58CU    58ZN EC DECAY (86 MS)         2005KA46,1998JO18         10NDS    201004
 58CU  H TYP=FUL$AUT=CAROLINE D. NESARAJA, SCOTT D. GERAEDTS AND BALRAJ SINGH$
 58CU2 H CIT=NDS 111, 897 (2010)$CUT=12-Jan-2010$
 58CU c  2005Ka46, 2000Oi04: {+58}Zn produced and identified in Nb(p,X)
 58CU2c  E=1.4 GeV at ISOLDE at CERN using selective laser-ion source. Measured
 58CU3c  E|g, I|g, |b|g coin, isotopic half-life. No delayed protons were
 58CU4c  observed from {+58}Zn isotope. 2005Ka46 is a brief conference
 58CU5c  report and the authors state that analysis of |b decay and
 58CU6c  experiment to detect protons from the decay of {+58}Zn are in progress
 58CU c  1998Jo18: mass-separated source of {+58}Zn produced by Nb(p,X) at
 58CU2c  E(p)=1 GeV. Measured E|g, I|g, |b{++}p delayed protons. ISOLDE-CERN
 58CU3c  facility.
 58CU d  1999Va08: calculation of Gamow-Teller log| {Ift} values
 58CU c  Except for the strong population of 203, 0+ (isobar state), the
 58CU2c  other features of the decay scheme are poorly known
 58CU cL J$ From 'adopted levels'
 58ZN  P  0.0         0+                86 MS    8                9364    50
 58ZN CP T$ Weighted average of 90 ms 8 (2009Fu15), 83 MS 10 (2005Ka46),
 58ZN2CP 83 MS 10 (2002Lo13), 86 MS 18 (1998Jo18). Methods:
 58ZN3CP |g decay timing (2009Fu15), |b-gated timing (1998Jo18),
 58ZN4CP |b(fragment) timing correlations (2002Lo13). Method not discussed in
 58ZN5CP 2005Ka46
 58CU  N  0.8      AP           1          1
 58CU cN BR$%|b{++}p<3 (1998Jo18)
 58CU PN                                                                     5
 58CU  L  0.0         1+
 58CU2 L ISPIN=0
 58CU CL $ ^B(^GT) LE 0.31 (1998Jo18), <0.5 (quoted by 2005Ka46 as
 58CU2CL 'to be published')
 58CU  E                18   10  0.019 11  4.1   3               18       10   ?
 58CUS E EAV=3955 25$CK=0.000936 17$CL=0.0001019 1$CM+=1.78E-5 4
 58CU cE TI$ deduced by the evaluators (100-feeding to 203 and 1051 states).
 58CU2cE others: |<20 (2005Ka46), 14 {I17} (1998Jo18). This feeding is
 58CU3cE uncertain since the feeding to higher levels is unknown
 58CU  L  203         0+
 58CU2 L ISPIN=1
 58CU  E                72   10  0.082 11  3.486                 72       10
 58CUS E EAV=3855 25$CK=0.001007 19$CL=0.0001096 2$CM+=1.91E-5 4
 58CU CE TI$ evaluators' estimate from LOGFT=3.486 4 (unweighted average of
 58CU3CE 13 best {Ift} values of 0+ to 0+ superallowed |b transitions as
 58CU4CE surveyed in 2009Ha12), T and Q(|e). This value is essentially the
 58CU5CE same as (72 7) in 2005Ka46. Other: 74 16 (1998Jo18) using
 58CU6CE log| {Ift}=3.48, T=86 ms 18, Q(|e)=9370 50.
 58CU CE LOGFT$ from analysis and survey of superallowed transitions for
 58CU2CE 13 best cases (2009Ha12)
 58CU  G  203           100
 58CU  L  1051         1+
 58CU2 L ISPIN=0
 58CU CL $ ^B(^GT)=0.54 26 (1998Jo18), 0.37 10 (quoted by 2005Ka46 from their
 58CU2CL results to be published)
 58CU  E               10    2   0.016 3   4.1   1                10      2
 58CUS E EAV=3437 25$CK=0.00139 3$CL=0.000152 4$CM+=2.65E-5 6
 58CU CE TI$ average of 8 2 (2005Ka46) and 12 6 (1998Jo18); possibly deduced
 58CU2CE from I(|g+ce)(203 level) and I|g(848)/I|g(203)=0.14 6
 58CU  G  848            12  2
 58CU cG RI$ assigned by the evaluators from |b feeding