215PO    215BI B- DECAY (7.6 M)        2003KU26                  13NDS    201312
215PO  H TYP=FUL$AUT=J.K. Tuli, B. Singh, S. Bhattacharya, S. Dasgupta$
215PO2 H AUT=J.Y. Lee$
215PO3 H CIT=NDS 114, 2023 (2013)$CUT=23-SEP-2013$
215PO c  2003Ku26: {+215}Bi produced by {+232}Th(p,X) and {+238}U(p,X) at
215PO2c  1 GeV proton energy, followed by mass separation. Measured E|g, I|g,
215PO3c  |a, |g|g, |b|g coin, |a|g coin, |g x ray coin using large Ge detector
215PO4c  for |g-rays, low-energy Ge detector for x rays and low-energy |g rays,
215PO5c  plastic scintillator for |b.
215PO c  2004DeZV: estimated |b feeding to the ground state
215PO c  See also evaluation of this decay scheme by the Decay Data Evaluation
215PO2c  Project (DDEP on www.nucleide.org); published in M.M. Be et al., Table
215PO3c  of Radionuclides, volume 7, BIPM Monographie-5 (2013)
215PO C  1990RU02: 215BI mass-separated source produced by spallation of 200-MEV
215PO2C  protons on targets of 232TH. Measured EG, RI, GG coin, BG coin.
215PO3C  Detectors: 4PI plastic scintillator, GELI.
215PO cB IB,LOGFT$ Except for the strongly populated level at 293.5 keV, all
215PO2cB other values should be considered as limits (upper for I|b and lower
215PO3cB for log| {Ift} values), since the level scheme is likely incomplete
215PO4cB above the excitation energy of 1400 keV. The I|b feedings given here
215PO5cB are deduced from |g-intensity balances based on 10% {I10} |b feeding
215PO6cB to g.s. Values listed in 2003Ku26 are given under comments
215PO cG RI$ In table 3 of their paper, 2003Ku26 state that gamma intensities
215PO2cG are in percent per decay, but this is inconsistent with their decay
215PO3cG scheme in their figure 6. The intensities quoted in table 3 of 2003Ku26
215PO4cG are relative intensities, instead, as communicated in a priv. comm. of
215PO5cG April 2011 from J. Kurpeta (first author of 2003Ku26) to evaluator
215PO6cG (Filip Kondev, ANL) of Decay Data Evaluation Project (DDEP)
215PO CG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas
215PO cL E$From least-squares fit of E|g data
215PO cL J$From Adopted Levels
215BI  P 0.0          (9/2-)           7.6 M     2              2189      15
215BI CP J,T$ From 215BI ^Adopted ^Levels
215BI CP QP$ From 2012Wa38
215PO  N 1.39      16           1.0       1.0
215PO CN NR$ Based on |b feeding of 10% 10 to GS; from 12% 8 (2004DeZV)
215PO2CN summed gamma-transition intensity=90 10 to ground state. 2003Ku26
215PO3CN estimated negligible |b feeding to the ground state based on measured
215PO4CN ratio of 215BI GS and isomer components in IA in 215PO |a decay and
215PO5CN in IG(294G)
215PO PN                                                                     3
215PO  L 0.0           9/2+
215PO  B              10     10             6.9  GT                            ?
215POS B EAV=807.6 63
215PO CB IB$ from 12% 8 (2004DeZV), and <3% from LOGFT>7.7 in 2003Ku26.
215PO2CB In ^DDEP evaluation, a large feeding of 61% 6 was suggested based on
215PO3CB an approach which is "approximate and of highly questionable merit" as
215PO4CB stated by the ^DDEP evaluators
215PO  L    271.11 10  7/2+
215PO  B               0.4   LT             8.2  GT                            ?
215POS B EAV=694.3 63
215PO CB IB$ 2.2% in 2003Ku26 could not be reproduced by the evaluators.
215PO2CB Intensity balance gives 0.0% 4
215PO  G 271.1     1  2.9    1 M1+E2     3.6     +7-5  0.207  12             C
215POS G KC=0.117 11$LC=0.0672 12$MC=0.0174 3$
215POS G NC=0.00446 7$OC=0.000872 15$PC=8.84E-5 21
215PO  L    293.53 10   (11/2)+
215PO  B              71     9             6.0   1
215POS B EAV=685.0 63
215PO CB IB$ 77% (2003Ku26)
215PO  G 293.5     1   35.2  11 M1                     0.537                 C
215POS G KC=0.437 7$LC=0.0763 11$MC=0.0180 3$
215POS G NC=0.00463 7$OC=0.000969 14$PC=0.0001253 18
215PO  L     401.6 10  5/2+
215PO  B              1.0                  7.7
215POS B EAV=640.3 62
215PO  G 401.6     10  0.7   1 E2                      0.0555
215POS G KC=0.0351 6$LC=0.0153 3$MC=0.00391 7
215POS G NC=0.001003 17$OC=0.000198 4$PC=2.09E-5 4
215PO  L    517.53 17 7/2+,9/2+
215PO  B               0.7                 7.8
215POS B EAV=592.7 62
215PO CB IB$ 0.5% (2003Ku26)
215PO  G 517.5     2  1.5    1 M1(+E2)                 0.1162                C
215PO CG CC$ for M1
215POS G KC=0.0948 14$LC=0.01634 23 $MC=0.00385 6 $
215POS G NC=0.000990 14 $OC=0.000207 3$PC=2.68E-5 4
215PO  L      609.0 5(11/2+,13/2+)
215PO  B              1.4                  7.4
215POS B EAV=555.5 61
215PO CB IB$ 1.5% (2003Ku26)
215PO  G  609.0    5  1.0    1
215PO  L      677.6 7
215PO  B              1.1                  7.4
215POS B EAV=527.7 61
215PO  G 384       1  0.2    1
215PO CG $ IG(384)/IG(678)=0.33 is in severe disagreement from
215PO2CG 0.025 in 219RN A decay
215PO  G 677.6     10  0.6   1
215PO  L      835.7 5
215PO  B              3.1                  6.8
215POS B EAV=464.4 60
215PO CB IB$ 3.3% (2003Ku26)
215PO  G 542.7     25  0.3   1
215PO  G 564.4     5   1.0   1                                               C
215PO  G 836.3     10  0.9   1
215PO  L    1077.6 15
215PO  B               1.5                 6.8
215POS B EAV=369.6 59
215PO CB IB$ 1.7% (2003Ku26)
215PO  G 784       2   0.5   1
215PO  G 806.5     22  0.6   1                                               C
215PO  L    1176.1 20
215PO  B               0.4                 7.2
215POS B EAV=331.9 58
215PO  G 905       2  0.3    1
215PO  L   1294.43 18
215PO  B               4.2                 6.0
215POS B EAV=287.5 56
215PO CB IB$ 4.5% (2003Ku26)
215PO  G 776.9     1  1.2    2                                               C
215PO  G 1023.1    12  0.9   1                                               C
215PO  G 1294.5    3  0.9    1
215PO  L     1398.8 3
215PO  B              5.7                  5.7
215POS B EAV=249.2 55
215PO CB IB$ 6.2% (2003Ku26)
215PO  G 1104.5    5  2.2    1
215PO  G 1127.7    7  0.7    1                                               C
215PO  G 1399.2    4  1.2    1