196TL 196PB EC DECAY (37 M) 1982HI04,1961SV01 07NDS 200706
196TL H TYP=FUL$AUT=Huang Xiaolong$CIT=NDS 108, 1093 (2007)$CUT=1-Jan-2006$
196TL c Source prepared by {+197}Au({+6}Li,7n), E({+6}Li)=95 MeV (1982Hi04);
196TL2c {+201}Tl(p,6n),{+203}Tl(p,8n) E(p)=120 MeV (1961Sv01).
196TL c Measured E|g, Ir, |g|g-coincidence (1982Hi04); Ice (1961Sv01).
196TL c The decay scheme presented here was constructed by 1982Hi04. The
196TL2c evaluators have noted some of the problems in the comments.
196TL cL E From least-squares fit to E|g's
196TL cL J,T From adopted levels.
196TL cG E From 1982Hi04 except where noted.
196TL2cG |DE=0.5 for E|g|<600 keV; |DE=0.8 for E|g|>800 keV (1982Hi04)
196TL cG RI Relative photon intensity measured by 1982Hi04.
196TL2cG Transition intensities are relative to 253|g in 1961Sv01.
196TL cG M Inferred from comparisons of the experimental conversion
196TL2cG ratios with theoretical values.
196TL cG TI Relative values from measured ce-intensities and theoretical
196TL2cG conversion coefficients for given multipolarity.
196TL cE IE From intensity balance at each level
196PB P 0.0 0+ 37 M 3 2136 19
196PB cP T From 1961Sv01, 1957An53. 1982Hi04 adopted 36.4 min.
196TL N 0.271 150.271 151 1
196TL cN NR calculated from |SI(|g+ce)=100% to g.s., assuming no
196TL2cN (|e+|b{++})-feeding to {+196}Tl g.s.
196TL PN 3
196TL G 608.2 8 ?
196TL cG Seen in |g|g-coincidence (1982Hi04).
196TL L 0.0 2- 1.84 H 3
196TL cL J from 1976Fu06.
196TL cL T from 1960Ju01, 1958An52.
196TL L 191.7 40-
196TL E 0.083 24 11 3 6.37 13 11 3
196TLS E EAV=433.5 84$CK=0.7972 4$CL=0.14734 18$CM+=0.04793 7
196TL G 191.7 5 41 6 E2 0.474 8 C
196TLS G KC=0.187 3$LC=0.215 4$MC=0.0558 10$NC+=0.0165 3
196TL cG M K:L2:L3:M:N=13 {I2}:9 {I2}:6 {I2}:8 {I2}:1.5 {I7} (1961Sv01).
196TL2cG K/L=0.8 {I2}, L2/L3=1.7 {I6}, L/M=2.1 {I8}, M/N=5 {I2} (1961Sv01).
196TL3cG E2 theory: K/L=0.87, L2/L3=1.6
196TL cG ce(K)(191.8)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.13 {I2} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG TI I(|g+ce)=34 {I5} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG M M1 from 1982Hi04.
196TL L 240.0 4(2)-
196TL G 240.0 5 30 5 M1+E2 0.6 LT 0.66 7 C
196TLS G KC=0.53 7$LC=0.098 3$MC=0.0232 5$NC+=0.00709 15
196TL2 G K/L GE 2.8 $ K/L3 GT 60 $ CEK=34 4 $ CEL LE 12 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(240.3)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.34 {I4} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG TI I(|g+ce)=31 {I4} (1961Sv01).
196TL L 253.1 4 1-
196TL cL J the relatively strong feeding to this level suggests
196TL2cL J|p=(1-).
196TL E 0.08 3 13 5 6.27 17 13 5
196TLS E EAV=406.5 86$CK=0.7981 3$CL=0.14788 17$CM+=0.04813 6
196TL cE If J|p=1-, |e/|b{++}>100 (1979Ha41).
196TL G 253.1 5 100 8 M1 0.625 C
196TLS G KC=0.512 8$LC=0.0867 13$MC=0.0202 3$NC+=0.00620 10
196TL2 G K/L=5.4 9 $L/M=5 3 $CEK=100 $ CEL=18 4 $
196TLx G CEM=3.5 10 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG M M1 theory: K/L=5.90, L/M=4.3; E1 theory: K/L=5.87, L/M=4.3.
196TL L 366.5 5 1-
196TL E 0.087 16 25 4 5.93 8 25 4
196TLS E EAV=356.7 87$CK=0.7992 2$CL=0.14883 16$CM+=0.04848 6
196TL G 113 1 1.0 4 [M1] 6.06 18 ?
196TLS G KC=4.95 15$LC=0.85 3$MC=0.199 6$NC+=0.0608 18
196TL cG ce(K)(113)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.10 {I3} (1961Sv01).
196TL3 G CEK=10 3 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG E from 1961Sv01 only.
196TL cG E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators.
196TL G 126 1 7.6 17[M1] 4.44 12
196TLS G KC=3.63 10$LC=0.622 17$MC=0.145 4$NC+=0.0445 12
196TL3 G CEK=6 2 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(126)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.06 {I2} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG E from 1961Sv01 only.
196TL cG RI From I(|g+ce)/(1+|a) and I(|g+ce) required for intensity
196TL2cG balance at 240 level.
196TL G 175 2 2.9 12[M1] 1.75 7 ?
196TLS G KC=1.43 6$LC=0.244 9$MC=0.0570 21$NC+=0.0174 7
196TL3 G CEK=8 3 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(175)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.08 {I3} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG E from 1961Sv01 only.
196TL cG E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators.
196TL G 366.5 5 41 6 M1 0.228
196TLS G KC=0.187 3$LC=0.0314 5$MC=0.00732 11$NC+=0.00224 4
196TL cG M K/L>5, ce(K)=18 {I6} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG ce(K)(366.6)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.18 {I6} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG TI I(|g+ce)=38 {I12} (1961Sv01).
196TL L 493.9 4 1-
196TL E 0.019 4 11.5 21 6.20 9 11.5 21
196TLS E EAV=300.4 85$CK=0.7996$CL=0.14987 16$CM+=0.04887 6
196TL G 127 1 0.9 4 [M1] 4.34 12 ?
196TLS G KC=3.55 10$LC=0.608 17$MC=0.142 4$NC+=0.0435 12
196TL3 G CEK=6 2 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(127)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.06 {I2} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG E from 1961Sv01 only.
196TL cG E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators.
196TL G 241 2 3.5 10[M1] 0.716 20 ?
196TLS G KC=0.586 16$LC=0.099 3$MC=0.0232 7$NC+=0.00710 20
196TL3 G CEK=4 1 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(241)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.04 {I1} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG E from 1961Sv01 only.
196TL cG E,RI$|DE, I{-|g} estimated from 1961Sv01 by evaluators.
196TL G 302.2 5 14 4 M1 0.384 C
196TLS G KC=0.315 5$LC=0.0531 8$MC=0.01240 19$NC+=0.00380 6
196TL3 G CEK=1.2 5 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(302)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.012 {I5} (1961Sv01).
196TL G 493.9 5 21 4 M1 0.1027
196TLS G KC=0.0844 12$LC=0.01406 20$MC=0.00327 5$NC+=0.001003 15
196TL3 G CEK=4 2 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(494)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.04 {I2} (1961Sv01).
196TL cG TI I(|g+ce)=17 {I9} (1961Sv01).
196TL L 755.2 5(1-)
196TL cL Based on strong coincidence between 502|g and 253|g.
196TL2cL Fast 1U |b transition (1982Hi04).
196TL E 0.0056 16 33 4 5.58 7 33 4
196TLS E EAV=182.6 88$CK=0.7979 3$CL=0.15218 19$CM+=0.04975 8
196TL G 502.1 5 98 8 (M1) 0.0984 C
196TLS G KC=0.0808 12$LC=0.01345 20$MC=0.00313 5$NC+=0.000959 14
196TL cG This is the same |g-ray as 503|g (1961Sv01).
196TL2 G K/L=5 2 $ CEK=21 2 $ CEL=4 2 (1961Sv01)
196TL cG ce(K)(503)/ce(K)(253.2)=0.21 {I2} (1961Sv01).
196TL G 515.2 5 5.0 25(M1) 0.0919 C
196TLS G KC=0.0755 11$LC=0.01256 18$MC=0.00293 5$NC+=0.000896 13
196TL G 755.2 8 7 3 (M1) 0.0339
196TLS G KC=0.0279 4$LC=0.00458 7$MC=0.001066 16$NC+=0.000326 5
196TL L 954.1 5(1-)
196TL E 7.0 15 6.11 10 7.0 15
196TLS E CK=0.7949 4$CL=0.1544 3$CM+=0.05064 11
196TL G 701.0 8 7 3 (M1) 0.0411 C
196TLS G KC=0.0338 5$LC=0.00557 8$MC=0.001296 19$NC+=0.000397 6
196TL G 714.1 8 3.0 15(M1) 0.0391 C
196TLS G KC=0.0322 5$LC=0.00531 8$MC=0.001234 18$NC+=0.000378 6
196TL G 954.1 8 15 4 (M1) 0.0186
196TLS G KC=0.01531 22$LC=0.00250 4$MC=0.000580 9$NC+=0.000178 3