199AU 199PT B- DECAY (30.8 M) 2004MI09,1969OK02,1974HEYW07NDS 200703
199AU H TYP=FUL$AUT=BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 108, 79 (2007)$CUT=15-Oct-2006$
199AU c 2004Mi09: measured I|g, emission probability of 543|g
199AU c 1974HeYW: Measured E|g, I|g
199AU c 1970Ba37: Measured E|g, I|g, Ice
199AU c 1969Ok02: Measured E|g, I|g, Ice, |g|g, |g|g(|q)
199AU c 1967Ba45: Measured E|g, I|g, Ice, |b|g, |g|g, |b(ce), |b(ce)(t),
199AU2c (ce)(ce)(t), (ce)|g(t)
199AU c 1966Pr05: Measured E|g, I|g, Ice, |g|g(|q), |g|g(t)
199AU c 1965Bl18: Measured E|g, I|g
199AU c 1964Jo09: measured |g|g, |b|g, |b|g(t)
199AU c 1956Le44: measured |g|g, |b|g
199AU cB Four |b groups resolved (E|b=1690 {I50}, I|b=63%; E|b=1380
199AU2cB {I50}, I|b|?4%; E|b=1140 {I50}, I|b=14%; E|b=900 {I50}, I|b=18%)
199AU3cB (1964Jo09). Also: 1956Le44. However, except for the 1690-keV |b, the
199AU3cB |b's are significant admixtures of decays to several levels.
199AU cG E$From 1974HeYW, unless otherwise noted
199AU cG RI$From 2004Mi09 unless otherwise stated. Weighted average of
199AU2cG values from 1974HeYW and 1969Ok02 are in good agreement with
199AU2cG those in 2004Mi09 for most of the gamma rays, but the values
199AU3cG from 2004Mi09 are adopted here due to the higher precision in this work
199AU cG M$Deduced from |a(K)exp or |a(L)exp ratios for most |g's
199AU2cG (1967Ba45,1970Ba37,1969Ok02,1966Pr05) and from |g|g(|q) of 1969Ok02.
199AU3cG 1967Ba45 normalized |a(K)exp to |a(K)(185.79|g)=0.197 assuming pure E2
199AU4cG transition (adopted |a(K)(185.79|g)=0.205). 1970Ba37 normalized
199AU5cG |a(K)exp to |a(K)(542.98|g)=0.059 {I7} assuming pure M1 transition
199AU6cG (adopted value |a(K)(542.98|g)=0.047 {I16}). However, this
199AU7cG normalization gives good agreement with theoretical |a(K) for other
199AU8cG pure transitions: 185.79|g (E2 from K/L), 191.69|g (E1 from |a(K)exp
199AU9cG of 1967Ba45). 1969Ok02 used other standard sources for calibration.
199AU cG E(A)$Interference from {+197}Au and K x-rays
199AU cG E(B)$Main placement from 792 level established from coin. Possible
199AU2cG placement from 968 level supported only by energy fit; however,
199AU3cG (n,|g) high resolution data do not support the placement from 968
199AU4cG level. Therefore, all the intensity is assigned to placement from
199AU5cG the 792 level
199AU cG E(D)$From 1967Ba45
199AU cG E(F)$From 1969Ok02
199AU cG E(G),RI(G)$|g reported by 1967Ba45 only
199AU cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g's
199AU cL J$From 'adopted levels'.
199AU cL T$From |b|g(t), |g|g(t) (1967Ba45), unless otherwise noted
199PT P 0.0 5/2- 30.8 M 4 1703 3
199AU N 0.1174 7 0.1174 7 1.0 1.0
199AU cN NR,NT$from absolute emission probability=0.1174 {I7} for 543.0|g
199AU2cN (2004Mi09) using 4|p|b-|g coin system. In earlier evaluations
199AU3cN (1994Ar13,1988Sc02), I|g normalization=0.147 {I25} based on
199AU4cN %I|b(g.s.)=63 {I6} (1964Jo09) and |S(I(|g+ce) of |g's to
199AUxcN g.s.)+I|b(g.s.)=100
199AU PN 3
199AU L 0.0 3/2+
199AU B 70.7 12 6.30 1
199AUS B EAV=613.3 13
199AU cB $E|b=1690 {I50}, I|b=63 (1964Jo09)
199AU L 77.170 21 1/2+ 1.3 NS 2
199AU cL T av: 1.46 ns {I12} (1966Pr05), 1.1 ns {I1} (1967Ba63)
199AU B 1.3 LT 8.8 GT 1U?
199AUS B EAV=567.6 12
199AU G 77.20 3 10.2 20 M1+E2 0.22 +6-2 3.5 4 AC
199AUS G LC= 2.6 3$MC= 0.63 7$NC+= 0.197 21
199AU cG E$direct measurement by 1969Ok02, deduced from ce spectra of 1967Ba45
199AU cG RI$average of 9 {I3} (1966Pr05) and 11.5 {I30} (calculated from ce
199AU2cG intensity of 1967Ba45)
199AU cG M,MR$deduced from L1:L2:L3=100:27 {I5}:14 {I4} (1967Ba63)
199AU DG $ ICE(L)=30 (1967Ba45)
199AU L 317.174 24 5/2+ 55 PS LT
199AU B 3.28 7 7.30 1
199AUS B EAV=482.9 13
199AU G 240.01 6 1.10 3 [E2] 0.207
199AUS G KC= 0.109 $LC=0.0737$ MC=0.0187$ NC+=0.00583
199AU G 317.03 4 33.06 11 M1+E2 -0.60 10 0.241 14 C
199AU cG E$poor fit; level-energy difference=317.17
199AUS G KC=0.194 13$ LC= 0.0362 10$ MC= 0.0085 2$ NC+=0.0027 1
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.194 {I15} (1970Ba37), 0.194 {I25} (1967Ba45),
199AU2cG |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02); other: |a(K)exp=0.186 {I23} (1969Ok02); K/L=5.4
199AU3cG {I6} (1969Ok02), 5 {I1} (1966Pr05).
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=6.3 7 (1967Ba45,1970Ba37)
199AU L 323.605 25 3/2+ 35 PS 20
199AU B 1.54 10 7.62 3
199AUS B EAV=480.3 13
199AU G 246.46 3 15.42 7 M1+E2 0.45 LT 0.56 4 C
199AUS G KC=0.45 3$ LC= 0.0792 12$ MC=0.0184 2$ NC+=0.00578 5
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.45 {I4} (1970Ba37); other: |a(K)exp=0.48 {I8}
199AU2cG (1967Ba45), -0.50<|d<0.22 from |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02); K/L=4.5 {I10}
199AUxcG (1966Pr05)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=7.2 9 (1967Ba45), 6.5 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 323.60 6 1.82 3 [M1,E2] 0.18 10
199AUS G KC= 0.14 9$ LC=0.031 7$ MC=0.0073 15$ NC+=0.0023 5
199AU L 493.76 3(7/2)+ 35 PS LT
199AU B 0.37 7 8.03 9
199AUS B EAV=412.0 12
199AU G 170.6 10 0.15 8 [E2] 0.664 G ?
199AUS G KC= 0.253 $LC= 0.308 $MC= 0.0791 $NC+=0.02463
199AU G 176.2 10 0.19 10 [M1,E2] 1.0 5 G ?
199AUS G KC=0.7 5$ LC= 0.24 2$ MC= 0.058 11$ NC+=0.018 3
199AU G 493.75 3 38.04 20 E2 0.0269 C
199AUS G KC=0.0195$ LC=0.00565$ MC=0.00136$ NC+=0.00042
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.019 {I3} (1970Ba37), 0.017 {I3} (1969Ok02), 0.23
199AUxcG {I5} (1967Ba45)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.83 17 (1967Ba45), 0.67 (1970Ba37)
199AU L 542.884 23 5/2+ 30 PS LT
199AU B 12.01 12 6.45 1
199AUS B EAV=392.6 12
199AU G 219.36 4 2.60 4 M1+E2 0.60 10 0.67 4 C
199AUS G KC=0.53 4$ LC= 0.1099 4$ MC=0.0261 1$ NC+=0.00817
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.52 {I5} (1970Ba37)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=1.36 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 225.36 4 1.11 3 M1+E2 0.6 2 0.62 7 C
199AUF G FL=317.174
199AUS G KC=0.49 7$ LC= 0.100 1$ MC=0.0238$ NC+=0.0074
199AU cG E$poor fit; level-energy difference=225.71
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.49 {I6} (1970Ba37)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.54 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 465.76 5 6.2 3 E2 0.0311
199AUS G KC=0.0222 $LC=0.00667 $MC=0.00163 $NC+=0.00051
199AU cG RI$weighted av: 6.2 {I3} (1969Ok02), 6.3 {I5} (1970Ba37), 6.3 {I9}
199AU2cG (1974HeYW), 6.7 {I5} (1967Ba45). 2004Mi09 give
199AUxcG I|g(468.09+465.76)=13.00 {I9}
199AU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.018 {I3} (1970Ba37), <0.03 (1967Ba45)
199AU DG $ Theory: KC(E2)=0.0222, KC(E1)=0.0083, KC(M1)=0.087
199AU DG $ ICE(K)<0.17 (1967Ba45), 0.11 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 542.98 4 100.0 6 M1(+E2) -0.06 +7-10 0.0709 10 C
199AUS G KC=0.0583 9$ LC= 0.00947 11
199AU cG M,MR$from |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02) and |a(K)exp=0.059 {I7} (1970Ba37),
199AU2cG 0.062 {I7} (1969Ok02), 0.062 {I10} (1967Ba45); |d from |g|g(|q); ;
199AU3cG K/L=6 (1966Pr05), 7.3 {I8} (1969Ok02)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=5.75 (normalized,1967Ba45,1970Ba37)
199AU L 548.86 4(11/2)- 0.44 MS 3 M1
199AU2 L %IT=100
199AU cL T$isomeric-state T{-1/2} evaluated from decay of 494|g (1968Bo22)
199AU G 55.15 5 0.106 CA M2+E3 0.11 6 334 40 35.4 5 C
199AUS G L/T=0.735 3$ M/T=0.197 3$ N+/T=0.0642 7
199AU cG E$from ce data (1967Ba45)
199AU cG TI$calculated from intensity balance in the level scheme, no
199AU2cG direct |b{+-} feeding is expected to this level (2U transition).
199AU cG RI$0.106 {I19} from I(|g+ce) and |a. Others: 0.10 {I3} from I(ce(L))
199AU2cG (1967Ba45), |a(L)=247 {I43}; <0.15 from |g spectrum (1967Ba45)
199AU cG M,MR$from L1:L2:L3=100 {I5}:16 {I2}:36 {I5} (1967Ba45)
199AU DG $ ICE(L)=23 (1967Ba45)
199AU L 734.64 3 7/2- 0.36 NS 4
199AU cL $7/2[514] orbital
199AU B 6.36 7 6.45 1
199AUS B EAV=318.1 12
199AU G 185.80 3 23.74 22 E2 0.490 C
199AUS G KC= 0.206$ LC= 0.213$ MC= 0.0546$ NC+=0.0170
199AU cG M$from K/L=1.0 {I2} (1966Pr05), |a(K)exp=0.20 {I2} (1970Ba37)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=5.1 (1967Ba45), 4.3 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 191.69 3 15.04 15 E1 0.0807 C
199AUS G KC= 0.0660$ LC=0.0113 $MC=0.00260$ NC+=0.00080
199AU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.070 {I7} (1970Ba37), 0.051 {I+12-6} (1967Ba45)
199AU cG $(192|g)(543|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.060 {I18}, A{-4}=+0.014 {I24} (1969Ok02)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.79 16 (1967Ba45), 1.04 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 240.9 10 0.4 LT [E1] 0.0459 ?
199AUS G KC= 0.0377 $LC=0.00628 $MC=0.00145 $NC+=0.00044
199AU cG E,RI$observed as weak line in |g and ce spectra (1967Ba45); also:
199AU2cG 1965Bl18
199AU G 417.61 5 2.55 3 [E1] 0.0127 C
199AUS G KC=0.0105$ LC=0.00167$ MC=0.000384$ NC+=0.00012
199AU cG RI$from branching in (n,|g) I|g=1.28 {I6}, possibly a doublet
199AU L 791.760 25 3/2+ 50 PS LT
199AU B 4.26 5 6.53 1
199AUS B EAV=296.4 12
199AU G 298.2 3 0.25 4 [E2] 0.105 DC
199AUS G KC=0.0635$ LC= 0.0315$ MC=0.00792$ NC+=0.00247
199AU cG RI$weighted average of values from 1967Ba45 and 1969Ok02
199AU G 468.09 5 6.8 3 M1(+E2) 0.45 LT 0.098 7 C
199AUS G KC=0.081 5$ LC= 0.0135 7$ MC=0.00311 14$ NC+=0.00098 5
199AU cG RI$weighted average of values from 1969Ok02 and 1974HeYW.
199AU2cG 2004Mi09 give I|g(468.09+465.76)=13.00 {I9}
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.080 {I6} (1970Ba37), 0.079 {I18} (1969Ok02),
199AU2cG 0.081 {I25} (1967Ba45); and |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02)
199AU cG $(468|g)(246|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.109, A{-4}=+0.01 {I3} (1969Ok02)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.58 17 (1967Ba45), 0.54 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 474.68 4 7.79 5 M1+E2 0.12 2 0.0997 4 @C
199AUF G FLAG=B
199AUS G KC= 0.0821 4$ LC=0.0134$ MC=0.00311$ NC+=0.00098
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.090 {I9} (1970Ba37), 0.095 {I20} (1969Ok02), 0.10
199AU2cG {I3} (1967Ba45) and |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02)
199AU cG $(475|g)(317|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.15 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1969Ok02)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.75 19 (1967Ba45), 0.72 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 714.55 4 12.34 8 M1+E2 0.6 LT 0.032 3 C
199AUS G KC=0.026 3$ LC=0.0043 4
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.026 {I5} (1970Ba37); also |g|g(|q) (1969Ok02)
199AU cG $(714|g)(77|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.003 {I18}, A{-4}=-0.044 {I24} (1969Ok02)
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.30 (1970Ba37)
199AU G 791.74 4 7.07 5 M1(+E2) 0.46 LT 0.0253 15
199AUS G KC=0.0205 15$ LC=0.00337 17
199AU cG M,MR$from |a(K)exp=0.023 {I4} (1970Ba37); theory: |a(K)=0.0205 {I15}
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.17 (1970Ba37)
199AU L 822.7 3 1/2+
199AU B 0.084 3 8.60 2 1U
199AUS B EAV=287.6 11
199AU G 505.5 3 0.70 2 [E2] 0.0254 DC
199AUS G KC= 0.0186$ LC=0.00517
199AU L 968.29 4 3/2+,5/2+ 100 PS LT
199AU B 1.037 13 6.82 1
199AUS B EAV=231.0 11
199AU G 425.34 7 1.02 4 [M1,E2] 0.09 5 C
199AUS G KC=0.07 4$ LC=0.014 5$ MC=0.0032 10$ NC+=0.0010 3
199AU G 474.68 4 @ ?
199AUF G FLAG=B
199AU G 644.63 7 0.55 2 [M1,E2] 0.030 15 C
199AUS G KC=0.024 13$ LC=0.0043 17
199AU G 649.8 15 0.063 11 [M1,E2] 0.029 15 F
199AUS G KC=0.024 13$ LC=0.0042 17
199AU G 891.30 15 0.161 6 [M1,E2] 0.014 6 C
199AUS G KC=0.011 5$ LC=0.0019 7
199AU G 968.32 5 6.85 5 (M1,E2) 0.011 5
199AUS G KC=0.009 4$ LC=0.0015 6
199AU cG M$from |a(K)exp=0.010 {I5} (1970Ba37); theory: |a(K)(M1)=0.013,
199AU2cG |a(K)(E1)=0.0020, |a(K)(E2)=0.0050
199AU DG $ ICE(K)=0.069 (1970Ba37)
199AU L 1070.02 14 3/2+,5/2+
199AU B 0.069 3 7.77 2
199AUS B EAV=194.6 11
199AU G 746.4 2 0.182 13 [M1,E2] 0.021 10 C
199AUS G KC=0.017 9$ LC=0.0029 12
199AU G 752.9 2 0.311 16 [M1,E2] 0.020 10 C
199AUS G KC=0.017 9$ LC=0.0029 12
199AU G 992.3 7 0.085 7 [M1,E2] 0.010 5 F
199AUS G KC=0.009 4$ LC=0.0014 6
199AU L 1103.99 13 (3/2,5/2,7/2)(+)
199AU B 0.077 3 7.64 2
199AUS B EAV=182.7 11
199AU G 609.8 6 0.104 12 [M1,E2] 0.034 18 FC
199AUS G KC=0.028 15$ LC=0.0050 20
199AU G 780.5 3 0.205 12 [M1,E2] 0.019 9 C
199AUS G KC=0.015 8$ LC=0.0026 11
199AU G 786.8 2 0.153 12 [M1,E2] 0.018 9 C
199AUS G KC=0.015 7$ LC=0.0026 10
199AU G 1104.0 2 0.182 8 [M1,E2] 0.008 3
199AU L 1159.01 7 (3/2+,5/2+,7/2+)
199AU B 0.086 3 7.46 2
199AUS B EAV=163.7 11
199AU G 665.0 1 0.385 14
199AU G 835.5 1 0.163 10 C
199AU G 842.4 2 0.118 9 C
199AU G 1159.2 5 0.069 5
199AU L 1249.4 3 3/2+,5/2+,7/2+
199AU B 0.0093 6 8.16 3
199AUS B EAV=133.2 10
199AU G 1249.4 3 0.079 5 [M1,E2] 0.006 2
199AU L 1396.22 19 5/2+,7/2+
199AU B 0.0321 13 7.07 2
199AUS B EAV=86.22 93
199AU G 902.0 6 0.070 6 [M1,E2] 0.013 6 FC
199AUS G KC=0.011 5$ LC=0.0018 7
199AU G 1072.7 2 0.137 7 [M1,E2] 0.009 4 C
199AU G 1077.0 14 0.064 5 [M1,E2] 0.009 4 F