42CL 42S B- DECAY (1.016 S) 2006WI10 16NDS 201607
42CL H TYP=FUL$AUT=JUN CHEN{+#} AND BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 135, 1 (2016)$
42CL2 H CUT=31-May-2016$
42CL c 2006Wi10: {+42}S isotope produced by fragmentation of a {+48}Ca beam
42CL2c at 70 MeV/nucleon hitting a {+9}Be target. The fragments were
42CL3c separated by A1200 fragment separator at NSCL, Michigan facility.
42CL4c Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |b, |b|g coin using two Ge detectors for
42CL5c |g rays and a plastic scintillator for |b rays. Comparisons with
42CL6c Shell-model calculations
42CL c 1998WiZX: reported preliminary result of 2006Wi10; measured T{-1/2},
42CL2c E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, neutrons. No delayed neutrons were observed by
42CL3c 1998WiZX; 1995So03 reported %|b{+-}n<4
42CL c 2013Sz02 refer to a study of this decay by D. O'Donnell, Ph.D. thesis,
42CL2c University of the West Scotland (2008)
42CL cB IB$From intensity balance
42CL cB IB,LOGFT$Due to large Q value, it is possible that there are unobserved
42CL2cB levels above the currently known level at 3030, thus the |b-feedings
42CL3cB and log {Ift} values are considered as limits only. However, |b
42CL4cB transitions with large feedings (>15%) are considered as allowed
42CL cG E,RI(A)$From 1998WiZX only.
42CL cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data
42CL cL J$Strong |b{+-} feeding from 0+. For states below 1.1 MeV, values are
42CL2cL inferred from a comparison with the decay scheme of {+40}S (2006Wi10)
42S P 0 0+ 1.016 S 15 7.28E3 14
42S cP T$From {+42}S Adopted Levels
42S cP QP$From 2012Wa38
42CL N 0.87 4 1 1
42CL cN NR$|S(I|g to g.s.)=100, assuming zero feeding to g.s.
42CL PN 3
42CL L 0.0 (2-)
42CL L 118.19 6 (3-)
42CL G 118.25 10 100 5 C
42CL L 588.96 6 (1-,2,3+)
42CL G 470.78 6 33.5 12 C
42CL G 588.78 9 0.25 5 C
42CL L 639.44 9 (1-,2,3+)
42CL G 521.26 10 2.0 4 C
42CL G 638.9 4 0.55 9 C
42CL L 841.90 6 (1-,2,3+)
42CL G 202.42 11 0.96 11 C
42CL G 252.6 4 0.35 9 ?
42CL G 723.72 7 37.6 12 C
42CL G 841.95 8 9.4 12 C
42CL L 1025.82 23 (1-,2,3+)
42CL G 907.5 5 0.39 18 C
42CL G 1025.9 4 0.55 17 ?
42CL L 1267.48 7 1+
42CL B 17.6 11 4.99 6
42CLS B EAV=2771 69
42CL G 425.61 6 5.7 4 C
42CL G 678.43 7 12.9 7 C
42CL G 1149.42 13 1.7 4 C
42CL G 1268.8 7 1.65 24 [M2] A ?
42CL L 1385.68 18
42CL B 0.7 2 6.4 2
42CLS B EAV=2713 69
42CL G 796.80 20 1.3 3 C
42CL L 1550.38 10
42CL G 1550.52 14 2.85 23 C
42CL L 1576.61 19 ?
42CL G 1458.53 23 1.21 20 C ?
42CL L 1684.16 11 ?
42CL G 1684.1 3 1.63 19 C ?
42CL L 1710.91 8
42CL B 1.6 8 5.9 2
42CLS B EAV=2554 69
42CL G 160.60 9 1.57 15 C
42CL G 685.1 3 1.22 13 C
42CL G 868.94 14 1.98 22 C
42CL G 1071.6 3 1.3 3 C
42CL G 1121.97 13 3.0 6 C
42CL G 1592.55 18 1.94 22 C
42CL L 1834.78 13 ?
42CL G 1245.93 24 1.08 18 C ?
42CL L 2123.28 9 1+
42CL B 63 3 4.13 6
42CLS B EAV=2352 69
42CL G 288.49 12 0.72 9 ? ?
42CL G 439.09 8 2.00 17 C ?
42CL G 737.8 3 0.45 13 ?
42CL G 1281.44 12 37.3 14 C
42CL G 1534.26 11 12.7 6 C
42CL G 2004.93 16 19.4 7 C
42CL G 2123.9 5 1.47 17 [M2] A ?
42CL L 2221.00 12 ?
42CL G 670.55 10 1.84 16 C ?
42CL L 2241.16 25 (1+)
42CL CL J$LOGFT=5.5 from 0+, however, due to weak |b feeding and incomplete
42CL2CL decay scheme, J|p is considered as tentative
42CL B 2.2 3 5.5 1
42CLS B EAV=2294 69
42CL G 1399.1 3 1.76 19 C
42CL G 1652.4 4 0.80 26 ?
42CL L 2403.1 4 ?
42CL B 1.0 2 5.8 1 ?
42CLS B EAV=2215 69
42CL G 1814.2 4 1.20 19 ? ?
42CL L 3029.76 12 1+
42CL B 16.2 9 4.33 7
42CLS B EAV=1909 69
42CL G 808.55 15 1.48 24 ? ?
42CL G 1193.1 9 1.6 3 A ?
42CL G 1318.88 11 9.1 4 C
42CL G 1453.2 3 1.31 17 C ?
42CL G 2187.2 4 2.6 3 C
42CL G 2440.6 3 2.4 3 C
42CL G 2911.7 5 1.8 3 C