250CF 250ES EC DECAY (2.22 H) 01NDS 200112 250CF H TYP=FMT$AUT=J. Tuli$DAT=22-APR-2005$COM=Fixed Fmt/Typo$ 250CF H TYP=FUL$AUT=Y. Akovali$CIT=NDS 94,131 (2001)$CUT=1-Aug-2001$ 250ES P 0.0+X 1(-) 2.22 H 5 2100 SY 250CF C Q+=2100 100 IS RECOMMENDED BY 1995AU04 FOR EC DECAY OF 250ES 250CF2C GROUND STATE. THE EXCITATION ENERGY OF THE PARENT 2.22-H 250ES 250CF3C ISOMERIC STATE HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED EXPERIMENTALLY. 250CF4C BY ASSUMING THAT THE ENERGY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE 250CF5C 1-,(p 7/2[633],n 9/2[734]) CONFIGURATION (2.22-H STATE)AND THE 250CF6C 6+,(p 3/2[521],n 9/2[734]) GROUND STATE OF 250ES IS LESS THAN 250CF7C THE DQ+ VALUE OF 100 KEV, CALCULATIONS ARE CARRIED HERE BY TAKING 250CF8C Q+(2.22-H 250ES)=2150 150. 250CF N 0.98 5 0.98 5 1.0 LE 0.98 5 250CF PN 0.98 5 0.98 5 2 250CF DN BR THE ADOPTED BRANCHING IS %EC LE 100. IN ORDER TO AVOID THE 250CF2DN AUTOMATIC FOOTNOTE STATEMENT, 'FOR ABSOLUTE INTENSITIES, MULTIPLY BY 250CF3DN LE 0.98 5', COLUMN 40 OF NORMALIZATION RECORD IS DELETED. THE COLUMNS 250CF4DN 40 AND 41 SHOULD BE 'LE'. 250CF CN THE BRANCHING FOR EC DECAY OF 2.22-H 250ES HAS NOT BEEN 250CF2CN MEASURED. NORMALIZATION FACTOR OF 0.98 5 TO CONVERT GAMMA AND ELECTRON 250CF3CN INTENSITIES TO PER 100 EC DECAY OF 2.22-H 250ES IS OBTAINED 250CF4CN BY REQUIRING THE SUM OF EC DECAY BRANCHES TO BE 100. 250CF CE IE THE INTENSITIES ARE GIVEN PER 100 B+ DECAY 250CF CE IE RELATIVE DECAY BRANCHES TO EXCITED LEVELS ARE DEDUCED 250CF2CE FROM INTENSITY BALANCES; THE EC+B+ DECAY BRANCH TO THE GROUND STATE 250CF3CE IS OBTAINED FROM I(K X-RAY; MEASURED)=I(K X-RAY; CALCULATED). 250CF4CE THE K X-RAY INTENSITY CALCULATED BY USING THEORETICAL CK/(EC+B+) 250CF5CE RATIOS FOR EACH LEVEL AND KC CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS FOR ALL 250CF6CE GAMMAS. FLUORESCENCE YIELD OF 0.973 4 (1979AH01) IS USED. 250CF TG 250CF2TG CALIFORNIUM X-RAYS (1980AH03): 250CF3TG 250CF4TG E(X-RAY) I(X-RAY) 250CF5TG (SAME UNITS AS IG'S) 250CF6TG -------- ------------------- 250CF7TG 109.8 1 22.2 16 XKA2 250CF8TG 115.0 1 34.7 24 XKA1 250CF9TG 129.7 2 13.1 9 XKB1P 250CF2TG 133.7 2 4.7 4 XKB2P 250CF3TG 250CF CG E MEASUREMENTS OF 1980AH03. SEE ALSO 1979AH02. EARLIER 250CF2CG MEASUREMENTS: 1970AH01, 1976YA02 250CF CG RI RELATIVE PHOTON INTENSITY, MEASURED BY 1980AH03. INTENSITIES 250CF2CG PER 100 EC DECAY IS OBTAINED BY NORMALIZING THE SUM OF ALL EC DECAY 250CF3CG BRANCHES TO 100. THE X-RAY INTENSITIES ARE UTILIZED TO DEDUCE THE 250CF4CG EC DECAY TO THE G.S. THE SAME PROCEDURE WAS APPLIED BY 1980AH03; 250CF5CG HOWEVER, Q+(250ES)=2070 WAS USED BY 1980AH03 FOR CK/EC CALCULATIONS 250CF6CG WHICH YIELDED SLIGHTLY HIGHER NORMALIZATION FACTOR THAN THE ONE GIVEN 250CF7CG HERE: THE LISTED IG'S AND ICE'S WERE GIVEN AS INTENSITIES PER 100 250CF8CG EC DECAYS BY 1980AH03; THESE INTENSITIES CORRESPOND TO PER 102 5 250CF9CG EC DECAYS HERE. 250CF CG M,MR DEDUCED FROM CE WORK OF 1980AH03, EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. THE 250CF2CG ELECTRON INTENSITIES WERE NORMALIZED AT ICE(^K 989.2G)=0.156 TO 250CF3CG YIELD KC=0.115 (E2 THEORY). MULTIPOLARITIES IN SQUARE BRACKETS ARE 250CF4CG DEDUCED FROM LEVEL SCHEME. 250CF CG RI(U) INTENSITY BALANCE AT THE 905.89-, 951.46-KEV LEVELS, AND 250CF2CG THE ADOPTED GAMMA BRANCHINGS FROM THESE LEVELS YIELD 250CF3CG RI(34.325)=2.6E-6 7, RI(46.098G)=1.1E-6 5, RI(80.4G)=1.6E-6 8, 250CF4CG RI(764.2G)=1.6E-4 4, RI(810.2G)=5.1E-5 23, RI(863.2G)=2.0E-4 5. 250CF CL J ADOPTED VALUES 250CF G 659.7 3 0.48 9 250CF CG EKC= 0.25 6, ELC= 0.058 19 (1980AH03). 250CF G 802.9 2 0.44 9 (M1+E2) 250CF CG EKC= 0.066 20 (1980AH03). KC(M1)=0.100, KC(E2)=0.0164. 250CF G 1068.2 5 0.1 AP 250CF CG 1980AH03 SUGGESTED THAT THE 1068.2G DECAYS FROM THE 1,3- 250CF2CG COLLECTIVE STATE SEEN IN (D,D') AT 1210 KEV, TO THE 4+ STATE OF 250CF3CG THE GS BAND. THE AUTHORS POINTED OUT THAT THE EXPECTED 1167.4-KEV 250CF4CG TRANSITION FROM THIS 3- STATE TO THE 2+ OF GS BAND WOULD BE 250CF5CG OBSCURED BY THE 1167.3G WHICH IS PLACED TO DEEXCITE THE 1210-KEV 250CF6CG 2-,( N 9/2[734], N 5/2[622]) STATE, IDENTIFIED IN (D,P) REACTION, 250CF7CG TO THE 4+ GS BAND. ON THEIR LEVEL SCHEME, THE 1068.2G IS SHOWN 250CF8CG HOWEVER, TO DECAY FROM THE 2- STATE TO THE 4+ OF GS BAND, COMPETING 250CF9CG WITH AN E1 TRANSITION. 250CF CG IF THE 1068.2 WERE TO DECAY FROM THE 3- STATE, AN EC DECAY 250CF2CG WITH AP 0.1% INTENSITY (DEDUCED FROM INTENSITY BALANCE, EXCLUDING 250CF3CG ANY CONTRIBUTION FROM POSSIBLE 1167.4G TO THE 4+ STATE) WOULD HAVE 250CF4CG LOGFT AP 8.8, WHICH IS QUITE SMALL FOR A SECOND-FORBIDDEN BETA 250CF5CG TRANSITION FROM THE 1- PARENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE 1068.2G IS 250CF6CG A DOUBLET, DECAYING FROM BOTH THE 3- AND 2- STATES AT 1210 KEV. 250CF7CG BECAUSE OF PROBLEMS MENTIONED ABOVE, THIS GAMMA IS NOT PLACED ON 250CF8CG THE DECAY SCHEME HERE. 250CF L 0.0 0+ 250CF E 0.23 12 51 5 6.91 8 51 5 250CFS E EAV=533 66 $ CK=0.7502 $ CL=0.1802 15 $ CM+=0.0651 6 250CF L 42.721 5 2+ 250CF E 0.032 19 8.1 18 7.69 12 8.5 18 250CFS E EAV=514 66 $ CK=0.7502 $ CL=0.1806 15 $ CM+=0.0653 7 250CF G 42.721 5 0.028 2 E2 1293 250CFS G LC=939 $ MC=266 $ 250CF CG E ADOPTED FROM 8.6-H 250ES EC DECAY. EG=42.7 2 WAS OBTAINED 250CF2CG BY 1980AH03 FROM THE ELECTRON LINES. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM ICE(M)=7.5 4 (1980AH03) AND MC=266 250CF2CG ONLY THE CE(^M) AND CE(^N) LINES OF THIS TRANSITION WERE OBSERVED. 250CF CG M ADOPTED FROM 8.6-H 250ES EC DECAY. 250CF L 141.875 10 4+ 250CF G 99.160 10 0.034 5 E2 23.8 S 250CFS G LC=17.0 $ MC=4.84 $ NC+=1.934 250CF CG GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED; ITS ENERGY IS FROM 8.6-H 250ES 250CF2CG EC DECAY; IG IS CALCULATED FROM INTENSITY BALANCE AT THE 141.88 LEVEL. 250CF L 871.57 3 2- 250CF E 5.6 9 7.38 14 5.6 9 250CFS E CK=0.738 6 $ CL=0.192 4 $ CM+=0.0701 17$ 250CF G 828.9 1 5.6 9 E1 0.00658 250CFS G KC=0.00528 $ LC= 0.00097 $ 250CF L 905.89 2 3- 250CF G 34.325 5 M1+E2 0.42 5 7.4E+2 11 U S 250CF G 764.2 1 E1 0.00758 U S 250CF G 863.2 1 E1 0.00613 U S 250CF L 951.98 2 4- 250CF G 46.093 5 M1+E2 0.40 2 200 10 U S 250CF G 80.412 10 E2 63.3 U S 250CF G 810.2 1 E1 0.00684 U S 250CF L 1031.852 21 2+ 250CF E 23.7 13 6.63 15 23.7 13 250CFS E CK=0.733 8 $ CL=0.196 6 $ CM+=0.0719 23 250CF G 126.01 3 0.00190 17 [E1] 0.0834 S 250CFS G LC=0.0622 $ MC=0.01541 $ NC+=0.00573 $ 250CF CG E TRANSITION WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY. 250CF2CG ITS ENERGY WAS MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI PHOTON INTENSITY IS CALCULATED FROM THE RATIO MEASURED IN 250CF2CG 250BK B- DECAY: RI(126G)/RI(989G)=0.0140 12/100 250CF G 160.26 4 0.0086 6 [E1] 0.1859 S 250CFS G KC= 0.1403 $ LC=0.0340 $ MC=0.00840 $ NC+=0.00313 $ 250CF CG E TRANSITION WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY. 250CF2CG ITS ENERGY WAS MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI PHOTON INTENSITY IS CALCULATED FROM THE RATIO MEASURED IN 250CF2CG 250BK B- DECAY: RI(160G)/RI(989G)=0.0633 44/100. 250CF G 889.9 2 0.45 7 [E2] 0.01961 250CFS G KC=0.01376 $ LC=0.00439 $ 250CF G 989.1 1 13.6 9 E2 0.01603 250CFS G KC=0.01153 $ LC=0.00338 $ 250CF G 1031.9 1 10.8 8 E2 0.01480 250CFS G KC=0.01074 $ LC=0.00306 $ 250CF L 1071.37 2 3+ 250CF G 119.4 3 0.00003415[E1] 0.0956 S 250CFS G LC=0.0714 $ MC=0.01769 $ NC+=0.00656 $ 250CF CG E GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY. ENERGY IS 250CF2CG FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM RI(119G)/RI(1028G)=0.0015 5/10.9 3, 250CF2CG MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF G 165.44 15 0.00007 3 [E1] 0.1726 S 250CFS G KC=0.1305 $ LC=0.0315 $ MC=0.00776 $ NC+=0.00289 $ 250CF CG E GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY. ENERGY IS 250CF2CG FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM RI(165G)/RI(1028G)=0.0030 4/10.9 3, 250CF2CG MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF G 199.72 200.00005517 [E1] 0.1127 S 250CFS G KC=0.0861 $ LC=0.01986 $ MC=0.00488 $ NC+=0.00182 $ 250CF CG E GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY. ENERGY IS 250CF2CG FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM RI(199G)/RI(1028G)=0.0024 3/10.9 3, 250CF2CG MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF G 929.4 3 0.10 7 [E2] 0.0180 250CFS G KC=0.0128 $ LC=0.00394 $ 250CF G 1028.5 3 0.25 7 (E2) 0.0149 250CFS G KC=0.01079 $ LC=0.00308 $ 250CF CG M DETERMINED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF L 1154.24 10 0+ 250CF E 0.38 5 8.31 17 0.38 5 250CFS E CK=0.727 10 $ CL=0.200 7 $ CM+=0.074 3 250CF G 1111.5 3 0.27 4 [E2] 0.0129 250CFS G KC=0.00947 $ LC=0.00256 $ 250CF G 1154.3 2 E0 250CF CG $K/Total ce=0.74 6, L/Total ce=0.14 4, M/Total ce=0.08 3 $ 250CF2CG N/Total ce AP 0.04 250CF L 1175.52 3 1- 250CF E 2.31 13 7.51 17 2.31 13 250CFS E CK=0.725 11 $ CL=0.200 8 $ CM+=0.074 4 250CF G 303.95 20 0.083 14 [M1,E2] 1.0 8 S 250CF CG E ENERGY IS FROM 250BK B- DECAY. THIS TRANSITION WAS NOT 250CF2CG OBSERVED IN 250ES EC DECAYS. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM RI(303G)/RI(1133G)=0.51 5/4.30 22, 250CF2CG MEASURED IN 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF G 1133.0 3 0.70 9 [E1] 0.00385 250CF3 G KC=0.00311 $ LC=0.00056 $ 250CF G 1175.5 2 1.60 9 E1 0.00362 250CF3 G KC=0.00292 $ LC=0.00052 $ 250CF L 1189.39 3 2+ 250CF E 0.32 5 8.35 19 0.32 5 250CFS E CK=0.725 11 $ CL=0.201 8 $ CM+=0.074 4 $ 250CF G 1047.8 5 0.1 AP [E2] 0.0144 250CF3 G KC=0.0105 $ LC=0.00295 $ 250CF G 1146.7 3 0.20 3 E0+E2 0.22 4 250CF3 G EKC= 0.075 20 $ 250CF CG THE EXPECTED CE INTENSITIES FROM E2 COMPONENT ARE 250CF2CG ICE(^K)=0.00180, ICE(^L)=0.00048. THE MEASURED ICE(^K)=0.015 3 IS THEN 250CF3CG MOSTLY DUE TO THE E0 COMPONENT: ICE(^K;E0)=0.013 3. THE UNOBSERVED 250CF4CG HIGHER-SHELL ELECTRON INTENSITY, ICE(LMN), CAN BE ESTIMATED AS 0.0046 250CF5CG BY ASSUMING THE SAME RATIO OBSERVED FOR THE 1154.3 KEV E0 TRANSITION. 250CF L 1209.97 4 (2)- 250CF E 3.01 20 7.36 18 3.01 20 250CFS E CK=0.723 12 $ CL=0.202 8 $ CM+=0.075 4 250CF G 1167.3 2 3.0 2 E1 0.00366 250CF3 G KC=0.00296 $ LC=0.00053 $ 250CF L 1244.50 8 (2+) 250CF E 1.71 10 7.57 19 1.71 10 250CFS E CK=0.721 13 $ CL=0.203 9 $ CM+=0.075 4 $ 250CF G 1103.0 3 0.09 3 [E2] 0.01306 250CF3 G KC=0.00960 $ LC=0.00261 $ 250CF G 1201.7 2 1.25 9 [E2,M1] 0.027 16 250CF3 G KC=0.00212 13 $ LC=0.0046 25 $ 250CF G 1244.4 2 0.35 3 [E2] 0.01045 250CF3 G KC=0.00781 $ LC=0.00198 $ 250CF L 1266.6 2 0+ 250CF E 0.95 5 7.80 19 0.95 5 250CFS E CK=0.720 14 $ CL=0.204 10 $ CM+=0.076 5 $ 250CF G 1223.8 2 0.33 3 [E2] 0.01078 250CF3 G KC=0.00804 $ LC=0.00206 $ 250CF G 1266.6 2 E0 250CF CG $K/Total ce=0.79 6, L/Total ce=0.153 14, M/Total ce=0.042 6 250CF L 1296.60 4 2+ 250CF E 0.28 3 8.29 20 0.28 3 250CFS E CK=0.717 15 $ CL=0.206 11 $ CM+=0.077 5 $ 250CF G 1154.9 3 0.10 2 [E2] 0.0120 250CF3 G KC=0.00888 $ LC=0.00235 250CF G 1254.0 2 0.05 AP E0+E2 0.177 23 250CF CG $K/Total ce=0.56, L/Total ce=0.11, M/Total ce=0.040 250CF G 1296.54 13 0.0094 13 [E2] 0.00969 S 250CF CG E,RI TRANSITION WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY. 250CF2CG ITS ENERGY WAS MEASURED BY 1979RE01 IN 250BK B- DECAY. THE INTENSITY, 250CF3CG RI=0.0094 13, IS CALCULATED FROM RI(1296G)/RI(1154G)=15 2/159 8, 250CF4CG ALSO MEASURED BY 1979RE01. 250CF L 1658.00 4 2+ 250CF E 4.8 3 6.5 5 4.8 3 250CFS E CK=0.66 8 $ CL=0.24 6 $ CM+=0.094 25 $ 250CF G 586.6 2 0.40 10 M1(+E2) 0.24 1 250CF3 G EKC= 0.18 5$ LC= 0.4 $ 250CF G 626.1 2 1.2 1 M1(+E2) 0.24 1 250CF3 G EKC= 0.18 3 $ ELC=0.044 9 $ 250CF G 786.26 14 0.19 4 [E1] 0.00721 S 250CFS G KC=0.00579 $LC=0.00107$ 250CF CG E THIS GAMMA WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY; ITS 250CF2CG ENERGY IS FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM ADOPTED BRANCHING RATIOS. 250CF G 1516.22 7 0.048 6 0.00727 S 250CFS G KC=0.00556 $ LC=0.00129 $ 250CF CG E 1516.22G WAS NOT OBSERVED IN 2.22-H 250ES EC DECAY; ITS 250CF2CG ENERGY IS FROM 250BK B- DECAY. 250CF CG RI CALCULATED FROM ADOPTED BRANCHING RATIOS. 250CF G 1615.3 3 1.80 17 E2 0.00498 250CF3 G EKC=0.0039 17 $ 250CF G 1658.1 3 1.05 9 E2 250CF3 G EKC=0.0048 20 $