242CM 246CF A DECAY 22NDS 202211
242CM H TYP=FUL$AUT=M.J. Martin, C.D. Nesaraja$CIT=NDS 186, 261 (2022)$
242CM2 H CUT=31-Dec-2021$
242CM DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3e (17-Jun-2020) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
242CM cA HF$The nuclear radius parameter r{-0}({+242}Cm)=1.49528 {I88}
242CM2cA is deduced by assuming HF=1.0 for the ground-state to
242CM3cA ground-state alpha decay branch.
246CF P 0.0 0+ 35.7 H 5 6861.6 10
246CF cP T$From 2011Br11
246CF cP QP$From 2021Wa16
242CM N 1.0 1.0 1.0
242CM PN 3
242CM cA IA$Alpha intensity per 100 |a decays, measured by 1977Ba69, except
242CM2cA for the 6467|a as noted. Others:1955Hu31, 1963Fr04.
242CM cA E$From 1977Ba69. The authors' original energies have been lowered
242CM2cA by 0.2 keV as recommended by 1991Ry01 to correct for a change in the
242CM3cA calibration energy used by the authors. Others:
242CM4cA 1955Hu31, 1963Fr04, 1996Ma72.
242CM5cA The measurements of 1996Ma72 are given for each |a group for
242CM6cA comparison; the energy resolution was about 20 keV at 7.14 MeV.
242CM cG E$From 1956Ch77 and 1955Pe57.
242CM cG RI$Photon intensity per 100 |a decays from 1956Ch77 and 1955Pe57.
242CM L 0.0 0+ 162.88 D 8
242CM A 6750.0 10 79.3 10 1.000
242CM cA E|a=6758 was measured by 1996Ma72.
242CM L 42.13 5 2+
242CM A 6708.2 10 20.6 10 2.53 13
242CM cA E|a=6719 was measured by 1996Ma72.
242CM G 42 3 0.0178 12E2 1155 16 20.6 13
242CMS G L/T=0.72 23$M/T=0.20 11
242CMS G N/T=0.057 34$O/T=0.014 8$P/T=0.0022 14$Q/T=5.4E-6 31
242CMS G LC=8E+2 4$MC=2.4E+2 10
242CMS G NC=66 29$OC=16 7$PC=2.6 11$QC=0.0064 24
242CM cG TI$From an intensity balance at the 42 level.
242CM cG RI$From I{-(|g+ce)} and |a.
242CM cG M deduced in {+242}Am |b{+-} decay.
242CM cG CC$For the adopted energy of 42.129 {I7}
242CM cG E|g=42.13 {I5} from {+242}Am |b{+-} decay.
242CM L 137 2 4+
242CM A 6615.6 10 0.15 2 134 18
242CM cA E|a=6726 was measured by 1996Ma72.
242CM G 96 3 0.012 [E2] 23 4
242CMS G LC=16.4 26$MC=4.6 7
242CMS G NC=1.29 21$OC=0.31 5$PC=0.052 8$QC=0.000206 27
242CM cG RI$Note that from an intensity balance at the 137 level, with the
242CM2cG assumption of mult=E2, one gets I|g=0.0113, compared with the
242CM3cG measured value of 0.012.
242CM L 288 6 6+
242CM A 6467 7 0.015 AP 261 AP
242CM cA E$|a was seen by 1963Fr04 in |a|g coincidence data. The original
242CM2cA energy of 6465 {I5}, listed in 1963Fr04, was calibrated to
242CM3cA E|a(to g.s.)=6753. These E|a's give E(level)=293; on the other hand,
242CM4cA the measured E|g=147 {I5} to 137-keV level gives E(level)=284 {I6}. An
242CM5cA unweighted average of these two energies, E(level)=288 {I6} is adopted,
242CM6cA and E|a=6467 {I7} is calculated from the level energy of 288 {I6} and
242CM7cA E|a(to g.s.)=6750.0 {I10}.
242CM cA IA deduced from intensity balance at 288-keV level. No I|a
242CM2cA was given by 1963Fr04.
242CM G 147 5 0.0035 [E2] 3.4 5
242CMS G KC=0.171 5$LC=2.3 4$MC=0.66 11
242CMS G NC=0.183 31$OC=0.044 7$PC=0.0075 12$QC=4.5E-5 5