208BI 208BI IT DECAY 07NDS 200707
208BI H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. J. MARTIN$CIT=NDS 108,1583 (2007)$CUT=1-Jun-2007$
208BI t 1958Du80 {+209}Bi(|g,n) E|<22 MeV
208BI t 1961Gl16 {+209}Bi(n,2n) E=14.7 MeV
208BI t 1962Mo19 {+208}Pb(p,n), {+209}Bi(p,pn) E=9 MeV
208BI t 1966Me02 {+209}Bi(n,2n) E=14.7 MeV
208BI t 1967Hi08 {+209}Bi(|g,n)
208BI t 1968Bo23 {+208}Pb(d,2n) E=13 MeV
208BI t 1968Ga17 {+209}Bi(|g,n)
208BI t 1973Sa22 {+209}Bi(n,2n) E=14.7 MeV
208BI t 1974Hu11 {+208}Pb(d,2n) E=18 MeV
208BI t 1975WhZY,1974WhZT {+204}Hg({+7}Li,3n) E=34 MeV
208BI t 1976Ga33 {+209}Bi(n,2n) E=14.7 MeV
208BI t 1986Ar12 Pb(p,xn) E=20 MeV
208BI t 1995An36 {+209}Bi(n,2n) E=14 MeV
208BI c K| x ray: I(K| x ray)/I(921|g)=0.50 {I8} (1968Bo23), 0.44 {I9}
208BIxc (1968Ga17).
208BI cG E,RI$From 1968Bo23. Other: 1968Ga17
208BI cG $|g|g: see 1967Hi08.
208BI cG M$From relative Ice(K) and I|g data of 1968Bo23 normalized so that
208BI2cG |a(K)exp(140|g)=3.05 {I14} (see 139|g below)
208BI cL E$From a least-squares fit to the adopted E|g data
208BI P 1571.1 8 10- 2.58 MS 4
208BI N 0.9804 0.9804 1
208BI cN NR,NT$from I(|g+ce 921|g)=100
208BI PN 3
208BI L 0.0 5+
208BI L 64.1 8 4+
208BI G 64 AP 0.27 7 M1(+E2) 0.14 LT 7.8 5 2.4 6
208BIS G LC=5.9 4$MC=1.41 10$NC+=0.44 3
208BIS G NC=0.359 25$OC=0.073 5$PC=0.0085 4
208BI cG RI$from I(|g+ce) and |a.
208BI cG M,MR,CC$from adopted gammas
208BI cG TI$from an intensity balance at the 64.1 level.
208BI L 510.3 5 6+ 8 NS LT
208BI cL T from (921|g)(510|g)(t)<8 ns (1958Du80)
208BI G 446.0 10 2.3 6[E2] 0.0406 7
208BIS G KC=0.0273 4$LC=0.01002 16$MC=0.00253 4$NC+=0.000780 13
208BIS G NC=0.000644 11$OC=0.0001244 20$PC=1.196E-5 19
208BI G 510.3 5 75 5E2(+M1) 1.3 GT 0.044 15
208BIS G KC=0.034 13$LC=0.0082 17$MC=0.0020 4$NC+=0.00062 12
208BIS G NC=0.00051 10$OC=0.000101 21$PC=1.1E-5 3
208BI cG MR$from K/L=3.2 {I15} (1968Bo23)
208BI L 650.1 6 7+
208BI G 139.8 5 14.4 20M1(+E2) 0.33 LT 3.81 11
208BIS G KC=3.05 15$LC=0.580 25$MC=0.138 7$NC+=0.0432 21
208BIS G NC=0.0352 18$OC=0.0071 3$PC=0.000825 17
208BI cG M,MR$|a(K)exp=3.2 {I8} from K| x ray/|g (1968Bo23) gives |d<0.62,
208BI2cG |a(exp)=4.1 {I10} from scin |S|g/|g (1967Hi08) gives |d<0.34, K/L=6.3
208BI3cG {I15} (1968Bo23) gives |d<0.34, and |a(exp)=4.4 {I+11-7} from the
208BI4cG requirement of an intensity balance at the 650 level gives |d<0.33
208BI G 650.1 8 24 3E2 0.0169
208BIS G KC=0.01260 18$LC=0.00324 5$MC=0.000794 12$NC+=0.000247 4
208BIS G NC=0.000203 3$OC=3.99E-5 6$PC=4.15E-6 6
208BI cG M$K/L=3.6 {I12} (1968Bo23) gives |d(E2/M1)>1.8. Placement in the
208BI2cG decay scheme rules out an M1 component
208BI L 1571.1 8 10- 2.58 MS 4 M
208BI2 L G=0.2674 14
208BI cL T$weighted average of 2.6 ms {I1} (1961Gl16), 2.5 ms {I1} and 2.6 ms
208BI2cL {I1} (1962Mo19), 2.7 ms {I1} (1966Me02), 2.53 ms {I5} (1967Hi08), 2.65
208BI3cL ms {I14} (1973Sa22), 2.7 ms {I1} (1976Ga33), and 2.58 ms {I26}
208BI4cL (1995An36). Others:1986Ar12, 1958Du80
208BI cL g-factor: from NMR-PAD (1974Hu11). Authors' value is
208BI2cL corrected for diamagnetic shift and Knight shift. The Knight-shift
208BI3cL correction is from 1985No09, and is slightly different from that
208BI4cL applied by the authors. The uncorrected value is 0.2658 {I14}
208BI G 921.0 5 100 E3(+M4) 0.05 LT 0.0200 2
208BIS G KC=0.0144 3$LC=0.00428 8$NC+=0.000332 7$
208BIS G NC=0.000273 5$OC=5.39E-5 10$PC=5.62E-6 11$
208BI cG M,MR$|a(K)exp=0.017 {I6} (1968Bo23) gives mult=E3(+M4) with |d<0.25.
208BI2cG From the recommended upper limit of 10 for the |g-ray strength,
208BI3cG one gets |d<0.05