190OS 190IR EC DECAY (11.78 D) 1974YA02,1964HA06 20NDS 202011
190OS H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh,{+1} and Jun Chen{+2}$CIT=NDS 169, 1 (2020)$
190OS2 H CUT=15-Oct-2020$
190OS c 1974Ya02 (also 1974YaZU): {+190}Ir ions were produced by the (d,|a)
190OS2c reaction with natural osmium bombarded with a 18 MeV deuteron
190OS3c beam from the ANL 152-cm cyclotron. |g rays were detected with Ge(Li)
190OS4c detectors. Measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin, |g(t). Deduced T{-1/2} of
190OS5c g.s. and isomer.
190OS c 1964Ha06: The 11.1-d isomer of {+190}Ir produced by proton irradiation
190OS2c of enriched {+190}Os at ORNL. Conversion electrons were analyzed with
190OS3c photographic-recording, permanent-magnet spectrographs. Measured E(ce),
190OS4c I(ce). Deduced conversion sub-shell ratios.
190OS c Others:
190OS c |g: 1969Ya03, 1969Sa18, 1969Ha44, 1967Sy02, 1960Ka14,
190OS2c 1959Ni30, 1958Di44, 1955At32, 1954NiZZ, 1969TeZZ, 1947Go01
190OS c |g|g: 1969Ya03
190OS c ce: 1969Ya03, 1969Sa18, 1967Sy02, 1966Sy01, 1960Ka14, 1959Ni30
190OS c |g|g(|q): 1974He08, 1971Kr01 (also 1970KrZW), 1969Ya03
190OS c ce|g(|q), ce-ce(|q): 1969Sa18, 1965Ya01, 1963Ya01, 1958Ca18
190OS c |g|g(|q,H): 1970Le04 (also 1970LeZZ)
190OS c |g(|q,t) (oriented nuclei): 1983Al15, 1980Mu07
190OS c T{-1/2}({+190}Ir): 1975Ba35, 1969Sa18, 1963Gr22, 1960Ka14,
190OS2c 1955At32, 1950Ch11, 1947Go01, 1970Bo22, 1969TeZZ
190OS c |b{++}: 1950Ch11
190OS cG $The A{-2} and A{-4} coefficients in |g|g(|q) are from
190OS2cG 1974He08, unless otherwise stated. The A{-2} coefficients
190OS3cG in |g(|q,t) are from 1983Al15
190OS cG $The following weak transitions, reported by 1964Ha06 in ce
190OS2cG data are omitted for lack of confirmation in |g-ray data of 1974Ya02:
190OS3cG 90.5, 100.0, 137.8, 182.1, 251.4, 402.4, 449.5, 462.5, 472.5, 750.7,
190OS4cG 772.2, 801.2, 826.5, 833.2, 836.5, 925.5, 932.7, 1078.7, 1110.4,
190OS5cG 1115.8, 1130.7, 1184.4, 1233.7, 1313.8, 1329.3, 1338.8, 1390.9, 1402.6,
190OS6cG 1414.0, 1436.7, 1463.7, 1473.4, 1482.4, 1516.9, 1525.0,
190OS7cG 1534.5, 1543.4, 1584.2, 1605.6, 1677.3, 1685.1, 1700.1, 1710.9
190OS cG $The following |g rays reported by 1969Ya03 are probably
190OS2cG due to impurities: 137.8, 147.0, 217.0, 272.0, 334.0, 344.0,
190OS3cG 375.2, 449.5, 482.5
190OS cG $Absolute K| x ray(Os) measurement: 1987Re05 (% K|a{-2}| x
190OS2cG ray=26.1 {I13}, % K|a{-1}| x ray=45.0 {I23})
190OS cG E,RI$From 1974Ya02, unless otherwise stated. Energy values in 1974Ya02
190OS2cG are obtained by the authors from weighted averages when possible from
190OS3cG their measurements of {+190}Ir |e decay (11.78 d) and {+190}Re |b{+-}
190OS4cG decay (3.2 h and 3.1 min). Conversion electron intensities from
190OS5cG 1964Ha06 are given under comments (including those given in sub-shell
190OS6cG ratios), normalized to 1100 for the ce(L3) line of 186.7|g. A 15%
190OS7cG uncertainty has been assigned to I(ce) according to a general statement
190OS8cG in 1964Ha06
190OS cG M$Deduced by evaluators from sub-shell ratios of conversion electron
190OS2cG intensities in 1964Ha06 where available under comments, and otherwise
190OS3cG from |a(exp) deduced from I|g of 1974Ya02 and I(ce(K)) of 1964Ha06
190OS4cG where no sub-shell ratios are available, and |g(|q) and/or |g|g(|q)
190OS5cG data. The |a(exp) values are deduced by evaluators by normalizing
190OS6cG I(ce(K))/I|g to |a(K)=0.203 {I3} (from BrIcc) for 186.7|g, giving a
190OS7cG normalization factor of 0.0133 {I21}. The same multipolarities are
190OS8cG recommended in the Adopted Gammas.
190OS cG MR$From |g|g(|q) in 1974He08, |g(|q) in 1983Al15, and ce data in
190OS2cG 1964Ha06. The same values are recommended in the Adopted Gammas.
190OS cE IE$From I(|g+ce) imbalance at each level.
190OS cL $Levels reported at 1781.7, 1886.8, 1963.9 by 1964Ha06
190OS2cL have been discarded for lack of confirmation by later studies.
190OS3cL The transitions reported with these levels have either not been
190OS4cL seen in |g-ray studies or have been assigned to different levels
190OS cL E$From a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies
190OS cL J$From the Adopted Levels
190OS cL J(A)$|g(|q) and/or |g|g(|q) results support adopted spin assignments
190IR P 0 4- 11.78 D 10 1954.2 12
190IR cP J,T$From {+190}Ir Adopted Levels
190IR cP QP$From 2017Wa10
190OS N 0.216 7 1 1
190OS cN NR$From |S(I(|g+ce) to g.s.)=100
190OS PN 3
190OS G 248.2 3 0.53 9
190OS G 394.5 4 0.19 7 (M1) 0.1239
190OS2 G EKC AP 0.14
190OS cG $|a(K) exp from I(ce(K))|?=2 in 1964Ha06
190OSS G KC=0.1028 15$LC=0.01629 24$MC=0.00373 6
190OSS G NC=0.000911 13$OC=0.0001575 23$PC=1.180E-5 17
190OS cG M$from |a(K)exp
190OS G 731.1 4 0.16 5
190OS L 0.0 0+
190OS L 186.69 4 2+ A
190OS2 L MOMM1=0.54 6 (1970Le04)
190OS cL MOMM1$from integral perturbed angular correlation (IPAC) in 1970Le04.
190OS E 0.03 2 5 3 9.1 3 5 3 1U?
190OSS E EAV=353.06 53$CK=0.8098$CL=0.1409$CM+=0.04433
190OS cE $The existence of this branch is simply from I(|g+ce) imbalance at
190OS2cE 187 level which however could be also due to possible missing
190OS3cE transitions to 187 level, and therefore is questionable.
190OS G 186.68 4 230 9 E2 0.420 C
190OSS G KC=0.203 3$LC=0.1642 23$MC=0.0415 6
190OSS G NC=0.00997 14$OC=0.001504 21$PC=1.88E-5 3
190OS cG $K:L2:L3=3500 525:1500 225:1100 165 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.075 {I6} (1983Al15)
190OS L 547.88 5 4+ A
190OS2 L MOMM1=0.88 48 (1970Le04)
190OS cL MOMM1$from integral perturbed angular correlation (IPAC) in 1970Le04.
190OS G 361.09 5 57.1 17E2 0.0535 C
190OSS G KC=0.0370 6$LC=0.01255 18$MC=0.00307 5
190OSS G NC=0.000742 11$OC=0.0001169 17$PC=3.82E-6 6
190OS2 G EKC=0.043 10
190OS cG $K:L3=185 28:13 2 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.33 {I3} (1983Al15)
190OS L 557.93 5 2+ A
190OS G 371.24 5 100 E2+M1 -8.1 8 0.0510 C
190OSS G KC=0.0359 6$LC=0.01151 17$MC=0.00281 4
190OSS G NC=0.000679 10$OC=0.0001074 16$PC=3.73E-6 7
190OS2 G EKC=0.042 9
190OS cG $K:M:N=315 47:23 4:7.5 11 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG M$1964Ha06 gives mult=E2
190OS cG MR$weighted average of -13 {I6} (1983Al15), -12 {I+3-5}, -7.5 {I+20-40}
190OS2cG (1974He08), -8.5 {I10} (1971Kr01), -6.5 {I13} (1969Sa18), -14 {I6}
190OS3cG (1965Ya01). Other: 1.9<|d<4.0 from K:M:N in (1964Ha06) (using
190OS4cG BrIccMixing)
190OS cG $(371|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.01 {I2}, A{-4}=+0.28 {I3} (1974He08).
190OS2cG Others: 1971Kr01, 1969Sa18 and 1965Ya01 (|g,ce(|q))
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.14 {I4} (1983Al15)
190OS G 557.95 7 132 4 E2 0.01748 C
190OSS G KC=0.01340 19$LC=0.00312 5$MC=0.000745 11
190OSS G NC=0.000181 3$OC=2.94E-5 5$PC=1.430E-6 20
190OS2 G EKC=0.021 5
190OS cG $|a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=210 {I32} in 1964Ha06
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.387 {I20} (1983Al15)
190OS L 755.92 5 3+ A
190OS G 198.08 20 8.5 10E2+M1 -9 +2-5 0.349 7 C
190OSS G KC=0.180 5$LC=0.1277 19$MC=0.0321 5
190OSS G NC=0.00773 12$OC=0.001171 18$PC=1.70E-5 6
190OS2 G EKC=0.137 34
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=87 {I13} in 1964Ha06.
190OS2cG 1964Ha06 gives mult=E2
190OS cG MR$from (198|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.32 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.02 {I4}
190OSxcG (1974He08)
190OS G 207.91 6 5.2 7 E2(+M1) -16 +5-20 0.293 @C
190OSS G KC=0.155 3$LC=0.1045 15$MC=0.0263 4
190OSS G NC=0.00632 9$OC=0.000959 14$PC=1.47E-5 3
190OS2 G EKC=0.133 34
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=67 {I10} in 1964Ha06 and
190OS2cG I|g=6.7 {I9} for the doublet (1974Ya02). 1964Ha06 gives mult=E2
190OS cG MR$from (208|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.07 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.17 {I4}
190OSxcG (1974He08)
190OS G 569.30 7 125 4 E2+M1 -9.8 10 0.0169925 C
190OSS G KC=0.01310 20$LC=0.00298 5$MC=0.000709 10
190OSS G NC=0.0001720 25$OC=2.81E-5 4$PC=1.401E-6 21
190OS2 G EKC=0.0192 42
190OS cG $K:N=180 27:11 2 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG M$1964Ha06 gives mult=E2
190OS cG MR$weighted average of -8.1 {I+13-21} (1983Al15), -11.5 {I15}
190OS2cG (1974He08),-9.0 {I15} (1971Kr01), -14 {I14} (1965Ya01)
190OS cG $(569|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.282 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I2}
190OS2cG (1974He08). Others: 1971Kr01, 1965Ya01 (|g,ce(|q))
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.06 {I3} (1983Al15)
190OS L 955.24 5 4+ A
190OS E 5.1 8 8.60 7 5.1 8
190OSS E CK=0.8048$CL=0.14820 2$CM+=0.047041 8
190OS G 199.3 3 1.0 3 E2 0.336 C
190OSS G KC=0.1712 25$LC=0.1246 20$MC=0.0314 5
190OSS G NC=0.00755 12$OC=0.001143 18$PC=1.604E-5 24
190OS2 G EKC=0.133 52
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=10 {I2} in 1964Ha06
190OS G 397.36 6 28.7 9 E2 0.0412 C
190OSS G KC=0.0293 5$LC=0.00904 13$MC=0.00220 3
190OSS G NC=0.000532 8$OC=8.44E-5 12$PC=3.05E-6 5
190OS2 G EKC=0.034 8
190OS cG $K:L3=74 11:4.2 6 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $(397|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.10 {I2}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I4} (1974He08)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.344 {I20} (1983Al15)
190OS G 407.22 6 20 3 E2+M1 -3.4 +6-9 0.045 3 @C
190OSS G KC=0.0330 23$LC=0.0089 3$MC=0.00214 6
190OSS G NC=0.000517 14$OC=8.3E-5 3$PC=3.5E-6 3
190OS2 G EKC=0.035 8
190OS cG $K:L3:M:N=330 50:17.5 26:23 4:5.5 8 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $|a(K)exp from I|g=125 {I6} for the doublet (1974Ya02)
190OS cG MR$from (407|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6}
190OS2cG (1974He08)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.255 {I39} for doublet (1983Al15)
190OS G 768.57 8 9.7 4 E2 0.00853 C
190OSS G KC=0.00682 10$LC=0.001318 19$MC=0.000309 5
190OSS G NC=7.50E-5 11$OC=1.250E-5 18$PC=7.32E-7 11
190OS2 G EKC=0.0124 34
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=9 {I2} in 1964Ha06.
190OS2cG No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.386 {I32}
190OS L 1050.40 9 6+ A
190OS G 502.55 8 5.5 3 E2 0.0225 C
190OSS G KC=0.01693 24$LC=0.00426 6$MC=0.001022 15
190OSS G NC=0.000248 4$OC=4.00E-5 6$PC=1.80E-6 3
190OS2 G EKC=0.032 7
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=13 {I2} in 1964Ha06.
190OS2cG No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06
190OS cG $(503|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.12 {I4}, A{-4}=+0.04 {I6} (1974He08)
190OS L 1163.11 5 4+ A
190OS E 25 3 7.69 6 25 3
190OSS E CK=0.7989$CL=0.15244 4$CM+=0.04864 2
190OS G 207.91 6 1.5 5 (E2) 0.291 @C
190OSS G KC=0.1533 22$LC=0.1045 15$MC=0.0263 4
190OSS G NC=0.00632 9$OC=0.000959 14$PC=1.446E-5 21
190OS2 G EKC=0.133 34
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=67 {I10} in 1964Ha06 and
190OS2cG I|g=6.7 {I9} for the doublet (1974Ya02).
190OS G 407.22 6 105 5 E2+M1 -2.6 +8-14 0.048 8 @C
190OSS G KC=0.036 8$LC=0.0092 8$MC=0.00220 16
190OSS G NC=0.00053 4$OC=8.6E-5 8$PC=3.9E-6 9
190OS2 G EKC=0.035 8
190OS cG $K:L3:M:N=330 50:17.5 26:23 4:5.5 8 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $|a(K)exp using I|g=125 {I6} for the doublet (1974Ya02)
190OS cG MR$from (407|g)(569|g)(|q): A{-2}=0.049 {I11}, A{-4}=0.096 {I17}
190OS2cG (1974He08) using |d(569|g)=-11.5
190OS cG $|g(|q) (doublet): U{-2}A{-2}=0.26 {I4} (1983Al15), deduced |d=-6.5
190OS2cG {I20}
190OS G 605.14 7 175 6 E2 0.01447 C
190OSS G KC=0.01123 16$LC=0.00248 4$MC=0.000589 9
190OSS G NC=0.0001427 20$OC=2.34E-5 4$PC=1.202E-6 17
190OS2 G EKC=0.0172 38
190OS cG $K:M=225 34:13.5 20
190OS cG $(605|g)(187|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.04 {I2}, A{-4}=0.00 {I4},
190OS2cG deduced |d(371|g)>6 (1974He08)
190OS cG $(605|g)(371|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.043 {I9}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I13},
190OS2cG deduced |d(371|g)=-7.5 {I+2-4} (1974He08)
190OS cG $(605|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=+0.098 {I10}, A{-4}=-0.001 {I16}
190OSxcG (1971Kr01)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.42 {I2} (1983Al15)
190OS G 615.39 15 2.06 12 C
190OS G 976.4 3 0.25 7 C
190OS L 1203.81 7 5+ A
190OS G 447.81 8 11.2 6 E2 0.0301 C
190OSS G KC=0.0221 3$LC=0.00611 9$MC=0.001475 21
190OSS G NC=0.000357 5$OC=5.72E-5 8$PC=2.32E-6 4
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp=0.027 {I7}, from I(ce(K))=23 {I4} in 1964Ha06
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.48 {I7}, deduced |d(M3/E2)=+0.18 {I9} (1983Al15)
190OS G 656.02 8 5.1 3 E2+M1 -1.7 14 0.017 14 C
190OSS G KC=0.014 12$LC=0.0026 15$MC=0.0006 4
190OSS G NC=0.00015 9$OC=2.5E-5 15$PC=1.5E-6 14
190OS cG M$K:L1=8.0 {I12}:1.4 {I2} (1964Ha06), deduced |a(K)exp=0.0209 {I47}.
190OS2cG No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06
190OS cG MR$from |g(|q) (1983Al15). Other: -9 {I+3-8} (1974He08)
190OS cG $(656|g)(361|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.20 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.05 {I4} (1974He08)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=0.72 {I23} (1983Al15)
190OS L 1386.91 5 3- A
190OS E 1.4 12 8.6 4 1.4 12
190OSS E CK=0.7871 1$CL=0.16104 7$CM+=0.05191 3
190OS G 223.81 5 16.4 8 E1 0.0500 13 C
190OSS G KC=0.0414 10$LC=0.00669 22$MC=0.00153 6
190OSS G NC=0.000370 13$OC=6.15E-5 22$PC=3.76E-6 15
190OS cG M$K:L1:L3=55 {I8}:9.0 {I14}:2.0 {I3} (1964Ha06), deduced |a(K)exp=0.044
190OS2cG {I10}
190OS cG MR$|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I2} from (224|g)(605|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I2},
190OSxcG A{-4}=-0.07 {I3} (1974He08)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.10 {I8} (1983Al15)
190OS G 431.62 7 12.0 7 [E1] 0.01056 C
190OSS G KC=0.00882 13$LC=0.001348 19$MC=0.000307 5
190OSS G NC=7.44E-5 11$OC=1.261E-5 18$PC=8.55E-7 12
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=0.16 {I6} (1983Al15)
190OS G 630.91 16 12.9 15[E1] 0.00472 C
190OSS G KC=0.00396 6$LC=0.000588 9$MC=0.0001335 19
190OSS G NC=3.24E-5 5$OC=5.54E-6 8$PC=3.92E-7 6
190OS G 828.99 7 15.2 12E1 0.00276 C
190OSS G KC=0.00232 4$LC=0.000339 5$MC=7.68E-5 11
190OSS G NC=1.87E-5 3$OC=3.20E-6 5$PC=2.33E-7 4
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp<0.008, from I(ce(K))<9 in 1964Ha06. No multipolarity
190OS2cG is given in 1964Ha06
190OS cG $|d(M2/E1)=-0.01 {I5} from (829|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.08 {I4},
190OS2cG A{-4}=-0.02 {I6} (1974He08). Other: +0.06 {I6} from (295|g)(829|g)(|q)
190OS3cG (1974He08).
190OS G 839.14 12 5.0 2 (E1) 0.00270 C
190OSS G KC=0.00227 4$LC=0.000331 5$MC=7.50E-5 11
190OSS G NC=1.82E-5 3$OC=3.13E-6 5$PC=2.27E-7 4
190OS cG M$deduced a(K)exp|?0.0053, from I(ce(K))|?2 in 1964Ha06
190OS G 1200.24 12 1.93 10(E1) 1.42E-3 C
190OSS G KC=0.001184 17$LC=0.0001693 24$MC=3.82E-5 6
190OSS G NC=9.30E-6 13$OC=1.603E-6 23$PC=1.196E-7 17$IPC=1.82E-5 3
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp=0.0073 {I16}, from I(ce(K))=1.05 {I16} in 1964Ha06
190OS G 1386.95 12 0.68 5 (E3) 0.00542 C
190OSS G KC=0.00434 6$LC=0.000818 12$MC=0.000191 3
190OSS G NC=4.66E-5 7$OC=7.86E-6 11$PC=5.00E-7 7$IPC=1.382E-5 20
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp=0.0118 {I28}, from I(ce(K))=0.6 {I1} in 1964Ha06
190OS L 1446.02 6 (5)+
190OS E 1.1 1 8.62 4 1.1 1
190OSS E CK=0.7819 2$CL=0.16480 9$CM+=0.05334 4
190OS G 282.93 6 2.1 4 E2(+M1) 2.5 GT 0.122 14 C
190OSS G KC=0.081 13$LC=0.0313 8$MC=0.00771 16
190OSS G NC=0.00186 4$OC=0.000290 9$PC=8.4E-6 16
190OS cG M,MR$from deduced |a(K)exp|?0.095, |a(L3)exp=0.0114 {I34}, from
190OS2cG I(ce(K))|?15, I(L3)=1.8 {I3} (1964Ha06)
190OS G 490.76 7 3.42 17 (E2) 0.0239 C
190OSS G KC=0.0179 3$LC=0.00458 7$MC=0.001101 16
190OSS G NC=0.000267 4$OC=4.30E-5 6$PC=1.89E-6 3
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp=0.0195 {I45}, from I(ce(K))=5.0 {I8} in 1964Ha06.
190OS2cG No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06
190OS G 690.04 8 1.24 12 (E2) 0.01077 C
190OSS G KC=0.00851 12$LC=0.001738 25$MC=0.000409 6
190OSS G NC=9.94E-5 14$OC=1.645E-5 23$PC=9.12E-7 13
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp|?0.016, from I(ce(K))|?1.5 in 1964Ha06.
190OS2cG No multipolarity is given in 1964Ha06
190OS L 1583.82 7 4- A
190OS E 10.0 9 7.34 4 10.0 9
190OSS E CK=0.7616 3$CL=0.17942 19$CM+=0.05895 8
190OS G 196.85 15 15.0 15E2+M1 +1.0 5 0.59 15 C
190OSS G KC=0.43 16$LC=0.121 7$MC=0.0292 24
190OSS G NC=0.0071 6$OC=0.00113 5$PC=4.8E-5 19
190OS2 G EKC=0.36 8
190OS cG $K:M:N=410 62:44 7:11 2 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG MR$from (197|g)(829|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.11 {I3}, A{-4}=-0.09 {I5}
190OSxcG (1974He08)
190OS G 380.03 12 8.9 4 E1 0.01407 C
190OSS G KC=0.01173 17$LC=0.00181 3$MC=0.000413 6
190OSS G NC=0.0001000 14$OC=1.690E-5 24$PC=1.125E-6 16
190OS2 G EKC=0.0142 31
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=9.5 {I14} in 1964Ha06.
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=0.05 {I9} (1983Al15)
190OS G 420.63 12 7.2 3 [E1] 0.01119 C
190OSS G KC=0.00934 13$LC=0.001430 20$MC=0.000326 5
190OSS G NC=7.90E-5 11$OC=1.338E-5 19$PC=9.03E-7 13
190OS G 628.4 3 3.3 4 C
190OS G 828 AP 2.5 6 C
190OS G 1036.05 20 10.6 6 E1 0.00182 C
190OSS G KC=0.001539 22$LC=0.000222 4$MC=5.01E-5 7
190OSS G NC=1.218E-5 17$OC=2.10E-6 3$PC=1.550E-7 22
190OS2 G EKC=0.0049 11
190OS cG $K:L=3.9 6:0.90 14 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.32 {I7} (1983Al15)
190OS cG $(1036|g)(361|g)(|q): 1969Ya03
190OS G 1397.24 14 0.66 5 (M2) 0.01158 C
190OSS G KC=0.00955 14$LC=0.001553 22$MC=0.000357 5
190OSS G NC=8.73E-5 13$OC=1.509E-5 22$PC=1.129E-6 16$IPC=1.753E-5 25
190OS2 G EKC=0.0162 37
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=0.80 {I12} in 1964Ha06.
190OS L 1681.60 6 5- A
190OS E 47 2 6.339 20 47 2
190OSS E CK=0.7302 6$CL=0.2021 5$CM+=0.06775 17
190OS G 97.93 15 0.42 6 M1+E2 0.40 12 5.80 13 C
190OSS G KC=4.4 4$LC=1.10 17$MC=0.26 5
190OSS G NC=0.064 11$OC=0.0104 15$PC=0.00051 4
190OS cG $L2:L3:M:N=37 6:7.5 11:5.0 8:13 2 (1964Ha06)
190OS2 G EKC>3.2 $ EL2C=1.18 31$ EL3C=0.24 6 $ EMC=0.16 4$ ENC=0.41 11
190OS cG MR$from deduced conversion coefficients above (by evaluators using
190OS2cG BrIccMixing). I(ce(K))>100 (1964Ha06)
190OS G 235.50 12 1.86 14E1 0.0441 C
190OSS G KC=0.0365 6$LC=0.00587 9$MC=0.001342 19
190OSS G NC=0.000324 5$OC=5.41E-5 8$PC=3.34E-6 5
190OS2 G EKC=0.043 10
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=6 {I1} in 1964Ha06.
190OS G 294.75 12 29 3 (E2) 0.0963 C
190OSS G KC=0.0618 9$LC=0.0262 4$MC=0.00649 10
190OSS G NC=0.001565 22$OC=0.000243 4$PC=6.19E-6 9
190OS cG $K:L3:M:N=205 31:16 3:15 2:3.5 5 (1964Ha06)
190OS2 G EKC=0.094 23 $ EL3C=0.0074 20$ EMC=0.0069 16
190OS cG MR$|?3 (2.3 {I+2-5} from |a(K)exp, >3 from |a(L3)exp)
190OS cG $(295|g)(829|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.05 {I3}, A{-4}=+0.01 {I6} (1974He08),
190OS2cG deduced |d(829|g)=+0.06 {I6}
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=-0.3945 {I4} (1983Al15)
190OS G 477.8 3 8.0 9 C
190OS G 518.55 7 149 5 E1(+M2) +0.010 15 0.0071114 C
190OSS G KC=0.00595 11$LC=0.000897 19$MC=0.000204 5
190OSS G NC=4.95E-5 11$OC=8.42E-6 19$PC=5.84E-7 13
190OS cG $K:L1:M=105 16:17 3:4.0 6 (1964Ha06)$
190OS2 G EKC=0.0094 21$ EL1C=0.0015 4 $ EMC=0.00036 8
190OS cG MR$from (519|g)(605|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.066 {I9}, A{-4}=0.002 {I14}
190OS2cG (1974He08). Other: 1971Kr01
190OS cG $(519|g)(558|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.102 {I15}, A{-4}=-0.01 {I2} (1974He08),
190OS2cG deduced |d(519|g)=-0.05 {I3}
190OS cG $|g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.2761 {I3} (1983Al15)
190OS G 631 AP 3.7 10 C
190OS G 726.22 8 16.6 5 E1 0.00357 C
190OSS G KC=0.00300 5$LC=0.000441 7$MC=9.99E-5 14
190OSS G NC=2.43E-5 4$OC=4.16E-6 6$PC=2.98E-7 5
190OS2 G EKC=0.0064 14
190OS cG $K:L1=8.0 12:1.5 2 (1964Ha06)
190OS cG $|d(M2/E1)=0.00 {I2} from |g(|q): U{-2}A{-2}=+0.27 {I5} (1983Al15)
190OS G 1123.8 3 0.14 3 [E3] 0.00856 C
190OSS G KC=0.00672 10$LC=0.001413 20$MC=0.000334 5
190OSS G NC=8.14E-5 12$OC=1.358E-5 19$PC=7.90E-7 11$IPC=1.142E-7 22
190OS G 1133.77 20 1.88 11E1 1.55E-3 C
190OSS G KC=0.001309 19$LC=0.000188 3$MC=4.24E-5 6
190OSS G NC=1.032E-5 15$OC=1.777E-6 25$PC=1.321E-7 19$IPC=3.45E-6 6
190OS2 G EKC=0.0043 10
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=0.6 {I1} in 1964Ha06.
190OS G 1494.9 3 0.27 4 [E3] 0.00464 C
190OSS G KC=0.00373 6$LC=0.000681 10$MC=0.0001586 23
190OSS G NC=3.86E-5 6$OC=6.54E-6 10$PC=4.26E-7 6$IPC=2.89E-5 4
190OS L 1708.30 21(2+,3,4+)
190OS E 0.18 2 8.64 5 0.18 2
190OSS E CK=0.7154 8$CL=0.2127 6$CM+=0.07191 22
190OS G 753.0 4 0.11 3
190OS G 952.3 3 0.43 7 (M1) 0.01271 C
190OSS G KC=0.01060 15$LC=0.001633 23$MC=0.000372 6
190OSS G NC=9.09E-5 13$OC=1.575E-5 22$PC=1.195E-6 17
190OS cG E$not placed in 1964Ha06
190OS2 G EKC AP 0.016
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))|?0.5 in 1964Ha06.
190OS G 1150.7 5 0.15 4
190OS G 1160.4 5 0.13 4
190OS L 1872.10 8 (5)-
190OS E 3.7 3 5.77 5 3.7 3
190OSS E CK=0.058 15$CL=0.669 10$CM+=0.272 5
190OS G 190.52 20 0.59 11M1 0.903
190OSS G KC=0.747 11$LC=0.1204 18$MC=0.0276 4
190OSS G NC=0.00675 10$OC=0.001165 17$PC=8.68E-5 13
190OS2 G EKC=0.90 26
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=40 {I6} in 1964Ha06.
190OS G 288.22 10 7.2 6 E2+M1 2.2 +11-5 0.135 17 C
190OSS G KC=0.095 16$LC=0.0302 10$MC=0.00736 18
190OSS G NC=0.00178 5$OC=0.000282 10$PC=1.01E-5 19
190OS cG $K:L2:L3=46 7:5.5 8:3.0 5 (1964Ha06)
190OS2 G EKC=0.085 20$ ELC=0.0102 23$ EL3C=0.0056 14
190OS cG MR$from K:L2:L3 in 1964Ha06 (by evaluators using BrIccMixing)
190OS G 426.2 4 0.11 4
190OS G 485.23 20 3.2 7 E2 0.0245 C
190OSS G KC=0.0183 3$LC=0.00474 7$MC=0.001141 16
190OSS G NC=0.000276 4$OC=4.45E-5 7$PC=1.94E-6 3
190OS2 G EKC=0.018 6
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=4.5 {I7} in 1964Ha06.
190OS G 668.1 3 0.23 6 ?
190OS G 709.1 3 0.32 5 C
190OS G 821.78 14 1.42 9 C
190OS G 916.75 25 0.55 6 C
190OS cG E$915.5 unplaced in 1964Ha06, with I(ce(K))=0.7 {I1}
190OS G 1324.30 18 2.1 3 E1 1.25E-3 C
190OSS G KC=0.000997 14$LC=0.0001419 20$MC=3.20E-5 5
190OSS G NC=7.80E-6 11$OC=1.345E-6 19$PC=1.010E-7 15$IPC=7.06E-5 10
190OS2 G EKC=0.0057 15
190OS cG M$deduced |a(K)exp from I(ce(K))=0.90 {I14} in 1964Ha06.
190OS L 1903.31 12(3+,4-)
190OS E 0.44 3 6.18 4 0.44 3
190OSS E CL=0.669 3$CM+=0.331 3
190OS G 740.19 14 0.85 7 C
190OS G 948.0 3 0.30 5 ?
190OS G 1147.3 3 0.58 6 ?
190OS G 1355.6 3 0.30 3 C