190PT 190AU EC DECAY (42.8 M) 1973JO11,1972FI12 20NDS 202011
190PT H TYP=FUL$AUT=Balraj Singh,{+1} and Jun Chen{+2}$CIT=NDS 169, 1 (2020)$
190PT2 H CUT=15-Oct-2020$
190PT c 1973Jo11: {+190}Au activity was produced by (p,xn) reactions with
190PT2c 80-MeV protons from the Uppsala synchrocyclotron on natural platinum
190PT3c targets. Measured E|g, I|g, ce, |b{++}, T{-1/2}({+190}Au).
190PT c 1972Fi12 (also 1972HuZL,1971Hu11,1971MaXM,1971JoZK,1970Er09):
190PT2c {+190}Au isotopes were from decays of {+190}Hg produced via (p,3pxn)
190PT3c reactions with 600-MeV protons from the CERN Synchrocyclotron on
190PT4c metallic lead target and were obtained by mass separation. Measured |g,
190PT5c |g|g, ce, ce |g(t). {+190}Au isotope
190PT c Others:
190PT c E|g, I|g: 1980GnZZ, 1970Du09, 1969Na10, 1964Ja05, 1960Al20,
190PTxc 1960Po07, 1959Al94
190PT c |g|g-coin: 1980GnZZ (no further details are available as per
190PT2c reply from one of the authors (September 1989))
190PT c ce, |g: 1969Na10
190PT c T{-1/2} of {+190}Au: 1969Na10, 1961An02, 1961Ja17,
190PT2c 1960Po07, 1960Al20, 1959Al94. Other: 1966Ch05
190PT c |b{++}: 1973Jo11, 1974DiZQ
190PT c |b{++} strength function: 1975Ho03
190PT cE $Due to many unplaced transitions, the quoted |e,|b{++} feedings and
190PT2cE associated log| {Ift} are given as approximate values.
190PT cE TI$From |g+ce intensity balance at each level
190PT cG $Other I(|b{++}) estimates: from |g{+|+}/K| x ray, %|b{++}=2
190PT2cG (1961Ja17), <1 (1959Al94). From |g-ray spectra shown by 1969Na10 and
190PT3cG 1972HuZL (both mass-separated samples), I(|g{+|+})/I|g(597|g)|?0.5
190PT4cG (evaluators' estimate) implying I(|b{++})|?2.4% which is consistent
190PT5cG with 2% (1961Ja17) and weak |b{++} branches (to g.s. and 296 level)
190PT6cG observed by 1973Jo11. In the present decay scheme, deduced
190PT7cG I(|b{++})|?4.1% for 597 level
190PT cG $Values of |a(K)exp deduced (evaluator) from averaged I|g and
190PT2cG ce(K) data given under comments; the quoted references indicate the
190PT3cG source of ce data. The data were normalized to 296|g, using
190PT4cG |a(K)=0.0632. The averaging procedure gives |a(K)exp values which are
190PT5cG somewhat different from those given in 1973Jo11 and 1972Fi12.
190PT cG $For transitions with E0 admixtures, total conversion
190PT2cG coefficients are deduced based on ce(K) values. Pair conversion is
190PT3cG considered when necessary
190PT cG E,RI$Weighted average from 1973Jo11 and 1972Fi12 (from 1972HuZL
190PT2cG above 1836), unless otherwise stated
190PT cG E(A)$|g reported by 1973Jo11 only
190PT cG E(B)$|g reported by 1972Fi12 (and 1972HuZL) only
190PT cG E(D)$|g reported by 1972HuZL only
190PT cG E(E),RI(E)$From 1972Fi12. In 1973Jo11, |g is complex due to
190PT2cG contribution from impurity.
190PT cG E(F),RI(F)$Complex |g in 1973Jo11 but authors have corrected for
190PT2cG admixtures. Values given here are weighted averages of 1973Jo11 and
190PT3cG 1972Fi12 (from 1972HuZL above 1836 keV)
190PT cG E(G)$|g from 1972HuZL only. Placement considered tentative (evaluator)
190PT cG E(K)$Tentative placement suggested by 1972HuZL
190PT cG RI(J)$From 1973Jo11. Value from 1972HuZL (given under comments) is
190PT2cG systematically lower by |?30% for |g rays above 1840 keV
190PT cG M,MR$From the Adopted Gammas. The adopted values are based on or
190PT2cG supported by ce data in 1973Jo11 and 1972Fi12 where available, unless
190PT3cG otherwise noted.
190PT cG E(M)$Uncertain |g
190PT cG E(N)$|a(K)exp(2957|g+2960|g)=0.00039 {I13} (1973Jo11). Mult=E1 for
190PT2cG both or (E2,M1) for one component and E1 for the other.
190PT cL E$From a least-squares fit to |g-ray energies.
190PT cL E(H)$Tentative level proposed by 1972HuZL
190PT cL J$From the Adopted Levels
190AU P 0.0 1- 42.8 M 10 4473 4
190AU cP J,T$From {+190}Au Adopted Levels
190AU cP QP$From 2017Wa10
190PT N 0.90 14 0.90 14 1.0 1.0
190PT cN NR$from |S(I(|g+ce) of gammas to g.s.)=98.4 {I8} and requiring that
190PT2cN |e+|b{++} feeding to g.s. and 296 level is 1.6% (1973Jo11). An
190PT3cN uncertainty of 15% is assigned to account for some uncertain features
190PT4cN of the decay scheme. The unplaced transitions intensity of |?28%
190PT5cN should not affect the normalization factor significantly, as this
190PT6cN intensity is most likely associated with deexcitations to excited
190PT7cN states rather than to g.s. since there is an apparent intensity
190PT8cN imbalance (from present decay scheme) at 296 level suggesting
190PT9cN |e+|b{++} feeding of |?28% as opposed to measured 0.7% (1973Jo11).
190PTAcN An apparent |e+|b{++} feeding of |?6% to 1354 level (|DJ=2,|D|p=no |e
190PTBcN transition) must also be due to unassigned |g transitions to 1354
190PTCcN level. See also comment above for I(|b{++}) feedings
190PT PN 3
190PT G 383.2 0.30 LT D
190PTF G FLAG=M$
190PT cG $Suggested placement from 1737 level (1972HuZL)
190PT G 398.0 3 0.12 10 B
190PTF G FLAG=M$
190PT2 G EKC<0.0016 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG $Suggested placement from 1603 level (1972Fi12)
190PT G 436.0 10
190PTF G FLAG=M$
190PT cG $Reported by 1969Na10 only and placed from 1353 level
190PT G 460.7 3 0.18 2 M1(+E2) 0.6 LT 0.088 9 E
190PT2 G EKC=0.092 25 (1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.072 8$LC=0.0120 9$MC=0.00279 20
190PTS G NC=0.00069 5$OC=0.000123 10$PC=8.1E-6 9
190PT cG RI$from 1972Fi12. I|g=0.44 {I7} (1973Jo11)
190PT G 586.7 3 0.15 1 E
190PT G 634.0 3 0.22 4 M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 0.037 5 E
190PT2 G EKC=0.043 15 (1972Fi12) $ EKC<0.022 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.031 4$LC=0.0050 5$MC=0.00117 12
190PTS G NC=0.00029 3$OC=5.2E-5 6$PC=3.4E-6 5
190PT G 675.3 3 0.32 3 E0+(E2,M1) 0.090 23 E
190PT2 G EKC=0.072 18 (1972Fi12)
190PT cG M$M2 is also possible from |a(K)exp
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.026 {I6}
190PT G 779.0 4 0.41 6 M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 0.022 3
190PT2 G EKC=0.023 6 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0183 22$LC=0.0030 3$MC=0.00068 7
190PTS G NC=0.000168 17$OC=3.0E-5 3$PC=2.0E-6 3
190PT G 836.4 3 0.20 2 M1(+E2) 1 LT 0.017 4 E
190PT2 G EKC=0.015 3 (1972Fi12) $ EKC<0.010 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.014 3$LC=0.0023 4$MC=0.00054 9
190PTS G NC=0.000133 21$OC=2.4E-5 4$PC=1.6E-6 4
190PT G 869.2 2 0.41 4 M1 0.0187
190PT2 G EKC=0.025 6 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.01550 22$LC=0.00245 4$MC=0.000563 8
190PTS G NC=0.0001393 20$OC=2.51E-5 4$PC=1.721E-6 25
190PT G 912.2 3 0.13 2 (E2) 0.00658 B
190PT2 G EKC<0.010 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00529 8$LC=0.000988 14$MC=0.000232 4
190PTS G NC=5.71E-5 8$OC=1.001E-5 14$PC=5.58E-7 8
190PT cG M$E1 is also possible from |a(K)exp
190PT G 977.0 3 0.20 2 M1 0.01388
190PT2 G EKC=0.017 3 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.01153 17$LC=0.00181 3$MC=0.000417 6
190PTS G NC=0.0001032 15$OC=1.86E-5 3$PC=1.277E-6 18
190PT G 1003.1 7 0.27 3 M1(+E2) 0.7 LT 0.0117 13
190PT2 G EKC=0.014 5 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0097 11$LC=0.00155 15$MC=0.00036 4
190PTS G NC=8.8E-5 9$OC=1.59E-5 16$PC=1.07E-6 12
190PT G 1154.2 4 0.45 11M1(+E2) 1 LT 0.0079 13 A
190PT2 G EKC=0.0074 21 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0065 11$LC=0.00104 16$MC=0.00024 4
190PTS G NC=5.9E-5 9$OC=1.06E-5 16$PC=7.2E-7 12$IPC=1.87E-6 20
190PT G 1161.0 4 1.02 23E2(+M1) 3 GT 0.0043 3 A
190PT2 G EKC=0.0029 8 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00355 22$LC=0.00060 3$MC=0.000140 7
190PTS G NC=3.46E-5 18$OC=6.1E-6 4$PC=3.75E-7 25$IPC=1.63E-6 6
190PT G 1304.8 9 1.16 5E2(+M1) 2 GT 0.0036 4
190PT2 G EKC=0.0026 7 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0030 3$LC=0.00049 5$MC=0.000113 10
190PTS G NC=2.80E-5 25$OC=5.0E-6 5$PC=3.2E-7 4$IPC=1.83E-5 11
190PT G 1345.8 3 0.87 12M1(+E2) 1.5 LT 0.0052 11
190PT2 G EKC=0.0050 16 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0043 9$LC=0.00067 14$MC=0.00015 3
190PTS G NC=3.8E-5 8$OC=6.9E-6 14$PC=4.6E-7 11$IPC=3.4E-5 5
190PT G 1475.0 5 0.04 LT (E0) D
190PTF G FLAG=M$
190PT2 G EKC AP 0.057 (1972HuZL)
190PT cG $1972HuZL suggest placement with a 1475, 0+ level, but this
190PT2cG level is not connected to any other levels
190PT G 1500.9 6 0.57 17M1 0.00483 A
190PT2 G EKC=0.0060 20 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00393 6$LC=0.000611 9$MC=0.0001402 20
190PTS G NC=3.47E-5 5$OC=6.26E-6 9$PC=4.33E-7 6$IPC=0.0001017 15
190PT G 1528.1 8 0.34 11E0+(E2,M1) 0.113 39 A
190PT2 G EKC=0.0090 31 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG M$M2 is also possible from |a(K)exp
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.0024 {I8}
190PT G 1622.9 4 0.27 3 E0+(E2,M1) 0.014 4 B
190PT2 G EKC=0.011 3 (1972Fi12) $ EKC<0.007 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG M$M2 is also possible from |a(K)exp
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.0022 {I7}
190PT G 1636.5 4 0.36 4 B
190PTF G FLAG=M$
190PT cG $ce(K) (1972Fi12) probably corresponds to 1638.7|g
190PT cG $1973Jo11 assigned this |g to double escape of 2658|g
190PT G 1638.7 6 0.17 LE (E0) A
190PT2 G EKC GE 0.014 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PT G 1664.1 5 0.68 22M1(+E2) 0.5 LT 0.0036818 A
190PT2 G EKC=0.0045 15 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00291 14$LC=0.000452 21$MC=0.000104 5
190PTS G NC=2.56E-5 12$OC=4.63E-6 22$PC=3.19E-7 16$IPC=0.000183 7
190PT G 1738.9 3 1.20 10M1 0.00351 F
190PT2 G EKC=0.0038 7 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.00273 4$LC=0.000422 6$MC=9.69E-5 14
190PTS G NC=2.40E-5 4$OC=4.33E-6 6$PC=3.00E-7 5$IPC=0.000234 4
190PT G 1772.8 5 0.22 2 D
190PT G 1821.1 5 0.08 1 D
190PTF G FLAG=M$
190PT G 1836.0 4 1.22 12M1 0.00316 F
190PT2 G EKC=0.0044 10 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.00239 4$LC=0.000369 6$MC=8.45E-5 12
190PTS G NC=2.09E-5 3$OC=3.77E-6 6$PC=2.62E-7 4$IPC=0.000295 5
190PT G 1844.2 5 0.47 5 D
190PT G 1850.9 5 0.43 5 D
190PT G 1871.2 5 0.37 4 D
190PT G 1886.6 5 0.23 3 D
190PT G 1904.9 5 0.40 4 D
190PT G 1936.8 5 0.35 3 D
190PT G 1952.0 5 0.18 2 D
190PT G 1967.2 5 0.30 3 D
190PT G 1972.9 5 0.44 4 D
190PT G 2001.3 5 0.25 3 D
190PT G 2024.9 6 0.2 LT (E0) A
190PT2 G EKC>0.016 (1973Jo11)
190PT G 2034.8 5 0.24 3 D
190PT G 2040.4 4 0.44 4 D
190PT G 2142.8 6 0.28 5 D
190PT G 2149.8 8 0.44 5 D
190PT G 2185.2 7 0.16 2 D
190PT G 2242.6 6 0.80 15 D
190PT G 2260.7 7 0.18 3 D
190PT G 2271.1 7 0.60 9 D
190PT G 2288.9 10 0.10 2 D
190PT G 2314.5 6 0.67 7 D
190PT G 2325.4 6 0.45 5 D
190PT G 2334.2 6 0.55 6 D
190PT G 2401.3 7 0.50 2 D
190PT G 2435.9 8 0.37 4 D
190PT G 2448.5 5 0.76 17E0+(E2,M1) 0.0063 15
190PT2 G EKC=0.0050 12 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.0040 {I13}
190PT cG $2451.7|g (1972HuZL) is probably a composite of 2448|g and
190PT2cG 2452|g reported by 1973Jo11
190PT G 2517.9 8 0.24 3 D
190PT G 2526.2 8 0.17 2 D
190PT G 2571.0 8 0.21 3 D
190PT G 2613 1 0.12 2 D
190PT G 2643.4 10 0.30 4 D
190PT G 2658.2 5 3.4 4 (E1) 1.38E-3 J
190PT cG RI$2.2 {I3} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00054 11 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000346 5$LC=4.89E-5 7$MC=1.109E-5 16
190PTS G NC=2.74E-6 4$OC=4.93E-7 7$PC=3.45E-8 5$IPC=0.000966 14
190PT cG M$M2 is also possible from |a(K)exp
190PT G 2697.0 7 0.34 4 D
190PT G 2726.0 7 0.11 2 D
190PT G 2843.5 10 0.28 3 D
190PT G 2875.0 5 1.14 23M1,E2 0.0016824 J
190PT cG RI$0.50 {I6} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00095 32 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00072 8$LC=0.000108 13$MC=2.5E-5 3
190PTS G NC=6.1E-6 8$OC=1.11E-6 14$PC=7.7E-8 10$IPC=0.00082 15
190PT G 2881.4 6 1.10 22M1,E2 0.0016824 J
190PT cG RI$0.70 {I10} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00075 26 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00072 8$LC=0.000108 13$MC=2.5E-5 3
190PTS G NC=6.1E-6 8$OC=1.10E-6 14$PC=7.6E-8 10$IPC=0.00082 15
190PT G 2921.2 10 0.23 3 D
190PT G 2941.9 7 1.07 23M1,E2 0.0016724 J
190PT cG RI$0.63 {I7} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0011 4 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00068 7$LC=0.000103 12$MC=2.4E-5 3
190PTS G NC=5.8E-6 7$OC=1.05E-6 12$PC=7.3E-8 9$IPC=0.00085 16
190PT G 2956.7 9 1.3 4 A
190PTF G FLAG=N$
190PT G 2959.8 9 1.5 5 A
190PTF G FLAG=N$
190PT G 3024.3 10 0.33 4 D
190PT G 3036.1 10 0.30 6 D
190PT G 3081.7 5 1.06 22 J
190PT cG RI$0.55 {I10} (1972HuZL)
190PT G 3094.8 5 0.68 14 J
190PT cG RI$0.30 {I7} (1972HuZL)
190PT G 3142.0 10 0.10 2 D
190PT G 3178.0 8 0.90 20 J
190PT cG RI$0.50 {I5} (1972HuZL)
190PT G 3199.5 5 0.80 23 J
190PT cG RI$0.35 {I6} (1972HuZL)
190PT G 3206.5 10 0.29 4 D
190PT G 3311.6 10 0.12 2 D
190PT G 3355.8 5 1.0 2 J
190PT cG RI$0.35 {I4} (1972HuZL)
190PT G 3639.0 10 0.12 2 D
190PT G 3652.0 10 0.11 2 D
190PT L 0.0 0+
190PT E 4442 15 0.4 1 0.5 1 8.4 1 0.9 2
190PTS E EAV=1557.9 19$CK=0.4949 7$CL=0.08439 12$CM+=0.02678 4
190PT cE E$E(|b{++})=3420 {I15} (1973Jo11). Other: 3358 {I55} (|b{++} data,
190PTxcE 1974DiZQ)
190PT cE TI$from I(|b{++}) relative to ce(K)(296|g) (1973Jo11)
190PT L 295.84 4 2+ 45 PS 15
190PT cL T$ce |g(t) (1972Fi12)
190PT E 0.2 1 0.5 1 8.4 1 0.7 2
190PTS E EAV=1423.6 19$CK=0.5441 7$CL=0.09297 12$CM+=0.02951 4
190PT cE TI$from I(|b{++}) relative to ce(K)(296|g) (1973Jo11). Intensity
190PT2cE balance based on |g-ray intensities gives an apparent |e+|b{++}
190PT3cE feeding of 29%, which must be due to unaccounted |g rays populating
190PT4cE the 295.8 level.
190PT G 295.82 4 100 2 E2 0.1027 FC
190PT cG $|a(K)=0.0638 used to normalize ce data for other transitions
190PT2 G K/L=2.09 21 $ (L1+L2)/L3=3.3 3 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0632 9$LC=0.0298 5$MC=0.00748 11
190PTS G NC=0.00183 3$OC=0.000298 5$PC=6.36E-6 9
190PT cG M$from K/L and (L1+L2)/L3
190PT L 597.68 4 2+
190PT E 4.1 AP 11 AP 7.0 AP 15 AP
190PTS E EAV=1287.3 18$CK=0.5947 7$CL=0.10187 12$CM+=0.03235 4
190PT G 301.82 3 33 1 E2 0.0967 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.066 5 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PT2 G K/L=2.17 18 (1973Jo11) $ (L1+L2)/L3=2.87 23 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0602 9$LC=0.0276 4$MC=0.00692 10
190PTS G NC=0.001696 24$OC=0.000276 4$PC=6.06E-6 9
190PT cG M$from K/L and (L1+L2)/L3. |d(E2/M1)>5
190PT G 597.68 8 13.3 9 E2 0.01624 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.0139 11 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12) $
190PT2 G K/L=4.0 6 (1973Jo11) $ (L1+L2)/L3=7.8 20 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.01241 18$LC=0.00292 4$MC=0.000702 10
190PTS G NC=0.0001728 25$OC=2.96E-5 5$PC=1.313E-6 19
190PT cG MR$from K/L and (L1+L2)/L3, |d(E2/M1)>4
190PT L 737.16 7 4+
190PT G 441.25 7 5.26 10E2 0.0338 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.030 3 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)$ K/L=3.2 4 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0242 4$LC=0.00732 11$MC=0.00179 3
190PTS G NC=0.000440 7$OC=7.37E-5 11$PC=2.53E-6 4
190PT cG MR$from K/L, |d(E2/M1)>4
190PT L 916.66 6 3+
190PT E 0.31 AP 3.5 AP 9.0 AP 3.8 AP 1U?
190PTS E EAV=1128.4 18$CK=0.7443 3$CL=0.13291 7$CM+=0.04250 3
190PT G 179.8 3 0.18 2 E2+M1 3 +2-1 0.59 8 EC
190PT2 G EKC=0.30 5 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.303 82$LC=0.219 7$MC=0.0556 20
190PTS G NC=0.0136 5$OC=0.00218 6$PC=3.07E-5 98
190PT cG $For |a(K)exp, I|g from 1972Fi12 and ce(K) from 1973Jo11
190PT G 318.96 6 6.6 4 E2+M1 3.1 +18-7 0.099 10 FC
190PT2 G EKC=0.069 7 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PT2 G K/L=2.9 5 (1973Jo11)$ (L1+L2)/L3=3.3 8 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.068 9 $LC=0.0237 8$MC=0.00585 16
190PTS G NC=0.00144 4 $OC=0.000238 8$PC=7.1E-6 11
190PT G 620.89 12 3.4 3 E2+M1 2.0 +20-6 0.021 5 FC
190PT2 G EKC=0.017 4 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.017 4$LC=0.0033 5$MC=0.00077 11
190PTS G NC=0.00019 3$OC=3.3E-5 5$PC=1.8E-6 4
190PT L 920.89 7 0+
190PT E 0.49 AP 1.9 AP 7.6 AP 2.4 AP
190PTS E EAV=1142.1 18$CK=0.6473 7$CL=0.11123 12$CM+=0.03534 4
190PT G 323.17 7 1.45 9 E2 0.0792 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.056 4 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.0508 8$LC=0.0215 3$MC=0.00535 8
190PTS G NC=0.001312 19$OC=0.000215 3$PC=5.16E-6 8
190PT cG $|d(E2/M1)>4 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 625.1 2 4.2 2 E2 0.01467 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.012 2 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.01129 16$LC=0.00258 4$MC=0.000618 9
190PTS G NC=0.0001521 22$OC=2.61E-5 4$PC=1.195E-6 17
190PT cG $|d(E2/M1)>3 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 921.05 14 0.1 LT E0 0.090 4
190PT cG TI$deduced from ce(K)/ce(K)(296|g)=0.0124 {I5} (1973Jo11),
190PT2cG 0.0110 {I25} (1972Fi12) and ce(L1+L2)/ce(K)(296|g)=0.0019 {I5}
190PT3cG (1971Hu11). ce(L3)/ce(K)(296|g)<0.0018 (1971Hu11)
190PT cG $X(E0/E2)=0.62 {I12} (1972Fi12)
190PT L 1128.0 (4+) ?
190PT cL $Level proposed (evaluator) on the basis of {+191}Ir(p,2n|g)
190PT G 530.6 3 0.60 6 (E2) 0.0214 E ?
190PT2 G EKC<0.025 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.01603 23$LC=0.00413 6$MC=0.000999 14
190PTS G NC=0.000246 4$OC=4.17E-5 6$PC=1.691E-6 24
190PT cG M$E1 is not excluded by |a(K)exp
190PT L 1203.07 7 2+
190PT E 0.66 AP 3.6 AP 7.3 AP 4.3 AP
190PTS E EAV=1016.0 18$CK=0.6898 6$CL=0.1189 1$CM+=0.03780 4
190PT G 282.3 8 1.08 8 E2 0.1182 20 EC
190PT2 G EKC=0.073 14 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0711 12$LC=0.0356 7$MC=0.00895 16
190PTS G NC=0.00219 4$OC=0.000356 7$PC=7.10E-6 11
190PT cG $|d(E2/M1)>4 from |a(K)exp)
190PT G 286.4 3 0.54 3 E2(+M1) 5 GT 0.118 5 EC
190PT2 G EKC=0.067 14 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.073 5$LC=0.0340 6$MC=0.00851 14
190PTS G NC=0.00209 4$OC=0.000340 6$PC=7.4E-6 5
190PT G 466.0 3 0.67 4 E2 0.0295 EC
190PT2 G EKC=0.021 4 (1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.0214 3$LC=0.00615 9$MC=0.001500 22
190PTS G NC=0.000369 6$OC=6.20E-5 9$PC=2.24E-6 4
190PT cG $|d(E2/M1)>4 from |a(K)exp)
190PT G 605.21 12 2.11 5 M1(+E2) 0.4 LT 0.0452 23 FC
190PT2 G EKC=0.040 3 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)$ K/(L1+L2)=6.7 10 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0373 20$LC=0.0060 3$MC=0.00139 6
190PTS G NC=0.000344 14$OC=6.2E-5 3$PC=4.17E-6 23
190PT G 907.30 9 2.05 5 E0+(E2,M1) 0.049 6 C
190PT cG RI$from 1972Fi12. I|g=3.2 {I4} (1973Jo11)
190PT2 G EKC=0.039 5 (1973Jo11) $ EKC=0.050 11 (1972Fi12)
190PT2 G EL1C+EL2C=0.0071 15 $ EL3C<0.00031 $EMC=0.0022 6 (1971Hu11)
190PT2 G K/L=6.8 8 (1973Jo11)$ K/L=7.6 20 (1971Hu11)$(L1+L2)/L3>23 (1971Hu11)
190PT cG $|a(M)exp value is for M1 to M5 shells
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.10 {I2}
190PT G 1203.4 4 0.30 3 (E2) 0.00382
190PT2 G EKC=0.0039 13 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.00313 5$LC=0.000531 8$MC=0.0001234 18
190PTS G NC=3.04E-5 5$OC=5.39E-6 8$PC=3.29E-7 5$IPC=4.50E-6 8
190PT cG $|a(K)exp for 1203.4|g+1205.5|g
190PT cG E,RI$from 1972Fi12, who also report a 1205.5|g (I|g=0.41). Only one
190PT2cG |g at 1203.1 (I|g=0.70 {I20}) reported by 1973Jo11
190PT L 1353.67 11 3-
190PT E 0.70 LT 4.8 LT 7.1 GT 5.5 LT ?
190PTS E EAV=949.0 18$CK=0.7105 6$CL=0.1227 1$CM+=0.03902 4
190PT cE $log| {Ift} is inconsistent with |DJ=2,(no) transition. The
190PT2cE apparent feeding is most likely due to unassigned |g-ray intensity
190PT G 225.0 3 0.40 5 E ?
190PT cG $Placement from {+191}Ir(p,2n|g)
190PT G 616.24 14 2.20 11E1 0.00536 FC
190PT2 G EKC=0.0049 8 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.00448 7$LC=0.000679 10$MC=0.0001553 22
190PTS G NC=3.82E-5 6$OC=6.79E-6 10$PC=4.32E-7 6
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.1 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 756.4 2 0.20 5 E1 0.00357 ?
190PT2 G EKC=0.0045 14 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00299 5$LC=0.000448 7$MC=0.0001021 15
190PTS G NC=2.52E-5 4$OC=4.49E-6 7$PC=2.91E-7 4
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.2 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 1057.7 3 4.9 6 E1 0.00191 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.0023 4 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.001609 23$LC=0.000236 4$MC=5.36E-5 8
190PTS G NC=1.322E-5 19$OC=2.37E-6 4$PC=1.582E-7 23
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.2 from |a(K)exp
190PT L 1395.26 9 2+
190PT E 0.31 AP 2.3 AP 7.4 AP 2.6 AP
190PTS E EAV=930.5 18$CK=0.7159 6$CL=0.1237 1$CM+=0.03935 3
190PT G 192.0 3 0.12 1 [M1,E2] 0.73 32 BC
190PTS G KC=0.53 34$LC=0.156 14$MC=0.038 6
190PTS G NC=0.0093 13$OC=0.00157 12$PC=5.8E-5 41
190PT G 478.4 3 0.45 16M1(+E2) 0.8 LT 0.076 12 EC
190PT2 G EKC=0.065 12 (1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.062 11$LC=0.0105 12$MC=0.0024 3
190PTS G NC=0.00060 7$OC=0.000108 13$PC=7.0E-6 12
190PT G 657.9 3 0.17 2 (E2) 0.01309 E?
190PT2 G EKC<0.028 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.01015 15$LC=0.00224 4$MC=0.000536 8
190PTS G NC=0.0001319 19$OC=2.27E-5 4$PC=1.075E-6 15
190PT G 797.5 3 0.16 2 E0+(E2,M1) 0.28 4
190PT2 G EKC=0.22 3 (1973Jo11)$ EKC<0.19 (1972Fi12)
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.038 {I5}
190PT G 1099.48 16 1.35 8 E0+(E2,M1) 0.041 6 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.033 5 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)$ K/L=6.1 4 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.040 {I7}
190PT G 1395.34 20 3.2 4 E2 0.00292 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.0028 5 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.00238 4$LC=0.000390 6$MC=9.00E-5 13
190PTS G NC=2.22E-5 4$OC=3.95E-6 6$PC=2.49E-7 4$IPC=3.65E-5 6
190PT cG $|d(E2/M1)>1.3 from |a(K)exp
190PT L 1602.0 2 (2,1)+
190PT E 0.16 AP 1.6 AP 7.5 AP 1.8 AP
190PTS E EAV=838.9 18$CK=0.7408 5$CL=0.12841 9$CM+=0.04086 3
190PT G 206.1 3 0.10 1 [M1,E2] 0.59 27 B
190PTS G KC=0.43 28$LC=0.121 5$MC=0.029 3
190PTS G NC=0.0072 6$OC=0.00122 4$PC=4.8E-5 33
190PT G 864.5 3 0.17 2 0.030 6 E? ?
190PT2 G EKC=0.025 5 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG M$(E0+E2+M1) from |a(K)exp, which is inconsistent with |DJ|p
190PT cG CC$based on |a(K)exp value
190PT G 1005.4 4 0.83 16M1+E2 0.7 5 0.0104 22 C
190PT2 G EKC=0.0088 20 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0086 19$LC=0.0014 3$MC=0.00032 6
190PTS G NC=7.9E-5 15$OC=1.4E-5 3$PC=9.5E-7 21
190PT G 1307.6 5 0.56 6 M1 0.00669
190PT2 G EKC=0.0073 15 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00554 8$LC=0.000865 13$MC=0.000199 3
190PTS G NC=4.91E-5 7$OC=8.86E-6 13$PC=6.11E-7 9$IPC=2.77E-5 4
190PT G 1601.5 4 0.25 3 (M1,E2) 0.0032693
190PT cG RI$from 1972Fi12. I|g=0.60 {I15} (1973Jo11)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0038 15 (1972Fi12)$ EKC=0.0039 11 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00260 75$LC=4.1E-4 12$MC=9.4E-5 26
190PTS G NC=2.31E-5 64$OC=4.2E-6 12$PC=2.81E-7 88$IPC=0.00013 3
190PT L 1737.0 2 1-
190PT E 0.53 AP 6.9 AP 6.8 AP 7.4 AP
190PTS E EAV=779.4 18$CK=0.7549 4$CL=0.13117 8$CM+=0.04175 3
190PT G 816.1 2 0.58 5 E1 0.00309 FC
190PT2 G EKC=0.0033 6 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00259 4$LC=0.000385 6$MC=8.79E-5 13
190PTS G NC=2.16E-5 3$OC=3.86E-6 6$PC=2.53E-7 4
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.17 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 1139.3 3 2.04 7 E1 1.68E-3 FC
190PT2 G EKC=0.0015 3 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.001409 20$LC=0.000206 3$MC=4.68E-5 7
190PTS G NC=1.153E-5 17$OC=2.07E-6 3$PC=1.388E-7 20$IPC=3.79E-6 7
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.15 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 1441.3 3 5.6 6 E1 1.25E-3 C
190PT cG RI$from 1973Jo11. I|g=4.05 {I10} (1972Fi12)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0010 2 (1973Jo11) $ EKC<0.0024 (1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.000938 14$LC=0.0001353 19$MC=3.07E-5 5
190PTS G NC=7.58E-6 11$OC=1.362E-6 19$PC=9.28E-8 13$IPC=0.0001386 20
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.16 from |a(K)exp
190PT L 1877.04 14 1-,2-,3-
190PT E 0.13 AP 2.2 AP 7.3 AP 2.3 AP
190PTS E EAV=717.7 18$CK=0.7678 4$CL=0.13377 7$CM+=0.04260 3
190PT G 523.28 13 0.24 2 E2(+M1) 1 GT 0.034 12 C
190PT cG RI$from 1972Fi12. I|g=0.60 {I11} (1973Jo11)
190PT2 G EKC=0.027 10 (1972Fi12)$ EKC=0.029 8 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.027 11$LC=0.0055 13$MC=0.0013 3
190PTS G NC=0.00032 7$OC=5.6E-5 13$PC=2.9E-6 12
190PT G 1279.5 3 1.28 23(E1) 1.41E-3 C
190PT cG RI$from 1973Jo11. I|g=0.90 {I5} (1972Fi12)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0015 4 (1973Jo11) $ EKC=0.0035 9 (1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.001150 17$LC=0.0001669 24$MC=3.79E-5 6
190PTS G NC=9.35E-6 13$OC=1.678E-6 24$PC=1.136E-7 16$IPC=4.75E-5 7
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.24. |a(K)exp (1972Fi12) also allows E2
190PT G 1581.5 3 1.00 8 E1 1.19E-3 FC
190PT2 G EKC<0.0012 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000802 12$LC=0.0001154 17$MC=2.62E-5 4
190PTS G NC=6.46E-6 9$OC=1.161E-6 17$PC=7.95E-8 12$IPC=0.000235 4
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.26 from |a(K)exp
190PT L 2212.8 4 (1-) H ?
190PT E 0.02 AP 0.7 AP 7.7 AP 0.7 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=570.2 18$CK=0.7909 3$CL=0.13885 6$CM+=0.04427 2
190PT G 2212.8 4 2.1 3 E1 1.23E-3 ? ?
190PTF G FLAG=JK$
190PT cG RI$1.8 {I1} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC<0.00082 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000463 7$LC=6.58E-5 10$MC=1.491E-5 21
190PTS G NC=3.68E-6 6$OC=6.63E-7 10$PC=4.60E-8 7$IPC=0.000687 10
190PT L 2216.2 3 (2+,3,4+) H ?
190PT E 0.039 AP 1.5 AP 7.3 AP 1.5 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=568.7 18$CK=0.7911 2$CL=0.13889 6$CM+=0.04428 2
190PT G 1013.1 4 0.12 1 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=EK$
190PT G 1920.4 4 1.5 3 M1 0.00291 ? ?
190PTF G FLAG=JK$
190PT cG RI$1.27 {I13} (1972HuZL). Complex |g in 1973Jo11
190PT2 G EKC=0.0031 9 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00213 3$LC=0.000329 5$MC=7.55E-5 11
190PTS G NC=1.87E-5 3$OC=3.37E-6 5$PC=2.34E-7 4$IPC=0.000350 5
190PT L 2358.3 3 (2)+
190PT E 0.022 AP 1.3 AP 7.3 AP 1.3 AP
190PTS E EAV=506.4 18$CK=0.7975 2$CL=0.14058 5$CM+=0.04485 2
190PT G 1760.7 3 1.12 7 M1(+E2) 0.8 LT 0.0032 3
190PT2 G EKC=0.0030 7 (1973Jo11,1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.00243 22$LC=0.00038 4$MC=8.7E-5 8
190PTS G NC=2.14E-5 19$OC=3.9E-6 4$PC=2.7E-7 3$IPC=0.000231 17
190PT G 2061.1 13 0.34 4 (E0+M1+E2) 0.0094 18 &
190PT cG RI$from 1972HuZL. I|g<0.2 (1973Jo11)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0075 14 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG $|a(K)exp using I|g=0.34 (1972HuZL)
190PT cG $I(E0)=0.0023 {I6}
190PT L 2382.67 14 (1)+
190PT E 0.19 AP 12 AP 6.4 AP 12 AP
190PTS E EAV=495.7 18$CK=0.7984 2$CL=0.14085 5$CM+=0.04494 2
190PT G 987.4 2 0.94 5 M1(+E2) 1 LT 0.0115 20 C
190PT cG RI$from 1972Fi12. I|g=1.49 {I22} (1973Jo11)
190PT2 G EKC=0.012 4 (1972Fi12) $ EKC=0.0088 17 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0096 17$LC=0.00153 24$MC=0.00035 6
190PTS G NC=8.7E-5 14$OC=1.57E-5 25$PC=1.05E-6 20
190PT G 1461.6 4 0.83 8 M1 0.00513 EC
190PT2 G EKC=0.0043 11 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00420 6$LC=0.000653 10$MC=0.0001499 21
190PTS G NC=3.71E-5 6$OC=6.69E-6 10$PC=4.62E-7 7$IPC=8.37E-5 12
190PT cG MR$<1.1 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 1784.9 3 2.91 15M1 0.00333 C
190PT dG E$misprinted as 1764.9 in 1972Fi12
190PT2 G EKC=0.0030 3 (1973Jo11) $ EKC<0.0035 (1972Fi12)
190PTS G KC=0.00256 4$LC=0.000396 6$MC=9.07E-5 13
190PTS G NC=2.24E-5 4$OC=4.05E-6 6$PC=2.81E-7 4$IPC=0.000262 4
190PT G 2087.3 4 1.6 3 E2,M1 0.0021 5 JC
190PT cG RI$1.2 {I2} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0015 4 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0014 3$LC=0.00022 5$MC=5.1E-5 11
190PTS G NC=1.3E-5 3$OC=2.3E-6 5$PC=1.5E-7 4$IPC=0.00039 8
190PT G 2382.6 3 7.2 6 (M1) 0.0018 4 J
190PT cG RI$5.2 {I5} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00109 11 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00108 18$LC=0.00016 3$MC=3.8E-5 7
190PTS G NC=9.3E-6 16$OC=1.7E-6 3$PC=1.16E-7 22$IPC=0.00055 11
190PT cG M$(M1,E2) from ce data
190PT cG $|d(E2/M1)=1.2 {I+11-5} from |a(K)exp; also Mult=M1 is not excluded
190PT L 2408.4 2 (1-,2-,3-) H ?
190PT E 0.019 AP 1.3 AP 7.3 AP 1.3 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=484.5 18$CK=0.7993 2$CL=0.14112 5$CM+=0.04503 2
190PT G 1013.1 4 0.12 1 (E1) 0.008 5 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=EK$
190PT2 G EKC<0.016 (1973Jo11)
190PT cG M$(D,E2) from ce data
190PT G 1054.7 3 0.50 5 (M1,E2) 0.0082 33 K ?
190PT cG RI$from 1972Fi12. I|g=1.4 {I4} (1973Jo11)
190PT2 G EKC=0.010 3 (1972Fi12) $ EKC=0.0038 12 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.0068 28$LC=0.00110 40$MC=2.54E-4 89
190PTS G NC=6.3E-5 22$OC=1.12E-5 41$PC=7.4E-7 32
190PT G 1205.5 4 0.41 4 ?
190PTF G FLAG=BK$
190PT cG RI$quoted uncertainty=0.40 (1972Fi12) is probably a misprint
190PT G 1810.7 5 0.21 2 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=G$
190PT G 2111.9 6 0.23 3 G ?
190PT L 2497.8 3 (2+) H ?
190PT E 0.017 AP 1.6 AP 7.2 AP 1.6 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=445.3 18$CK=0.8020 1$CL=0.14202 4$CM+=0.04534 2
190PT G 1760.7 3 K ?
190PT cG $Main placement from 2358 level (1973Jo11)
190PT G 2497.6 4 1.81 24(E2) 1.49E-3 ?
190PTF G FLAG=JK$
190PT cG RI$1.12 {I20} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00070 16 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000830 12$LC=0.0001248 18$MC=2.85E-5 4
190PTS G NC=7.04E-6 10$OC=1.267E-6 18$PC=8.62E-8 12$IPC=0.000502 7
190PT L 2679.8 4 (1-) H ?
190PT E 0.0084 AP 1.7 AP 7.1 AP 1.7 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=365.3 18$CK=0.8055$CL=0.14364 4$CM+=0.04591 2
190PT G 2081.6 5 0.80 8 G ?
190PT G 2680.2 5 1.05 17(E1) 1.38E-3 ?
190PTF G FLAG=JK$
190PT cG RI$0.75 {I8} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC<0.00062 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000342 5$LC=4.83E-5 7$MC=1.094E-5 16
190PTS G NC=2.70E-6 4$OC=4.87E-7 7$PC=3.40E-8 5$IPC=0.000979 14
190PT cG M$E2 is also possible from |a(K)exp
190PT L 2723.4 2 (1-) H ?
190PT E 0.0063 AP 1.6 AP 7.1 AP 1.6 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=346.2 18$CK=0.8060$CL=0.14400 4$CM+=0.04604 2
190PT G 1802.8 3 0.66 8 E1 1.16E-3 K ?
190PT2 G EKC=0.00057 10 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000645 9$LC=9.24E-5 13$MC=2.10E-5 3
190PTS G NC=5.17E-6 8$OC=9.30E-7 13$PC=6.41E-8 9$IPC=0.000397 6
190PT G 1985.8 5 0.32 4 [E3] G ?
190PT G 2125.0 6 0.14 1 G ?
190PT G 2428.0 7 0.60 7 G ?
190PT L 2797.0 3 H ?
190PT E 0.0047 AP 1.8 AP 7.0 AP 1.8 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=313.8 18$CK=0.8065$CL=0.14458 4$CM+=0.04625 2
190PT G 1401.9 3 0.73 4 E1 1.28E-3 K ?
190PT2 G EKC=0.0017 3 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000983 14$LC=0.0001420 20$MC=3.23E-5 5
190PTS G NC=7.95E-6 12$OC=1.429E-6 20$PC=9.72E-8 14$IPC=0.0001133 16
190PT G 1880.0 4 0.87 17(M1) 0.00302 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=JK$
190PT cG MR$<1 from |a(K)exp
190PT cG RI$0.70 {I7} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0027 18 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.00225 4$LC=0.000347 5$MC=7.96E-5 12
190PTS G NC=1.97E-5 3$OC=3.56E-6 5$PC=2.47E-7 4$IPC=0.000323 5
190PT G 2061.1 13 0.34 4 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=K$
190PT L 2875.4 3 H ?
190PT E 0.0016 AP 1.00 AP 7.2 AP 1.0 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=279.0 18$CK=0.8067$CL=0.14520 4$CM+=0.04647 2
190PT G 1672.4 3 K ?
190PT cG $Main placement from the 3067 level (1973Jo11)
190PT G 1958.8 5 0.27 3 G ?
190PT G 2277.6 7 0.77 8 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=G$
190PT G 2579.4 8 0.09 2 G ?
190PT L 2942.7 5 (0-,1-,2-) H ?
190PT E 0.0012 AP 1.2 AP 7.1 AP 1.2 AP ?
190PTS E EAV=249.0 18$CK=0.8066$CL=0.14573 4$CM+=0.04667 2
190PT G 729.88 17 1.26 6 M1 0.0292 K? ?
190PT2 G EKC=0.036 6 (1972Fi12,1973Jo11)
190PT cG $No E2 from |a(K)exp
190PTS G KC=0.0242 4$LC=0.00385 6$MC=0.000885 13
190PTS G NC=0.000219 3$OC=3.95E-5 6$PC=2.70E-6 4
190PT L 2980.9 4 1-
190PT E 0.0022 AP 3.2 AP 6.6 AP 3.2 AP
190PTS E EAV=231.9 18$CK=0.8065$CL=0.14604 4$CM+=0.04679 2
190PT G 2685.1 5 1.92 21E1 1.38E-3 J
190PT cG RI$1.36 {I15} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC<0.00045 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000341 5$LC=4.82E-5 7$MC=1.091E-5 16
190PTS G NC=2.69E-6 4$OC=4.86E-7 7$PC=3.39E-8 5$IPC=0.000982 14
190PT G 2980.9 6 1.6 3 E1 1.49E-3 J
190PT cG RI$0.92 {I10} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00036 13 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000290 4$LC=4.08E-5 6$MC=9.25E-6 13
190PTS G NC=2.28E-6 4$OC=4.12E-7 6$PC=2.88E-8 4$IPC=0.001143 16
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.4 from |a(K)exp
190PT L 3014.0 2 (2)-
190PT E 0.0050 AP 9.8 AP 6.1 AP 9.8 AP
190PTS E EAV=217.0 18$CK=0.8063$CL=0.14631 4$CM+=0.04689 2
190PT G 1810.7 5 0.21 2 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=G$
190PT G 2097.2 3 3.1 4 E1 1.21E-3 JC
190PT cG RI$2.03 {I12} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00053 12 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000504 7$LC=7.18E-5 10$MC=1.629E-5 23
190PTS G NC=4.02E-6 6$OC=7.24E-7 11$PC=5.02E-8 7$IPC=0.000608 9
190PT G 2277.6 7 0.77 8 & ?
190PTF G FLAG=G$
190PT G 2416.4 3 6.8 6 E1 1.30E-3 JC
190PT cG RI$4.7 {I5} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00043 6 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000402 6$LC=5.70E-5 8$MC=1.292E-5 18
190PTS G NC=3.19E-6 5$OC=5.75E-7 8$PC=4.00E-8 6$IPC=0.000820 12
190PT L 3049.3 2 (2)-
190PT E 0.0029 AP 8.2 AP 6.2 AP 8.2 AP
190PTS E EAV=201.0 19$CK=0.8060$CL=0.14661 4$CM+=0.04700 2
190PT G 2132.5 3 1.36 23E1 1.21E-3 JC
190PT cG RI$0.97 {I9} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00070 21 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000491 7$LC=6.99E-5 10$MC=1.585E-5 23
190PTS G NC=3.91E-6 6$OC=7.04E-7 10$PC=4.88E-8 7$IPC=0.000632 9
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.4 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 2452.0 5 1.8 3 E1 1.31E-3 JC
190PT cG RI$1.38 {I15} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00043 15 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000393 6$LC=5.57E-5 8$MC=1.262E-5 18
190PTS G NC=3.11E-6 5$OC=5.61E-7 8$PC=3.91E-8 6$IPC=0.000842 12
190PT G 2753.3 4 6.0 6 E1 1.41E-3 JC
190PT cG RI$4.0 {I5} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00034 7 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000328 5$LC=4.63E-5 7$MC=1.048E-5 15
190PTS G NC=2.59E-6 4$OC=4.67E-7 7$PC=3.26E-8 5$IPC=0.001020 15
190PT L 3067.5 2 (1,2)-
190PT E 0.0013 AP 4.5 AP 6.4 AP 4.5 AP
190PTS E EAV=192.7 19$CK=0.8059$CL=0.14676 4$CM+=0.04706 2
190PT G 1672.4 3 0.84 12E1 1.17E-3
190PT2 G EKC=0.0011 2 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000731 11$LC=0.0001049 15$MC=2.38E-5 4
190PTS G NC=5.87E-6 9$OC=1.056E-6 15$PC=7.25E-8 11$IPC=0.000301 5
190PT cG $|d(M2/E1)<0.3 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 1864.5 4 1.4 3 (E1) 1.17E-3 J
190PT cG RI$1.00 {I5} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.0012 3 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000611 9$LC=8.73E-5 13$MC=1.98E-5 3
190PTS G NC=4.88E-6 7$OC=8.79E-7 13$PC=6.07E-8 9$IPC=0.000442 7
190PT cG M$E2 also possible from |a(K)exp
190PT G 2469.5 4 1.7 3 E1 1.31E-3 J
190PT cG RI$complex |g in 1973Jo11. I|g=1.40 {I14} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00048 13 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000389 6$LC=5.51E-5 8$MC=1.248E-5 18
190PTS G NC=3.08E-6 5$OC=5.55E-7 8$PC=3.87E-8 6$IPC=0.000853 12
190PT G 2771.2 5 1.03 18E1 1.41E-3 J
190PT cG RI$0.83 {I10} (1972HuZL)
190PT2 G EKC=0.00037 13 (1973Jo11)
190PTS G KC=0.000324 5$LC=4.58E-5 7$MC=1.038E-5 15
190PTS G NC=2.56E-6 4$OC=4.62E-7 7$PC=3.23E-8 5$IPC=0.001030 15
190PT L 3233.7 4 (2-,3-) H ?
190PT E 1.6 AP 6.8 AP 1.6 AP ?
190PTS E CK=0.8039$CL=0.14836 5$CM+=0.04767 2
190PT G 1880.0 4 0.87 17 (M1) 0.0027 3 &? ?
190PTF G FLAG=JK$
190PTS G KC=0.00203 22$LC=0.00031 4$MC=7.2E-5 8
190PTS G NC=1.78E-5 19$OC=3.2E-6 4$PC=2.2E-7 3$IPC=0.00030 3
190PT cG MR$<1 from |a(K)exp
190PT G 2636.2 8 0.95 10 G? ?