208TL    212BI A DECAY (60.55 M)                                 07NDS    200707
208TL  H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 108,1583 (2007)$CUT=1-Jun-2007$
208TL C  THIS DATA SET IS UPDATED FROM 1992AR05. THE QA VALUE HAS BEEN
208TL2C  REPLACED BY THE VALUE FROM 2003AU03. THE FOLLOWING ARE JPI CHANGES:
208TL3C  JPI(GS) FROM 5(+) TO 5+, JPI(40) FROM 4(+) TO 4+, JPI(328) FROM
208TL4C  5(+) TO 5+, JPI(473) FROM (3+,4+,5+) TO (4+), AND JPI(493) FROM
208TL5C  (3+,5+) TO (3)+. THE MULT DATA HAVE BEEN REANALYZED USING THE
208TL6C  THEORETICAL VALUES OF 2005KIZT
208TL CA           (ALPHA)G(THETA): SEE 208TL LEVELS FROM 212BI A DECAY
208TL2CA (60.55 M)
208TL CA           OTHER: 1962BE09,
208TL CA E,IA$ FROM 1960WA14, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EA CORRECTED (+4 KEV)
208TL2CA FOR CALIBRATION CHANGE (SEE 1991RY01). IA RENORMALIZED BY EVALUATOR
208TL3CA TO |SIA(WEAK BRANCHES)=100-|SIA(6051+6090)
208TL CA HF$ R0(208TL)=1.50 2
208TL CA E(A),IA(A)$ FROM 1991RY01
208TL CA HF$THE RADIUS PARAMETER IS POORLY KNOWN, AND ALONE CONTRIBUTES
208TL2CA AN UNCERTAINTY OF DHF=+53% AND -35%. HF=71 +38-25, FOR THE
208TL3CA 5607A, FOR EXAMPLE
208TL CG           ABSOLUTE INTENSITY MEASUREMENTS: IG(288.20G)=0.337 4 PER
208TL2CG 100 212BI DECAYS (1984GE07) WHICH GIVES IG(288.20G)=0.938 8 PER 100
208TL3CG 212BI A DECAYS. OTHER: 1983SC13.
208TL CG E$        FROM 1957VO22, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. THE EVALUATOR HAS
208TL2CG RECALCULATED EG FROM  B*RHO(CEK) USING REVISED FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS
208TL3CG (1987CO39) AND ELECTRON BINDING ENERGIES (1967BE73).
208TL4CG OTHERS: 1984GE07, 1982SA36, 1973DA38, 1967BE19
208TL CG RI$ FROM 1984GE07, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. OTHERS: 1983SC13,
208TL2CG 1982SA36, 1973DA38, 1967BE19, 1962BE09, 1960EM01
208TL CG RI(B)$ FROM 1967BE19
208TL CG E(D)$ FROM 1966KLZZ
208TL CG RI(E)$  CORRECTED FOR CONTRIBUTION FROM 327.6-KEV G FROM 232U DECAY
208TL CG M$THE QUOTED EKC VALUES ARE FROM ICE(K) AND THE ADOPTED IG VALUES,
208TL2CG NORMALIZED TO KC=0.357 FOR THE 288G, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE
208TL CL $(G)(G): 1958DE25
208TL CL $(ALPHA)(G): 1955NI19, 1962BE09, 1967BE19
208TL CL $(ALPHA)(G)(THETA):
208TL2CL 1)  6051 ALPHA - 40G DATA OF 1955WE10, 1956FI41, 1956HO11, AND
208TL3CL 1968DO17 ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIN SEQUENCES 1-3-4, AND 1-4-5. NOT
208TL4CL CONSISTENT WITH 1-5-5, 1-4-4, 1-5-4, NOR 1-6-5. NOT CONSISTENT WITH
208TL5CL J(212BI)=0. THE EVALUATOR ASSUMES THAT THE 39.9G IS M1 (MR<0.02 BASED
208TL6CL ON CE DATA).
208TL7CL 2)  5768 ALPHA - 288G AND 5768 ALPHA - 328G DATA OF 1966KLZZ
208TL8CL ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIN SEQUENCES 1(L,L+2)J(^D,Q)4
208TL9CL AND 1(L,L+2)J(^D,Q)5, RESPECTIVELY, FOR J(328 LEVEL)=5, L(ALPHA)=5,
208TLACL MR(288G)=+0.067 6, MR(328G)=+0.07 5. OTHER: 1963CO28.
208TLBCL 3)  5625 ALPHA - 432G AND 5625 ALPHA - 472G DATA OF 1966KLZZ
208TLCCL ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH J(472 LEVEL)=3 TO 6, THE MAXIMUM J-RANGE
208TLDCL ALLOWED BY CE DATA. AUTHORS' ANALYSIS, WHICH YIELDS J=4,
208TLECL MR(432G)=+1.7 TO 2.6, MR(472G)=-14 TO -8, MR(ALPHA L=5/L=3)=+1,
208TLFCL APPEARS TO BE IN ERROR. IN PARTICULAR, THE EXPERIMENTAL A4 TERMS HAVE
208TLGCL THE OPPOSITE SIGN FROM THE THEORETICAL VALUES (FOR ALL VALUES OF L=5,
208TLHCL L=3 ALPHA-MIXING), WHEREAS 1966KLZZ SHOW THE THEORETICAL A4 VALUES
208TLICL CHANGING SIGNS WITH ALPHA MIXING (THE AUTHORS' TERM LINEAR IN
208TLJCL MR(ALPHA) APPEARS TO BE AP 5 TIMES TOO LARGE). THE LACK OF AGREEMENT
208TLKCL IN POSSIBLE J-VALUES BETWEEN THE AG(THETA) AND CE DATA MIGHT BE DUE
208TLLCL TO THE INABILITY TO RESOLVE THE WEAK 5626 ALPHA FROM THE 5607 ALPHA
208TLMCL IN THE ALPHA GATE AND THE WEAK 432 AND 472 G'S FROM 452G IN THE
208TLNCL COINCIDENCE SPECTRUM.
208TLOCL 4)  5606 ALPHA - 452G AND 5606 ALPHA - 492G DATA OF 1966KLZZ
208TLPCL ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE SPIN SEQUENCES 1(L,L+2)J(^D,Q)4
208TLQCL AND 1(L,L+2)J(^D,Q)5, RESPECTIVELY, FOR J(492 LEVEL)=3, L(ALPHA)=3,
208TLRCL MR(453G)=-0.048 8 AND FOR J=5, L(ALPHA)=5, MR(453G)=+0.123 4,
208TLSCL MR(492G)=-0.51 2, +2.06 8. DATA ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH J=4 OR 6.
208TLTCL NOTE, HOWEVER, THAT THE 492G IS VERY WEAK. (OTHERS: 1956KO60,
208TLUCL 1963CO28 FOR 452G)
208TLVCL 5)  5486 ALPHA - 620G AND 5486 ALPHA - 576G DATA OF 1966KLZZ ARE
208TLWCL SUSPECT. THE 5486 ALPHA WAS NOT SEEN IN THE AUTHORS' SPECTRUM, SO A
208TLXCL WIDE GATE WAS SET AT ITS EXPECTED POSITION. AND THE EXISTENCE OF THE
208TLYCL 576G IS IN DOUBT. IT HAS NOT BEEN REPORTED IN SINGLES STUDIES AND, AS
208TLZCL POINTED OUT BY 1966KLZZ, MOST OF ITS CONTRIBUTION TO AG(THETA) COULD
208TLACL BE DUE TO CHANCE COINCIDENCES FROM THE STRONG 583G IN 208PB. DATA FOR
208TLBCL THE 620G ARE CONSISTENT WITH J(620 LEVEL)=6, L(ALPHA)=5,
208TLCCL MR(620G)<-8; >47; NOT CONSISTENT WITH J=3,4 OR 5.
208TL CL $AG(THETA,H,T): 1969VA21 STUDIED THE TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FIELD
208TL2CL (DUE TO RECOIL) ON 208TL NUCLEI IN FE.
208TL CL E$ FROM EG, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
208TL CL J$ FROM 208TL ADOPTED LEVELS
208TL CL E(E)$ CALCULATED FROM DQA
212BI  P 0.0          1(-)              60.55 M  6              6207.26   3
208TL  N 1.0                    0.3594  6
208TL PN                                                                     3
208TL CN BR$WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF 36.00 3 (1965WA09), 35.81 4 (1962BE09),
208TL2CN AND 35.96 6 (1960SC07) BASED ON IA(212BI)/[IA(212BI)+IA(212PO)].
208TL3CN OTHERS: 1961BA12, 1961FE04, 1958EV80, 1958PR70, 1956SE17, 1953MA26
208TL4CN AND 1950TO63
208TL  G  124.1
208TL CG E$ FROM 1973SLZJ; OBSERVED CEL AND CEM LINES IN 212PB SOURCE AND
208TL2CG FOUND TO BE CONVERTED IN TL. NOT REPORTED BY OTHER AUTHORS
208TL  G  144.94                                                               ?
208TL CG $1957ZH05 REPORT E=144.94 WITH I(CEK)=0.036. THE TRANSITION IS NOT
208TL2CG SEEN BY 1962BE09 WHO REPORT IG<0.006. THESE DATA GIVE EKC>6,
208TL3CG CONSISTENT ONLY WITH A LARGE E0 COMPONENT
208TL  L    0.0       5+                3.053 M  4
208TL  A 6089.88   3  27.12  14 480    AP
208TL2 A FLAG=A$
208TL  L   39.857  4  4+                6.5 PS   8
208TL CL T$        (ALPHA)(CEL 39.85G)(T); MEASURED RECOIL OF ATOMS (1965SE02).
208TL2CL OTHERS(PS): AP 4 (1956BU26), 2.6 10 (1958SI81)
208TL  A 6050.78   3  69.91  15 130    AP
208TL2 A FLAG=A$
208TL  G   39.857  4   2.96  24  M1                     23.2                 C
208TLS G LC=17.81 25$MC=4.16 6$NC+=1.275 18
208TLS G NC=1.052 15$OC=0.204 3$PC=0.0193 3
208TL CG E$ FROM THE  B*RHO MEASUREMENTS OF 1956SI23, RECALCULATED BY
208TL2CG THE EVALUATOR USING REVISED FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS (1987CO39) AND
208TL2CG ELECTRON BINDING ENERGIES (1967BE73)
208TL CG M$L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3:N12:O12=1000 25:106 5:8.2 33:262 15:30 5:6.2 25:
208TL2CG 76 4:10 4 (1963SE20). L1:L2:L3:M1:N:O=1000:92:8.0:231:57:13
208TL3CG (1957ZH05). CC=22.6 5 FROM AG-COIN (1966IL01). FROM L3/L1, MR<0.012
208TL  L  328.04   4  5+                0.1 PS   GT
208TL  A 5768         1.70     280     AP
208TL CA IA$OTHER: 1.67 2 (1962BE09)
208TL  G  288.20   4  0.938  8   M1+E2   +0.067  6      0.436                C
208TLS G KC=0.357 5$LC=0.0605 9$MC=0.01411 20$NC+=0.00432 6
208TLS G NC=0.00356 5$OC=0.000692 10$PC=6.54E-5 10
208TL CG M$FROM K/L=5.6 6 (1967BE19); AG(THETA) (1963CO28, 1966KLZZ)
208TL CG MR$MR FROM AG(THETA) (1966KLZZ)
208TL  G 328.03    4  0.349  17M1                      0.307
208TL2 G FLAG=E$
208TLS G KC=0.252 4$LC=0.0425 6$MC=0.00990 14$NC+=0.00303 5
208TLS G NC=0.00250 4$OC=0.000486 7$PC=4.60E-5 7
208TL CG M$EKC=0.230 15 (1955NI19), 0.27 2 (1967BE19), 0.31 3 FROM XKG/G
208TL2CG (1966IL01). L1/K=0.23 +7-6 (1963DA11). L/K=0.15 4 (1967BE19),
208TL3CG 0.21 4 (1955NI19). OTHER: EKC=0.30 (1957VO22)
208TL  L  473.4    4  (4+)
208TL  A 5626         0.157     630    AP
208TL  G 433.7     5  0.047  9 M1                      0.1451
208TL2 G FLAG=B$
208TLS G KC=0.1191 17$LC=0.0199 3$MC=0.00464 7$NC+=0.001421 21
208TLS G NC=0.001172 17$OC=0.000228 4$PC=2.16E-5 3
208TL CG M$EKC=0.43 12 (1967BE19), 0.25 9 (1955NI19). OTHER: 0.12 (1957VO22),
208TL2CG 0.13 7 (1963DA11) USING AUTHORS ICE(K)/ICE(K)(328G)
208TL  G 473.0     7  0.14   1 M1+E2                   0.07   5
208TL2 G FLAG=B$
208TLS G KC=0.06 4$LC=0.011 5$MC=0.0027 10$NC+=0.0008 3
208TLS G NC=0.00069 24$OC=0.00013 5$PC=1.1E-5 6
208TL CG M$EKC=0.079 18 (1967BE19), 0.100 15 (1966IL01). 0.053 15 (1955NI19).
208TL2CG OTHER: 0.12 (1957VO22). THE VALUE OF 1966IL01 IS FROM XKG/G FOR
208TL3CG THE UNRESOLVED 473+493G; HOWEVER, THE 493G IS QUESTIONABLE
208TL  L  492.84   4  (3+)
208TL  A 5607         1.13       70    AP
208TL  G 452.98    5  1.010  9 M1                      0.1292
208TLS G KC=0.1061 15$LC=0.01772 25$MC=0.00413 6$NC+=0.001264 18
208TLS G NC=0.001042 15$OC=0.000203 3$PC=1.92E-5 3
208TL CG M$EKC=0.086 22 (1978AV01), NORMALIZED TO MULT(583G)=E2 IN 208TL
208TL2CG B- DECAY, 0.115 6 (1967BE19), 0.100 7 (1955NI19). OTHER: 0.11
208TL3CG (1957VO22)
208TL  G  493.3    7  0.01   LT                                                ?
208TL2 G FLAG=B$
208TL CG M$I(CEK)=0.009 (1957VO22) NOT SEEN BY 1967BE19 WHO REPORT IG<0.01.
208TL2CG THESE DATA GIVE EKC>0.9, REQUIRING MULT GE M4 OR AN E0 COMPONENT.
208TL3CG THE PLACEMENT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH MULT=E0
208TL  L  621         (6+)
208TL2 L FLAG=E$
208TL  A 5481         0.013     1500   AP
208TL  G  576         0.001  LT                                                ?
208TL2 G FL=39.857$FLAG=D$
208TL CG RI$I(G)/I(620G)=0.22 10 (1966KLZZ). TRANSITION MASKED BY STRONG
208TL2CG 583G IN 208TL DECAY.
208TL  G  620         0.003  LT                                                ?
208TL2 G FLAG=D$
208TL CG RI$NOT SEEN. THE IG LIMIT IS FROM 1962BE09
208TL  L  759
208TL2 L FLAG=E$
208TL  A 5345         0.0010  1 3800   AP
208TL  L  803
208TL2 L FLAG=E$
208TL  A 5302      2 0.00011 1  20000  AP