199HG    199TL EC DECAY (7.42 H)       1975MA05,1960JU03,1962BA3707NDS    200703
199HG  H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 108, 79 (2007)$CUT=15-Oct-2006$
199HG C  1975Ma05: prepared by 197AU(A,2N), MEASURED EG, IG
199HG C  1960Ju03: prepared by 85-MEV proton irradiation of thallium.
199HG2C  Chem separation of PB followed by mass-separator TL purification, CE
199HG3C  spectra, magnetic spectrometer
199HG C  1962BA37: MEASURED G, GG, GG(T), GG(THETA)
199HG C  Others:
199HG C  G: 1951IS02
199HG C  CE: 1960JU03, 1953BE79
199HG C  GG: 1961GR29
199HG C  GG(T), GG(THETA,H,T): 1961GR29
199HG C  (CE)(CE)(T): 1961RE12
199HG CE TI$Deduced from level scheme, unless otherwise noted
199HG CG           EKC (1975Ma05) given in the table were calculated from
199HG2CG ICE(K)(1960Ju03)/IG(1975Ma05) assuming that the 158.379G is E2 and
199HGxCG KC=0.30
199HG CG E,RI$ From 1975Ma05, unless otherwise noted
199HG CG RI(A)$ G line not seen. Estimated from CE spectra of 1960Ju03 based
199HG2CG on M1 assignment
199HG CG E(B)$ G seen in coincidence spectra only (1975Ma05)
199HG CG E(D)$ From 1960Ju03
199HG CG M(E),MR$ From 'adopted gammas', unless otherwise indicated
199HG CG MR(F)$For possible penetration effect, see comment in 199AU B- decay
199HG CL E$ From least-squares fit to E|g's
199HG CL J$ From 'adopted levels'
199TL  P    0.0       1/2+             7.42 H    8              1488      28
199HG  N  0.124    12 0.124  12 1.0       1.0
199HG CN NR        From intensity balance at each level combined with adopted
199HG2CN IE=48% to GS (1962Ba37). 1962Ba37 do not state explicitly their XK
199HG3CN intensity. Evaluator estimates 10% uncertainty in NR.
199HG PN                                                                     3
199HG  L    0.0       1/2-
199HG  E               0.027 8    48   5   6.54   5              48       5
199HGS E EAV=231 13$CK=0.8015 2$CL=0.14946 25$CM+=0.04846 10
199HG CE TI        from 1962Ba37, |DI(|e+|b{++}) estimated by evaluator
199HG CE IB        no B+ detected (1951Is02);
199HG2CE from theory and Q+, EC/B+ AP 3000. The uncertainty in EC/B+ is large
199HG3CE due to the large uncertainty in Q+.
199HG  L  158.37950 95/2-               2.36 NS    8
199HG CL           G=+0.352 13 from 1977Kr11 IG(THETA,T1/2,h).
199HG CL T$ weighted average of 2.32 NS 8 (1961Gr29,1962Ba37),
199HG2CL 2.53 NS 15 (1961Re12).
199HG  E                          0.4  LT   9.3  GT                0.4    LT 1U?
199HGS E CK=0.7794 10$CL=0.1657 7$CM+=0.0549 3
199HG  G  158.359  25  40     2 E2                       0.914              D
199HGS G KC=  0.296   $LC=  0.461   $MC= 0.1194   $NC+= 0.0374
199HG CG M         K/L=0.6 2, L/M=3.6 4, M/N=4.4 10, L1/L2 LT 0.3, (L1+L2)/L3=
199HG2CG 1.7 3 (1960Ju03)
199HG  L  208.2061610 3/2-
199HG  E                          9.3  17  7.11   9                9.3    17
199HGS E CK=0.7993 5$CL=0.1515 4$CM+=0.04923 13
199HG  G 49.817    15   4.1   2 M1+E2     -0.044 4       11.7               D
199HGF G FLAG=F
199HGS G               LC=   8.92  4$MC=  2.08   1
199HG CG M         L1/L3=61 12, L2/L3=6 2, L/M=4.8 5, M/N=3.1 3, N/O=5 2
199HG2CG (1960Ju03); theory: L1/L3=45 4, L2/L3=5.1 5, L/M=4.29 1
199HG CG RI        calculated from adopted branching ratio
199HG  G 208.20    3   99     5 M1+E2     -0.388 9       0.9374             F
199HGS G KC=0.751 4$  LC=0.142$  MC=0.0334 2$  NC+=0.0106
199HG CG M         EKC=0.8 1 (1975Ma05); K/L=5.1 6, L/M=4.4 5, M/N=4.4 10,
199HG2CG L1/L3=20 10 (1960Ju03).
199HG  L  403.51   3  3/2-
199HG  E                         1.77  23  7.68   7                1.77   23
199HGS E CK=0.7958 7$CL=0.1540 5$CM+=0.05022 18
199HG  G  195.30    5   2.1   2 M1                       1.23
199HGS G KC=  1.007   $LC= 0.1695   $MC= 0.0394   $NC+=0.01262
199HG CG M         K/L=5.3 10 (1960Ju03); EKC=1.0 2 (1975Ma05)
199HG  G  245.1    10 0.3    LE  [M1,E2]                0.43  23            B
199HG  G  403.50    4  13.9  7  M1+E2     +0.32  2      0.157 1
199HGS G KC= 0.1286 12$LC=0.02190 13$MC=0.00510  3$NC+=0.00162
199HG CG M         EKC=0.15 5 (1975Ma05)
199HG  L  413.84   5  5/2-
199HG  E                         0.08  LT   9.6  GT                0.08   LT 1U?
199HGS E CK=0.7684 16$CL=0.1735 12$CM+=0.0580 5
199HG  G   10.4    10            [M1,E2]                         0.08       B  S
199HG CG TI        deduced from 337-KEV coin data (1975Ma05)
199HG  G  205.6    10   0.08  3  [M1,E2]                 0.7  4             B
199HG  G  255.5     1   0.10  3  [M1,E2]                 0.38 20
199HG  G  413.85    8   1.6   2 E2                      0.0437              E
199HGS G KC= 0.0298   $LC=0.01050   $MC=0.00261   $NC+=0.00082
199HG  L  455.462  17 1/2-,3/2-
199HG  E                          29   3   6.42   6               29      3
199HGS E CK=0.7946 7$CL=0.1548 5$CM+=0.05055 20
199HG  G   51.93    6  0.19   6(M1)                      10.12              A
199HGF G FLAG=D
199HGS G               LC=   7.74   $MC=  1.801   $NC+=  0.579
199HG CG M         L1/L3 GT 5, L/M=3 1 (1960Ju03)
199HG  G  247.26    3  75     4M1                        0.637
199HGS G KC=  0.523   $LC= 0.0877   $MC=0.02036   $NC+=0.00650
199HG CG M         K/L=5.4 11, L1/L2 GT 20 (1960Ju03), EKC=0.5 1 (1975Ma05)
199HG CG $ (247G)[50G](158G)(THETA): ISOTROPIC (1962BA37)
199HG CG $ (247G)(208G)(THETA): A2=0.00 1, A4=0.00 1 (1962BA37)
199HG  G  297.07    6   2.8   3 (E2)                    0.1108
199HGS G KC= 0.0651   $LC= 0.0343   $MC=0.00870   $NC+=0.00272
199HG CG M         non observation in CE spectrum of 1960Ju03 excludes a
199HG2CG predominantly M1 transition, decay scheme excludes E1.
199HG  G  455.46    3 100     5 M1                      0.1221
199HGS G KC= 0.1004   $LC=0.01662   $MC=0.00385   $NC+=0.00123
199HG CG M         K/L=5.3 13, L/M=4.0 12 (1960Ju03), EKC=0.12 2 (1975Ma05)
199HG  L  492.297  18 3/2-
199HG  E                          7.3  8   6.98   6                7.3    8
199HGS E CK=0.7937 8$CL=0.1555 6$CM+=0.05080 21
199HG  G   36.83    3  0.09   2 M1                        27.9              A
199HGF G FLAG=D
199HGS G               LC=  21.31   $MC=   4.97
199HG CG M         L1/L2 AP 10, L/M=3 1 (1960Ju03)
199HG  G  284.09    3  17.8   9 M1                       0.435
199HGS G KC=  0.357   $LC= 0.0597   $MC=0.01386   $NC+=0.00442
199HG CG M         K/L=5.8 15 (1960Ju03), EKC=0.39 8 (1975Ma05)
199HG  G  333.93    4  14.2   7 M1+E2     +0.22  2      0.271 2
199HGS G KC= 0.2219 15$LC=0.03760 14$MC=0.00875  3$NC+=0.00279
199HG CG M         K/M GT 16 (1960Ju03), EKC=0.24 5 (1975Ma05)
199HG CG MR$ from A2=-0.42 2, A4=+0.01 2 (1962Ba37)
199HG  G  492.30    4  12.3   6 M1                      0.0994
199HGS G KC= 0.0818   $LC=0.01352   $MC=0.00313   $NC+=0.00100
199HG CG M         EKC=0.06 3 (1975Ma05), no L3 (1953Be79)
199HG  L  750.40   3 1/2-,3/2-
199HG  E                         1.88  20  7.29   6                1.88   20
199HGS E CK=0.7843 15$CL=0.1622 11$CM+=0.0534 5
199HG  G  258.14   11   0.58  6  [M1,E2]                 0.37 20
199HG  G  294.94   10   0.42  4  [M1,E2]                 0.25 14
199HG  G  336.5     1   1.14 11  [M1,E2]                 0.18 10
199HG  G  346.89    8   1.07 11  [M1,E2]                 0.16 9
199HG  G  542.21    5   2.1   2  [M1,E2]                 0.05 3
199HG  G  592.0     1   0.8   3  [M1,E2]                0.040 22            B
199HG  G  750.4     1   8.4   4  [M1,E2]                0.022 11
199HG  L 1221.17   4  1/2(-),3/2(-)
199HG  E                          2.6  3   6.10  14                2.6    3
199HGS E CK=0.699 21$CL=0.223 15$CM+=0.078 6
199HG  G  470.77   13   0.31  6  [M1,E2]                0.07  4
199HG  G  728.86   11   0.36  4  [M1,E2]                0.024 12
199HG  G  765.7     2  0.1   AP  [M1,E2]                0.021 11            B
199HG  G  807.3     1   0.40  4  [M1,E2]                0.019 9
199HG  G  817.67   10   3.3   2  [M1,E2]                0.018 9
199HG  G 1012.95   10  14.2   7  [M1,E2]                0.011 5
199HG  G 1062.8     1   2.0   2  [M1,E2]                0.010 4
199HG  G 1221.16   10   0.24  3  [M1,E2]                0.007 3