193TL 193PB EC DECAY (5.8 M) 1976HA25 17NDS 201709
193TL H TYP=FUL$AUT=M. Shamsuzzoha Basunia$CIT=NDS 143, 1 (2017)$
193TL2 H CUT=31-Mar-2017$
193TL C 1976Ha25: sources from bombardment of natural tungsten by
193TL2C {+16}O, mass separation; measured E|g, I|g (Ge(Li)), |g|g coin.
193TL C Others: 1974Ne16, 1961An03.
193TL CE All log| {Ift} information was calculated with Q(|e)=5120
193TL2CE {I120}, E(365+x, {+193}Tl)=365 and E(5.8 min, {+193}Pb)=100.
193TL CG M,MR$From adopted |g's, unless otherwise noted
193TL CL The decay scheme shown is from 1976Ha25 and is based on
193TL2CL |g|g coincidences. The authors state that the results should be
193TL3CL considered preliminary. The proposed level scheme agrees with
193TL4CL the scheme obtained from (HI,xn|g).
193TL cL 1976Ha25 state that the intensity of the 365.0|g (100 on
193TL2cL the I|g scale) is that of the 5.8 min activity ({+193}Pb 23/2+ state)
193TL3cL and from that deduce that 70% of the |e+|b{++} decay goes directly
193TL4cL to the 2.11 min, 365+x level. (they do not state whether this intensity
193TL5cL is the measured intensity, or intensity corrected for transient
193TL6cL equilibrium conditions). However, a 70% |e+|b{++} branch to the 365+x
193TL7cL level would give log| {If{+1u}t}=7.6 (expected log| {If{+1u}t}|>8.5).
193TL8cL This could be explained by: 1) an anomalous log| {If{+1u}t} value or
193TL9cL 2) the |e+|b{++} transition is not 1U (either
193TLAcL J|p({+193}Pb (5.8 min)|=(13/2+) or J|p({+193}Tl (2.11 min)|=9/2-)).
193TLBcL None of these explanations is really acceptable. Another
193TLCcL possible explanation for such high I|g(365) is that the {+193}Pb 3/2-
193TLDcL level has T{-1/2}|?5.8 min (this activity has not been seen)
193TLEcL and that the source contained both activities. With similar T{-1/2} it
193TLFcL would be difficult to distinguish between the two decays.
193TL CL J$From Adopted Levels
193TL CL BAND(A)$9/2(505) Band
193TL DG CC$FROM BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
193TL C Sum of decay energies of this dataset is 5157 keV {I195} cf.
193TL2C 5280 keV {I5} obtained from 28NE B- DECAY ^Q(g.s.) and branching.
193PB P 0.0+X (13/2+) 5.8 M 2 5280 50
193PB CP E Level energy 130 keV {I80} in 2017Au03 from systematics.
193TL N 3.3 3.3 1.00 1.0
193TL CN NR$From |SI(|g+ce)(to 365+x level)=95 {I5}. From
193TL2CN log| {If{+1u}t}>8.5, I(|e+|b{++})(to 365+x level) < 10%
193TL PN 5
193TL L 0.0 1/2(+) 21.6 M 8
193TL L 365.0 3/2(+)
193TL G 365.0 M1+E2 1.7 +5-4 0.106 20
193TLS G KC=0.079 17$LC=0.0209 17$MC=0.0051 4
193TLS G NC=0.00129 10$OC=0.000239 20$PC=1.7E-5 3
193TL CG RI |g follows an isomeric transition with T=2.11 min and
193TL2CG %IT|<75%. The equilibrium status of the source is not known. Therefore,
193TL2CG I|g of this |g cannot be compared with I|g of the other |g's in the
193TL3CG decay scheme. 1976Ha25 give I|g=100
193TL CG M,MR$from {+193}Tl ^IT decay (2.11 min).
193TL L 365.0+X (9/2-) 2.11 M 15 AM
193TL CL %IT|<75, from 193TL ^IT decay (2.11 min) (1976GoZP)
193TL CL T$from {+193}Tl ^IT decay (2.11 min) (1963Di10).
193TL E 2.2 LT 7.8 LT 8.5 GT 10 LT 1U
193TLS E EAV=1695 63$CK=0.632 16$CL=0.115 4$CM+=0.0374 11
193TL CE TI from log| {If{+1u}t}>8.5 for a 13/2+ to 9/2- transition
193TL G X [E3] S
193TL CG E E|g<13 keV from {+193}Tl ^IT decay (2.11 min)
193TL L 757.2+X (11/2-) A
193TL E 8.3 15.7 6.2 24
193TLS E EAV=1564 66$CK=0.531 22$CL=0.094 4$CM+=0.0304 13
193TL G 392.2 20.7 M1+E2 -0.59 14 0.154 13
193TLS G KC=0.124 11$LC=0.0228 12$MC=0.0054 3
193TLS G NC=0.00136 7$OC=0.000261 14$PC=2.33E-5 18
193TL L 1081.5+X (13/2-) A
193TL E 8.5 21.5 6.0 30
193TLS E EAV=1418 65$CK=0.580 22$CL=0.103 4$CM+=0.0333 13
193TL G 324.3 2.5 M1+E2 0.6 4 0.26 6
193TLS G KC=0.21 5$LC=0.039 5$MC=0.0093 9
193TLS G NC=0.00234 22$OC=0.00045 5$PC=3.9E-5 8
193TL G 716.5 6.7 E2 0.01248
193TLS G KC=0.00961 14$LC=0.00218 3$MC=0.000526 8
193TLS G NC=0.0001323 19$OC=2.48E-5 4$PC=1.93E-6 3
193TL L 1163.7+X
193TL CL Level not confirmed by (HI,xn|g) data
193TL E 2.4 6.6 6.5 9
193TLS E EAV=1381 65$CK=0.592 22$CL=0.105 4$CM+=0.0340 13
193TL G 406.5 2.4
193TL CG 406.6G placed from 1900.2+X level in (HI,xn|g) data
193TL L 1423.4+X
193TL E 1.5 5.5 6.5 7
193TLS E EAV=1264 65$CK=0.631 22$CL=0.112 4$CM+=0.0363 13
193TL G 666.2 2.0
193TL L 1493.2+X (13/2-)
193TL CL J$From Adopted Levels
193TL E 3.1 11.9 6.1 15
193TLS E EAV=1233 65$CK=0.641 21$CL=0.114 4$CM+=0.0370 13
193TL G 736.1 5.1 E1 0.00425
193TLS G KC=0.00354 5$LC=0.000545 8$MC=0.0001257 18
193TLS G NC=3.16E-5 5$OC=6.08E-6 9$PC=5.45E-7 8
193TL L 1513.0+X (15/2-) A
193TL E 2.2 8.8 6.2 11
193TLS E EAV=1224 65$CK=0.644 21$CL=0.115 4$CM+=0.0371 13
193TL G 431.5 0.8 M1(+E2) 0.094 54
193TLS G KC=0.074 47$LC=0.0149 53$MC=0.0036 12
193TLS G NC=9.0E-4 29$OC=1.71E-4 61$PC=1.44E-5 75
193TL G 755.8 2.6 E2 0.01115
193TLS G KC=0.00866 13$LC=0.00190 3$MC=0.000457 7
193TLS G NC=0.0001149 16$OC=2.16E-5 3$PC=1.709E-6 24
193TL L 1870.7+X
193TL E 0.29 1.71 6.8 2
193TLS E EAV=1065 65$CK=0.692 19$CL=0.124 4$CM+=0.0401 12
193TL G 1113.5 0.6
193TL L 1960.0+X (15/2-)
193TL CL J$From Adopted Levels
193TL E 0.26 1.74 6.8 2
193TLS E EAV=1025 64$CK=0.703 18$CL=0.126 4$CM+=0.0408 12
193TL G 466.7 1.2 LTM1 0.1194
193TLS G KC=0.0981 14$LC=0.01636 23$MC=0.00381 6
193TLS G NC=0.000962 14$OC=0.000187 3$PC=1.772E-5 25