190OS 190IR EC DECAY (3.087 H) 1964HA06 20NDS 202011
190OS H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh,{+1} and Jun Chen{+2}$CIT=NDS 169, 1 (2020)$
190OS2 H CUT=15-Oct-2020$
190OS c 1964Ha06: The 3.1-h isomer of {+190}Ir produced by proton irradiation
190OS2c of enriched {+190}Os at ORNL. Conversion electrons were analyzed with
190OS3c photographic-recording, permanent-magnet spectrographs. Measured E(ce),
190OS4c I(ce). Deduced conversion sub-shell ratios.
190OS c Others:
190OS c |g: 1958Sc30, 1955At32, 1960Ka14, 1959Ni30, 1958Di44
190OS c |g|g: 1955At32
190OS c ce: 1958Di44
190OS c T{-1/2} and production: 1996Ga30, 1970Bo22, 1963Gr22, 1950Ch11
190OS c |g(|q,H,t): 1987Be54
190OS c Absolute K| x ray(Os) measurement: 1987Re05 (% K|a{-2}| x
190OS2c ray=27 {I4}, % K|a{-1}| x ray=47 {I4}). Other: 1955At32
190OS c %|e branching: 1996Ga30
190OS cG $Quoted values of conversion-line intensities from 1960Ha06 under
190OS2cG comments (including those given in sub-shell ratios) are normalized to
190OS3cG 100 for 502.6|g ce(K) line. A 15% uncertainty has been assigned
190OS4cG according to a general statement in 1964Ha06
190OS cG E$From energies of conversion electrons in 1964Ha06. Estimated
190OS2cG |DE|g=0.1 keV (evaluator)
190OS cG RI$100/(1+|a)
190OS cG M,MR$From ce data in 1964Ha06, recommended in the Adopted Gammas
190OS cG E(A)$Weak |g reported by 1955At32 only
190OS cG E(B)$Composite line in ce data (1964Ha06)
190OS cL E$From E|g data, assuming |DE|g=0.1 keV.
190OS cL J,T$From the Adopted Levels
190IR P 376.4 1 (11)- 3.087 H 12 1954.2 12
190IR cP J,T$From {+190}Ir Adopted Levels. T{-1/2} is adopted from 1996Ga30
190IR2cP in this study. Others from decay study: 3.25 h {I20} (1970Bo22), 3.0 h
190IR3cP {I2} (1963Gr22), 3.2 h {I2} (1950Ch11)
190IR cP QP$From 2017Wa10.
190OS N 1 1 0.914 2 1.095
190OS cN BR$%|e=91.4 {I2} (1996Ga30). Other: 94.4 {I8} (1964Ha06)
190OS PN 1.0 3
190OS G 116.7 1 B
190OS cG $I(ce(K))=95 {I14} (1964Ha06)
190OS G 206.6 1 B
190OS cG $I(ce(K))=35 {I5} (1964Ha06)
190OS G 920 A ?
190OS G 1090 A ?
190OS L 0.0 0+
190OS L 186.7 1 2+
190OS G 186.7 70.2 E2 0.420 100
190OSS G KC=0.203 3$LC=0.1642 23$MC=0.0415 6
190OSS G NC=0.00997 14$OC=0.001503 21$PC=1.88E-5 3
190OS cG $K:L2:L3:M=875 131:375 56:275 41:220 33 (1964Ha06)
190OS L 547.90 154+
190OS G 361.2 94.9 E2 0.0535 100
190OSS G KC=0.0370 6$LC=0.01254 18$MC=0.00307 5
190OSS G NC=0.000741 11$OC=0.0001168 17$PC=3.81E-6 6
190OS cG $K:L2:L3=215 32:50 8:15 2 (1964Ha06)
190OS L 1050.40 18 6+
190OS G 502.5 1 97.79 4 E2 0.0225 100
190OSS G KC=0.01693 24$LC=0.00426 6$MC=0.001023 15
190OSS G NC=0.000248 4$OC=4.01E-5 6$PC=1.80E-6 3
190OS cG $K:L1=100:23 4 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $ce(L) line partially resolved (1964Ha06)
190OS L 1666.90 20 8+
190OS G 616.5 98.6 E2 0.01386 100
190OSS G KC=0.01079 16$LC=0.00236 4$MC=0.000558 8
190OSS G NC=0.0001354 19$OC=2.22E-5 4$PC=1.155E-6 17
190OS cG $K:L1=62 9:13 2 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $ce(L) line partially resolved (1964Ha06)
190OS L 1705.80 22(10)- 9.86 M 3 M
190OS2 L MOMM1=-0.56 +8-12 (1987Be54)
190OS cL MOMM1$from 616|g(|q,H,t) (1987Be54)
190OS E 91.4 2 4.94 1 91.4 2
190OSS E CK=0.7910 $CL=0.15817 19 $CM+=0.05082 7
190OS cE IE$from 1996Ga30. Other: 94.4 {I8} (1964Ha06)
190OS G 38.9 1 0.081 3 M2+E3 0.10 2 1.23E3 11 100
190OSS G LC=9.1E2 8$MC=247 23
190OSS G NC=61 6$OC=9.8 8$PC=0.452 7
190OS cG E$transition seen in ce data only (1964Ha06). Uncertainty
190OS2cG estimated by evaluators
190OS cG MR$deduced from L1:L2:L3:M in 1964Ha06 by evaluators using the
190OS2cG BrIccMixing code. 1964Ha06 give mult=M2
190OS2 G (L1+L2)/L3=1.9 4 $ M/L=0.36 4 $ N/L=0.11 3 (1958Sc30)
190OS cG $L1:L2:L3:M=1200 {I180}:270 {I41}:750 {I113}:750 {I113} (1964Ha06)