239PU 239AM EC DECAY 1972PO04 14NDS 201411
239PU H TYP=FUL$AUT=E. BROWNE, J. K. TULI$CIT=NDS 122, 293 (2014)$
239PU2 H CUT=30-Jun-2013$
239PU D Updated by E. Browne (Sept. 26, 2013). BRICC_2008 conversion
239PU2D coeffcients. New calculation of X-ray intensities (RADLST_2008).
239PU c Other measurements: 1957Sm77, 1960Gl01, 1972Po12
239PU cE IE$Deduced by evaluator from |g-ray transition intensity balance.
239PU DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2 (31-Mar-2008) 2008KiAA, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
239PU cG M,MR$Based on ce data of 1957Sm77,1972Po04 and |g(|q) of 1972Kr07,
239PU2cG unless otherwise specified.
239PU cG MR(Y)$Deduced by evaluator from conversion electron data of 1991Sh06
239PU2cG in {+243}Cm |a decay.
239PU cG K|a{-2}| x ray={ 35.5% }, K|a{-1}| x
239PU2cG ray={ 56.2% }, and K|b| x ray={ 27.8% } calculated by
239PU3cG evaluator (RADLST) agree well with experimental K|a{-2}| x
239PUxcG ray={ 35.0% {I15}}, K|a{-1}| x ray={ 53.9% {I23}}, and K|b| x
239PU4cG ray={ 27.0% {I12}} (1972Po04), respectively. This agreement suggests
239PUxcG negligible |e feeding to g.s. and 7.86-keV levels
239PU cL J From adopted levels
239PU cL E$Deduced by evaluator from a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies.
239AM P 0 (5/2)- 11.9 H 1 802.1 17
239PU N 1.00 10 1.00 0.999901 1.0
239PU cN NR assuming negligible |e feeding to g.s. and first excited
239PU2cN state; this assumption is consistent with the measured x-ray
239PU3cN intensities (I|e<1% to g.s. from log| {If{+1u}t}>8.5).
239PU L 0 1/2+
239PU L 7.860 3 3/2+
239PU G 7.860 3 M1+E2 0.055 3 5.7E3 4 88 AP
239PUS G MC=4.2E3 3$NC+=1.49E3 10
239PUS G NC=1.16E3 8$OC=280 18$PC=48 3$QC=1.632 23
239PU L 57.273 4 5/2+
239PU E 2.4 AP 7.8 AP ?
239PUS E CK=0.7291 2$CL=0.1986 1$CM+=0.07229 5
239PU G 49.412 4 0.11 1 M1+E2 0.50 3 126 8
239PUS G LC=92 6$MC=24.8 17$NC+=8.7 6
239PUS G NC=6.8 5$OC=1.62 11$PC=0.269 17$QC=0.00592 13
239PU G 57.273 4 0.09 APE2 222
239PUS G LC=161.1 23$MC=45.0 7$NC+=15.73 22
239PUS G NC=12.36 18$OC=2.91 4$PC=0.457 7$QC=0.001109 16
239PU cG RI$from I|g={ 0.170 {I17}} after subtracting |?0.08 for 57.3|g
239PU2cG deexciting the 387 level. I|g(57|g)|?0.09 disagrees with I|g(57|g, 57
239PU3cG level) in {+243}Cm |a decay and {+239}Np |b{+-} Decay.
239PU L 75.701 8 7/2+
239PU E 3.4 AP 7.7 AP ?
239PUS E CK=0.7274 2$CL=0.1998 2$CM+=0.07281 5
239PU G 18.4 [M1+E2] 3 LT S
239PU G 67.841 7 0.130 13E2 98.5
239PUS G LC=71.5 10$MC=20.0 3$NC+=6.99 10
239PUS G NC=5.50 8$OC=1.293 19$PC=0.204 3$QC=0.000543 8
239PU L 163.76 2 9/2+
239PU G 88.06 3 0.0008 AP(M1+E2) 0.50 12.26
239PUS G LC=9.07 13$MC=2.36 4$NC+=0.830 12
239PUS G NC=0.645 9$OC=0.1563 22$PC=0.0274 4$QC=0.001050 15
239PU cG RI$from {+239}Np |b{+-} decay I|g(88.06|g)/I|g(106.50|g)={ 0.12 {I5}},
239PU2cG and I|g(106.50|g)={ 0.007 {I1}}.
239PU G 106.50 3 0.007 1 E2 11.78
239PUS G LC=8.55 12$MC=2.39 4$NC+=0.838 12
239PUS G NC=0.658 10$OC=0.1551 22$PC=0.0247 4$QC=9.28E-5 13
239PU cG RI from intensity balance at 163-keV level.
239PU L 285.46 1 5/2+
239PU CL T { 1.09 ns {I6}}, from GG(THETA,H,T) (1973PaYM)
239PU E 71 8 6.0 1
239PUS E CK=0.6968 4$CL=0.2210 3$CM+=0.08217 12
239PU G 209.8 1 3.5 2 M1+E2 0.37 8 2.93 13 Y
239PUS G KC=2.27 12$LC=0.499 9$MC=0.1231 18$NC+=0.0435 7
239PUS G NC=0.0335 5$OC=0.00830 13$PC=0.00155 3$QC=9.3E-5 5
239PU G 228.184 12 11.3 6 M1+E2 0.28 7 2.41 9 Y
239PUS G KC=1.88 8$LC=0.395 7$MC=0.0967 15$NC+=0.0342 6
239PUS G NC=0.0263 4$OC=0.00653 11$PC=0.001232 23$QC=7.7E-5 3
239PU G 277.604 16 15.0 7 M1+E2 0.23 10 1.42 7 Y
239PUS G KC=1.12 6$LC=0.228 6$MC=0.0555 13$NC+=0.0196 5
239PUS G NC=0.0151 4$OC=0.00375 9$PC=0.000711 19$QC=4.53E-5 22
239PU G 285.5 1 0.80 5 E2 0.247
239PUS G KC=0.0843 12$LC=0.1189 17$MC=0.0326 5$NC+=0.01145 17
239PUS G NC=0.00895 13$OC=0.00213 3$PC=0.000356 5$QC=4.98E-6 7
239PU L 330.12 1 7/2+
239PU E 3.5 AP 7.2 AP
239PUS E CK=0.6857 5$CL=0.2287 4$CM+=0.08561 15
239PU G 44.663 5 0.09 1 M1+E2 0.20 3 86 8
239PUS G LC=64 6$MC=16.2 17$NC+=5.7 6
239PUS G NC=4.4 5$OC=1.08 11$PC=0.193 17$QC=0.00902 15
239PU G 166.39 6 0.009 APM1 6.22 S
239PUS G KC=4.91 7$LC=0.984 14$MC=0.239 4$NC+=0.0846 12
239PUS G NC=0.0651 10$OC=0.01621 23$PC=0.00308 5$QC=0.000202 3
239PU cG RI deduced from I|g(166.39|g)/I|g(254.4|g)={ 0.111 {I23}}, using
239PU2cG I(ce(L1))(166.39|g)/I(ce(K))(254.4|g)={ 7 {I1}}/{ 105 {I15}} from
239PU3cG {+239}Am |e decay (1959Ew90), the following theoretical conversion
239PU4cG coefficients: |a(L1)(166.39|g; M1)=0.932, and |a(K)(254.4|g;
239PU5cG M1+E2)=1.556, and I|g(254.4|g)={ 0.084 {I6}}.
239PU G 254.4 1 0.084 6 M1+E2 -0.12 6 1.86 4
239PUS G KC=1.47 4$LC=0.295 5$MC=0.0718 11$NC+=0.0254 4
239PUS G NC=0.0195 3$OC=0.00486 8$PC=0.000924 15$QC=5.98E-5 13
239PU G 272.8 1 0.064 5 M1 1.553
239PUS G KC=1.229 18$LC=0.244 4$MC=0.0593 9$NC+=0.0210 3
239PUS G NC=0.01614 23$OC=0.00402 6$PC=0.000764 11$QC=4.98E-5 7
239PU G 322.3 2 0.0026 3 [E2] 0.1699
239PUS G KC=0.0679 10$LC=0.0745 11$MC=0.0203 3$NC+=0.00713 11
239PUS G NC=0.00557 8$OC=0.001329 19$PC=0.000224 4$QC=3.73E-6 6
239PU L 387.42 1 9/2+
239PU G 57.3 CA 0.08 AP M1(+E2) 27.9
239PU cG CC$for M1.
239PU cG RI from I|g(57|g, 387 level)/I|g(311|g)|?4.7 in
239PU2cG {+243}Cm |a decay, and I|g(311|g){ 0.017 {I2}}.
239PU G 101.965 13 0.008 APE2 14.42
239PUS G LC=10.46 15$MC=2.93 5$NC+=1.025 15
239PUS G NC=0.805 12$OC=0.190 3$PC=0.0302 5$QC=0.0001088 16
239PU G 311.7 2 0.017 2 (M1+E2) 0.6 5
239PUS G KC=0.5 4$LC=0.13 5$MC=0.032 9$NC+=0.011 4
239PUS G NC=0.0087 24$OC=0.0021 7$PC=0.00039 14$QC=1.9E-5 16
239PU L 391.60 1 7/2-
239PU E 0.065 10 8.8 1
239PUS E CK=0.6649 7$CL=0.2431 5$CM+=0.09204 22
239PU G 4.2 CA [E1] S
239PU G 61.480 4 0.0020 4 E1 0.472 S
239PUS G LC=0.354 5$MC=0.0880 13$NC+=0.0300 5
239PUS G NC=0.0236 4$OC=0.00553 8$PC=0.000870 13$QC=2.87E-5 4
239PU G 106.1 2 0.043 5 E1(+M2) 0.26 3
239PU3 G ELC=0.19 3$EMC=0.050 8$ENC+=0.017 3
239PU cG RI from I|g(106|g doublet)={ 0.05 {I1}} after subtracting
239PU2cG I|g(106|g, 163-keV level)={ 0.007 {I1}}.
239PU cG CC anomalous E1 conversion (from {+239}Np |b{+-} of 1959Ew90)
239PU G 315.9 2 0.0032 5 E1(+M2) -0.10 12 0.07 12
239PUS G KC=0.05 9$LC=0.01 3$MC=0.003 7$NC+=0.0011 24
239PUS G NC=0.0009 19$OC=0.0002 5$PC=4.E-5 9$QC=2.E-6 6
239PU cG RI from {+239}Np |b{+-} decay, the value I|g={ 0.0170 {I15}} in
239PU2cG 1972Po04 is probably a typographical error.
239PU G 334.3 2 0.0042 5 E1(+M2) +0.02 3 0.034 6
239PUS G KC=0.027 4$LC=0.0053 13$MC=0.0013 4$NC+=0.00045 12
239PUS G NC=0.00035 9$OC=8.6E-5 22$PC=1.6E-5 4$QC=8.3E-7 25
239PU L 505.7 2 (5/2-)
239PU E 0.0033 6 9.7 1
239PUS E CK=0.5908 18$CL=0.2940 13$CM+=0.1153 6
239PU G 430.0 3 0.0017 3
239PU G 448.3 5 0.00012AP S
239PU cG From {+239}Np |b{+-} decay
239PU G 497.8 3 0.0015 3
239PU L 511.84 1 7/2+
239PU E 18.1 21 5.9 1
239PUS E CK=0.5842 19$CL=0.2984 13$CM+=0.1173 6
239PU G 124.416 15 0.10 1 M1(+E2) 0.26 LT 13.8 4
239PUS G KC=10.7 4$LC=2.32 7$MC=0.570 22$NC+=0.201 8
239PUS G NC=0.155 6$OC=0.0385 14$PC=0.00725 19$QC=0.000451 15
239PU G 181.715 10 1.08 6 M1+E2 -0.12 6 4.80 10
239PUS G KC=3.78 9$LC=0.766 11$MC=0.187 3$NC+=0.0660 10
239PUS G NC=0.0508 8$OC=0.01264 18$PC=0.00240 4$QC=0.000155 4
239PU cG MR from 1972Kr07, 1972Po04, 1959Ew90
239PU G 226.383 12 3.3 2 M1+E2 0.55 10 2.13 14
239PUS G KC=1.61 13$LC=0.387 9$MC=0.0964 17$NC+=0.0340 6
239PUS G NC=0.0263 5$OC=0.00648 13$PC=0.00120 3$QC=6.7E-5 5
239PU G 436.0 3 0.008 1 [M1] 0.428
239PUS G KC=0.339 5$LC=0.0669 10$MC=0.01623 23$NC+=0.00573 8
239PUS G NC=0.00441 7$OC=0.001098 16$PC=0.000209 3$QC=1.361E-5 20
239PU G 454.6 3 0.0120 12[M1] 0.382
239PUS G KC=0.303 5$LC=0.0597 9$MC=0.01447 21$NC+=0.00511 8
239PUS G NC=0.00394 6$OC=0.000979 14$PC=0.000186 3$QC=1.214E-5 18
239PU G 504.0 3 0.0140 14[E2] 0.0516
239PUS G KC=0.0304 5$LC=0.01561 22$MC=0.00413 6$NC+=0.001451 21
239PUS G NC=0.001130 16$OC=0.000272 4$PC=4.75E-5 7$QC=1.387E-6 20