218PO 218BI B- DECAY (33 S) 2004DE16,2014MO02 19NDS 201911
218PO H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh, M.S. Basunia, Murray Martin et al.,$
218PO2 H CIT=NDS 160, 405 (2019)$CUT=30-Oct-2019$
218PO c 2004De16 (also 2004Fr14): {+218}Bi produced in spallation reaction
218PO2c with a 1.4-GeV proton beam on a uranium carbide target at ISOLDE
218PO3c facility. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g, |b|g|g coin, T{-1/2} of {+218}Bi
218PO4c nuclide
218PO c 2014Mo02: {+218}Bi produced at the accelerator system of GSI
218PO2c facility. A {+238}U beam at 1 GeV/nucleon on a Be target produced
218PO3c fragmentation species which were separated using the FRS
218PO4c spectrometer via B|r-|DE-B|r method. Selected nuclei were identified
218PO5c via time-of-flight detectors and ionizing chambers (MUSIC), and
218PO6c implanted in a DSSSD detector. Half-lives were determined via spatial
218PO7c and time correlations between implants and |b decays. The HPGe based
218PO8c RISING |g-ray spectrometer surrounding the DSSSD stack allowed the
218PO9c correlation of decays with |g|g coincidences.
218PO c Other: 1998Pf02: {+218}Bi nuclide identified in {+9}Be({+238}U,X) E=1
218PO2c GeV/nucleon.
218PO cB IB,LOGFT$Deduced by the evaluators from |g-ray intensity balance at
218PO2cB each level. Values should be considered as upper limits since there
218PO3cB is a large gap between Q value and the highest observed level at
218PO4cB 2287. Also the uncertainties on |g-ray intensities are quite large.
218PO cG E,RI$From 2004De16, except where noted.
218PO cG E(X)$Ordering of the cascade is based on systematics in this mass
218PO2cG region.
218PO cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data, by evaluators
218PO cL J,T$From the Adopted Levels.
218BI P 0 (6-,7-,8-) 33 S 1 4859 27
218BI cP E,J,T$From {+218}Bi Adopted Levels
218BI cP QP$From 2017Wa10
218PO N 0.80 7 1 1
218PO cN NR$I(|g+ce)(509.7|g)=100, assuming no |b{+-} feeding to g.s.
218PO PN 3
218PO L 0.0 0+ 3.097 M 12
218PO L 509.70 10 2+
218PO G 509.7 1 121 11 [E2] 0.0307 C
218POS G KC=0.0213 3$LC=0.00705 10$MC=0.001769 25$NC=0.000454 7$OC=9.08E-5 13$
218POS G PC=1.000E-5 14
218PO cG RI$weighted average of 134 {I42} (2004De16) and 120 {I11} (2014Mo02)
218PO L 935.20 15 (4+)
218PO G 425.5 1 107 10 [E2] 0.0478 C
218POF G FLAG=X
218POS G KC=0.0311 5$LC=0.01259 18$MC=0.00320 5$NC=0.000822 12$OC=0.0001627 23$
218POS G PC=1.733E-5 25
218PO cG RI$weighted average of 95 {I27} (2004De16) and 109 {I10} (2014Mo02)
218PO B 19 LT 6.6 GT ?
218POS B EAV=1551 12
218PO L 1320.90 18 (6+)
218PO G 385.7 1 100 9 [E2] 0.0619 C
218POF G FLAG=X
218POS G KC=0.0384 6$LC=0.01760 25$MC=0.00450 7$NC=0.001156 17$OC=0.000228 4$
218POS G PC=2.38E-5 4
218PO cG RI$from 2014Mo02, as values is reported with no uncertainty in
218PO2cG 2004De16
218PO B 26 13 6.3 2 ?
218POS B EAV=1384 12
218PO L 1583.90 20 (8+)
218PO G 263.0 1 49 5 [E2] 0.189 C
218POF G FLAG=X
218POS G KC=0.0902 13$LC=0.0735 11$MC=0.0192 3$NC=0.00493 7$OC=0.000956 14$
218POS G PC=9.36E-5 14
218PO cG RI$weighted average of 59 {I16} (2004De16) and 48 {I5} (2014Mo02)
218PO B 28 7 6.2 1
218POS B EAV=1271 12
218PO L 1757.9 3
218PO G 174.5 9 0.2 1 [D,E2] 1.2 11 C
218PO cG RI$from Figure 2 of 2004De16, <2.2 in Table I of 2004De16
218PO G 437.0 2 4 2 [D,E2] 0.10 9 C
218PO B 4 2 6.9 2
218POS B EAV=1196 12
218PO L 1858.70 20
218PO G 537.8 1 10 2 [D,E2] 0.06 5 C
218PO cG RI$weighted average of 12 {I3} (2004De16) and 9 {I2} (2014Mo02)
218PO B 9 2 6.5 1
218POS B EAV=1153 12
218PO L 1871.0 3
218PO G 287.1 2 0.2 1 [D,E2] 0.32 28 C
218PO cG RI$from Figure 2 of 2004De16, <2.7 in Table I of 2004De16
218PO B 0.2 LT 8.1 GT
218POS B EAV=1147 12
218PO L 2002.2 6
218PO G 418.3 5 6 2 [D,E2] 0.12 10 C
218PO B 5 2 6.7 2
218POS B EAV=1091 12
218PO L 2047.5 6
218PO G 176.6 9 0.1 1 [D,E2] 1.2 11 C
218PO cG RI$from Figure 2 of 2004De16, <1.3 in Table I of 2004De16
218PO G 463.5 6 6 2 [D,E2] 0.09 8 C
218PO B 5 2 6.6 2
218POS B EAV=1072 12
218PO L 2286.8 4
218PO G 702.9 3 8.4 20 [D,E2] 0.030 25 C
218PO cG RI$weighted average of 7 {I3} (2004De16) and 9 {I2} (2014Mo02)
218PO B 7 2 6.3 1
218POS B EAV=970 12