0.0005 3
71GE2 G %IG=0.00041 25
71GE L 1801.13 7 (5/2+,7/2)
71GE E 0.035 3 7.14 5 0.035 3
71GES E CK=0.8728 3$CL=0.10690 18$CM+=0.02025 4
71GE G 1211.35 8 0.0300 21
71GE2 G %IG=0.0247 18
71GE G 1276.0 5 0.009 3 AC
71GE2 G %IG=0.0074 25
71GE G 1602.74 14 0.0031 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.0026 3
71GE L 1937.45 3 (3/2+,5/2-) 0.69 PS 28
71GE cL $431.7, 798.3, 911.4 and 1191.3 |g rays placed by 1972Va17 from this
71GE2cL level. The 911|g is not seen by 1990Me01 while others are placed from
71GE3cL different levels.
71GE E 0.0196 6 6.42 6 0.0196 6
71GES E CK=0.8503 23$CL=0.1254 19$CM+=0.0243 4
71GE G 1347.7 5 0.0005 3 C
71GE2 G %IG=0.00041 25
71GE cG RI$from Table I of 1990Me01, listed as 0.005 in authors' level-scheme
71GE2cG Fig. 1.
71GE G 1762.49 6 0.0095 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.0078 4
71GE G 1937.41 4 0.0137 4
71GE2 G %IG=0.0113 4
71GE L 1965.06 7 3/2-
71GE E 0.0011625 7.18 14 0.00116 25
71GES E CK=0.824 8$CL=0.147 7$CM+=0.0289 14
71GE G 1965.03 7 0.0014 3
71GE2 G %IG=0.00115 25