238PU 238AM EC DECAY 15NDS 201507
238PU H TYP=FUL$AUT=E. BROWNE, J. K. TULI$CIT=NDS 127, 191 (2015)$
238PU2 H CUT=1-Jun-2014$
238AM P 0.0 1+ 98 M 2 2260 50
238PU N 0.28 3 0.28 3 1.0
238PU cN NB |e intensities have been deduced from |g-transition
238PU2cN intensities requiring an intensity balance at each level.
238PU3cN |e intensity to the ground state has been calculated by comparing
238PU4cN x-ray intensities expected from |e captures and internal conversion
238PU5cN with the measured x-ray intensities
238PU cN NR Normalization obtained from K| x ray/|g
238PU cG |g|g, |gce: 1972Ah04
238PU tG x-ray:
238PU2tG I|g (relative to
238PU3tG E|g I(962.8|g)=100)
238PU4tG ------- ---------------
238PU5tG 99.5 {I1} 82 {I5} K|a{-2}| x ray 1972Ah04
238PU6tG 103.8 {I1} 124 {I8} K|a{-1}| x ray 1972Ah04
238PU7tG 117.1 {I2} 46 {I3} K|b{-1}'| x ray 1972Ah04
238PU8tG 120.6 {I2} 16 {I1} K|b{-2}'| x ray 1972Ah04
238PU9tG
238PU cL J From adopted levels
238PU cL J(A) Band 1 K=0
238PU cL J(B) Band 2 K=0
238PU cL J(D) Band 3 K=0
238PU cL J(G) Band 4 K=0
238PU cL J(H) Band 5 K=0
238PU cL J(E) K=1: |n 7/2[743]-|n 5/2[622]
238PU cL J(F) K=2
238PU cG E Measurements of 1972Ah04 (semi) are given here. E|g's
238PU2cG measured by 1972PoZS agree with those of 1972Ah04
238PU cG E(A)$Unplaced by authors. Placement suggested by the evaluators
238PU2cG on the basis of energy fit (2002Ch52).
238PU cG RI From 1972Ah04. Measurements of 1972PoZS are in agreement
238PU2cG with those of 1972Ah04.
238PU cG M From ce measurements of 1972Ah04 (semi) in {+238}Am |e decay,
238PU2cG and from {+242}Cm |a decay, {+238}Np |b decay data.
238PU cG ce intensities were normalized such that
238PU2cG |a(K)(962.8|g)=0.0035 (E1 theory)
238PU G 565.8 3 0.55 7
238PU G 665.2 2 E0
238PU cG M$no photon was observed. Ice(K)=0.052 {I6}
238PU G 749.2 E0
238PU cG M$no photon was observed. Ice(K)=0.024 {I3}
238PU G 884.3 3 0.47 6
238PU G 908.8 2 0.78 7 M1 0.0646
238PU cG M$|a(K)exp=0.055 {I6};
238PUS G KC=0.0513 16$LC=0.0100 3
238PU G 1097.3 3 1.1 1 (E2) 0.0105
238PU cG M$|a(K)exp|?0.006;
238PUS G KC=0.00793 24$LC=0.00194 6
238PU G 1226.4 3 0.16 3
238PU G 1231.3 3 0.15 3
238PU G 1368.8 5 0.2 AP
238PU G 1501.7 5 E0
238PU cG M$no photon was observed. Ice(K)=0.053 {I6}
238PU G 1551.0 5 E0
238PU cG M$no photon was observed. Ice(K)=0.008
238PU G 1761.5 4 0.32 4
238PU G 1789.0 5 0.04 AP
238PU G 1835.1 5 0.12 3
238PU L 0.0 0+ 87.74 Y 4 A
238PU E 0.08 8 11 11 7.0 GE
238PUS E EAV=578 22$CK=0.7627 6$CL=0.1694 5$CM+=0.05975 19
238PU L 44.11 6 2+ A
238PU E 0.04 4 6 6 7.2 GE
238PUS E EAV=559 22$CK=0.7631 5$CL=0.1698 5$CM+=0.05991 19
238PU G 44.1 1 0.23 3 E2 775
238PU cG M$|a(L12)exp=296 {I30}; L12:L3:M:N=68 {I7}; 57 {I6}; 43 {I5}; 14.6
238PUxcG {I15}
238PU cG CC$value given is the E2 theory value lowered by 3% (see 1987Ra01)
238PU L 145.9910 4+ A
238PU G 101.9 1 0.24 2 E2 14.8
238PU cG M$from L3/L12=0.62 {I9};
238PU cG RI$photon obscured by K x rays. Value is from (Ice(L)=2.6 {I3} and
238PU2cG |a(L). From an intensity balance at the 146 level one deduces
238PU3cG I|g=0.137 {I13}, suggesting additional feeding to the 146 level
238PU L 605.13 7 1- B
238PU E 0.010 4 14.8 18 6.94 6
238PUS E EAV=312 23$CK=0.7620 7$CL=0.1752 6$CM+=0.06214 25
238PU G 561.0 1 39.0 23 E1 0.0116
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.0092 {I10}. M/L|?0.087
238PUS G KC=0.0093 3$LC=0.00170 6
238PU G 605.1 1 27.0 16 E1 0.0101
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.0078 {I8}. K:L12:M=0.21 {I2}:0.035 {I4}:0.024 {I3}.
238PU2cG |d(M2/E1)<0.05
238PUS G KC=0.00810 25$LC=0.00146 5
238PU L 661.38 10 3- B
238PU E 0.19 10 9.7 3 1U
238PUS E CK=0.7344 19$CL=0.1948 14$CM+=0.0708 6
238PU G 515.4 2 1.40 13 E1+M2 0.114 17 0.023 3
238PU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I2}. 1990Si11 report |d=-0.2 {I+2-5} in
238PUxcG |b{+-} decay
238PUS G KC=0.0178 22$LC=0.0039 6
238PU G 617.4 2 2.6 2 E1+M2 0.077 17 0.012213
238PU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.0096 {I10}. 1990Si11 report |d=-0.2 {I+1-2} in
238PUxcG |b{+-} decay
238PUS G KC=0.0097 9$LC=0.00188 23
238PU L 941.50 14 0+ D
238PU E 0.64 10 8.09 8
238PUS E CK=0.7560 13$CL=0.1798 9$CM+=0.0641 4
238PU G 897.3 2 2.0 2 (E2) 0.0154
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp|?0.008 mult=E1 or E2. The placement requires |D|p=no
238PUS G KC=0.0112 4$LC=0.00314 10
238PU G 941.5 2 E0 1.18 11
238PU cG M$no photons observed. Ice(K)=0.93 {I10}, Ice(L12)=0.19 {I2}
238PU L 962.85 7 1- E
238PU E 54 6 6.15 7
238PUS E CK=0.7555 14$CL=0.1802 10$CM+=0.0643 4
238PU G 301.5 1 1.80 15 E2 0.213
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.089 {I9} and K:L12:L3:M:N=
238PU2cG 0.16 {I2}:0.15 {I2}:0.055 {I6}:0.075 {I8}: |?0.034
238PUS G KC=0.0779 24$LC=0.098 3$MC=0.0268 8$NC+=0.0102 3
238PU G 357.7 1 7.5 5 M1+E2 2.43 20 0.224 15
238PU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.16 {I2}, L12/K=0.41 {I4}, and also |a(K)exp=0.13
238PUxcG {I2} from |b{+-} decay
238PUS G KC=0.139 13$LC=0.0620 17$MC=0.0163 4$NC+=0.00618 14
238PU G 918.7 1 82 5 E1
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.0037 {I4}. |d(M2/E1)<0.05
238PUS G CC=0.00471$KC=0.00383 12$LC=0.00067 2
238PU G 962.8 1 100 E1 0.0043
238PU cG M$from |b{+-} decay. Ice(K) normalized to 0.35. K:L12:L3:M=
238PU2cG (0.35):0.066 {I7}: |?0.005:0.013 {I2}
238PUS G KC=0.00353 11$LC=0.00061 2
238PU L 983.0914 2+ D
238PU E 0.26 6 8.45 11
238PUS E CK=0.7550 14$CL=0.1806 10$CM+=0.0644 5
238PU G 837.1 2 0.13 3 [E2] 0.0176 S
238PU cG E,RI$transition was not observed in |e decay. I|g is deduced from
238PU2cG I|g(837|g)/I|g(939|g)=1.06 {I25} in |a decay and E|g is a rounded-off
238PU3cG value from |b{+-} decay and |a decay
238PUS G KC=0.0126 4$LC=0.00375 12
238PU G 939.0 2 0.121 13 E0+E2 4.4 4
238PU cG RI$no photons were observed in |e decay. I|g is deduced from
238PU2cG Ice(K)=0.42 {I4} and (Ice(L)=0.082 {I8} (with M+/L taken as 0.3) and
238PU3cG |a=4.4 {I4} from |b{+-} decay
238PU cG M$from |b{+-} decay
238PU G 983.0 30.34 9 [E2] 0.0129 S
238PU cG E,RI$transition was not observed in |e decay. I|g is deduced from
238PU2cG I|g/I|g(939|g)=2.8 {I8} in |a decay and E|g is from |a decay
238PU L 985.5310 2- E
238PU E 2.3 3 7.50 7
238PUS E CK=0.7549 14$CL=0.1806 10$CM+=0.0645 5
238PU G 324.2 3 0.22 3 M1+E2 2.8 8 0.29 6
238PU cG CC$|d gives |a=0.27 {I+7-4}
238PU cG M$|a(L12)exp|?0.15 and M/L12|?0.37 agree with mult=M1; however,
238PU2cG |a(K)exp in |b{+-} decay gives mult=M1+E2 with |d=2.8 {I8}. If mult
238PU3cG were M1, the ce(K) line would have had an intensity of 0.18, a value
238PU4cG large enough to have been seen. Note that the ce(K) line of the
238PU5cG 301.5|g, with Ice(K)=0.16 is reported. The evaluators adopt the
238PU6cG assignment from |b{+-} decay
238PUS G KC=0.15 7$LC=0.084 8$MC=0.0224 17$NC+=0.0085 6
238PU G 380.3 2 0.159 13 [M1] 0.665
238PU cG E,RI$transition not observed. I|g is from I|g/I|g(941|g)=0.0199 {I10}
238PU2cG in |b{+-} decay and E|g is a rounded-off value from |b{+-} decay
238PU cG M$from Ice(L12)|?0.035 and deduced I|g, one gets |a(L12)exp|?0.22
238PU2cG compared with theory values of 0.034 for E2 and 0.10 for M1. The
238PU3cG placement requires |DJ=1 and |D|p=no
238PUS G KC=0.526 16$LC=0.104 4$MC=0.0254 8$NC+=0.0094 3
238PU G 941.4 1 8.0 5 [E1+M2] -0.17 +1-2
238PU cG M,MR$from |b{+-} decay
238PUS G CC=0.0081 5$KC=0.0064 7$LC=0.00127 8
238PU L 1028.5713 2+ F
238PU E 0.24 4 8.45 9
238PUS E CK=0.7537 15$CL=0.1814 11$CM+=0.0648 5
238PU G 882.6 1 0.0153 15 E2 0.0159 S
238PU cG E,RI$not observed in |e decay. E is a rounded-off value
238PU2cG from |b{+-} decay, and I|g is from
238PU3cG I|g/I|g(984|g+1028|g)=0.01866 {I19} in |b{+-} decay
238PU cG M$from |b{+-} decay.
238PUS G KC=0.0115 4$LC=0.00328 10
238PU G 984.0 5 0.41 5 M1+E2 +23 GT 0.0129
238PU cG M$from |b{+-} decay. |a(K)exp|?0.012 in |e decay
238PUS G KC=0.0096$LC=0.00252 1
238PU G 1028.5 4 0.41 6 E2 0.0119
238PU cG M$from |b{+-} decay.
238PUS G KC=0.0089 3$LC=0.00226 7
238PU L 1174.4 4 (2+)
238PU E 0.092 16 8.75 9
238PUS E CK=0.7489 20$CL=0.1848 14$CM+=0.0663 6
238PU G 1130.2 5 0.18 3
238PU G 1174.5 5 0.15 3
238PU L 1228.6622 0+ G
238PU E 0.59 8 7.89 8
238PUS E CK=0.7468 23$CL=0.1863 16$CM+=0.0669 7
238PU G 1184.5 3 1.90 16 E2
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.0074 {I8}. L12/K|?0.31 {I0}.0091
238PUS G CC=0.0091$KC=0.00695 21$LC=0.00163 5
238PU G 1228.7 3 E0 0.175 16
238PU cG M$no photons were observed.
238PU cG TI$Ice(K)=0.143 {I15}, Ice(L12)=0.024 {I3}
238PU L 1264.2123 2+ G
238PU E 0.35 5 8.09 8
238PUS E CK=0.7452 25$CL=0.1874 17$CM+=0.0674 8
238PU G 1118.2 3 0.63 7 [E2] 0.0102
238PUS G KC=0.00768 23$LC=0.00186 6
238PU G 1220.1 3 0.50 6 E0+E2+M1 0.26 3
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.21 {I2}, L12/K=0.17 {I3}
238PU L 1310.3 3 1+,2+ ?
238PU E 1.73 22 7.35 8 ?
238PUS E CK=0.743 3$CL=0.1890 19$CM+=0.0681 9
238PU G 1266.2 3 6.0 4 M1 0.0268
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.021 {I2}. K:L12:M=0.123:0.02: |?0.0054
238PUS G KC=0.0213 7$LC=0.00413 13
238PU L 1426.61 25 0+ H
238PU E 0.34 5 7.92 9
238PUS E CK=0.736 4$CL=0.194 3$CM+=0.0702 12
238PU G 821.5 4 1.1 1 E1
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp<0.008
238PUS G CC=0.00574$KC=0.00465 14$LC=0.00082 3
238PU G 1426.6 3 E0 0.093 10
238PU cG M$no photons were observed.
238PU cG TI$Ice(K)=0.075 {I8}, Ice(L12)=0.0133 {I14}
238PU L 1447.25 19 1-
238PU E 1.12 14 7.38 9
238PUS E CK=0.734 4$CL=0.195 3$CM+=0.0707 12
238PU G 841.9 4 E0 0.106 11
238PU cG M$no photons were observed.
238PU cG TI$Ice(K)=0.084 {I9} and assumptions that L/K=0.22 and M+/L=0.3
238PU G 1403.2 3 2.4 2 E1
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp|?0.0013
238PUS G CC=0.00229$KC=0.00187 6$LC=0.00032 1
238PU G 1447.3 3 1.5 1 E1
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp<0.002
238PUS G CC=0.00217$KC=0.00177 6$LC=0.00030 1
238PU L 1458.3122 2+
238PU E 0.160 23 8.21 9
238PUS E CK=0.734 5$CL=0.195 3$CM+=0.0709 13
238PU G 1414.0 3 0.1 AP E0+E2+M1 0.27 AP
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp|?0.22. L12/K|?0.18. Ice(K)=0.022 {I3}
238PU G 1458.5 3 0.44 5 0.0062
238PU L 1559.8515 1-
238PU E 0.58 8 7.52 10
238PUS E CK=0.725 6$CL=0.202 4$CM+=0.0737 18
238PU G 574.0 3 0.4 1 M1+E2 3.2 5 0.055 6
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.038 {I4}
238PUS G KC=0.038 5$LC=0.0127 8
238PU G 597.0 3 0.52 6 [M1+E2] 0.12 8
238PUS G KC=0.09 7$LC=0.020 11
238PU G 954.7 3 0.3 AP[M1+E2] 0.035 22
238PUS G KC=0.028 18$LC=0.006 3
238PU G 1515.9 3 0.41 5
238PU G 1560.0 3 0.34 5
238PU L 1596.4 3(2+)
238PU E 0.151 20 8.05 10
238PUS E CK=0.720 7$CL=0.205 5$CM+=0.0749 21
238PU G 633.0 5 0.2 AP ?
238PU2 G FLAG=A$
238PU G 1450.4 5 0.2 AP ?
238PU2 G FLAG=A$
238PU G 1552.2 3 0.26 4
238PU G 1596.5 5 0.08 AP
238PU L 1621.2913 1-
238PU E 4.1 5 6.58 10
238PUS E CK=0.717 8$CL=0.207 5$CM+=0.0759 23
238PU G 658.4 2 0.64 7 E0+E2+M1 1.39 14
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=1.08 {I11}. K:L12:M=0.69 {I7}:0.147 {I15}:0.04
238PU G 679.5 4 0.91 9 E1
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp<0.009
238PUS G CC=0.00809$KC=0.00654 20$LC=0.00117 4
238PU G 1016.2 2 1.0 1 E0+E2+M1 0.66 7
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.51 {I5}. K:L12:M=0.51 {I5}:0.103 {I11}:0.025 {I3}
238PU G 1577.3 3 10.3 8 E1
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp|?0.001
238PUS G CC=0.00154$KC=0.00154 5
238PU G 1621.4 4 0.06 AP
238PU L 1636.4214 1-
238PU E 1.89 24 6.89 11
238PUS E CK=0.715 8$CL=0.208 6$CM+=0.0765 24
238PU G 653.3 5 0.2 AP ?
238PU2 G FLAG=A$
238PU G 673.4 2 E0 0.15 2
238PU cG M$no photons were observed.
238PU cG TI$Ice(K)=0.12, Ice(L12)=0.026
238PU G 1031.3 3 E0 0.188 19
238PU cG M$no photons were observed.
238PU cG TI$Ice(K)=0.143, Ice(L12)=0.034
238PU G 1592.5 3 1.70 17
238PU G 1636.6 3 4.5 4 E1
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp|?0.0013
238PU L 1651.2 4 1,2+
238PU E 0.112 20 8.09 12
238PUS E CK=0.713 9$CL=0.210 6$CM+=0.077 3
238PU G 1607.0 4 0.34 5
238PU G 1651.4 5 0.06 2
238PU L 1726.3622 1,2+
238PU E 0.76 10 7.12 12
238PUS E CK=0.700 12$CL=0.219 9$CM+=0.081 4
238PU G 1682.2 3 1.70 17 E1,E2
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp|?0.0029
238PU G 1726.4 3 1.0 1
238PU L 1783.6 3 1,2+
238PU E 0.087 18 7.94 16
238PUS E CK=0.686 16$CL=0.228 11$CM+=0.085 5
238PU G 1739.4 4 0.10 2
238PU G 1783.6 4 0.21 5
238PU L 1898.26 19 2- ?
238PU cL E$proposed by the evaluators based on energy fit of three transitions
238PU E 0.66 8 6.75 19
238PUS E CK=0.64 4$CL=0.260 25$CM+=0.100 12
238PU G 935.2 3 0.3 AP ?
238PU2 G FLAG=A$
238PU G 1237.0 3 0.89 8 M1 0.0285 ?
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.022
238PUS G KC=0.0227 7$LC=0.00440 14
238PU2 G FLAG=A$
238PU G 1293.2 3 1.1 1 M1 0.0254 ?
238PU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.020 {I2}. L12/K|?0.14
238PUS G KC=0.0202 6$LC=0.00391 12
238PU2 G FLAG=A$