219FR 223AC A DECAY (2.10 M) 1991LI19,1969LEZW 21NDS 202106
219FR H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh et al.,$CIT=NDS 175, 1 (2021)$CUT=19-May-2021$
219FR c 1991Li19, 1990Li33: mass-separated {+223}Ac source. Measured E|g,
219FR2c I|g, conversion electrons, E|a, I|a, |a|g-coin, (|a)(ce)-coin using
219FR3c HPGe and Si(Li) detectors
219FR c 1969LeZW, 1968Ba73: measured E|g, I|g, E|a, I|a, |a|g-coin, magnetic
219FR2c spectrometer used
219FR c 1964Su04, 1963Su10: measured E|g, I|g, E|a, I|a, |a|g-coin
219FR c 1958Hi78: measured E|a, I|a
219FR c 1951Me10: measured E|a, I|a
219FR c The {+223}Ac decay scheme presented here is based on measurements by
219FR2c 1991Li19, and on the |a-particle data of 1969LeZW, 1963Su10, and
219FR3c 1968Ba73. Some aspects of the level scheme, as proposed by 1991Li19
219FR4c (and further discussed in 2002Sh19) should be considered
219FR5c as tentative, as the J|p values are mostly based on band assignments,
219FR6c and theoretical calculations, without a clear evidence of association
219FR7c of a level in a particular band, especially for closely spaced levels.
219FR8c 1991Li19 emphasized that the higher in energy in the level scheme and
219FR9c smaller the alpha population, the more tentative the level scheme.
219FRAc Evaluators also note a intensity imbalance of 1.9% at 191 and
219FRBc non-physical negative intensity imbalance of 0.5% at 305 levels.
219FR c The |a feedings to levels deduced from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2c balance at each level using the experimental absolute |g-ray
219FR3c intensities of 1991Li19 agree reasonably well with the measured
219FR4c |a-particle abundances. The total Fr K-x ray intensity of 2.7% {i2},
219FR5c deduced by evaluators using the |g-ray data presented here, also
219FR6c agrees with the measured value of 2.90 {I5}% (1991Li19). Both
219FR7c agreements confirm the correctness of the decay scheme.
219FR cA $The coincidence evidence indicated here is taken from |a|g-coin
219FR2cA spectra Fig. 1 in 1991Li19
219FR cA E,IA$From 1969LeZW and 1968Ba73 obtained with magnetic spectrometer,
219FR2cA unless otherwise specified.
219FR cA HF$The nuclear radius parameter r{-0}({+219}Fr)=1.5439 {I23}
219FR2cA is deduced from interpolation (or unweighted average) of radius
219FR3cA parameters of the adjacent even-even nuclides from 2020Si16
219FR cA E(X),IA(X)$From 1969LeZW, recommended by 1991Ry01. 1991Ry01 increased
219FR2cA original E|a values by 0.7 keV to adjust for an energy change in the
219FR3cA {+211}Bi standard.
219FR cG $Measured I(K-x ray intensity)=2.90 {I5} per 100 |a decays
219FR cG $The |g rays listed here were observed in coincidence with |a particles
219FR2cG with energies in the range 5892-6646 keV. Specific |g-ray coincidence
219FR3cG evidence indicated here is gathered from |a|g-coin spectral Figs. 2 and
219FR4cG 4, and comment column in Table I in 1991Li19
219FR cG E,RI$From 1991Li19. Others: 1969LeZW, 1963Su10.
219FR cG M$From |g-transition intensity balance or ce data, the latter from
219FR2cG 1991Li19. Assignments listed in square brackets are implied from J|p
219FR3cG values.
219FR cG M(Y)$From |g-transition intensity balance at the relevant level,
219FR2cG with respect to the |a feeding and intensity of any incoming |g rays.
219FR cG E(W)$Uncertain |g ray
219FR dG CC$Theoretical values from BrIcc code (2008Ki03).
219FR cL E$Deduced by evaluators from a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies.
219FR cL E(w)$Weakly populated level by |a branch, the gamma transition
219FR2cL is either not confirmed or not observed
219FR cL J$From Adopted Levels. {+219}Fr lies in the transitional region between
219FR2cL quadrupole deformation and spherical shape (|j{-2}=|j{-3}=0.08).
219FR3cL For some reason, however, this nucleus
219FR4cL presents a typical structure of parity doublet bands
219FR5cL (1990Li33,1991Li19). Most of the assigned spins and parities
219FR6cL are based mainly on rotational band structure, |g-ray
219FR7cL multipolarities and decay patterns, favored |a decay from {+223}Ac
219FR8cL and to {+215}At, and on a comparison with similar band structures
219FR9cL observed in {+221}Fr. Assignments for the excited states should be
219FRAcL considered as tentative.
219FR cL $Configuration and band assignments are from 1991Li19. See also
219FR2cL 2002Sh19
219FR cL E(F)$Possible configuration=|p5/2[523]+|p5/2[512]+(|p1/2[541]+Q{-30})
219FR cL BAND(A)$K|p=1/2-,|p1/2[541], parity doublet band
219FR cL BAND(a)$K|p=1/2+, parity doublet band.
219FR2cL Configuration=|p1/2[411]+(|p1/2[541]+Q{-30})
219FR cL BAND(B)$K|p=3/2-, parity doublet band.
219FR2cL Configuration=|p3/2[532]+(|p3/2[402]+Q{-30})
219FR cL BAND(b)$K|p=3/2+, parity doublet band.
219FR2cL Configuration=|p3/2[402]+(|p3/2[532]+Q{-30})
219FR cL BAND(D)$K|p=5/2-, parity doublet band.
219FR2cL Configuration=|p5/2[512]+|p5/2[523]+(|p1/2[660]+Q{-30})
219FR cL BAND(d)$K|p=5/2+, parity doublet band.
219FR2cL Configuration=|p5/2[402]+(|p5/2[523]+Q{-30})
223AC P 0.0 (5/2-) 2.10 M 5 6783.2 10
223AC cP J,T$From {+223}Ac Adopted Levels in the ENSDF database
223AC2cP (May 2001 update)
223AC cP QP$From 2021Wa16
219FR N 1.0 1.0 0.99
219FR cN NR$Experimental |g-ray intensities per 100 |a decays (1991Li19).
219FR cN BR$%|a=99 for {+223}Ac |a decay (1951Me10)
219FR PN 3
219FR G 101.1 2 0.04 1
219FR G 130.5 0.02 1 W
219FR cG $|g observed in coin with |a particles (Fig. 2 in 1991Li19)
219FR G 341.0 0.05 3 W
219FR L 0.0 9/2- 24 MS 4 A
219FR cL T$from Adopted Levels.
219FR A 6661.6 10 31.8 30 10 1 C
219FRF A FLAG=X
219FR cA IA$I|a=35 {I5} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR cA $Other values: E|a=6660, I|a=40 {I2}, E|a has been increased
219FR2cA by 3 keV because of a change in the calibration energy of the {+211}Bi
219FR3cA standard (1958Hi78,1977Ma31); E|a=6663 {I5}, I|a=37.6, E|a has been
219FR4cA increased by 6 keV because of a change in the calibration energy of
219FR5cA the {+211}Bi standard (1964Su04,1977Ma31).
219FR L 15.0 1 (5/2-) A
219FR A 6646.7 10 44.6 40 6.4 6 C
219FRF A FLAG=X
219FR cA $Other values: E|a=6646, I|a=46.0 {I23}, E|a has been
219FR2cA increased by 3 keV because of a change in the calibration energy of
219FR3cA the {+211}Bi standard (1958Hi78,1977Ma31); E|a=6649 {I5}, I|a=42.1,
219FR4cA E|a has been increased by 6 keV because of a change in the calibration
219FR5cA energy of the {+211}Bi standard (1963Su10,1977Ma31).
219FR G 15.0 0.0025 2 [E2] 2.36E4 59.1 47 S
219FRS G MC=1.786E4 25$ NC=4.66E3 7$OC=959 14$PC=120.9 17$QC=0.1125 16
219FR cG TI$from I|a=44.6% {I40} and |g-ray transition intensity balance
219FR2cG of 14.5 {I25} at 15.0 level.
219FR cG RI$deduced from I(|g+ce) and |a(theory) for mult=E2 for 15.0-keV
219FR2cG transition
219FR L 56.1 1 (3/2-) B
219FR A 6606 1 LT 190 GT ?
219FR cA E,IA$from 1991Li19. Transition intensity balance giving 0 {I3} is
219FR2cA consistent with the upper limit of the measured I|a
219FR G 41.15 10 0.024 4 (M1+E2) 1.0 2 330 70 C
219FRS G LC=240 50$MC=65 13
219FRS G NC=17 4$OC=3.5 7$PC=0.46 9$QC=0.0024 3
219FR cG $L1+L2, L3, M and N conversion lines seen in coincidence with 6563|a
219FR cG M,MR$from |g-ray transition intensity balance at 56 level.
219FR2cG 1991Li19 list M1+E2
219FR L 73 1 (13/2-) A ?
219FR A 6590 0.01 LT 164E2 GT S
219FR cA E,IA$from decay scheme. Existence of this |a branch is uncertain
219FR G 72.8 [E2] 39.4 0.01 LT& ?
219FRS G LC=29.0 4$MC=7.84 11
219FRS G NC=2.05 3$OC=0.425 6$PC=0.0544 8$QC=0.0001003 14
219FR cG $E|g=73 {I1}, %I|g=0.20 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 81.0 5 (1/2-) A
219FR A 6581.8 30 0.3 2 5.2E2 35
219FR cA IA$I(|g+ce) for 66.0-keV transition gives 0.7 {I5}, but note that the
219FR2cA placement of this |g ray is uncertain
219FR G 66.0 5 0.011 7 [E2] 63 3 ?
219FRS G LC=46.4 19$MC=12.5 5
219FRS G NC=3.28 13$OC=0.68 3$PC=0.087 4$QC=0.000149 6
219FR L 98.58 5 (7/2-) B
219FR A 6563.7 10 13.7 10 9.7 8 C
219FRF A FLAG=X
219FR cA IA$I|a=10.9 {I17} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition
219FR2cA intensity balance. Other values: E|a=6564, I|a=14.0 {I7}, E|a has been
219FR3cA increased by 3 keV because of a change in the calibration energy of the
219FR4cA {+211}Bi standard (1958Hi78,1977Ma31); E|a=6566 {I5}, I|a=13.3, E|a has
219FR5cA been increased by 6 keV because of a change in the calibration energy
219FR6cA of the {+211}Bi standard (1963Su10,1977Ma31).
219FR G 42.4 1 0.013 3 (E2) 538 10 YC
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list E2
219FRS G LC=397 8$MC=106.8 20
219FRS G NC=27.9 5$OC=5.76 11$PC=0.733 14$QC=0.001019 18
219FR cG $L2, L3, M and N conversion lines seen in coincidence with 6563|a
219FR G 83.55 10 0.58 4 (M1) 4.75 C
219FRS G LC=3.60 6$MC=0.859 13
219FRS G NC=0.225 4$OC=0.0504 8$PC=0.00808 12$QC=0.000452 7
219FR cG M$from (L1+L2)/L3 ratio.
219FR2cG L1+L2, L3, M and N conversion lines seen in coincidence with 6563|a
219FR cG $E|g=84 {I1}, %I|g=0.17 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW);
219FR2cG E|g=82, %I|g=0.23, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10).
219FR G 98.58 5 0.90 2 (M1) 2.94 C
219FRS G LC=2.23 4$MC=0.532 8
219FRS G NC=0.1395 20$OC=0.0312 5$PC=0.00500 7$QC=0.000279 4
219FR cG M$from (L1+L2)/L3 ratio. 1991Li19 list M1
219FR2cG L1+L2, L3, M and N conversion lines seen in coincidence with 6563|a
219FR cG $E|g=99 {I1}, %I|g=0.20 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW);
219FR2cG E|g=96, %I|g=0.2, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10).
219FR L 134.4 1 (5/2-) B
219FR A 6528.4 15 3.1 3 31 3 C
219FR cA IA$I|a=2.8 {I3} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR cA $Other values: E|a=6526 {I5}, I|a=3.8, E|a has been increased
219FR2cA by 6 keV because of a change in the calibration energy of the {+211}Bi
219FR3cA standard (1963Su10,1977Ma31).
219FR G 35.7 1 0.028 4 (M1) 57.5 10 YC
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list M1
219FRS G LC=43.6 8$MC=10.41 17
219FRS G NC=2.73 5$OC=0.611 10$PC=0.0979 16$QC=0.00549 9
219FR G 78.25 10 0.055 7 [M1] 5.75 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list (M1) from decay scheme
219FRS G LC=4.36 7$MC=1.040 15
219FRS G NC=0.273 4$OC=0.0610 9$PC=0.00978 15$QC=0.000547 8
219FR G 119.4 1 0.11 1 (M1) 8.65 YC
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list M1
219FRS G KC=6.96 10$LC=1.283 19$MC=0.306 5
219FRS G NC=0.0802 12$OC=0.0179 3$PC=0.00288 4$QC=0.0001607 23
219FR cG $E|g=120 {I2}, %I|g|?0.03, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW);
219FR2cG E|g=123, %I|g<0.05, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10).
219FR L 139.8 1 (3/2-) A
219FR A 6523.2 20 0.6 3 150 75
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.70 {I9} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 124.8 1 0.09 1 (M1) 7.63 YC
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list M1
219FRS G KC=6.14 9$LC=1.130 16$MC=0.269 4
219FRS G NC=0.0706 10$OC=0.01579 23$PC=0.00253 4$QC=0.0001414 20
219FR cG $E|g=126 {I2}, %I|g|?0.04, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 191.29 6 (7/2+) a
219FR A 6473.0 15 3.1 3 18 2 C
219FR cA IA$I|a=1.21 {I6} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition
219FR2cA intensity balance, with the assumed multipolarities.
219FR cA $Note a large imbalance of 1.9% at this level
219FR cA $Other values: E|a=6476 {I5}, I|a=3.2, E|a has been increased
219FR2cA by 6 keV because of a change in the calibration energy of the {+211}Bi
219FR3cA standard (1963Su10,1977Ma31).
219FR G 56.95 20 0.038 6 [E1] 0.481 9 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list (E1) from decay scheme
219FRS G LC=0.365 7$MC=0.0886 15
219FRS G NC=0.0227 4$OC=0.00473 8$PC=0.000634 11$QC=1.93E-5 3
219FR G 92.71 5 0.39 2 [E1] 0.1309 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list E1 from intensity balance
219FRS G LC=0.0993 14$MC=0.0239 4
219FRS G NC=0.00616 9$OC=0.001310 19$PC=0.000185 3$QC=6.59E-6 10
219FR cG $E|g=93 {I1}, %I|g=0.17 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR G 176.3 2 0.11 2 [E1] 0.1194 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list E1(+M2), with <5% M2 admixture from intensity balance
219FRS G KC=0.0951 14$LC=0.0185 3$MC=0.00441 7
219FRS G NC=0.001145 17$ OC=0.000248 4$PC=3.68E-5 6$QC=1.545E-6 22
219FR cG E|g=176 {I2}, %I|g|?0.05, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR2cG E|g|?170, %I|g<0.8, |a|g coin, scin (1963Su10).
219FR G 191.3 1 0.59 4 [E1] 0.098 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list E1(+M2), with <5% M2 admixture from intensity balance
219FRS G KC=0.0783 11$LC=0.0150 2$MC=0.00358 5
219FRS G NC=0.000930 13$OC=0.000202 3$PC=3.01E-5 5$QC=1.287E-6 18
219FR cG $E|g=192 {I1}, %I|g=0.25 {I15}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 210.4 2 (3/2+) a
219FR A 6454.7 30 0.06 3 7.8E2 39
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.10 {I3} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 195.4 2 0.12 2 (E1) 0.0932 YC
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list E1 from intensity balance
219FRS G KC=0.0745 11$LC=0.01424 21$MC=0.00340 5
219FRS G NC=0.000881 13$OC=0.000191 3$PC=2.86E-5 4$QC=1.227E-6 18
219FR L 216.0 1 (11/2+) a
219FR A 6448.6 15 0.20 3 220 35
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.26 {I7} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 216.0 1 0.37 4 [E1] 0.0734 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list E1, possibly from decay scheme
219FRS G KC=0.0588 9$LC=0.01107 16$MC=0.00264 4
219FRS G NC=0.000685 10$OC=0.0001491 21$PC=2.24E-5 4$QC=9.82E-7 14
219FR cG $E|g=216 {I1}, %I|g=0.15 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 269.2 1 (7/2-) A
219FR A 6396.8 15 0.13 2 205 30 C
219FR cA IA$|g-transition intensity balance gives 0.30 {I7} if the intensity
219FR2cA of the 64.4-keV transition listed in Table I of 1991Li19 is interpreted
219FR3cA as I(|g+ce)
219FR G 134.6 3 0.01 AP [M1+E2] 4.3 18 C
219FRS G KC=2.6 24$LC=1.28 37$MC=0.33 12
219FRS G NC=0.087 30$OC=0.0185 58$PC=0.0026 6$QC=6.3E-5 51
219FR G 254.4 3 0.07 2 [M1+E2] 0.63 40 C
219FRS G KC=0.46 37$LC=0.128 23$MC=0.032 4
219FRS G NC=0.0084 10$OC=0.0018 3$PC=0.00027 7$QC=1.06E-5 82
219FR G 269.2 1 0.10 2 [M1+E2] 0.54 34 C
219FRS G KC=0.40 31$LC=0.107 22$MC=0.027 4
219FRS G NC=0.0070 11$OC=0.0015 3$PC=2.28E-4 60$QC=9.1E-6 70
219FR cG $E|g=268 {I2}, %I|g|?0.05, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 305.5 1 (9/2-) B
219FR A 6360.5 15 0.22 3 85 12 C
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.67 {I17} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition
219FR2cA intensity balance.
219FR cA $Note non-physical negative intensity imbalance of 0.5%
219FR G 89.6 2 0.05 1 [E1] 0.1433 22
219FRS G LC=0.1087 17$MC=0.0262 4
219FRS G NC=0.00675 11$OC=0.001433 22$PC=0.000202 3$QC=7.11E-6 11
219FR G 207.0 2 0.19 4 [M1+E2] 1.2 7 C
219FR cG M$(M1) in 1991Li19 from decay scheme and |g-transition
219FR2cG intensity balance
219FRS G KC=0.8 7$LC=0.258 11$MC=0.0652 17
219FRS G NC=0.0171 5$OC=0.00370 7$PC=0.00054 6$QC=1.9E-5 15
219FR cG $E|g=207 {I2}, %I|g|?0.06, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR G 305.5 1 0.18 2 [M1+E2] 0.38 25 C
219FRS G KC=0.28 22$LC=0.071 20$MC=0.018 4
219FRS G NC=0.0046 11$OC=1.01E-3 26$PC=1.53E-4 50$QC=6.5E-6 49
219FR cG $E|g=306 {I2}, %I|g|?0.08, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 325 2 F ?
219FRF L FLAG=w
219FR cL J$possible 5/2-
219FR A 6341.8 20 0.05 1 310 65
219FR L 333.5 1 (11/2-) A
219FR A 6332.5 20 0.14 6 100 45
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.16 {I6} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 64.4 3 [E2] 70.8 19 0.02 AP C
219FR cG TI$intensity listed in Table I of 1991Li19 is assumed by evaluators
219FR2cG as transition intensity. If it were just the photon intensity, then
219FR3cG it produces a large non-physical negative intensity balance at 269-keV
219FR4cG level, as well as gives too large an I|a to the 333 level from
219FR5cG |g-transition intensity balance
219FRS G LC=52.2 14$MC=14.1 4
219FRS G NC=3.69 10$OC=0.764 21$PC=0.098 3$QC=0.000164 4
219FR G 333.5 1 0.11 4 [M1+E2] 0.30 19 C
219FRS G KC=0.22 17$LC=0.054 17$MC=0.0133 36
219FRS G NC=0.00350 94$OC=7.7E-4 23$PC=1.17E-4 42$QC=5.1E-6 38
219FR L 340.3 1 (5/2+) b
219FR A 6325.7 15 0.30 5 44 8 C
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.49 {I5} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 205.7 3 0.04 2 [E1] 0.0824
219FRS G KC=0.0659 10$LC=0.01251 19$MC=0.00298 5
219FRS G NC=0.000774 12$OC=0.0001683 25$PC=2.52E-5 4$QC=1.095E-6 16
219FR G 241.7 2 0.18 2 [E1] 0.0563 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list (E1), possibly from decay scheme
219FRS G KC=0.0452 7$LC=0.00839 12$MC=0.00200 3
219FRS G NC=0.000519 8$OC=0.0001131 16$PC=1.709E-5 25$QC=7.67E-7 11
219FR G 284.2 1 0.20 2 [E1] 0.0387 C
219FR cG M$1991Li19 list (E1) from decay scheme
219FRS G KC=0.0312 5$LC=0.00567 8$MC=0.001346 19
219FRS G NC=0.000350 5$OC=7.66E-5 11$PC=1.167E-5 17$QC=5.39E-7 8
219FR G 325.3 1 0.05 2 [E1] 0.0285 C
219FRS G KC=0.0231 4$LC=0.00412 6$MC=0.000977 14
219FRS G NC=0.000254 4$OC=5.58E-5 8$PC=8.55E-6 12$QC=4.05E-7 6
219FR L 369.5 2 (3/2+) b
219FR cL J$1991Li19 assign |p=+ or -, band association favors positive parity
219FR A 6299 0.074 11 135 20 S
219FR cA E,IA$from decay scheme. Existence of this |a branch is uncertain
219FR G 229.7 2 0.07 1 [E1] 0.0634 C
219FRS G KC=0.0509 8$LC=0.00951 14$MC=0.00226 4
219FRS G NC=0.000588 9$OC=0.0001281 19$PC=1.93E-5 3$QC=8.57E-7 13
219FR L 372.4 1 (7/2+) b
219FR A 6292.8 15 0.47 6 21 3 C
219FR cA E$possible doublet to 372 and 375 levels.
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.47 {I5} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 238.1 2 0.07 1 [E1] 0.0583 C
219FRS G KC=0.0468 7$LC=0.00870 13$MC=0.00207 3
219FRS G NC=0.000538 8$OC=0.0001173 17$PC=1.77E-5 3$QC=7.92E-7 12
219FR G 274.0 2 0.05 1 [E1] 0.0421 C
219FRS G KC=0.0339 5$LC=0.00618 9$MC=0.001470 21
219FRS G NC=0.000382 6$OC=8.35E-5 12$PC=1.271E-5 18$QC=5.84E-7 9
219FR G 357.4 1 0.18 3 [E1] 0.0232 C
219FRS G KC=0.0188 3$LC=0.00332 5$MC=0.000786 11
219FRS G NC=0.000204 3$OC=4.49E-5 7$PC=6.91E-6 10$QC=3.33E-7 5
219FR cG $E|g=359 {I2}, %I|g|?0.10, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR G 372.4 1 0.16 3 [E1] 0.0212 C
219FRS G KC=0.01720 25$LC=0.00302 5$MC=0.000715 10
219FRS G NC=0.000186 3$OC=4.09E-5 6$PC=6.31E-6 9$QC=3.05E-7 5
219FR cG $E|g=373 {I2}, %I|g|?0.05, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 374.8 2 (7/2) F
219FR cL J$possible negative parity
219FR A 6294 0.071 16 130 30 S
219FR cA E,IA$from decay scheme. Existence of this |a branch is uncertain
219FR G 374.8 2 0.06 1 [D,E2] 0.19 17 C
219FR L 384.3 1 (5/2+) a
219FR A 6281.3 0.05 AP 170 AP ?
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.13 {I2} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR cA E$6284.1 from Q|a and E(level)
219FR G 285.7 1 0.13 2 [E1] 0.0382 C
219FRS G KC=0.0309 5$LC=0.00560 8$MC=0.001329 19
219FRS G NC=0.000346 5$OC=7.56E-5 11$PC=1.152E-5 17$QC=5.33E-7 8
219FR L 432.0 2 (9/2) F
219FR cL J$possible negative parity
219FR A 6235.8 20 0.09 59
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.12 {I6} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 126.4 2 0.01 AP [D,E2] 3.8 35 C
219FR G 216.1 2 0.04 2 [D,E2] 0.84 77 C
219FR L 445 4 w ?
219FR A 6223.4 40 0.006 AP 781 AP
219FR L 462.2 5 (9/2+) b
219FR cL J$1991Li19 assign |p=+ or -, band association favors positive parity
219FR A 6205.9 25 0.03 AP 131 AP
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.04 {I2} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 462.2 5 0.04 2 [E1] 0.01339 C
219FRS G KC=0.01093 16$LC=0.00187 3$MC=0.000442 7
219FRS G NC=0.0001152 17$OC=2.54E-5 4$PC=3.95E-6 6$QC=1.98E-7 3
219FR L 490.3 1 (5/2-) D
219FR A 6177.7 20 0.95 15 3.1 5 C
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.96 {I9} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 279.8 3 0.03 1 [E1] 0.0401 ?
219FRS G KC=0.0323 5$LC=0.00588 9$MC=0.001398 20
219FRS G NC=0.000363 6$OC=7.95E-5 12$PC=1.210E-5 18$QC=5.58E-7 8
219FR G 299.1 2 0.03 1 [E1] 0.0344 C
219FRS G KC=0.0278 4$LC=0.00502 7$MC=0.001191 17
219FRS G NC=0.000310 5$OC=6.78E-5 10$PC=1.036E-5 15$QC=4.84E-7 7
219FR G 434.2 1 0.53 5 [M1+E2] 0.145 93 C
219FRS G KC=0.112 81$LC=0.025 10$MC=0.0060 23
219FRS G NC=0.00158 59$OC=3.5E-4 14$PC=5.4E-5 24$QC=2.5E-6 18
219FR cG $E|g=433 {I2}, %I|g|?0.07, E|g=435?, %I|g|?0.07, |a|g coin (1969LeZW)
219FR G 475.2 1 0.27 4 [M1+E2] 0.114 73 C
219FRS G KC=0.089 63$LC=0.0190 81$MC=0.0046 19
219FRS G NC=0.00121 48$OC=2.7E-4 11$PC=4.2E-5 19$QC=2.0E-6 14
219FR cG $E|g=477 {I2}, %I|g|?0.14, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR L 506.5 3 (9/2+) a
219FR A 6163.0 25 0.05 50
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.03 {I2} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 315.2 3 0.01 [M1+E2] 0.35 23 C
219FRS G KC=0.26 20$LC=0.065 19$MC=0.016 4
219FRS G NC=0.0042 10$OC=9.1E-4 25$PC=1.39E-4 47$QC=5.9E-6 45
219FR G 506.6 5 0.03 2 [E1] 0.0111 C
219FRS G KC=0.00907 13$LC=0.001540 22$MC=0.000363 6
219FRS G NC=9.46E-5 14$OC=2.09E-5 3$PC=3.26E-6 5$QC=1.651E-7 24
219FR L 530.0 5(11/2+) b
219FR A 6140.2 30 0.03 AP 66 AP
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.03 {I2} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 530.0 5 0.03 2 [E1] 0.01013 C
219FRS G KC=0.00829 12$LC=0.001401 20$MC=0.000330 5
219FRS G NC=8.60E-5 13$OC=1.90E-5 3$PC=2.97E-6 5$QC=1.513E-7 22
219FR L 533.8 4 (7/2-) D
219FR A 6134.9 20 0.12 3 16 4 C
219FR cA IA$I|a=0.07 {I4} deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 518.8 4 0.09 3 [M1+E2] 0.091 57 C
219FRS G KC=0.071 49$LC=0.0148 66$MC=0.0036 15
219FRS G NC=9.4E-4 39$OC=2.09E-4 90$PC=3.3E-5 16$QC=1.6E-6 11
219FR L 589 1 (9/2-) D
219FR A 6082.7 20 0.03 36 C
219FR G 82.4 0.01 LT [E1] 0.179 ?
219FR cG $The |g ray mixed with Tl, K-x rays
219FRS G LC=0.1359 19$MC=0.0328 5
219FRS G NC=0.00844 12$OC=0.00179 3$PC=0.000250 4$QC=8.57E-6 12
219FR L 650 3 (11/2-) D
219FRF L FLAG=w
219FR A 6023.0 30 0.01 56 C
219FR cA $The 6023|a seen in |a|g-coin spectrum (1991Li19), but no |g transition
219FR2cA is associated with this level at present
219FR L 705.5 5 (5/2+) d
219FR A 5966.8 30 0.03 10 C
219FR cA IA$I|a<0.06 deduced by evaluators from |g-ray transition intensity
219FR2cA balance.
219FR G 171.7 3 0.02 1 [E1] 0.1273
219FRS G KC=0.1013 15$LC=0.0198 3$MC=0.00472 7
219FRS G NC=0.001225 18$OC=0.000265 4$PC=3.93E-5 6$QC=1.640E-6 24
219FR G 199.3 4 0.03 2 [E2] 0.560 9 ?
219FR cG $Tentative placement proposed by evaluators based on
219FR2cG level-energy difference. This |g was unplaced in 1991Li19
219FR L 778 1 (7/2+) d
219FRF L FLAG=w
219FR A 5892 0.01 14 C
219FR cA E,IA$from 1991Li19.
219FR cA E$5897 from Q|a and E(level)
219FR G 72.8 [M1+E2] 23 17 0.01 LT&C ?
219FRS G LC=17 12$MC=4.6 33
219FRS G NC=1.20 86$OC=0.25 18$PC=0.033 22$QC=3.9E-4 29
219FR cG $E|g=73 {I1}, %I|g=0.20 {I10}, |a|g coin, semi (1969LeZW).
219FR2cG I(|g+ce)=0.01 from intensity balance at 778 level.