250CF 250ES EC DECAY (8.6 H) 01NDS 200112 250CF H TYP=FUL$AUT=Y. Akovali$CIT=NDS 94,131 (2001)$CUT=1-Aug-2001$ 250ES P 0.0 (6+) 8.6 H 1 2100 SY 250CF N 1.0 1.0 0.985 15 250CF PN 2 250CF CG NO ALPHA DECAY FROM THE 250ES GS WAS OBSERVED, AND AN UPPER 250CF2CG LIMIT OF 3% WAS GIVEN BY 1970AH01. THE EC DECAY BRANCH OF %EC>97 250CF3CG IS ADOPTED FOR 250ES G.S. FOR THE ABSOLUTE INTENSITY NORMALIZATION 250CF4CG FACTOR, THE EC BRANCHING APPEAR HERE AS 98.5% 15, RATHER THAN THE 250CF5CG ADOPTED BRANCHINGS OF %EC>97. 250CF TG 250CF2TG CALIFORNIUM X-RAYS (1977FR03): 250CF3TG 250CF4TG E(X-RAY) I(X-RAY) %EC DECAY 250CF5TG ---------- ------------------- 250CF6TG 109.82 5 46.2 23 XKA2 250CF7TG 115.05 5 73.4 37 XKA1 250CF8TG 128.6 1 XKB3 250CF9TG 30.6 15 XKB1P 250CF2TG 129.8 1 XKB1 250CF3TG 133.66 10 10.3 5 XKB2P 250CF4TG 250CF CG THE SUM OF X-RAY INTENSITY DUE TO CK BRANCHINGS AND 250CF2CG K-ELECTRON CONVERSIONS IS CALCULATED TO BE XKA1=46, XKA2=74. 250CF CG E MEASUREMENT OF 1977FR03. 250CF CG RI RELATIVE PHOTON INTENSITY, MEASURED BY 1977FR03. 250CF2CG THE RELATIVE INTENSITIES WERE NORMALIZED SUCH THAT SUM OF TRANSITION 250CF3CG INTENSITIES FEEDING THE GROUND-STATE BAND IS 100%. THEREFORE, THE 250CF4CG IG'S LISTED HERE CORRESPOND TO PER 100 EC DECAYS. 250CF CG M,MR DETERMINED BY 1977FR03 FROM THEIR CE DATA. MULTIPOLARITIES 250CF2CG IN SQUARE BRACKETS ARE DEDUCED FROM LEVEL SCHEME, THEY ARE NOT 250CF3CG DETERMINED EXPERIMENTALLY. 250CF CG TI SUM OF ICE+RI, MEASURED BY 1977FR03, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 250CF2CG THE RELATIVE CE INTENSITIES WERE NORMALIZED TO IG'S BY USING WELL 250CF3CG RESOLVED CONVERSION LINES FROM TRANSITIONS WITH ESTABLISHED 250CF4CG MULTIPOLARITIES (DETERMINED FROM SUB-SHELL RATIOS). THEORETICAL 250CF5CG CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS WERE UTILIZED WHEN CONVERSION-ELECTRON LINES 250CF6CG WERE NOT SEEN. 250CF CE IE DEDUCED FROM INTENSITY BALANCE AT EACH LEVEL. THE BRANCHES 250CF2CE SUM TO 106% 7. 250CF G 299.6 2 1.00 9 250CF L 0.0 0+ 250CF L 42.721 5 2+ 250CF G 42.721 5 0.09 1 E2 1293 100 5 250CFS G LC=939 $ MC=266 $ 250CF L 141.875 10 4+ 250CF G 99.160 10 0.80 7 E2 23.8 21.0 10 250CFS G LC=17.0 $ MC=4.84 $ NC+=1.934 $ 250CF L 296.22 6 6+ 250CF G 154.35 6 0.31 7 E2 3.33 1.3 3 250CFS G KC=0.155 $ LC=2.27 $ MC=0.647 $ NC+=0.258 $ 250CF CG TI CALCULATED FROM IG AND CC. THE AUTHORS OF 1977FR03 OBTAINED 250CF2CG CE INTENSITIES FROM THE MEASURED ICE(L2), AND LISTED TI=2.1 2. 250CF L 871.57 3 2- 250CF G 829.00 7 73.6 37 E1 0.00658 74 4 250CFS G KC=0.00528 $ LC=0.00097 $ 250CF L 905.89 2 3- 250CF G 34.325 5 0.06 AP M1+E2 0.42 5 7.4E2 11 48.5 25 250CFS G LC=545 80 $ MC=149 23 $ 250CF CG RI TOTAL INTENSITY OF 48.5 25 AND CC=7.4E2 11 GIVE RI=0.066 11. 250CF G 764.2 1 4.0 2 E1 0.00758 4.0 2 250CFS G KC=0.00608 $ LC=0.00113 $ 250CF G 863.2 1 5.1 3 E1 0.00613 5.1 3 250CFS G KC=0.00493 $ LC=0.00090 $ 250CF L 951.98 2 4- 250CF G 46.093 5 0.19 2 M1+E2 0.40 2 200 10 32.8 15 250CFS G LC=147 7 $ MC=39.6 21 $ 250CF G 80.412 10 0.29 3 E2 63.3 18.6 20 250CFS G LC=45.2 $ MC=12.9 $ NC+=5.14 $ 250CF CG TI 1977FR03 LISTED TI=12.9 15 BY ADDING EXPECTED L1, L2, M2 250CF2CG AND HIGHER SHELL ELECTRONS. BECAUSE THE UNCERTAINTIES ON ICE'S 250CF3CG ARE LARGER THAN THAT FOR IG, TI CALCULATED FROM IG AND CC IS GIVEN 250CF4CG FOR 80.412-KEV TRANSITION. 250CF G 810.2 1 9.1 5 E1 0.00684 9.1 5 250CFS G KC=0.00549 $ LC=0.00101 $ 250CF L 1008.51 2 5- 250CF G 56.527 13 0.09 1 M1+E2 0.37 +20-10 80 40 5.5 5 250CFS G LC=60 30 $ MC=16 8 $ NC+=6 3 $ 250CF G 102.623 10 0.21 3 E2 20.28 4.0 4 250CFS G LC=14.50 $ MC=4.13 $ NC+=1.650 $ 250CF CG RI=0.21 3 IS CALCULATED FROM ICE(L3; MEASURED)=1.09 15, 250CF2CG L3C(E2 THEORY)=5.24 AND ICE(M2; MEASURED)=0.51 4, M2C(E2 THEORY)=2.400. 250CF G 712.3 1 1.34 9 [E1] 0.00859 1.34 9 250CFS G KC=0.00688 $ LC=0.00129 $ 250CF G 866.7 1 1.3 1 [E1] 0.00608 1.3 1 250CFS G KC=0.00489 $ LC=0.00090 $ 250CF L 1071.37 2 3+ 250CF G 119.4 3 0.00006 3 [E1] 0.0956 S 250CFS G LC=0.0714 $ MC=0.0177 $ NC+=0.00656 $ 250CF CG E GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 8.6-H 250ES EC DECAY. ENERGY IS 250CF2CG FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM RI(119G)/RI(1028G)=0.0015 5/10.9 3, 250CF2CG MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF G 165.44 15 0.00012 2 [E1] 0.1726 S 250CFS G KC=0.1305 $ LC=0.0315 $ MC=0.00776 $ NC+=0.00289 $ 250CF CG E GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 8.6-H 250ES EC DECAY. ENERGY IS 250CF2CG FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM RI(165G)/RI(1028G)=0.0030 4/10.9 3, 250CF2CG MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF G 199.72 200.00010 2 [E1] 0.1127 S 250CFS G KC=0.0861 $ LC=0.01986 $ MC=0.00488 $ NC+=0.00182 $ 250CF CG E GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 8.6-H 250ES EC DECAY. ENERGY IS 250CF2CG FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM RI(199G)/RI(1028G)=0.0024 3/10.9 3, 250CF2CG MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF G 929.4 2 0.14 2 [E2] 0.0180 250CFS G KC=0.01280 $ LC=0.00394 $ 250CF G 1028.5 2 0.45 4 (E2) 0.01489 250CFS G KC=0.01079 $ LC=0.00308 $ 250CF CG M DETERMINED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF L 1255.39 4 4- 250CF G 184.2 2 0.47 7 [E1] 0.1352 0.53 7 250CFS G KC= 0.1029 $ LC=0.0242 $ MC=0.00595 $ NC+=0.00221 $ 250CF G 246.92 6 3.8 2 M1+E2 1.00 6 1.86 9 10.7 4 250CFS G KC=1.29 8 $ LC=0.416 7 $ MC=0.1078 14 $ NC+=0.0418 5 $ 250CF G 303.41 3 22.3 11 M1+E2 0.92 7 1.09 10 46.7 16 250CF3 G KC=0.79 5 $ LC=0.221 7 $ MC=0.0566 14 $ NC+=0.0219 5 $ 250CF G 349.4 1 20.4 9 E2+M1 4.6 5 0.223 12 25.0 10 250CFS G KC=0.106 10 $ LC=0.0850 14 $ MC=0.0232 3 $ NC+=0.00916 11 $ 250CF G 383.7 1 14.0 7 E2 0.1346 16.0 8 250CFS G KC=0.0564 $ LC=0.0566 $ MC=0.0155 $ NC+=0.00615 $ 250CF L 1311.00 4 5- 250CF E ? 250CF G 55.602 5 0.20 2 M1+E2 0.59 5 133 9 22.9 20 250CFS G LC=96 8 $ MC=26.3 22 $ NC+=10.4 9 $ 250CF L 1377.76 4 (6)- 250CF G 66.759 10 0.05 2 M1(+E2) 0.5 LE 37 7 1.9 9 250CFS G LC=31 9 $ MC=8 3 $ NC+=3.2 11 $ 250CF CG MR E2 ADMIXTURE OF LE 20% LISTED IN 1977FR03 WAS DETERMINED 250CF2CG FROM L1/L3=0.6 1/<0.3. THE L2 LINE WAS MASKED. 250CF3CG L1C(EXP)=0.6 1/0.05 2=12 6 GIVES MR=0.9 +12-6. 250CF CG TI TRANSITION INTENSITY IS LISTED AS (1.0-1.9) BY 1977FR03. 250CF2CG SINCE THE INTENSITY BALANCE AT THE 1377.85 LEVEL REQUIRES 250CF3CG TI(66.759G) GE TI(79.998G), THE HIGHER NUMBER IS GIVEN HERE. 250CF L 1396.09 7 (5)- 250CF E ? 250CF G 85.086 7 1.07 9 M1(+E2) 0.27 LE 15.4 16 17.5 10 250CFS G LC=11.5 5 $ MC=2.86 14 $ NC+=1.11 6 $ 250CF CG MR E2 ADMIXTURE OF LE 7% LISTED IN 1977FR03 WAS DETERMINED 250CF2CG FROM L1/L3=10.0 5/0.5 5. L1C(EXP)=10.0 5/1.07 9 GIVES MR=0.21 +25-21. 250CF CG CC(MR=0.14 14)=15.4 +16-7. 250CF G 140.694 10 4.7 3 M1(+E2) 0.1 LT 15.6 77 5 250CFS G KC=12.1 $ LC=2.58 $ MC=0.636 $ NC+=0.247 $ 250CF L 1457.76 4 (6)- 250CF E 10 5 7.0 3 10 5 250CFS E CK=0.694 20 $ CL=0.222 14 $ CM+=0.084 6 250CF G 61.667 5 0.85 7 M1+E2 0.20 3 45.1 16 39 2 250CFS G LC=33.3 16 $ MC=8.5 5 $ NC+=3.29 19 $ 250CF G 79.998 30 0.11 3 (M1+E2) 0.3 LT 18.7 11 2.3 AP 250CFS G LC=13.9 20 $ MC=3.5 6 $ NC+=1.35 24 $ 250CF G 146.8 1 0.22 6 M1(+E2) 0.6 LT 13.0 18 3.2 3 250CFS G KC=9.9 19 $ LC=2.33 10 $ MC=0.58 5 $ NC+=0.227 19 $ 250CF L 1478.37 4 (5)- 250CF E 54 2 6.27 19 54 2 250CFS E CK=0.691 21 $ CL=0.224 15 $ CM+=0.085 7 250CF G 82.282 6 2.6 2 M1(+E2) 0.06 LT 16.33 11 45.0 20 250CFS G LC=12.16 8 $ MC=3.008 23 $ NC+=1.166 9 $ 250CF G 222.993 20 1.85 13 M1+E2 0.42 7 3.71 15 8.6 3 250CFS G KC=2.82 13 $ LC=0.663 10 $ MC=0.1661 18 $ NC+=0.0639 6 $ 250CF L 1499.53 4 (6)- 250CF E 42 4 6.35 20 42 4 250CFS E CK=0.687 24 $ CL=0.227 16 $ CM+=0.086 8 250CF G 41.775 5 0.29 3 M1+E2 0.14 +7-14 144 30 35 4 250CFS G LC=107 22 $ MC=27 6 $ 250CF G 103.440 10 0.71 6 M1+E2 0.25 +15-10 9.1 9 7.2 7 250CFS G LC=6.7 6 $ MC=1.68 19 $ NC+=0.66 5 $