207BI    207BI IT DECAY (182 US)       1969BE47,1972MA24,1978LO1211NDS    201102
207BI  H TYP=FUL$AUT=F.G. KONDEV, S. LALKOVSKI$CIT=NDS 112, 707 (2011)$
207BI2 H CUT=1-Aug-2010$
207BI  P    2101.3917 21/2+            182 US    6
207BI  N 1.03      101.00       1.0
207BI cN NR$From |S' I(|g+ce)(g.s.)=100. Note that this condition gives
207BI2cN |S' I(|g+ce)(from isomer)=97 {I12}
207BI PN                                                                     3
207BI c  1978Lo12, 1979Lo04: Pulsed beam, E(|a)=30-43 MeV, E(d)=25 MeV; |g
207BI2c  Ge(Li), ce Si(Li); |g|g coin, |g(|q), |g(t);
207BI c  1969Be47: Pulsed beam, E(|a)=28 MeV; Target: 10 mg/cm{+2}
207BI3c  {+205}Tl{-2}O{-3} sandwiched between 100 |mg/cm{+2} thick foils;
207BI4c  Detectors: two Ge(Li); Measured: E|g, I|g, |g(t)
207BI c  1972Ma24: Isomeric state produced in {+204}Hg({+7}Li,4n|g) reaction;
207BI2c  Pulsed beam, E({+7}Li)=41 MeV; Target: 80 mg liquid mercury enriched
207BI3c  to 80% in {+204}Hg; two planar Ge(Li) detectors, magnet; Measured:
207BI4c  E|g, I|g, |g(|q,H,t), g-factor
207BI c  Others: 1998Pf02, 1979Lo04, 1967Co20
207BI c  I(K|a| x ray)/I(669|g)=1.05 (1967Co20)
207BI cL E$From a least-squares fit to E|g
207BI cL J,T$From adopted levels, unless otherwise stated
207BI cG E,RI$From 1969Be47, unless otherwise stated
207BI cG M,MR$From adopted gammas
207BI  G 238        1 2.5    10
207BI cG E$Tentative line, observed in 1969Be47 with I|g=2.5 {I10} and
207BI2cG suggested to be a decay branch from the isomeric state in order to
207BI3cG account for the intensity imbalance. However, the final state at 1863
207BI4cG keV has not been observed.
207BI  L 0.0           9/2-            31.55 Y   4
207BI cL CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#0{-1}{++}
207BI  L 669.52     9 11/2-
207BI cL CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#2{-1}{++}
207BI  G 669.5     1  62     6  M1+E2     +0.24   4     0.052311
207BIS G KC=0.0427 9$LC=0.00728 14$MC=0.00171 3$NC+=0.000536 10
207BIS G NC=0.000436 8$OC=8.92E-5 16$PC=1.061E-5 20
207BI  L 931.78    11 13/2-
207BI cL CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#2{-1}{++}
207BI  G 262.2     1  23     3 M1+E2     -0.03   2     0.671
207BIS G KC=0.547 8$LC=0.0948 14$MC=0.0223 4$NC+=0.00700 10
207BIS G NC=0.00570 8$OC=0.001165 17$PC=0.0001387 20
207BI  G 931.8      2 29     3 E2                      0.00803
207BIS G KC=0.00633 9$LC=0.001299 19$MC=0.000312 5$NC+=9.72E-5 14
207BIS G NC=7.95E-5 12$OC=1.590E-5 23$PC=1.756E-6 25
207BI  L 1240.45   12 13/2-
207BI cL CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#3{-1}{++}
207BI  G 308.6     2  2.5    7 M1(+E2)   -0.03   5     0.429  7
207BIS G KC=0.350 6$LC=0.0605 9$MC=0.01420 21$NC+=0.00446 7
207BIS G NC=0.00363 6$OC=0.000742 11$PC=8.84E-5 13
207BI  G 571.0     1  16     2 M1+E2     -0.20   5     0.0802 17
207BIS G KC=0.0656 14$LC=0.01121 21$MC=0.00263 5$NC+=0.000826 16
207BIS G NC=0.000672 13$OC=0.000137 3$PC=1.63E-5 4
207BI  G 1240.9    7  2.3    5 E2                      0.00464
207BIS G KC=0.00374 6$LC=0.000684 10$MC=0.0001619 23$NC+=5.83E-5 9
207BIS G NC=4.13E-5 6$OC=8.34E-6 12$PC=9.51E-7 14$IPC=7.74E-6 14
207BI cG RI$I|g(delayed)=3 (1978Lo12) and 8 {I5} (1969Be47)
207BI cG M$A{-2}=0.23 {I7}, A{-4}=0.08 {I6}
207BI cG RI$From unweighted average of I|g/I|g(571|g)=0.17 (1978Lo12 prompt
207BI2cG spectrum) and 0.12 (1978Lo12 delayed spectrum). Note that
207BI3cG I|g/I|g(571|g)=0.56 {I14} in 1969Be47
207BI  L 1358.04   18 15/2-
207BI cL CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#3{-1}{++}
207BI  G 117.9     4  2.5    4 M1+E2     -0.06   4     6.36   11
207BIS G KC=5.16 10$LC=0.914 18$MC=0.215 5$NC+=0.0676 14
207BIS G NC=0.0551 11$OC=0.01124 22$PC=0.001334 24
207BI  G 426.1     2  14     2 M1+E2     -0.10   5     0.178  3
207BIS G KC=0.1455 25$LC=0.0250 4$MC=0.00586 9$NC+=0.00184 3
207BIS G NC=0.001500 23$OC=0.000306 5$PC=3.65E-5 6
207BI  L 1645.31   16 15/2-
207BI cL CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(f{-5/2}{+-2}){-3{++}}
207BI  G 288          1      LE [M1]
207BI cG RI$From 1972Ma24; shows the 182 |ms half-life
207BI  G 405.0     2  4.2    8 M1+E2     -0.15   4     0.202  4
207BIS G KC=0.165 3$LC=0.0285 5$MC=0.00669 11$NC+=0.00210 4
207BIS G NC=0.00171 3$OC=0.000349 6$PC=4.16E-5 7
207BI  G 713.5     2  39     4 M1(+E2)   -0.03   4     0.0460
207BIS G KC=0.0377 6$LC=0.00636 9$MC=0.001490 22$NC+=0.000468 7
207BIS G NC=0.000381 6$OC=7.79E-5 11$PC=9.30E-6 14
207BI  G 975.6     4   7     2 E2                      0.00734
207BIS G KC=0.00581 9$LC=0.001167 17$MC=0.000279 4$NC+=8.71E-5 13
207BIS G NC=7.13E-5 10$OC=1.427E-5 20$PC=1.586E-6 23
207BI  L 2101.39   17 21/2+            182 US    6                           M1
207BI cL T$From |g(t) in 1969Be47. Other: 174 |ms {I20} (1967Co20)
207BI cL MOMM1$+3.43 {I4} from g=+0.327 {I4}, weighted average of g=+0.325 {I6}
207BI2cL (1972Ma24) and 0.329 {I5} (1974PrZF)
207BI cL CONF$|p(1h{-9/2}{++1})~#|n(p{-1/2}{+-1},i{-13/2}{+-1}){-6{+-}}
207BI  G 456.1     1  49     5 E3                      0.1395
207BIS G KC=0.0662 10$LC=0.0545 8$MC=0.01436 21$NC+=0.00445 7
207BIS G NC=0.00368 6$OC=0.000702 10$PC=6.32E-5 9
207BI  G 743.30    15 37     4 E3                      0.0335
207BI cG RI$The value I|g=21 of 1978Lo12 (from I|g/I|g(669|g)=0.35)
207BI2cG is inconsistent with spectra of 1972Ma24 and 1979Lo04. The authors'
207BI3cG value may be a misprint. A ratio of 0.55 would give good agreement
207BIS G KC=0.0223 4$LC=0.00844 12$MC=0.00214 3$NC+=0.000666 10
207BIS G NC=0.000548 8$OC=0.0001070 15$PC=1.069E-5 15