228TH 228AC B- DECAY 1987DA28 14NDS 201403
228TH H TYP=FUL$AUT=KHALIFEH ABUSALEEM$CIT=NDS 116, 163 (2014)$CUT=31-Dec-2012$
228TH DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2s, 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
228AC P 0 3+ 6.15 H 2 2134 3
228AC cP $Q(|b{+-}) from 2012Wa38
228TH N 1.000 1.000 1.0 1.0
228TH PN 2
228TH cN NR From absolute I|g, based on measurements by 1992Li05,
228TH2cN 1983Sc13 and 1982Sa36. This normalization leads to I|b(g.s.)=6% {I6},
228TH4cN although consistent with zero as expected from the spin change |DJ=3,
228TH5cN it may indicate that some g.s. transitions are missing from the level
228THxcN scheme.
228TH c 1987Da28: Radiochemically separated {+228}Ac source. 17% Ge, 10%
228TH2c Ge(Li), and LEPS detectors to measure E|g, |g-|g, and I|g
228TH c 1984Da05: {+228}Ac source was prepared using radiochemical separation
228TH2c from {+228}Ra sources primarily isolated from Th(No3)4. Measured E{-|g}
228TH3c and I{-|g} for 242 |g-rays using two HPGe and a planar HPGe detectors.
228TH4c However, neither levels in {+228}Th nor scheme are presented in this
228TH5c work. These are presented in 1987Da28 (same working group)
228TH c 2006Xu10: Observed |b{+-}delayed fission of {+228}Ac. {+228}Ac
228TH2C source was chemically prepared
228TH2c from Thorium solution, then exposed to mica foils
228TH3c (|a-detector) and HPGe (|g-detector) for 720 days. 17 |a-events were
228TH4c observed. These were interpreted from {+228}Ac fission based on
228TH5c analysis of |b{+-} decay energy and fissility
228TH6C systematics. Also, several
228TH6c |g-rays were observed and interpreted from the |b{+-} decay
228TH7C of {+228}Ac.
228TH7c These |g-rays are presented in figure 2 of 2006Xu10. However, no |g-
228TH8c uncertainty, intensity, or level energies are given. Probability of
228TH9c |b{+-}delayed fission (N{-|bDF}/N{-|b}) was found
228THAC to be 5|*10{+-12} {I2}
228TH cB IB Deduced from intensity balance in the level scheme.
228TH cG E From 1987Da28, unless otherwise noted
228TH cG RI$From 1987Da28, unless otherwise noted. The relative I|g of
228TH2cG 1987Da28 have been normalized to the absolute measurements of 1992Li05,
228TH3cG 1983Sc13 and 1982Sa36 at the three |g's with I|g>10 % (338.324|g
228TH4cG I|g=11.27% {I19}, 911.205|g I|g=25.8% {I4} and 968.987|g I|g=15.8%
228TH5cG {I3}, giving a normalization factor of 0.0258 {I5}).
228TH cG M$From adopted I|g and the Ice data of 1960Ar06 and 1971He23
228TH2cG (as noted with |a(exp)) normalized to theoretical values for:
228TH3cG |a(L)(E2) for 129.065|g, |a(K)(E1) for 209.253|g and |a(K)(E2) for
228THxcG 968.971|g
228TH cG E(A) Weighted average of measurements by 1987Da28, 1979He10. The
228TH2cG measurements of 1979He10 have been corrected by using the calibration
228TH3cG line E|g from 1995HeZZ.
228TH cG E(B) Energy fit poor, E|g not included in the least squares fit
228TH2cG to obtain E(level)
228TH cG RI(D) Weighted average of absolute intensity measurements of
228TH2cG 1992Li05, 1983Sc13, 1982Sa36
228TH cG RI(E) Weighted average of measurements by 1992Li05, 1987Da28,
228TH2cG 1983Sc13, 1982Sa36
228TH cG RI(F) Weighted average of measurements by 1987Da28, 1983Sc13,
228THxcG 1982Sa36
228TH cG RI(G) Weighted average of measurements by 1987Da28, 1983Sc13
228TH cG RI(H) Weighted average of measurements by 1987Da28, 1982Sa36
228TH cG RI(I) Weighted average of measurements by 1992Li05, 1987Da28,
228THxcG 1983Sc13
228TH cG M(J),MR(K)$From {+228}Pa |e decay
228TH cG M(L) |a(K)exp(1245|g+1247|g)=0.013 {I3} (1971He23); theory:
228TH2cG |a(K)(M1)=0.0162, |a(K)(E2)=0.00521. I(1245|g)=0.095 {I18},
228TH3cG I(1247|g)=0.50 {I3}; the 1245|g is [M1,E2]. Therefore, if the 1245|g
228TH4cG is M1, then |a(K)exp(1247|g)=0.013 {I3}; if 1245|g is E2, then
228THxcG |a(K)exp(1247|g)=0.015 {I3}. In each case the |g M1(+E2).
228TH cG E(P) The adopted J|p require that this |g have an unreasonable
228TH2cG multipolarity (M2 or E3). The placement of this transition is
228TH3cG therefore questionable.
228TH cG RI(Q) Total intensity (I|g=0.013 {I3}) placed from 1344.1 level by
228TH2cG 1987Da28. Alternate placement from 1928.6 level suggested by {+228}Pa
228TH3cG decay.
228TH cG E(R) |g's of approximately same energy and intensity are reported
228TH2cG in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays. On the basis of coin with
228TH3cG 911.2|g, it is suggested in {+228}Ac decay that the |g feeds the 2+
228TH4cG 968.97 level. In {+228}Pa decay, the |g is placed feeding the 3-
228TH5cG 968.37 level. The energy of the |g (E|g=674.65 {I5}) agrees with decay
228TH6cG to the 968.37 level. Possibly the |g is a doublet feeding both the
228TH7cG 968.97 and 968.37 levels. I|g(doublet)=0.101 {I8}
228TH cG E(T),RI(T)$|g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228TH cG RI(U) The energy of the 853-keV transition from the 1944.9 level is
228TH2cG expected to be 853.877 {I12} from E(level); the expected intensity
228TH3cG is I|g=0.0031 {I4} from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay. Therefore,
228TH4cG the 853.17 {I10} |g with I|g=0.0119 {I18} reported by 1987Da28 seems
228TH5cG to be a doublet with part of the intensity belonging to a |g unplaced
228TH6cG in level scheme
228TH cL $ 2009So02: discussion of log {Ift}
228TH cL $ 1992Li05: measured absolute I|g
228TH cL $ 1987Da28: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g. Earlier report: 1984Da05
228TH cL $ 1983Sc13, 1982Sa36: measured absolute I|g
228TH cL $ 1982Ma52, 1960Ar06, 1957Bj56: measured ce
228TH cL $ 1979Bo30: measured E|g; not included in E|g calculation
228TH2cL because five out of twelve E|g disagree with measurements of 1987Da28
228TH3cL and 1979He10 (deviation>3 x |s)
228TH cL $ 1979He10: measured E|g
228TH cL $ 1974De14: measured E|g, I|g, |b|g(|q), |b|g(circ pol)(|q)
228TH cL $ 1974Da17: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g. Deduced levels and J|p
228TH cL $ 1971He23: measured E-conversion electron, I-conversion electron.
228TH2cL Deduced J|p and Icc and polarity
228TH cL $ The decay scheme is that proposed by 1987Da28
228TH cL $ CC calculated using BrIcc v2.3S published in 2008Ki07
228TH cL E$ From 1971He23 and 1974Da17
228TH CL J$ From adopted levels
228TH CL BAND(A) g.s. ROTATIONAL BAND
228TH CL BAND(B) KPI=0- OCTUPOLE BAND
228TH CL BAND(C) KPI=0+ TWO OCTUPOLE PHONON BAND
228TH CL BAND(D) KPI=1- OCTUPOLE BAND
228TH CL BAND(E) KPI=2+ GAMMA-VIBRATIONAL BAND
228TH CL BAND(F) KPI=2- OCTUPOLE BAND
228TH CL BAND(G) KPI=2+ ROTATIONAL BAND ON QUASIPARTICLE STATE
228TH G 56.96 5 0.019 4
228TH G 137.91 5 0.024 5 M1 7.44
228THS G KC=5.94 9$LC=1.135 16$MC=0.273 4$NC+=0.0937 14
228THS G NC=0.0728 11$OC=0.01724 25$PC=0.00335 5$QC=0.000318 5
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=5.5 {I17}, K/L=5.6 {I27} (1971He23)
228TH G 466.40 10 0.029 3
228TH G 634.18 10 0.0106 21
228TH G 853.17 10 0.0088 18 U
228TH G 1337.33 20 0.0049 15
228TH G 1378.23 10 0.0059 18
228TH G 1385.39 10 0.0106 21
228TH G 1434.22 15 0.0080 23
228TH G 1438.01 10 0.0059 15
228TH G 1480.37 15 0.016 3
228TH G 1529.05 10 0.057 6
228TH G 1671.64 15 0.0041 13
228TH G 1684.01 20 0.015 5
228TH G 1721.4 3 0.0057 21
228TH G 1745.28 20 0.0065 8
228TH G 1784.4 3 0.0059 10
228TH G 1787.3 5 0.0013 5
228TH G 1915.9 4 0.0008 3
228TH G 1919.5 3 0.0021 5
228TH G 1944.20 20 0.0021 5
228TH G 2000.9 5 0.0010 3
228TH L 0.0 0+ A
228TH L 57.763 4 2+ A
228TH B 7 5 8.9 4
228THS B EAV=747.0 13
228TH G 57.766 5 0.47 3 E2 153.1 A
228TH3 G FLAG=H
228THS G LC=112.0 16$MC=30.7 5$NC+=10.35 15
228THS G NC=8.22 12$OC=1.83 3$PC=0.302 5$QC=0.000869 13
228TH cG M |a(L)exp=124 {I11} (1971He23); L12/L3=1.42 (1982Ma52), 1.14
228TH2cG {I8} (1960Ar06), 1.15 {I15} (1957Bj56); theory: |a(K)=114, L12/L3=1.23
228TH L 186.827 4 4+ A
228TH B 0.6 5 9.9 4
228THS B EAV=694.3 13
228TH G 129.065 1 2.42 9 E2 3.74 A
228TH3 G FLAG=E
228THS G KC=0.264 4$LC=2.54 4$MC=0.697 10$NC+=0.236 4
228THS G NC=0.187 3$OC=0.0417 6$PC=0.00696 10$QC=4.23E-5 6
228TH cG M L12/L3=1.94 {I14} (1960Ar06), 1.7 {I2} (1957Bj56). K/L=0.10
228TH2cG {I1} (1971He23), 0.12 {I3} (1957Bj56); theory: L12/L3=1.70, K/L=0.10
228TH L 328.006 4 1- B
228TH B 0.59 17 10.75 13 1U
228THS B EAV=609.3 12
228TH G 270.245 2 3.46 6 E1 0.0470 A
228TH3 G FLAG=E
228THS G KC=0.0376 6$LC=0.00716 10$MC=0.001717 24$NC+=0.000581 9
228THS G NC=0.000454 7$OC=0.0001054 15$PC=1.96E-5 3$QC=1.473E-6 21
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.029 {I4} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.0379
228TH G 328.000 6 2.95 12E1 0.0305 H
228THS G KC=0.0245 4$LC=0.00455 7$MC=0.001089 16$NC+=0.000369 6
228THS G NC=0.000288 4$OC=6.71E-5 10$PC=1.256E-5 18$QC=9.82E-7 14
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.037 {I8} (1971He23); theory |a(K)=0.0245
228TH L 378.178 11 6+ A
228TH B 0.116 18 10.45 7
228THS B EAV=616.9 12
228TH G 191.353 10 0.123 8 E2 0.776 H
228THS G KC=0.1710 24$LC=0.443 7$MC=0.1209 17$NC+=0.0409 6
228THS G NC=0.0324 5$OC=0.00726 11$PC=0.001224 18$QC=1.375E-5 20
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.24 {I7}, K/L=1.0 {I5}; theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.174,
228TH2cG K/L(E2)=0.39, |a(K)(M1)=2.49, K/L(M1)=5.25
228TH L 396.083 5 3- B
228TH B 11.65 24 8.435 10
228THS B EAV=609.7 12
228TH G 209.253 6 3.89 7 E1 0.0848 E
228THS G KC=0.0672 10$LC=0.01333 19$MC=0.00321 5$NC+=0.001082 16
228THS G NC=0.000848 12$OC=0.000196 3$PC=3.60E-5 5$QC=2.55E-6 4
228TH cG M from K/L and L subshell ratios in {+228}Pa |e decay.
228TH2cG Other: K/L=2.4 {I4} (1971He23)
228TH G 338.320 3 11.27 19E1 0.0285 A
228TH3 G FLAG=D
228THS G KC=0.0229 4$LC=0.00424 6$MC=0.001014 15$NC+=0.000344 5
228THS G NC=0.000269 4$OC=6.25E-5 9$PC=1.172E-5 17$QC=9.22E-7 13
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.019 {I2} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.0231
228TH L 519.195 6 5- B
228TH B 0.01 5 12.2 22 1U
228THS B EAV=536.9 12
228TH G 141.02 3 0.050 8 E1 0.217 J
228THS G KC=0.1689 24$LC=0.0362 5$MC=0.00875 13$NC+=0.00294 5
228THS G NC=0.00231 4$OC=0.000529 8$PC=9.53E-5 14$QC=6.10E-6 9
228TH cG M$ |a(K)exp=0.7 {I5} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.171
228TH G 332.370 4 0.40 4 E1 0.0297 A
228TH3 G FLAG=EJ
228THS G KC=0.0238 4$LC=0.00441 7$MC=0.001056 15$NC+=0.000358 5
228THS G NC=0.000280 4$OC=6.51E-5 10$PC=1.219E-5 17$QC=9.56E-7 14
228TH cG M ce(K) not seen by 1960Ar06. |a(K)exp=0.41 {I8} (1971He23)
228TH2cG does not agree with [E1] required by the level scheme or E1 measured
228TH3cG in {+228}Pa decay.
228TH L 831.822 10 0+ C
228TH G 503.823 13 0.182 12(E1) 0.01243 A
228TH3 G FLAG=G
228THS G KC=0.01009 15$LC=0.001775 25$MC=0.000422 6$NC+=0.0001435 20
228THS G NC=0.0001119 16$OC=2.62E-5 4$PC=4.97E-6 7$QC=4.19E-7 6
228TH cG M Ice not seen (1971He23), upper limit in Ice suggests E1
228TH G 774.1 2 0.06 AP[E2] 0.01649
228THS G KC=0.01204 17$LC=0.00333 5$MC=0.000835 12$NC+=0.000285 4
228THS G NC=0.000223 4$OC=5.17E-5 8$PC=9.54E-6 14$QC=6.19E-7 9
228TH L 874.48 3 2+ C
228TH cL J$ |gs to 0+ and 4+ in g.s. band (1987Da28)
228TH B 0.21 8 9.67 17
228THS B EAV=421.2 12
228TH G 478.33 5 0.209 15E1 0.01380 B
228THS G KC=0.01119 16$LC=0.00198 3$MC=0.000471 7$NC+=0.0001601 23
228THS G NC=0.0001249 18$OC=2.92E-5 4$PC=5.54E-6 8$QC=4.63E-7 7
228TH G 546.47 5 0.201 13[E1] 0.01058
228THS G KC=0.00860 12$LC=0.001500 21$MC=0.000357 5$NC+=0.0001212 17
228THS G NC=9.45E-5 14$OC=2.22E-5 4$PC=4.21E-6 6$QC=3.60E-7 5
228TH G 688.10 5 0.067 5 [E2] 0.0210 ?
228TH2 G FL=186.827$ FLAG=B
228THS G KC=0.01490 21$LC=0.00455 7$MC=0.001153 17$NC+=0.000393 6
228THS G NC=0.000308 5$OC=7.12E-5 10$PC=1.303E-5 19$QC=7.79E-7 11
228TH G 816.71 10 0.030 3 [M1,E2] 0.036 21
228THS G KC=0.028 18$LC=0.006 3$MC=0.0014 7$NC+=0.00047 23
228THS G NC=0.00037 18$OC=9.E-5 5$PC=1.7E-5 9$QC=1.5E-6 9
228TH G 874.44 7 0.047 10[E2] 0.01294 A
228THS G KC=0.00968 14$LC=0.00245 4$MC=0.000608 9$NC+=0.000208 3
228THS G NC=0.0001623 23$OC=3.78E-5 6$PC=7.03E-6 10$QC=4.90E-7 7
228TH L 938.61 5 0+ D
228TH cL J$2+ in 1987Da28 while no ruling out of 0+
228TH G 610.64 10 0.023 5 [E1]
228THS G CC=0.00853 12$KC=0.00695 10$LC=0.001198 17$MC=0.000284 4$NC+=9.67E-5 14
228THS G NC=7.54E-5 11$OC=1.769E-5 25$PC=3.37E-6 5$QC=2.93E-7 4
228TH G 880.76 10 0.0062 18[E2] 0.01276
228THS G KC=0.00956 14$LC=0.00240 4$MC=0.000597 9$NC+=0.000204 3
228THS G NC=0.0001594 23$OC=3.71E-5 6$PC=6.90E-6 10$QC=4.83E-7 7
228TH L 944.200 13 1-
228TH B 0.041 23 10.29 25
228THS B EAV=394.4 12
228TH G 616.22 3 0.080 5 A
228TH G 944.196 14 0.095 8 A
228TH L 968.335 25 2- D
228TH cL J$ |gs to 1- (1987Da28)
228TH B
228THS B EAV=385.3 12
228TH G 572.14 8 0.150 16 [M1,E2] 0.09 6 A
228THS G KC=0.07 5$LC=0.015 7$MC=0.0036 17$NC+=0.0012 6
228THS G NC=0.0010 5$OC=0.00023 11$PC=4.3E-5 21$QC=3.6E-6 25
228TH G 640.34 3 0.054 5 [E2] 0.0245 A
228THS G KC=0.01700 24$LC=0.00556 8$MC=0.001416 20$NC+=0.000482 7
228THS G NC=0.000378 6$OC=8.73E-5 13$PC=1.589E-5 23$QC=8.98E-7 13
228TH L 968.45 4+
228TH CL E$Level from EC decay
228TH G 449.15 5 0.048 5 A
228TH CG E$Placement from EC decay
228THS G KC=0.0331 5$LC=0.01653 24$MC=0.00432 6$NC+=0.001469 21
228THS G NC=0.001157 17$OC=0.000264 4$PC=4.68E-5 7$QC=1.86E-6 3
228TH L 968.972 5 2+ E
228TH B 29.9 10 7.395 16
228THS B EAV=385.0 12
228TH G 782.142 5 0.485 19[E2] 0.01615 A
228TH3 G FLAG=E
228THS G KC=0.01182 17$LC=0.00324 5$MC=0.000812 12$NC+=0.000277 4
228THS G NC=0.000217 3$OC=5.03E-5 7$PC=9.29E-6 13$QC=6.07E-7 9
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.024 {I3} (1960Ar06), 0.07 {I3} (1971He23)
228TH2cG inconsistent with each other and with E2 assignment required by level
228THxcG scheme
228TH G 911.204 4 25.8 4 E2 0.01194 A
228TH3 G FLAG=D
228THS G KC=0.00900 13$LC=0.00221 3$MC=0.000549 8$NC+=0.000187 3
228THS G NC=0.0001463 21$OC=3.41E-5 5$PC=6.36E-6 9$QC=4.53E-7 7
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.0104 {I10}, K/L=4.6 {I5} (1971He23),
228TH2cG |a(K)exp=0.0092 {I9} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.0091, K/L=4.04.
228THxcG |d=+24 {I8} from {+228}Pa decay
228TH G 968.971 17 15.8 3 E2 0.01061 A
228TH3 G FLAG=D
228THS G KC=0.00806 12$LC=0.00191 3$MC=0.000472 7$NC+=0.0001610 23
228THS G NC=0.0001258 18$OC=2.93E-5 5$PC=5.49E-6 8$QC=4.04E-7 6
228TH cG M |a(L)exp=0.0016 {I3} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.00815,
228TH2cG |a(L)=0.0194; |a(K)exp used in normalization of the ce spectra.
228TH L 979.507 14 2+
228TH cL J$ 0 or 2 from |gs to 0+ and 2+ levels in g.s. and 1- and 3-
228TH2cL levels of the octupole band (1987Da28)
228TH B 0.14 4 9.71 13
228THS B EAV=381.0 12
228TH G 583.41 5 0.111 10[E1]
228THS G CC=0.00932 13$KC=0.00759 11$LC=0.001313 19$MC=0.000312 5$NC+=0.0001061
228THS G NC=8.27E-5 12$OC=1.94E-5 3$PC=3.69E-6 6$QC=3.18E-7 5
228TH G 651.51 3 0.090 8 [E1] A
228THS G CC=0.00754 11$KC=0.00615 9$LC=0.001053 15$MC=0.000250 4$NC+=8.50E-5 12
228THS G NC=6.62E-5 10$OC=1.555E-5 22$PC=2.97E-6 5$QC=2.60E-7 4
228TH G 792.8 0.08 AP[E2] 0.01572
228THS G KC=0.01154 17$LC=0.00313 5$MC=0.000784 11$NC+=0.000267 4
228THS G NC=0.000209 3$OC=4.85E-5 7$PC=8.98E-6 13$QC=5.91E-7 9
228TH G 921.98 10 0.0147 21 [M1,E2] 0.027 15 &
228TH3 G FLAG=B
228THS G KC=0.021 13$LC=0.0041 20$MC=0.0010 5$NC+=0.00034 16
228THS G NC=0.00027 13$OC=6.E-5 3$PC=1.2E-5 6$QC=1.1E-6 7
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=2.0 {I4} (1971He23) may indicate an E0 component
228TH cG Total intensity placed here by 1987Da28
228TH G 979.48 10 0.026 3 [E2] 0.01039
228THS G KC=0.00791 11$LC=0.00186 3$MC=0.000460 7$NC+=0.0001568 22
228THS G NC=0.0001225 18$OC=2.86E-5 4$PC=5.36E-6 8$QC=3.96E-7 6
228TH L 1016.386 23 3-
228TH cL J$ (2+) in 1987 Da28 from |g to 0+ g.s.
228TH B 0.33 5 9.29 7
228THS B EAV=367.0 12
228TH G 620.38 5 0.080 5
228TH G 688.10 5 0.067 5
228TH2 G FL=328.006 $ FLAG=B
228TH cG |g not placed here by 1987Da28; this placement of the |g
228TH2cG suggested in {+228}Pa decay
228TH cG $Poor fit in the level scheme. Ignored in the intensity balance
228TH G 958.61 4 0.28 4 A
228TH3 G FLAG=H
228TH G 1016.44 15 0.019 3 & ?
228TH L 1022.531 6 (3)+ E
228TH B 3.11 15 8.306 22
228THS B EAV=364.7 12
228TH G 835.710 6 1.61 6 E2 0.01415 A
228TH3 G FLAG=EJ
228THS G KC=0.01050 15$LC=0.00274 4$MC=0.000683 10$NC+=0.000233 4
228THS G NC=0.000182 3$OC=4.24E-5 6$PC=7.86E-6 11$QC=5.34E-7 8
228TH cG M |a(K)exp|<0.015 (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.0106
228TH G 964.766 10 4.99 9 E2+M1 -7.2 10 0.0111923 A
228TH3 G FLAG=EK
228THS G KC=0.00853 19$LC=0.00199 4$MC=0.000492 9$NC+=0.000168 3
228THS G NC=0.0001312 23$OC=3.06E-5 6$PC=5.74E-6 11$QC=4.28E-7 10
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.0084 {I9} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.00821
228TH L 1059.94 7 4-
228TH B 0.070 11 9.90 7
228THS B EAV=350.6 12
228TH G 540.76 10 0.026 3 [M1,E2] 0.10 7
228THS G KC=0.08 6$LC=0.017 9$MC=0.0042 19$NC+=0.0014 7
228THS G NC=0.0011 5$OC=0.00026 12$PC=5.0E-5 25$QC=4.E-6 3
228TH G 663.82 10 0.028 6 (M1+E2) 0.06 4 J
228THS G KC=0.05 4$LC=0.010 5$MC=0.0024 12$NC+=0.0008 4
228THS G NC=0.0006 3$OC=0.00015 8$PC=2.9E-5 15$QC=2.5E-6 17
228TH G 873.17 15 0.031 6 [E1]
228THS G CC=0.00440 7$KC=0.00361 5$LC=0.000601 9$MC=0.0001421 20$NC+=4.84E-5 7
228THS G NC=3.77E-5 6$OC=8.87E-6 13$PC=1.704E-6 24$QC=1.546E-7 22
228TH L 1091.020 9 4+ E
228TH B 0.26 5 9.29 9
228THS B EAV=338.9 12
228TH G 904.20 4 0.77 3 E2 0.01212 A
228TH3 G FLAG=FJ
228THS G KC=0.00912 13$LC=0.00225 4$MC=0.000559 8$NC+=0.000191 3
228THS G NC=0.0001492 21$OC=3.47E-5 5$PC=6.48E-6 9$QC=4.60E-7 7
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.027 {I10} (1971He23), ce(K) not seen (1960Ar06);
228TH2cG |a(K)exp does not agree with |a(K)exp measured in {+228}Pa |e decay.
228TH G 1033.248 9 0.201 13E2 A
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G CC=0.00938 14$KC=0.00720 10$LC=0.001643 23$MC=0.000404 6$NC+=0.0001380
228THS G NC=0.0001078 15$OC=2.52E-5 4$PC=4.73E-6 7$QC=3.58E-7 5
228TH L 1122.949 6 2- F
228TH cL J$|?Member of a rotational band (1987Da28)
228TH B 5.90 14 7.883 12
228THS B EAV=327.0 12
228TH G 100.41 3 0.093 13 (E1+M2) 0.23 AP 3.10 AP
228THS G LC AP 2.27$MC AP 0.615$NC+ AP 0.215
228THS G NC AP 0.1676$OC AP 0.0393$PC AP 0.00738$QC AP 0.000589
228TH cG M,MR |a(L3)exp|?0.43 (1971He23); theory: |a(L3)(E1)=0.0213,
228TH2cG |a(L3)(M2)=8.66. |a(L3)exp could also fit M1+E2; however, level scheme
228TH3cG requires |D|p=yes
228TH G 153.977 10 0.722 21E1 0.1757 E
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228THS G KC=0.1375 20$LC=0.0289 4$MC=0.00697 10$NC+=0.00234 4
228THS G NC=0.00184 3$OC=0.000422 6$PC=7.65E-5 11$QC=5.02E-6 7
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.095 {I16} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.129
228TH G 726.863 15 0.62 8 (E2) 0.0187
228THS G KC=0.01349 19$LC=0.00393 6$MC=0.000990 14$NC+=0.000337 5
228THS G NC=0.000264 4$OC=6.12E-5 9$PC=1.125E-5 16$QC=7.00E-7 10
228TH cG M |a(K)exp|?0.012 (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.0136
228TH G 794.947 5 4.25 7 E2+M1 -4.4 10 0.0179 14 A
228TH3 G FLAG=DK
228THS G KC=0.0133 12$LC=0.00340 19$MC=0.00085 5$NC+=0.000289 16
228THS G NC=0.000226 12$OC=5.3E-5 3$PC=9.8E-6 6$QC=6.8E-7 6
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.0118 {I20}, K/L=1.6 {I7} (1971He23),
228TH2cG |a(K)exp=0.0139 {I19} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0116,
228THxcG |a(K)(M1)=0.0524
228TH G 1065.18 4 0.132 10 A
228TH L 1153.465 10 2+ 0.29 NS 2
228TH cL T from 1974De14
228TH B 5.8 9 7.84 7
228THS B EAV=315.7 12
228TH G 173.964 13 0.035 5 M1+E2 1.2 +11-6 2.2 9 A
228THS G KC=1.4 10$LC=0.63 3$MC=0.166 14$NC+=0.056 5
228THS G NC=0.044 4$OC=0.0101 7$PC=0.00180 5$QC=8.E-5 5
228TH cG M,MR from |a(K)exp=1.5 {I8} (1971He23); also fits E1+M2 with
228TH2cG |d=0.35 {I12}, level scheme requires |D|p=no. Theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.104,
228TH3cG |a(K)(E2)=0.203, |a(K)(M1)=3.26, |a(K)(M2)=12.9
228TH G 184.54 2 0.070 8 E0+M1 63 8 4.5 8
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228THS G KC=53 7$ LC=10.2 13$ MC=0.126$ NC+=0.0462
228TH cG M K/L=4.0 {I5}, L1/L2=33 {I6}, L1/L3>>50 (1974De14),
228TH2cG |a(K)exp=53 {I7} (1971He23); measured |a(K)exp yields an E0 transition
228TH3cG with an admixture of: 5.4% M1 with K/L=5.2, L1/L2=30, L1/L3=3300, or
228TH4cG 1.4% E2 with K/L=5.0, L1/L2=16.5, L1/L3=58. Thus the ratios support
228TH5cG E0+M1 transition
228TH cG CC from |a(K)exp
228TH G 214.85 5 0.76 11
228TH CG E$From figure 4 in 1987Da28
228TH G 278.95 5 0.160 21 (M1,E2) 0.6 4 @
228TH3 G FL=874.48
228THS G KC=0.5 4$LC=0.12 3$MC=0.031 6$NC+=0.0107 22
228THS G NC=0.0083 16$OC=0.0019 5$PC=0.00036 10$QC=2.4E-5 19
228TH cG M |a(K)exp(doublet)=0.18 {I4} (1960Ar06),
228TH2cG |a(L)exp(279|g+282|g)=0.37 {I7} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.872,
228THxcG |a(K)(E2)=0.0854
228TH G 321.646 8 0.226 11[E2] 0.1369 A
228TH3 G FLAG=D
228THS G KC=0.0635 9$LC=0.0540 8$MC=0.01444 21$NC+=0.00490 7
228THS G NC=0.00387 6$OC=0.000875 13$PC=0.0001514 22$QC=3.88E-6 6
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.49 {I8} (1971He23) indicating mainly M1 transition
228TH2cG (|a(K)(M1)=0.590) which is not in agreement with the level scheme.
228TH3cG 1960Ar06 did not see ce(K) suggesting that the |a(K)exp may be
228THxcG unreliable.
228TH G 1095.679 20 0.129 10 [M1,E2] 0.017 9 A
228THS G KC=0.014 8$LC=0.0026 13$MC=0.0006 3$NC+=0.00022 10
228THS G NC=0.00017 8$OC=4.0E-5 19$PC=8.E-6 4$QC=7.E-7 4
228TH G 1153.52 4 0.139 10 A
228TH L 1168.377 5 3- F
228TH B 3.11 7 8.091 11
228THS B EAV=310.2 11
228TH G 77.34 3 0.026 5 [E1] 0.232
228THS G LC=0.1747 25$MC=0.0426 6$NC+=0.01416 20
228THS G NC=0.01118 16$OC=0.00252 4$PC=0.000435 7$QC=2.30E-5 4
228TH G 145.849 10 0.158 8 E1 0.200 H
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G KC=0.1561 22$LC=0.0332 5$MC=0.00802 12$NC+=0.00269 4
228THS G NC=0.00212 3$OC=0.000485 7$PC=8.76E-5 13$QC=5.66E-6 8
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=1.3 {I4} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.158. ce not
228TH2cG seen by 1960Ar06.
228TH G 199.407 10 0.315 5 E1 0.0950 H
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G KC=0.0752 11$LC=0.01502 21$MC=0.00362 5$NC+=0.001220 17
228THS G NC=0.000956 14$OC=0.000221 3$PC=4.05E-5 6$QC=2.84E-6 4
228TH cG M ce(K), ce(L) not seen (1971He23,1960Ar06), suggests E1 mult
228TH G 648.84 10 0.040 4 [E2] 0.0238 &
228TH2 G FL=519.195 $ FLAG=B
228THS G KC=0.01659 24$LC=0.00536 8$MC=0.001363 19$NC+=0.000464 7
228THS G NC=0.000364 5$OC=8.40E-5 12$PC=1.532E-5 22$QC=8.75E-7 13
228TH G 772.291 5 1.49 3 E2+M1 -3.4 +8-27 0.021 3 A
228TH3 G FLAG=EK
228THS G KC=0.0154 22$LC=0.0039 4$MC=0.00096 9$NC+=0.00033 3
228THS G NC=0.000256 22$OC=6.0E-5 6$PC=1.11E-5 11$QC=7.9E-7 12
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.016 {I7} (1971He23), 0.019 {I3} (1960Ar06);
228TH2cG theory: |a(K)=0.0157 {I24}
228TH G 840.377 7 0.91 4 E2 0.01400 A
228TH3 G FLAG=EJ
228THS G KC=0.01039 15$LC=0.00270 4$MC=0.000673 10$NC+=0.000230 4
228THS G NC=0.000180 3$OC=4.18E-5 6$PC=7.75E-6 11$QC=5.29E-7 8
228TH cG M |a(K)exp|<0.026 (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.0105
228TH G 1110.610 10 0.285 23 E1 @
228TH cG RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison
228TH2cG with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured
228TH3cG in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays.
228TH3 G FLAG=AJ
228THS G CC=0.00288 4$KC=0.00237 4$LC=0.000388 6$MC=9.15E-5 13$NC+=3.20E-5 5
228THS G NC=2.43E-5 4$OC=5.73E-6 8$PC=1.104E-6 16$QC=1.025E-7 15$IPC=7.72E-7 11
228TH L 1174.50 7 (5+) E
228TH B 0.005 LT 10.9 GT
228THS B EAV=307.9 11
228TH CB IB$ From 1987Da28
228TH G 987.71 20 0.077 13 [M1,E2] 0.022 13
228THS G KC=0.018 10$LC=0.0035 17$MC=0.0008 4$NC+=0.00029 14
228THS G NC=0.00022 11$OC=5.2E-5 25$PC=1.0E-5 5$QC=9.E-7 6
228TH L 1175.45 5 2+
228TH cL J$ |gs to 0+, 2+, and 4+ in g.s. and to 2+ level (1987Da28)
228TH B 0.17 3 9.34 8
228THS B EAV=307.6 11
228TH G 231.42 10 0.025 4 [D,E2] 1.1 7
228TH G 988.63 20 0.077 13[E2] 0.01021
228THS G KC=0.00778 11$LC=0.00182 3$MC=0.000449 7$NC+=0.0001534 22
228THS G NC=0.0001198 17$OC=2.79E-5 4$PC=5.24E-6 8$QC=3.89E-7 6
228TH G 1117.63 10 0.054 8
228TH G 1175.31 10 0.024 3
228TH L 1200.5 10
228TH CL E$Placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay
228TH L 1226.566 8 4- F
228TH B 0.67 4 8.66 3
228THS B EAV=288.8 11
228TH G 135.54 5 0.018 4 E1 0.238 J
228THS G KC=0.185 3$LC=0.0401 6$MC=0.00970 14$NC+=0.00325 5
228THS G NC=0.00256 4$OC=0.000585 9$PC=0.0001053 15$QC=6.66E-6 10
228TH cG M |a(K)exp|?3 (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.185,
228TH2cG discrepant |a(K) for E1 |g-ray
228TH G 204.026 10 0.112 15E1 0.0900 H
228THS G KC=0.0713 10$LC=0.01419 20$MC=0.00342 5$NC+=0.001152 17
228THS G NC=0.000903 13$OC=0.000208 3$PC=3.83E-5 6$QC=2.70E-6 4
228TH cG M |a(L)exp<0.23 (1971He23); theory: |a(L)(E1)=0.0143,
228THxcG |a(L)(E2)=0.342
228TH G 707.41 5 0.155 15(E2) 0.0198 H
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G KC=0.01417 20$LC=0.00422 6$MC=0.001067 15$NC+=0.000364 5
228THS G NC=0.000285 4$OC=6.59E-5 10$PC=1.209E-5 17$QC=7.38E-7 11
228TH G 830.486 8 0.540 21 E2(+M1) -7.7 9 0.0150 3 A
228TH3 G FLAG=FJK
228THS G KC=0.01117 22$LC=0.00287 5$MC=0.000715 12$NC+=0.000244 4
228THS G NC=0.000191 3$OC=4.43E-5 8$PC=8.24E-6 14$QC=5.69E-7 12
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.020 {I11} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.0113 {I2}
228TH G 1039.65 15 0.044 9
228TH L 1297.440 11 (5)- F
228TH B 0.058 13 9.97 10 1U
228THS B EAV=260.3 10
228TH G 778.23 0.022 6 [M1,E2] 0.040 25 S
228TH cG E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228THS G KC=0.032 20$LC=0.006 4$MC=0.0016 8$NC+=0.0005 3
228THS G NC=0.00042 20$OC=0.00010 5$PC=1.9E-5 10$QC=1.6E-6 11
228TH G 901.23 15 0.016 3 [E2] 0.01220
228THS G KC=0.00917 13$LC=0.00227 4$MC=0.000564 8$NC+=0.000192 3
228THS G NC=0.0001504 21$OC=3.50E-5 5$PC=6.53E-6 10$QC=4.63E-7 7
228TH G 1110.610 10 0.019 10 E1 @
228TH cG RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison
228TH2cG with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured
228TH3cG in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays.
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G CC=0.00288 4$KC=0.00237 4$LC=0.000388 6$MC=9.15E-5 13$NC+=3.20E-5 5
228THS G NC=2.43E-5 4$OC=5.73E-6 8$PC=1.104E-6 16$QC=1.025E-7 15$IPC=7.72E-7 11
228TH L 1344.082 11 3-
228TH cL J$ |gs to 1- and 5- (1987Da28)
228TH B 0.217 15 8.95 3
228THS B EAV=246.4 11
228TH G 168.65 10 0.010 3 [E1] 0.1414 @
228TH cG RI$ Total intensity (I|g=0.013 {I3}) placed from 1344.1 level by
228TH2cG 1987Da28. Alternate placement from 1928.6 level suggested by {+228}Pa
228TH3cG decay.
228THS G KC=0.1111 16$LC=0.0229 4$MC=0.00552 8$NC+=0.00186 3
228THS G NC=0.001458 21$OC=0.000335 5$PC=6.11E-5 9$QC=4.10E-6 6
228TH G 824.934 23 0.050 5 [E2] 0.01452 A
228THS G KC=0.01074 15$LC=0.00283 4$MC=0.000706 10$NC+=0.000241 4
228THS G NC=0.000188 3$OC=4.38E-5 7$PC=8.12E-6 12$QC=5.48E-7 8
228TH G 947.982 11 0.106 8 [M1,E2] 0.025 14 A
228THS G KC=0.020 12$LC=0.0038 19$MC=0.0009 5$NC+=0.00032 15
228THS G NC=0.00025 12$OC=6.E-5 3$PC=1.1E-5 6$QC=1.0E-6 6
228TH G 1016.44 15 0.019 3 &
228TH G 1157.14 15 0.0070 13
228TH G 1286.27 20 0.050 10
228TH L 1416.09 7 (3-)
228TH B 0.060 8 9.36 6
228THS B EAV=220.9 11
228TH G 471.76 15 0.033 3 [E2] 0.049
228TH G 1019.86 10 0.021 4
228TH G 1088.18 15 0.0059 13
228TH G 1229.40 15 0.0075 23
228TH L 1431.981 6 4+
228TH cL J$E2 and M1 |gs K{+|p}=2{++} band (1987Da28). |g-ray to 1- level
228TH2cL supports 3+ rather than 4+ (1987Da28)
228TH B 1.2 4 8.03 15
228THS B EAV=215.3 11
228TH G 257.52 10 0.030 3 (M1) 1.285 J
228THS G KC=1.028 15$LC=0.194 3$MC=0.0466 7$NC+=0.01600 23
228THS G NC=0.01243 18$OC=0.00294 5$PC=0.000571 8$QC=5.42E-5 8
228TH G 263.58 10 0.040 4 E1 0.0498 J
228THS G KC=0.0397 6$LC=0.00760 11$MC=0.00182 3$NC+=0.000617 9
228THS G NC=0.000482 7$OC=0.0001119 16$PC=2.08E-5 3$QC=1.553E-6 22
228TH G 278.95 5 0.031 5 [E2] 0.211 @
228TH3 G FL=1153.465$ FLAG=B
228THS G KC=0.0842 12$LC=0.0935 14$MC=0.0252 4$NC+=0.00853 12
228THS G NC=0.00675 10$OC=0.001521 22$PC=0.000261 4$QC=5.39E-6 8
228TH cG |g not placed here by 1987Da28; this alternate placement is
228TH2cG suggested in {+228}Pa decay
228TH G 340.96 5 0.369 21 E2+M1 -5.2 18 0.133 21 E
228TH3 G FLAG=JK
228THS G KC=0.072 19$LC=0.0451 21$MC=0.0119 5$NC+=0.00405 16
228THS G NC=0.00319 13$OC=0.00073 3$PC=0.000127 7$QC=4.2E-6 10
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.66 {I7} (1971He23) suggests an M1 transition.
228TH2cG However, ce(K) not seen by 1960Ar06.
228TH G 409.462 6 1.92 4 E2+M1 -5.4 8 0.080 4 A
228TH3 G FLAG=EK
228THS G KC=0.048 3$LC=0.0236 5$MC=0.00618 12$NC+=0.00210 5
228THS G NC=0.00165 4$OC=0.000378 8$PC=6.69E-5 15$QC=2.69E-6 16
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.058 {I9}, K/L=2.0 {I4} (1971He23), |a(K)exp=0.049
228TH2cG {I4} (1960Ar06). Theory: |a(K)=0.049 {I4}, K/L=2.02 {I14}
228TH G 452.47 10 0.015 5 [E2] 0.0544
228THS G KC=0.0326 5$LC=0.01613 23$MC=0.00422 6$NC+=0.001433 20
228THS G NC=0.001128 16$OC=0.000258 4$PC=4.57E-5 7$QC=1.83E-6 3
228TH G 463.004 6 4.40 7 E2 0.0514 A
228TH3 G FLAG=E
228THS G KC=0.0312 5$LC=0.01495 21$MC=0.00390 6$NC+=0.001326 19
228THS G NC=0.001044 15$OC=0.000238 4$PC=4.24E-5 6$QC=1.744E-6 25
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.036 {I4}, K/L=3.0 {I7} (1971He23); |a(K)exp=0.028
228TH2cG {I3} (1960Ar06); theory: |a(K)=0.0316, K/L=2.1
228TH G 1103.41 10 0.0150 23[E3] 0.0195
228TH2 G FL=328.006$ FLAG=BP
228THS G KC=0.01377 20$LC=0.00429 6$MC=0.001090 16$NC+=0.000373 6
228THS G NC=0.000292 4$OC=6.78E-5 10$PC=1.256E-5 18$QC=8.16E-7 12$IPC=3.24E-8 5
228TH G 1245.05 20 0.095 18 [M1,E2] 0.013 6 B
228THS G KC=0.010 5$LC=0.0019 9$MC=0.00046 20$NC+=0.00017 8
228THS G NC=0.00012 6$OC=2.9E-5 13$PC=5.6E-6 25$QC=5.E-7 3$IPC=1.2E-5 5
228TH G 1374.19 10 0.014 4 [E2]
228TH L 1450.35 3 4-
228TH B 0.60 7 8.29 6
228THS B EAV=208.9 11
228TH G 18.4 0.014 4 [E1] 6.47 0.11 3 S
228THS G L/T=0.513 7$M/T=0.268 5$N+/T=0.0851 15
228THS G N/T=0.0690 13$O/T=0.0141 3$P/T=0.00195 4$Q/T=5.60E-5 11
228TH cG TI,RI deduced from branching ratio in Pa decay
228TH G 223.85 10 0.054 5 M1+E2 -0.18 5 1.85 4 J
228TH3 G FLAG=K
228THS G KC=1.47 4$LC=0.285 5$MC=0.0688 10$NC+=0.0236 4
228THS G NC=0.0184 3$OC=0.00434 7$PC=0.000839 13$QC=7.80E-5 18
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=1.7 {I5}, K/L=4.2 {I19} (1971He23); theory:
228THxcG |a(K)=1.56 {I3}, K/L=5.2
228TH G 282.00 3 0.072 19 M1+E2 -0.51 12 0.83 7 A
228TH3 G FLAG=HJK
228THS G KC=0.65 6$LC=0.138 6$MC=0.0337 11$NC+=0.0115 4
228THS G NC=0.0090 3$OC=0.00211 7$PC=0.000403 16$QC=3.4E-5 3
228TH G 327.44 0.12 4 [E2] 0.1299 S
228TH cG E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228THS G KC=0.0613 9$LC=0.0505 7$MC=0.01349 19$NC+=0.00458 7
228THS G NC=0.00361 5$OC=0.000818 12$PC=0.0001417 20$QC=3.72E-6 6
228TH cG |g may be masked by strong 328.000|g.
228TH cG E E|g from E(level)
228TH G 480.94 20 0.023 5 [M2] 0.645 P
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228THS G KC=0.484 7$LC=0.1200 17$MC=0.0300 5$NC+=0.01038 15
228THS G NC=0.00807 12$OC=0.00191 3$PC=0.000367 6$QC=3.29E-5 5
228TH cG Not reported in {+228}Pa decay
228TH G 930.93 10 0.0124 18 &
228TH G 1054.11 20 0.018 5
228TH L 1531.478 6 3+
228TH B 7.6 4 7.003 24
228THS B EAV=181.0 11
228TH G 99.509 6 1.26 7 M1 3.84 A
228TH2 G FLAG=H
228THS G LC=2.90 4$MC=0.699 10$NC+=0.240 4
228THS G NC=0.186 3$OC=0.0442 7$PC=0.00857 12$QC=0.000815 12
228TH cG M |a(L12)exp=3.0 {I3} (1971He23), 2.0 {I3} (1960Ar06); L3 not
228TH2cG seen (1960Ar06)
228TH G 356.94 10 0.0170 18[E2] 0.1015
228THS G KC=0.0517 8$LC=0.0368 6$MC=0.00977 14$NC+=0.00331 5
228THS G NC=0.00261 4$OC=0.000593 9$PC=0.0001033 15$QC=3.07E-6 5
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=1.9 {I9} (1971He23) does not agree with
228TH2cG multipolarity deduced from level scheme. Theory: |a(K)=0.0523
228TH G 377.99 10 0.025 3 [M1,E2] 0.27 18
228THS G KC=0.20 16$LC=0.049 19$MC=0.012 5$NC+=0.0041 15
228THS G NC=0.0032 11$OC=0.0007 3$PC=0.00014 6$QC=1.1E-5 8
228TH G 440.44 5 0.121 8 M1 0.295
228THS G KC=0.237 4$LC=0.0442 7$MC=0.01061 15$NC+=0.00364 5
228THS G NC=0.00283 4$OC=0.000670 10$PC=0.0001300 19$QC=1.234E-5 18
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.26 {I9} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.252. Limit of
228TH2cG E2 admixture |d<0.8
228TH G 508.959 17 0.45 5 E2(+M1) +1.1 GT 0.08 4 A
228THS G KC=0.06 3$LC=0.015 5$MC=0.0038 10$NC+=0.0013 4
228THS G NC=0.0010 3$OC=0.00024 7$PC=4.4E-5 13$QC=3.0E-6 16
228TH cG M,MR |a(K)exp=0.06 {I3} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(E2)=0.0264,
228THxcG |a(K)(M1)=0.171
228TH G 562.500 4 0.87 3 E2+M1 +1.6 6 0.07 3 A
228TH3 G FLAG=EK
228THS G KC=0.050 23$LC=0.012 4$MC=0.0030 8$NC+=0.0010 3
228THS G NC=0.00081 20$OC=0.00019 5$PC=3.5E-5 10$QC=2.6E-6 12
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.048 {I10} (1971He23); E1+M2 mixture requires
228THxcG |d=0.39
228TH G 1135.24 15 0.0098 15
228TH G 1344.59 15 0.0090 18
228TH L 1539.24 9 2+
228TH G 416.30 20 0.0132 21[E1] 0.0183
228THS G KC=0.01482 21$LC=0.00267 4$MC=0.000637 9$NC+=0.000216 3
228THS G NC=0.0001686 24$OC=3.94E-5 6$PC=7.43E-6 11$QC=6.07E-7 9
228TH G 1142.85 15 0.0103 21
228TH L 1617.78 7 4+
228TH B 0.095 9 8.68 5
228THS B EAV=152.1 10
228TH G 648.84 10 0.040 4 &
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228TH G 1430.95 10 0.035 7
228TH G 1559.85 20 0.020 4
228TH L 1638.283 10 2+ G
228TH cL Quasiparticle configuration=((|p 3/2+[651])(|p 1/2+[660])) or
228TH2cL configuration=((|p 3/2+[651])(|p 1/2+[400])) suggested for this level
228TH cL J$|gs to 0+ and 4+ levels of the g.s. (1987Da28)
228TH B 1.15 5 7.542 21
228THS B EAV=145.32 99
228TH G 470.25 20 0.013 3 [E1] 0.01428
228THS G KC=0.01157 17$LC=0.00205 3$MC=0.000489 7$NC+=0.0001661 24
228THS G NC=0.0001295 19$OC=3.03E-5 5$PC=5.74E-6 8$QC=4.79E-7 7
228TH G 515.06 10 0.049 5 [E1] 0.01190
228THS G KC=0.00966 14$LC=0.001695 24$MC=0.000403 6$NC+=0.0001371 20
228THS G NC=0.0001069 15$OC=2.50E-5 4$PC=4.75E-6 7$QC=4.02E-7 6
228TH G 1309.71 20 0.019 6
228TH G 1451.40 15 0.0106 21
228TH G 1580.53 3 0.60 4 (M1,E2) A
228TH3 G FLAG=I
228THS G CC=0.007 3$KC=0.0057 24$LC=0.0011 4$MC=0.00025 10$NC+=0.00022 9
228THS G NC=7.E-5 3$OC=1.6E-5 6$PC=3.1E-6 12$QC=2.9E-7 13$IPC=0.00013 5
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.012 {I7} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0087,
228THxcG |a(K)(E2)=0.00343
228TH G 1638.281 10 0.47 3 (E2) A
228TH3 G FLAG=IJ
228THS G CC=0.00410 6$KC=0.00319 5$LC=0.000608 9$MC=0.0001463 21$NC+=0.0001539 2
228THS G NC=3.89E-5 6$OC=9.16E-6 13$PC=1.755E-6 25$QC=1.533E-7 22$IPC=0.0001039
228TH L 1643.119 16 (3-)
228TH B 3.0 8 7.11 12
228THS B EAV=143.73 99
228TH G 474.75 10 0.022 3 [M1,E2] 0.14 10
228THS G KC=0.11 9$LC=0.025 12$MC=0.006 3$NC+=0.0021 9
228THS G NC=0.0016 7$OC=0.00038 17$PC=7.E-5 4$QC=6.E-6 5
228TH G 520.151 16 0.067 5 (M1) 0.189 A
228THS G KC=0.1516 22$LC=0.0282 4$MC=0.00676 10$NC+=0.00232 4
228THS G NC=0.00180 3$OC=0.000426 6$PC=8.27E-5 12$QC=7.86E-6 11
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.31 {I12} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.161
228TH G 627.23 20 0.014 3
228TH G 674.16 0.109 LE [E1] R
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228THS G CC=0.00707 10$KC=0.00577 8$LC=0.000985 14$MC=0.000233 4$NC+=7.95E-5 12
228THS G NC=6.19E-5 9$OC=1.454E-5 21$PC=2.78E-6 4$QC=2.44E-7 4
228TH cG E deduced from E(level)
228TH G 674.75 2.1 7 [M1,E2] 0.06 4 R
228TH cG RI$ From {+228}Pa decay with respect to I{1247.07}=8.2 {I4}
228TH3 G FL=968.335
228THS G KC=0.05 3$LC=0.009 5$MC=0.0023 11$NC+=0.0008 4
228THS G NC=0.0006 3$OC=0.00014 7$PC=2.7E-5 14$QC=2.4E-6 16
228TH cG E deduced from E(level)
228TH G 699.08 15 0.037 5 [E2] 0.020
228TH G 1247.08 4 0.50 3 (M1) 0.0187 A
228TH3 G FLAG=IB
228THS G KC=0.01505 21$LC=0.00274 4$MC=0.000654 10$NC+=0.000242 4
228THS G NC=0.0001743 25$OC=4.13E-5 6$PC=8.02E-6 12$QC=7.69E-7 11$IPC=1.771E-5 2
228TH G 1315.34 10 0.015 3 [E2] 0.006
228TH L 1646.005 11 3+
228TH B 4.19 19 6.958 22
228THS B EAV=142.79 99
228TH G 114.56 7 0.0098 21 [M1,E2] 9 4
228THS G KC=5 5$LC=3.2 13$MC=0.8 4$NC+=0.28 13
228THS G NC=0.22 10$OC=0.051 22$PC=0.009 4$QC=0.00030 24
228TH G 419.42 10 0.021 3 [E1] 0.0181
228THS G KC=0.01460 21$LC=0.00262 4$MC=0.000626 9$NC+=0.000213 3
228THS G NC=0.0001659 24$OC=3.88E-5 6$PC=7.31E-6 11$QC=5.98E-7 9
228TH G 492.37 10 0.0235 23 [M1,E2] 0.13 9
228THS G KC=0.10 8$LC=0.022 11$MC=0.0055 24$NC+=0.0019 8
228THS G NC=0.0015 7$OC=0.00034 15$PC=7.E-5 3$QC=5.E-6 4
228TH G 523.131 16 0.103 8 [E1] 0.01153 A
228TH3 G FL=1122.949$ FLAG=B
228THS G KC=0.00937 14$LC=0.001641 23$MC=0.000390 6$NC+=0.0001327 19
228THS G NC=0.0001035 15$OC=2.42E-5 4$PC=4.60E-6 7$QC=3.91E-7 6
228TH cG M |a(K)exp|<0.08 (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(E1)=0.0094,
228TH2cG |a(K)(E2)=0.0251, |a(K)(E3)=0.0610, |a(K)(M1)=0.158
228TH G 555.12 10 0.046 5 [M1,E2] 0.10 7
228THS G KC=0.07 6$LC=0.016 8$MC=0.0039 18$NC+=0.0013 6
228THS G NC=0.0010 5$OC=0.00025 12$PC=4.7E-5 23$QC=4.E-6 3
228TH G 623.27 20 0.011 3 [M1,E2] 0.07 5 B
228THS G KC=0.06 4$LC=0.012 6$MC=0.0028 13$NC+=0.0010 5
228THS G NC=0.0008 4$OC=0.00018 9$PC=3.4E-5 17$QC=2.9E-6 20
228TH G 629.40 5 0.045 5 [D,E2] 0.07 5
228THF G FL=1016.386
228TH G 666.45 10 0.057 6 [M1,E2] 0.06 4 @
228TH cG RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison
228TH2cG with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured
228TH3cG in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays
228THS G KC=0.05 4$LC=0.010 5$MC=0.0024 11$NC+=0.0008 4
228THS G NC=0.0006 3$OC=0.00015 7$PC=2.8E-5 15$QC=2.4E-6 16
228TH cG I|g(doublet)=0.052 {I5}. All of intensity placed here by
228THxcG 1987Da28,
228TH G 677.11 10 0.062 5 [M1,E2] 0.06 4
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228THS G KC=0.05 3$LC=0.009 5$MC=0.0023 11$NC+=0.0008 4
228THS G NC=0.0006 3$OC=0.00014 7$PC=2.7E-5 14$QC=2.3E-6 16
228TH G 1250.04 10 0.062 5 A
228TH G 1459.138 15 0.83 8 E2 A
228TH3 G FLAG=IJ
228THS G CC=0.00498 7$KC=0.00391 6$LC=0.000771 11$MC=0.000187 3$NC+=0.0001108 16
228THS G NC=4.97E-5 7$OC=1.167E-5 17$PC=2.23E-6 4$QC=1.89E-7 3$IPC=4.71E-5 7
228TH G 1588.20 3 3.22 8 E2 A
228TH3 G FLAG=IJ
228THS G CC=0.00431 6$KC=0.00337 5$LC=0.000647 9$MC=0.0001561 22$NC+=0.0001396 2
228THS G NC=4.15E-5 6$OC=9.77E-6 14$PC=1.87E-6 3$QC=1.622E-7 23$IPC=8.62E-5 12
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.0050 {I16} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.00340
228TH L 1682.754 19 (2+,3+,4+)
228TH B 1.12 5 7.420 22
228THS B EAV=130.82 97
228TH G 660.1 3 0.005 AP [M1,E2] 0.06 4
228THS G KC=0.05 4$LC=0.010 5$MC=0.0024 12$NC+=0.0008 4
228THS G NC=0.0006 3$OC=0.00015 8$PC=2.9E-5 15$QC=2.5E-6 17
228TH G 1495.910 20 0.86 4 (E2) A
228TH3 G FLAG=IJ
228THS G CC=0.00477 7$KC=0.00374 6$LC=0.000732 11$MC=0.0001769 25$NC+=0.0001177
228THS G NC=4.71E-5 7$OC=1.107E-5 16$PC=2.11E-6 3$QC=1.81E-7 3$IPC=5.72E-5 8
228TH G 1625.06 5 0.255 18 A
228TH L 1683.71 7 (4-)
228TH B 0.164 17 8.25 5
228THS B EAV=130.51 97
228TH G 457.17 15 0.0150 23 [M1,E2] 0.16 11
228THS G KC=0.12 10$LC=0.028 13$MC=0.007 3$NC+=0.0023 10
228THS G NC=0.0018 8$OC=0.00043 18$PC=8.E-5 4$QC=6.E-6 5
228TH G 1164.50 8 0.065 5 (M1+E2) 0.015 8 J
228THS G KC=0.012 7$LC=0.0023 11$MC=0.00055 24$NC+=0.00019 9
228THS G NC=0.00015 7$OC=3.4E-5 16$PC=7.E-6 3$QC=6.E-7 4$IPC=2.2E-6 10
228TH G 1287.68 20 0.080 15 (M1+E2) 0.012 6 J
228THS G KC=0.009 5$LC=0.0018 8$MC=0.00042 18$NC+=0.00017 7
228THS G NC=0.00011 5$OC=2.7E-5 12$PC=5.1E-6 23$QC=4.7E-7 24$IPC=2.0E-5 9
228TH cG |g listed in table I of 1987Da28 as deexciting the 1682.8
228TH2cG level; however, on level scheme (fig. 4) shown as deexciting the
228TH3cG 1683.8 level. The energy fit is much better from the 1683.8 level.
228TH L 1688.398 11 2+,3+ G
228TH B 2.43 15 7.07 3
228THS B EAV=129.00 97
228TH G 42.46 5 0.009 3 [M1] 46.3
228THS G LC=35.0 5$MC=8.43 13$NC+=2.89 5
228THS G NC=2.25 4$OC=0.533 8$PC=0.1034 15$QC=0.00986 15
228TH cG M$ From intensity balance at 1646 level, multipolarity cannot
228TH2cG be pure E2. Some E2 admixture, however, cannot be ruled out
228TH G 672.00 15 0.026 8
228TH cG |g listed in table I of 1987Da28 as deexciting the 1683.8
228TH2cG level; however, on level scheme (fig. 4) shown as deexciting the
228TH3cG 1688.4 level.
228TH G 813.77 15 0.0070 16 [M1,E2] 0.036 22
228THS G KC=0.029 18$LC=0.006 3$MC=0.0014 7$NC+=0.00047 23
228THS G NC=0.00037 18$OC=9.E-5 5$PC=1.7E-5 9$QC=1.5E-6 9
228TH G 1501.57 5 0.46 3 G
228TH G 1630.627 10 1.51 4 (M1,E2) A
228TH2 G FLAG=I
228THS G CC=0.007 3$KC=0.0053 22$LC=0.0010 4$MC=0.00023 9$NC+=0.00024 9
228THS G NC=6.2E-5 24$OC=1.5E-5 6$PC=2.9E-6 11$QC=2.7E-7 12$IPC=0.00016 6
228TH cG M from |a(K)exp(1625|g+1630|g)=0.0062 {I20} (1971He23); theory:
228TH2cG |a(K)(M1)=0.0090, |a(K)(E2)=0.0034
228TH L 1724.288 6 2+
228TH B 1.76 5 7.087 17
228THS B EAV=117.50 96
228TH G 497.49 15 0.0059 18[M2] 0.581 P
228TH cG E,RI$ In {+228}Pa decay this |g is assigned to this level based on the
228TH2cG level scheme, and is given an intensity upper limit.
228THS G KC=0.438 7$LC=0.1075 15$MC=0.0269 4$NC+=0.00928 13
228THS G NC=0.00722 11$OC=0.001705 24$PC=0.000328 5$QC=2.95E-5 5
228TH G 548.73 15 0.023 3 [M1,E2] 0.10 7
228THS G KC=0.08 6$LC=0.017 8$MC=0.0041 18$NC+=0.0014 7
228THS G NC=0.0011 5$OC=0.00025 12$PC=4.8E-5 24$QC=4.E-6 3
228TH G 570.91 10 0.182 24(M1) 0.1472 G
228THS G KC=0.1182 17$LC=0.0219 3$MC=0.00525 8$NC+=0.00180 3
228THS G NC=0.001401 20$OC=0.000332 5$PC=6.44E-5 9$QC=6.12E-6 9
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.20 {I8} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)=0.125
228TH cG 1987Da28 assigns this |g to be the 1539.2 to 968.4 transition
228TH2cG on the basis of coin with 911.2|g. However, the E(level) difference is
228TH3cG 570.25 {I9}. In {+228}Pa decay this |g is assigned to the 1724.3 level;
228TH4cG energy, intensity, multipolarity, and coin results agree with this
228TH5cG assignment.
228TH G 701.747 14 0.173 10(M1) 0.0850 A
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G KC=0.0684 10$LC=0.01261 18$MC=0.00302 5$NC+=0.001036 15
228THS G NC=0.000805 12$OC=0.000191 3$PC=3.70E-5 6$QC=3.52E-6 5
228TH G 755.315 4 1.00 3 M1 0.0700 A
228TH3 G FLAG=D
228THS G KC=0.0563 8$LC=0.01036 15$MC=0.00248 4$NC+=0.000851 12
228THS G NC=0.000661 10$OC=0.0001566 22$PC=3.04E-5 5$QC=2.90E-6 4
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.055 {I9} (1971He23), 0.057 {I8} (1960Ar06);
228TH2cG theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0599
228TH G 1537.89 10 0.047 5
228TH2 G FL=186.827 $ FLAG=B
228TH G 1666.523 13 0.178 13M1 A
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G CC=0.00895 13$KC=0.00702 10$LC=0.001269 18$MC=0.000303 5$NC+=0.000351 5
228THS G NC=8.08E-5 12$OC=1.91E-5 3$PC=3.72E-6 6$QC=3.58E-7 5$IPC=0.000247 4
228TH G 1724.21 4 0.029 3 A
228TH L 1735.508 24 4+
228TH B 0.133 8 8.17 3
228THS B EAV=113.94 96
228TH G 1217.03 10 0.021 3 B
228TH2 G FL=519.195
228TH G 1357.78 15 0.020 4 B
228TH2 G FL=378.178
228TH G 1548.65 4 0.038 4 A
228TH G 1677.67 3 0.054 5 A
228TH L 1743.87 3 4+
228TH B 0.389 18 7.673 23
228THS B EAV=111.29 95
228TH G 399.62 10 0.029 3 [E1] 0.0200
228THS G KC=0.01613 23$LC=0.00292 4$MC=0.000697 10$NC+=0.000236 4
228THS G NC=0.000185 3$OC=4.31E-5 6$PC=8.11E-6 12$QC=6.58E-7 10
228TH G 590.4 0.017 3 [E2] 0.0292 S
228TH cG E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228THS G KC=0.0197 3$LC=0.00703 10$MC=0.00180 3$NC+=0.000613 9
228THS G NC=0.000481 7$OC=0.0001107 16$PC=2.00E-5 3$QC=1.056E-6 15
228TH G 684.0 0.019 5 [E1] S
228TH cG E,RI$|g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228THS G CC=0.00688 10$KC=0.00562 8$LC=0.000957 14$MC=0.000227 4$NC+=7.72E-5 11
228THS G NC=6.02E-5 9$OC=1.413E-5 20$PC=2.70E-6 4$QC=2.38E-7 4
228TH G 1347.50 15 0.015 3
228TH cG |g is uncertain in {+228}Pa decay with I|g= 0.16 {I5}
228TH G 1365.70 15 0.014 3
228TH G 1415.66 10 0.021 4 [E3] 0.01141 P
228TH3 G FL=328.006
228THS G KC=0.00849 12$LC=0.00217 3$MC=0.000543 8$NC+=0.000202 3
228THS G NC=0.0001450 21$OC=3.39E-5 5$PC=6.36E-6 9$QC=4.71E-7 7$IPC=1.604E-5 23
228TH G 1557.11 4 0.178 13 (E2+M1) +1.2 2 A
228TH3 G FLAG=JK
228THS G CC=0.0070 6$KC=0.0055 5$LC=0.00102 8$MC=0.000245 19$NC+=0.000198 15
228THS G NC=6.5E-5 5$OC=1.54E-5 12$PC=2.98E-6 23$QC=2.75E-7 24$IPC=0.000114 9
228TH G 1686.09 7 0.095 8 (E2) A
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G CC=0.00391 6$KC=0.00303 5$LC=0.000573 8$MC=0.0001378 20$NC+=0.0001688 2
228THS G NC=3.67E-5 6$OC=8.64E-6 12$PC=1.655E-6 24$QC=1.455E-7 21$IPC=0.0001217
228TH L 1758.24 12 2+
228TH B 0.062 13 8.42 10
228THS B EAV=106.77 95
228TH G 326.04 20 0.033 5 [E2] 0.13
228TH G 1571.52 20 0.0057 16
228TH G 1700.59 20 0.0101 23
228TH L 1760.17 3 2(+),3(+) G
228TH B 0.119 10 8.13 4
228THS B EAV=106.17 95
228TH G 737.72 5 0.037 4 [M1,E2] 0.05 3
228THS G KC=0.037 24$LC=0.007 4$MC=0.0018 9$NC+=0.0006 3
228THS G NC=0.00048 23$OC=0.00011 6$PC=2.2E-5 11$QC=1.9E-6 12
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.28 {I14} (1971He23); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0637,
228TH2cG |a(K)(E2)=0.0133, |a(K)(M2)=0.147. Unconfirmed |a(K)exp seems to
228THxcG indicate E0 admixture
228TH G 791.49 25 0.010 3 [M1,E2] 0.039 23 @
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228THS G KC=0.031 19$LC=0.006 3$MC=0.0015 7$NC+=0.00051 25
228THS G NC=0.00040 19$OC=9.E-5 5$PC=1.8E-5 9$QC=1.6E-6 10
228TH cG |g placed here with I|g=0.023 {I7} by 1987Da28
228TH G 1573.26 5 0.033 3 (E2) A
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G CC=0.00438 7$KC=0.00342 5$LC=0.000660 10$MC=0.0001592 23$NC+=0.0001356
228THS G NC=4.24E-5 6$OC=9.97E-6 14$PC=1.91E-6 3$QC=1.650E-7 24$IPC=8.12E-5 12
228TH G 1702.43 5 0.048 5 A
228TH L 1795.65 8 4+
228TH B 0.01 LT 9.1 GT
228THS B EAV=95.13 93
228TH G 1276.69 10 0.014 3
228TH G 1738.22 25 0.018 4
228TH L 1797.66 8 2+
228TH B 0.045 6 8.40 6
228THS B EAV=94.51 93
228TH G 1401.49 10 0.012 3
228TH G 1469.71 15 0.020 4
228TH G 1740.4 3 0.011 3
228TH G 1797.5 5 0.0021 8 [E2]
228TH L 1893.02 4 3+
228TH B 0.117 7 7.53 4
228THS B EAV=65.77 89
228TH G 666.45 10 0.005 2 [E1] @
228TH cG RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison
228TH2cG with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured
228TH3cG in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays.
228THS G CC=0.00722 11$KC=0.00590 9$LC=0.001007 15$MC=0.000239 4$NC+=8.13E-5 12
228THS G NC=6.33E-5 9$OC=1.487E-5 21$PC=2.84E-6 4$QC=2.50E-7 4
228TH cG This placement of the |g suggested by {+228}Pa decay.
228TH G 692.5 0.0056 7 (M1+E2+E0) 0.05 4 S
228THS G KC=0.04 3$LC=0.009 5$MC=0.0021 10$NC+=0.0007 4
228THS G NC=0.0006 3$OC=0.00013 7$PC=2.6E-5 13$QC=2.2E-6 15
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=0.17 {I3} (1973Ku09), 0.13 (1960Ar06); theory:
228TH2cG |a(K)(E2)=0.0148, |a(K)(M1)=0.0751. |a(K)exp may indicate E0 presence.
228TH cG E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228TH G 770.04 0.0063 8 [E1] S
228TH cG E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228THS G CC=0.00552 8$KC=0.00452 7$LC=0.000762 11$MC=0.000180 3$NC+=6.14E-5 9
228THS G NC=4.78E-5 7$OC=1.124E-5 16$PC=2.15E-6 3$QC=1.93E-7 3
228TH G 870.46 4 0.044 4 M1 0.0481 A
228TH3 G FLAG=J
228THS G KC=0.0387 6$LC=0.00710 10$MC=0.001699 24$NC+=0.000583 9
228THS G NC=0.000453 7$OC=0.0001073 15$PC=2.08E-5 3$QC=1.99E-6 3
228TH G 924.03 0.0075 10 [M1,E2] 0.026 15 S
228TH cG E,RI$ |g not reported in this decay. Placement suggested by
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay. I|g deduced from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay.
228THS G KC=0.021 13$LC=0.0041 20$MC=0.0010 5$NC+=0.00034 16
228THS G NC=0.00026 13$OC=6.E-5 3$PC=1.2E-5 6$QC=1.1E-6 7
228TH G 1706.19 10 0.0085 10M1+E2 +0.42 4 J
228TH3 G FLAG=K
228THS G CC=0.00776 16$KC=0.00605 13$LC=0.001097 22$MC=0.000262 6$NC+=0.000346 7
228THS G NC=6.99E-5 14$OC=1.65E-5 4$PC=3.21E-6 7$QC=3.07E-7 7$IPC=0.000256 6
228TH G 1835.43 10 0.038 4 E2+M1 +2.9 3 J
228TH3 G FLAG=K
228THS G CC=0.00382 10$KC=0.00291 8$LC=0.000536 14$MC=0.000128 4$NC+=0.000246 7
228THS G NC=3.42E-5 9$OC=8.06E-6 21$PC=1.55E-6 4$QC=1.41E-7 4$IPC=0.000202 6
228TH L 1899.97 6 (2+)
228TH cL Quasiparticle configuration=((|p 3/2[651])(|p 1/2[660])) or
228TH2cL configuration=((|p 3/2[651])(|p 1/2[400])) suggested for this level
228TH cL J$|gs to 0+ and 4+ levels of g.s. (1987Da28)
228TH B 0.077 6 7.67 4
228THS B EAV=63.71 91
228TH G 877.46 10 0.014 3 [M1,E2] 0.030 18
228THS G KC=0.024 15$LC=0.0047 23$MC=0.0011 6$NC+=0.00039 19
228THS G NC=0.00030 15$OC=7.E-5 4$PC=1.4E-5 7$QC=1.2E-6 8
228TH G 930.93 10 0.0124 18 &
228TH cG This placement of |g suggested in {+228}Pa decay
228TH G 1713.47 20 0.0054 10
228TH cG |g not seen in {+228}Pa decay. I|g<0.002 from upper limit in
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay
228TH G 1842.13 10 0.042 4 M1+E2 -0.86 14 J
228TH3 G FLAG=K
228THS G CC=0.0055 4$KC=0.00420 25$LC=0.00076 5$MC=0.000182 11$NC+=0.000363 21
228THS G NC=4.9E-5 3$OC=1.15E-5 7$PC=2.23E-6 13$QC=2.10E-7 13$IPC=0.000301 18
228TH G 1900.07 20 0.0028 5
228TH L 1906.63 10 (2+)
228TH B 0.034 5 7.98 7
228THS B EAV=61.79 88
228TH G 490.33 15 0.0111 23
228TH G 1074.71 15 0.010 3
228TH G 1907.18 20 0.0119 10
228TH L 1928.66 7 3+
228TH B 0.056 7 7.63 6
228THS B EAV=55.39 87
228TH G 168.65 10 0.0030 7 [M1,E2] 2.7 15 @
228TH cG RI$ Total intensity (I|g=0.013 {I3}) placed from 1344.1 level by
228TH2cG 1987Da28. Alternate placement from 1928.6 level suggested by {+228}Pa
228TH3cG decay.
228THS G KC=1.8 16$LC=0.70 7$MC=0.18 3$NC+=0.062 10
228THS G NC=0.049 8$OC=0.0111 15$PC=0.00200 12$QC=0.00010 8
228TH G 389.12 15 0.0103 15 [M1,E2] 0.25 17
228THS G KC=0.19 15$LC=0.044 18$MC=0.011 4$NC+=0.0038 14
228THS G NC=0.0029 11$OC=0.0007 3$PC=0.00013 6$QC=1.0E-5 8
228TH G 1742.0 3 0.0080 23
228TH G 1870.83 10 0.0243 23(M1+E2) J
228THS G CC=0.0051 18$KC=0.0038 14$LC=0.00070 24$MC=0.00017 6$NC+=0.00036 13
228THS G NC=4.4E-5 15$OC=1.1E-5 4$PC=2.0E-6 7$QC=1.9E-7 8$IPC=0.00030 11
228TH L 1937.18 9 2+,3,4+
228TH B 0.046 5 7.66 6
228THS B EAV=52.94 87
228TH G 397.94 10 0.027 3 [D,E2]
228TH G 1062.55 15 0.010 3
228TH G 1750.54 20 0.0080 8
228TH G 1879.6 3 0.0013 5
228TH L 1944.83 3 3+ G
228TH B 0.251 14 6.86 4
228THS B EAV=50.75 86
228TH G 718.48 15 0.019 4 (E1) J
228THS G CC=0.00628 9$KC=0.00513 8$LC=0.000870 13$MC=0.000206 3$NC+=7.02E-5 10
228THS G NC=5.46E-5 8$OC=1.284E-5 18$PC=2.46E-6 4$QC=2.18E-7 3
228TH G 776.56 10 0.019 6
228TH G 791.49 25 0.013 3 (M1) 0.0618 @
228TH cG RI$ Intensity of the doublet divided by evaluator by comparison
228TH2cG with branching ratios and the intensities of the doublet as measured
228TH3cG in both {+228}Ac and {+228}Pa decays.
228THS G KC=0.0497 7$LC=0.00915 13$MC=0.00219 3$NC+=0.000751 11
228THS G NC=0.000584 9$OC=0.0001382 20$PC=2.68E-5 4$QC=2.56E-6 4
228TH cG This placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay
228TH cG M |a(K)exp(doublet)=0.054 {I11} (1973Ku09), I|g(doublet)=3.8;
228TH2cG theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.0497
228TH G 853.17 10 0.0031 4 [M1,E2] 0.032 19
228TH2 G FL=1091.020$ FLAG=BU
228THS G KC=0.025 16$LC=0.0050 25$MC=0.0012 6$NC+=0.00042 20
228THS G NC=0.00033 16$OC=8.E-5 4$PC=1.5E-5 8$QC=1.3E-6 8
228TH cG RI from branching ratio in {+228}Pa decay
228TH G 921.98 10 0.0147 21 &
228TH3 G FLAG=B
228THF G FL=1022.531
228TH cG This placement suggested by {+228}Pa decay
228TH G 975.96 5 0.050 5 M1 0.0356 J
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228THS G KC=0.0287 4$LC=0.00524 8$MC=0.001254 18$NC+=0.000430 6
228THS G NC=0.000334 5$OC=7.91E-5 11$PC=1.537E-5 22$QC=1.468E-6 21
228TH G 1000.69 15 0.005
228TH cG |g not seen in {+228}Pa decay. I|g<0.002 from upper limit in
228TH2cG {+228}Pa decay.
228TH G 1758.11 10 0.035 4 E2+M1 -9 1 J
228TH3 G FLAG=K
228THS G CC=0.00371 6$KC=0.00285 5$LC=0.000533 8$MC=0.0001281 19$NC+=0.000195 3
228THS G NC=3.41E-5 5$OC=8.03E-6 12$PC=1.542E-6 23$QC=1.369E-7 20$IPC=0.0001515
228TH G 1887.10 5 0.090 8 E2+M1 -9.1 1 J
228TH3 G FLAG=K
228THS G CC=0.00333 5$KC=0.00251 4$LC=0.000462 7$MC=0.0001107 16$NC+=0.000243 4
228THS G NC=2.95E-5 5$OC=6.95E-6 10$PC=1.336E-6 19$QC=1.201E-7 17$IPC=0.000205 3
228TH L 1958.72 22 (2+)
228TH B 0.0033 7 8.64 10
228THS B EAV=46.79 86
228TH G 1772.2 3 0.0018 5
228TH G 1958.4 3 0.0015 5
228TH L 1987.46 10 4+
228TH B 0.038 3 7.34 5
228THS B EAV=38.72 84
228TH G 1017.92 20 0.0057 13
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228TH G 1609.41 15 0.0077 15
228TH G 1800.86 20 0.0044 8
228TH G 1929.78 20 0.0199 21
228TH L 2010.20 5 (2+)
228TH cL 1987Da28 suggests that this is the 4+ level of K|p=2+
228TH2cL rotational band built on the 1900.0 level. However, the relatively
228TH3cL strong 887.33|g to the 1123-keV level would then have M2 mult.
228TH B 0.28 3 6.25 6
228THS B EAV=32.44 83
228TH G 214.85 10 0.029 4 [E2] 0.516 B
228THF G FL=1795.65
228TH G 372.57 20 0.0067 15 [D,E2] 0.28 19 B
228TH3 G FL=1638.283
228TH G 887.33 10 0.027 3
228TH G 918.97 10 0.027 3
228TH cG M |a(K)exp=1.1 {I2} (1971He23) indicates E0 component;
228TH2cG however, then the relatively strong 887.33 |g to 1123 {I2}- level
228TH3cG must be M2
228TH G 1040.92 15 0.044 9
228TH G 1823.22 10 0.044 4
228TH G 1952.33 15 0.059 5
228TH L 2013.6 3 2+,3,4+
228TH B 0.0029 9 8.19 14
228THS B EAV=31.51 83
228TH G 1826.7 3 0.0021 8
228TH G 1955.9 5 0.0008 3
228TH L 2022.64 9 2+
228TH cL J$From 1987Da28
228TH B 0.054 6 6.82 6
228THS B EAV=29.04 82
228TH G 384.63 20 0.0067 15 [D,E2] 0.25 18
228TH G 1053.09 20 0.013 4 B
228TH3 G FL=968.972
228TH G 1148.12 15 0.0059 13
228TH G 1190.81 20 0.0062 16
228TH G 1965.24 20 0.0204 18
228TH L 2030.39 11 2+
228TH B 0.019 3 7.18 8
228THS B EAV=26.94 82
228TH G 939.87 15 0.009 3 B
228TH3 G FL=1091.020$
228TH G 1013.58 20 0.0046 13
228TH G 1971.9 3 0.0036 8
228TH G 2029.4 5 0.0018 5
228TH L 2037.00 17 2+,3,4+
228TH B 0.0062 10 7.58 9
228THS B EAV=25.15 81
228TH G 1850.13 20 0.0044 8
228TH G 1979.3 3 0.0018 5
228TH L 2123.1 3 (2+)
228TH B 0.0042 10 4.9 5
228THS B EAV=2.73 76
228TH G 1795.1 5 0.0021 8
228TH G 1936.3 3 0.0021 5