207AT 207RN EC DECAY 1975ZEZY,1973KEZP 11NDS 201102 207AT H TYP=FUL$AUT=F.G. KONDEV, S. LALKOVSKI$CIT=NDS 112, 707 (2011)$ 207AT2 H CUT=1-Aug-2010$ 207AT DG CC$ FROM BrIcc v2.2 (31-Mar-2008) 2008KiAA, "Frozen Orbitals" appr. 207AT C 1975ZeZY: mass separated 207RN source was produced in proton 207AT2C spallation reactions on a natural ThO target; E(P)=660 MEV; Detectors: 207AT3C several GELI and SILI; Measured: EG, IG, GG coin, CE 207AT C 1973KEZP: 207RN source was produced in 197AU(15N,5N) reaction at 207AT2C E(15N)=95 MEV; Detectors: several GELI, NAI and SILI; 207AT3C Measured: EG, IG, GG coin, CE. Others: 1971KeZZ and 1971KeZH (same 207AT4C collaboration) 207RN P 0 5/2- 9.25 M 17 4612 34 207AT N 0.058 2 0.79 31.27 207AT PN 1 3 207AT CN NR$From the requirement that SUMOF TI(G's to GS)=100 and the assumption 207AT2CN that there is no direct feeding to the GS 207AT CL E$From a least-squares fit to EG 207AT CL J$From deduced transition multipolarities, unless otherwise specified 207AT CE $Because of the large unplaced photon intensity (AP 20%), 207AT2CE and the probable incompleteness of the decay scheme, only EC+B+ 207AT3CE branches with intensity >2% are shown. 207AT CG $On the basis of energy fits, the following G's that were initially 207AT2CG placed by 1975ZeZY, were multiply placed by 1984Sc44: 344G, 610G, 207AT3CG 643G, 674G, 780G, 865G, and 879G 207AT CG E,RI$ From 1975ZeZY. Others: 1971KeZH, 1971KeZZ, 1973KeZP 207AT CG M,MR$From EKC data of 1973KeZP. No uncertainties are given by 207AT2CG the authors. The evaluator has assigned an uncertainty of 20%. 207AT3CG The authors in 1975ZeZY state that data of 1973KeZP give mult(329G)=M1. 207AT CG $I(G+-)=178 18 (1975ZeZY) 207AT CG RI(A)$IG(674G)=265 25 is given by the authors in their table. 207AT2CG The divided intensities shown here are given in the authors' decay 207AT3CG scheme and presumably were deduced from GG. 207AT CG M(B)$EKC for the doubly placed 674G is consistent only with 207AT2CG mult=E2 for the more intense component, and with E1 or E2 for the 207AT3CG weaker component 207AT G 233.8 2 15 3 207AT G 295.5 3 8.8 15 207AT G 337.6 4 2.8 20 207AT G 380.3 6 5.8 20 207AT G 417.7 2 10 2 207AT G 436.3 3 6.5 18 207AT G 443.5 4 4.2 13 207AT G 475.6 2 15 4 207AT G 486.9 5 6.4 18 207AT G 547.0 2 7.2 20 207AT G 553.2 1 26 5 207AT G 573.4 4 3.8 12 207AT G 620.7 2 7.0 20 207AT G 636.0 4 3.0 15 207AT G 638.1 4 3.0 15 207AT G 647.2 1 39 8 207AT G 655.6 4 4.2 15 207AT G 660.4 2 19 4 207AT G 672.0 3 14 4 207AT G 685.8 1 27 5 207AT G 700.5 1 9.7 20 207AT G 712.8 2 13 4 207AT G 739.8 5 5.0 17 207AT G 751.6 4 10 2 207AT G 820.7 4 5.0 20 207AT G 834.8 3 3.8 13 ? 207AT CG E$Value given by authors is 884.8, but the transition is 207AT2CG listed between the 820.7 and 847.5 G's. 207AT G 847.5 3 7 3 207AT G 873.5 7 5.3 24 207AT G 884.5 3 6.6 25 207AT G 892.7 7 22 4 207AT G 908.6 1 30 15 207AT G 919.8 3 6 3 207AT G 983.0 5 5.2 20 207AT G 985.8 3 8 3 207AT G 999.2 2 26 4 207AT G 1083.0 7 6 3 207AT G 1121.1 5 5.0 20 207AT G 1129.7 5 4.4 20 207AT G 1172.0 4 207AT G 1254.6 2 7.4 3 207AT G 1326.6 7 207AT G 1474.3 7 207AT G 1507.5 6 10 4 207AT G 1522.8 4 15 4 207AT G 2576.6 3 6.6 20 207AT L 0 9/2- 1.81 H 3 207AT CL J,T$From adopted levels 207AT L 344.55 4 7/2- 207AT E 3.9 5 12.2 16 6.56 6 16.1 21 207ATS E EAV=1459 16$CK=0.607 5$CL=0.1133 9$CM+=0.0377 3 207AT CE TI$if the 344.5G deexcites only the 344 level 207AT CE E$ E(B+)=3250 100 (1975ZeZY) 207AT G 344.53 5 1000 E2+M1 3.1 +19-7 0.115 17 & 207ATS G KC=0.074 15$LC=0.0308 15$MC=0.0079 4$NC+=0.00249 11 207ATS G NC=0.00203 9$OC=0.000414 19$PC=4.8E-5 4 207AT CG RI$Alternate placement from the 1018 level, suggested by 207AT2CG 1984Sc44 must have a negligible fraction of the intensity since no 207AT3CG 344G-344G coin was reported by the authors. From intensity balance 207AT4CG arguments, IG(344G from 1018) must be less than AP 240. 207AT CG M$EKC=0.075 207AT L 643.40 20 11/2- 207AT G 643.4 2 27 5 & 207AT L 673.98 4 (5/2)- 207AT E 2.09 16 8.9 7 6.62 4 11.0 8 207ATS E EAV=1312 16$CK=0.648 5$CL=0.1215 9$CM+=0.0405 3 207AT G 329.45 5 66 7(M1) 0.426 207AT CG M$Assigned M1 in 1975ZeZY, but EKC was not given by the authors 207ATS G KC=0.346 5$LC=0.0611 9$MC=0.01444 21$NC+=0.00465 7 207ATS G NC=0.00374 6$OC=0.000801 12$PC=0.0001106 16 207AT G 674.00 5 180 APE2 0.01716 & 207AT3 G FLAG=AB$ 207ATS G KC=0.01270 18$LC=0.00337 5$MC=0.000833 12$NC+=0.000266 4 207ATS G NC=0.000215 3$OC=4.47E-5 7$PC=5.59E-6 8 207AT CG M$EKC=0.012 207AT L 747.19 5 7/2- 207AT E 5.0 6 23 2 6.19 5 28 3 207ATS E EAV=1280 16$CK=0.657 4$CL=0.1233 9$CM+=0.0411 3 207AT G 402.68 5 260 26M1 0.247 207ATS G KC=0.201 3$LC=0.0353 5$MC=0.00834 12$NC+=0.00269 4 207ATS G NC=0.00216 3$OC=0.000463 7$PC=6.39E-5 9 207AT CG M$EKC=0.24 207AT G 747.15 7 310 30M1+E2 0.8 4 0.035 9 207ATS G KC=0.028 8$LC=0.0051 11$MC=0.00122 25$NC+=0.00039 8 207ATS G NC=0.00032 7$OC=6.7E-5 14$PC=9.1E-6 20 207AT CG M$EKC=0.029 207AT L 973.28 8 207AT G 628.6 1 24 5 207AT G 973.35 13 55 10 207AT L 976.09 10 207AT E 0.26 6 1.5 3 7.31 10 1.8 4 207ATS E EAV=1178 15$CK=0.684 4$CL=0.1286 8$CM+=0.0429 3 207AT G 631.6 1 64 6 207AT L 1018.57 6 3/2-,5/2,7/2 207AT E 0.43 4 2.68 21 7.06 4 3.11 24 207ATS E EAV=1159 15$CK=0.688 4$CL=0.1295 8$CM+=0.0432 3 207AT G 344.53 5 ? 207AT CG RI$see comment given with placement from the 344 level 207AT G 674.00 5 90 AP E1,E2 0.012 6 & 207ATS G KC=0.009 4$LC=0.0021 14 207AT3 G FLAG=AB$ 207AT CG M$EKC=0.012 207AT L 1042.10 10 3/2-,5/2,7/2 207AT E 0.28 6 1.8 3 7.22 9 2.1 4 207ATS E EAV=1149 15$CK=0.691 4$CL=0.1301 8$CM+=0.0434 3 207AT G 697.5 1 52 8 207AT L 1108.15 25 207AT G 361.0 4 2.2 10 207AT G 763.4 7 2.0 7 207AT L 1114.75 7/2- ? 207AT E 0.43 6 3.0 4 6.99 7 3.4 5 ? 207ATS E EAV=1117 15$CK=0.699 4$CL=0.1316 8$CM+=0.04390 25 207AT G 367.60 5 55 6M1 0.316 ? 207ATS G KC=0.257 4$LC=0.0452 7$MC=0.01069 15$NC+=0.00344 5 207ATS G NC=0.00277 4$OC=0.000593 9$PC=8.19E-5 12 207AT CG E$Observed in coin with the 344G, and placed by the authors 207AT2CG from 1041 keV to 747 keV levels, apparently a typing error. 1984Sc44 207AT3CG places this transition from the 1041 keV to 674 keV levels, but this 207AT4CG placement is inconsistent with the coin data. The present evaluators 207AT5CG suggest a placement from a new level at 1114 keV, which accommodates 207AT6CG two additional transitions, one of which is now defined as multiply 207AT7CG placed. 207AT CG M$EKC=0.29 207AT G 471.4 7 4.4 12 & ? 207AT L 1119.95 8 207AT E 0.33 5 2.3 4 7.11 7 2.6 4 207ATS E EAV=1114 15$CK=0.699 4$CL=0.1317 8$CM+=0.04393 25 207AT G 446.1 1 11.0 22 207AT G 775.30 9 45 6 207AT L 1197.95 10 207AT G 524.2 3 5.0 25 207AT G 853.4 1 51 10 207AT L 1224.76 16 207AT G 477.8 5 7.8 17 207AT G 879.9 7 4.0 15 & 207AT G 1224.8 2 13 3 207AT L 1284.13 15 207AT G 308.0 4 3.7 8 & 207AT G 537.6 5 6.2 18 207AT G 610.1 2 8.4 17 & 207AT G 939.4 3 7.6 24 207AT L 1351.21 15 207AT G 242.9 4 3.4 10 207AT G 377.9 2 15 3 207AT G 604.0 4 4.4 11 207AT L 1534.80 16 207AT G 559.2 4 4.6 11 207AT G 561.1 2 7.8 16 207AT G 788.1 4 4.6 13 207AT G 861.4 4 3.2 12 207AT G 1190.4 5 5.0 20 207AT L 1539.36 13 207AT G 188.0 3 5.6 11 207AT G 520.2 3 3.0 15 207AT G 566.3 2 6.4 20 207AT G 792.3 4 3.8 10 207AT G 865.4 4 5.0 23 & 207AT G 1539.5 7 13 5 207AT L 1553.55 20 207AT G 535.2 5 7.8 20 207AT G 580.1 3 7.6 20 207AT G 806.1 5 6.2 23 207AT G 879.9 7 4.0 15 & 207AT L 1799.43 19 207AT G 245.7 4 3.4 8 207AT G 691.5 5 2.6 10 207AT G 780.9 4 1.5 AP & 207AT G 823.3 4 4.4 16 207AT G 1799.6 8 207AT L 1823.24 25 207AT G 471.4 7 4.4 12 & 207AT G 599.0 4 5.2 18 207AT G 780.9 4 1.5 AP & 207AT G 804.3 7 4.4 20 207AT G 1478.8 7 207AT L 1841.27 15 207AT G 616.2 4 4.8 12 207AT G 643.4 2 27 5 & 207AT G 798.9 3 4.8 14 207AT G 865.4 4 5.0 23 & 207AT L 1966.59 17 207AT G 768.6 3 6.2 20 207AT G 947.9 4 6.5 20 207AT G 990.7 3 7.4 25 207AT G 993.2 3 11 3 207AT L 2038.66 23 207AT G 485.0 6 5.2 16 207AT G 687.5 2 14 4 207AT G 754.2 6 5.9 14 207AT G 923.2 6 2.8 14 ? 207AT L 2149.53 17 207AT G 308.0 4 3.7 8 & 207AT G 350.1 3 12 3 207AT G 610.1 2 8.4 17 & 207AT G 951.8 4 8 3 207AT G 1176.3 6 207AT G 1806.1 8