189OS 189RE B- DECAY (24.3 H) 1973HO27,1979SA18 201704 201704
189OS H TYP=FUL$AUT=T.D. JOHNSON, BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 142, 1 (2017)$
189OS2 H CUT=15-Apr-2017$
189OS c 1973Ho27: measured E|g, I|g, |g|g-coin.
189OS c 1979Sa18: measured E|g, I|g, I(ce), |g|g-coin, |b|g-coin
189OS c Others: 1965Bl06, 1963Cr06
189OS cG $Experimental conversion coefficients from 1963Cr06, 1965Bl06,
189OSxcG and 1979Sa18 assuming |a(K)exp(185.9|g)=0.49.
189OS cG E,RI$Weighted average of values from 1973Ho27 and 1979Sa18,
189OS2cG unless otherwise noted.
189OS cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas
189OS cG E(D)$Weighted average of 1963Cr06 (electron measurements) and 1979Sa18
189OS cG E(E)$From 1979Sa18
189OS cG RI(A)$From adopted gammas branching ratios, I|g(59.0|g+59.3|g)=2.0 {I5}
189OS cG RI(B)$From I|g(59.0|g+59.3|g)=21 {I2} in {+189}Ir |e decay,
189OS2cG I|g(59.0|g+59.3|g)=2.2 {I5} {+189}Re |b{+-} decay, and relative
189OS3cG intensities deexciting the 95 and 276 levels.
189OS cG RI(C)$Deduced from coincidence data in 1979Sa18.
189OS cG CC$From BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
189OS N 0.055 9 0.055 9 1 1
189OS cN NR$From weighted average of I|g(186|g+189|g)=0.025 {I10},
189OS2cN I|g(217|g+219|g)=0.11 {I3}, and I|g(245|g)=0.04 {I2} for |g-ray
189OS3cN singles per {+189}Re |b; and I|g(217|g+219|g)=0.09 {I3} from |b|g
189OSxcN coincidences (1963Cr06)
189OS PN 3
189RE P 0.0 5/2+ 24.3 H 4 1008 8
189RE cP J,T$From {+189}Re Adopted Levels
189RE cP QP$From 2017Wa10. Other: Q(|b{+-})=924 {I10} for measured
189RE2cP mass excess({+189}Re)=-38063 {I10} (2013Sh30) and
189RE3cP mass excess({+189}Os)=-38986.7 {I7} (2017Wa10)
189OS G 90.0 1 0.3112 E
189OS G 118.60 5 0.12 6 E
189OS G 175.1 5 0.5 2 ?
189OS cG E$observed only by 1973Ho27.
189OS2cG Inspection of the spectrum indicates that this transition may be
189OS2cG the same as one identified at 180.7 in 1979Sa18.
189OS G 223.80 5 0.3712 E
189OS G 332.9 1 0.3112 E
189OS G 432.0 8 0.1912 E
189OS L 0.0 3/2-
189OS B 62 7 7.1 1
189OSS B EAV=335.2 31
189OS cB IB$other measured values: 60 {I20} (1965Bl06), 58 {I25} (1963Cr06)
189OS cB E$1015 {I20} from 1965Bl06, other value: 1000 {I50} (1963Cr06)
189OS L 30.82 49/2- 5.81 H 10 M1
189OS B 3.9 23 8.8 3 1U
189OSS B EAV=325.7 30
189OS cB IB$from the intensity balance through the 30.8 level assuming no direct
189OS2cB |b feeding. Note that for log| {If{+1u}t}>8.5, I|b<6%.
189OS G 30.82 5 M3+E4 0.04 2 3.12E5 10 227 39
189OS2 G M1/M3=0.32 5 (1963Cr06)
189OSS G L/T=0.707 19$M/T=0.227 11
189OSS G N/T=0.057 3$O/T=0.0085 5$P/T=0.000152 6
189OSS G LC=2.20E5 6$MC=7.1E4 4
189OSS G NC=1.78E4 9$OC=2.65E3 10$PC=47.4 8
189OS cG E$weighted average of values from |b-decay (1962Cr02) by
189OS2cG measurement of the conversion electrons
189OS cG TI$from ce(M3)(30.8|g)/ce(L3)(69.5|g)=550 {I60}/465 {I10} measured in
189OS2cG equilibrium. The indirect feeding into the 30.8 level is I(|g+ce)=5.6
189OSxcG {I4}
189OS cG MR$<0.09 from M1/M3 in |b{+-} decay
189OS L 36.21 31/2-
189OS B 2.6 16 8.9 3 1U
189OSS B EAV=323.7 30
189OS G 36.17 5 4.3 13M1+E2 0.046 5 20.2 4 D
189OS2 G EL1C=13.8 +67-44 (1973Ho27)
189OS cG MR$other: <0.8 from ce data in |b{+-}
189OSS G LC=15.6 3$MC=3.60 7
189OSS G NC=0.877 17$OC=0.150 3$PC=0.01064 16
189OS L 69.551 225/2-
189OS B 4 LT 8.2 GT ?
189OSS B EAV=308.4 31
189OS G 33.31 4 0.027 3E2 723 A
189OSS G LC=546 9$MC=138.5 21
189OSS G NC=33.0 5$OC=4.83 8$PC=0.00382 6
189OS cG RI$referred from |e decay,
189OS2cG the ratio of 0.113:59 (in |e) or 0.027:14.0 (in |b-decay)
189OS cG E$From {+189}Ir |e decay (1970Ma37). Included here for completeness
189OS G 69.54 4 14.0 5M1+E2 +0.683 25 8.2 3
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3:M1:M2:M3=367 {I20}:470 {I20}:465 {I10}:52 {I20}:108
189OSxcG {I15}:115 {I15}
189OS2 G EL2C=2.55 +26-24 (1973Ho27)
189OSS G LC=6.25 23$MC=1.56 6
189OSS G NC=0.375 14$OC=0.0572 20$PC=0.00113 3
189OS cG MR$other: +0.62 {I+11-9} in |b{+-} decay
189OS L 95.269 103/2-
189OS B 5 LT 8.1 GT ?
189OSS B EAV=298.6 31
189OS G 25.65 10 0.035 13 M1+E2 0.11 +5-3 1.3E+3 13 A
189OSS G LC=1.02E+3 98$MC=2.6E+2 25
189OSS G NC=61 59$OC=9.0 86$PC=0.0217 78
189OS cG E$from {+189}Ir |e decay (1970Ma37). Included here for completeness
189OS G 59.1 1 1.7 6M1+E2 0.085 10 4.81 10 B
189OSF G FLAG=D
189OSS G LC=3.71 8$MC=0.857 19
189OSS G NC=0.209 5$OC=0.0357 7$PC=0.00250 4
189OS G 95.27 1 0.55 6M1+E2 +0.32 2 6.36
189OS2 G EKC=6.5 25 (1979Sa18)
189OS cG $L1+L2:L3=63 30:32 24 (1963Cr06)
189OS2 G EL1C=0.82 +145-53 (1973Ho27)
189OS cG MR$other: +0.3 {I+5-1} from |b{+-} decay
189OSS G KC=4.92 9$LC=1.10 3$MC=0.261 8
189OSS G NC=0.0634 19$OC=0.0105 3$PC=0.000577 10
189OS L 216.68 37/2-
189OS B 13 2 7.4 1
189OSS B EAV=252.9 30
189OS cB E$E|b=800 {I20} (1965Bl06), E|b=780 {I20} (1963Cr06) to the 217+219
189OSxcB levels.
189OS G 121.39 5 0.53 6[E2] 2.02 D
189OSS G KC=0.567 8$LC=1.098 16$MC=0.280 4
189OSS G NC=0.0672 10$OC=0.00996 14$PC=5.30E-5 8
189OS G 147.09 5 22.6 6M1+E2 -1.0 +4-3 1.43 21 D
189OS2 G EKC=0.94 20 (1973Ho27)
189OSS G KC=0.96 28$LC=0.36 5$MC=0.088 15
189OSS G NC=0.021 4$OC=0.0033 5$PC=1.07E-4 35
189OS DG EKC$the authors there report 0.93, however using
189OS2DG their electron intensities, evaluators find this rounds to 0.94
189OS G 185.89 5 34.3 7M1+E2 0.5 LT 0.91 6
189OSS G KC=0.74 6$LC=0.133 5$MC=0.0309 14
189OSS G NC=0.0075 4$OC=0.00128 4$PC=8.6E-5 8
189OS cG $K:L1:L3=194 25:37 13:14 12 (1963Cr06,1965Bl06)
189OS2 G EKC=0.83 11 (1973Ho27)
189OS G 216.69 7 100.0 25E2 0.254
189OSS G KC=0.1376 20$LC=0.0881 13$MC=0.0221 4
189OSS G NC=0.00532 8$OC=0.000809 12$PC=1.307E-5 19
189OS2 G EL1C=0.047 25 (1973Ho27)
189OS L 219.399 257/2-
189OS B 7.4 13 7.7 1
189OSS B EAV=251.9 30
189OS cB E$see comment on |b to 217 level
189OS G 124.14 5 0.53 6[E2] 1.85 D
189OSS G KC=0.541 8$LC=0.991 14$MC=0.253 4
189OSS G NC=0.0607 9$OC=0.00900 13$PC=5.03E-5 7
189OS G 149.84 5 14.3 3E2 0.917
189OSS G KC=0.352 5$LC=0.426 6$MC=0.1083 16
189OSS G NC=0.0260 4$OC=0.00388 6$PC=3.21E-5 5
189OS2 G EKC=0.75 32 (1973Ho27)
189OS G 188.53 9 9.06 18M1+E2 1.5 +10-4 0.57 9
189OS cG MR$other: <0.6 from |b{+-} decay
189OS2 G EKC=1.0 3 (1973Ho27)
189OSS G KC=0.374 98$LC=0.147 6$MC=0.0363 20
189OSS G NC=0.0088 5$OC=0.00137 5$PC=4.0E-5 12
189OS G 219.40 5 82.5 18E2 0.244
189OSS G KC=0.1332 19$LC=0.0837 12$MC=0.0210 3
189OSS G NC=0.00506 7$OC=0.000769 11$PC=1.268E-5 18
189OS2 G EKC=0.127 33 (1973Ho27)
189OS L 233.54 3 5/2-
189OS B 0.21 4 9.2 1
189OSS B EAV=246.7 30
189OS G 138.24 5 0.45 4M1+E2 -0.8 2 1.84 13 E
189OSS G KC=1.29 18$LC=0.42 4$MC=0.102 11
189OSS G NC=0.025 3$OC=0.0039 4$PC=0.000146 23
189OS G 164.02 5 0.38 4M1+E2 1.7 LT 1.1 3 E
189OSS G KC=0.82 32$LC=0.22 4$MC=0.053 12
189OSS G NC=0.013 3$OC=0.0021 4$PC=9.3E-5 40
189OS G 197.33 5 1.97 6E2 0.347
189OSS G KC=0.1757 25$LC=0.1299 19$MC=0.0328 5
189OSS G NC=0.00788 11$OC=0.001191 17$PC=1.643E-5 23
189OS G 233.6 1 1.29 6M1+E2 1.7 +6-3 0.28 4
189OSS G KC=0.19 3$LC=0.0657 10$MC=0.01609 24
189OSS G NC=0.00389 6$OC=0.000613 11$PC=2.1E-5 4
189OS L 275.90 3 5/2-
189OS B 5.6 10 7.6 1
189OSS B EAV=231.1 30
189OS cB E$725 {I30} from 1963Cr06
189OS G 56.50 4 1.23 12M1 5.17 E
189OSS G LC=3.99 6$MC=0.916 13
189OSS G NC=0.224 4$OC=0.0386 6$PC=0.00287 4
189OS G 59.1 1 0.5 AP(M1+E2) 0.9 AP 22.0 AP B
189OS2 G L1/L2 AP 5 (1962Ha24)
189OSS G LC AP 16.6$MC AP 4.20
189OSS G NC AP 1.007$OC AP 0.1504$PC AP 0.001543
189OS cG E$note that this transition is not confirmed in (n,|g), |g|g coin
189OS2cG measurements
189OS G 180.67 5 0.35 4M1+E2 0.2 GT 0.75 28 E
189OSS G KC=0.53 31$LC=0.165 24$MC=0.040 8
189OSS G NC=0.0097 18$OC=0.00155 19$PC=5.9E-5 39
189OS cG E$see comment on 175.1|g.
189OS G 206.36 5 1.21 16M1+E2 1.9 GT 0.34 5
189OSS G KC=0.20 5$LC=0.1066 20$MC=0.0266 7
189OSS G NC=0.00640 16$OC=0.000983 16$PC=2.07E-5 60
189OS G 239.7 1 0.25 6[E2] 0.183 E
189OSS G KC=0.1057 15$LC=0.0585 9$MC=0.01464 21
189OSS G NC=0.00352 5$OC=0.000539 8$PC=1.021E-5 15
189OS G 245.09 10 64 8E2 0.1704 D
189OSS G KC=0.0997 14$LC=0.0536 8$MC=0.01338 19
189OSS G NC=0.00322 5$OC=0.000493 7$PC=9.67E-6 14
189OS2 G EKC=0.137 63 (1973Ho27)
189OS G 275.9 1 5.6 3M1+E2 1.8 2 0.167 10
189OSS G KC=0.119 9$LC=0.0359 7$MC=0.00873 14
189OSS G NC=0.00211 4$OC=0.000336 7$PC=1.29E-5 11
189OS L 365.77 57/2-
189OS B 0.03LT 9.8 GT ?
189OSS B EAV=198.7 29
189OS G 132.28 5 0.086 25[M1] 2.53 E
189OSS G KC=2.09 3$LC=0.339 5$MC=0.0777 11
189OSS G NC=0.0190 3$OC=0.00328 5$PC=0.000244 4
189OS G 270.6 1 0.172 18[E2] 0.1249 E
189OSS G KC=0.0770 11$LC=0.0363 6$MC=0.00903 13
189OSS G NC=0.00218 3$OC=0.000336 5$PC=7.60E-6 11
189OS G 296.0 1 0.49 12[M1] 0.268 E
189OSS G KC=0.222 4$LC=0.0355 5$MC=0.00813 12
189OSS G NC=0.00199 3$OC=0.000343 5$PC=2.57E-5 4
189OS L 427.93 45/2-,7/2-
189OS B 0.20 4 8.8 1
189OSS B EAV=176.8 28
189OS G 152.03 5 0.47 4 E
189OS G 211.26 5 0.25 4 E2(+M1) 1 GT 0.38 10 E
189OSS G KC=0.25 11$LC=0.0959 24$MC=0.0236 11
189OSS G NC=0.00570 23$OC=0.000892 14$PC=2.7E-5 13
189OS cG $K/(L1+L2)|?2.4 (1965Bl06)
189OS G 397.0 1 1.88 18
189OS G 428.8 5 0.86 18
189OSS G KC=0.0244 4$LC=0.00702 11$MC=0.001702 25
189OSS G NC=0.000411 6$OC=6.57E-5 10$PC=2.57E-6 4
189OS L 438.67 6 1/2-,3/2-
189OS G 343.5 1 0.80 12 E
189OS G 402.6 3 0.12 6 E
189OS G 438.8 8 0.05520 @
189OSF G FLAG=EA
189OS L 498.78 51/2-,3/2-
189OS B 0.32 6 8.4 1
189OSS B EAV=152.4 28
189OS G 222.84 8 0.14 3 S
189OS cG E,RI$from Adopted Gammas, based on (n,|g) E=thermal data. It is
189OS2cG possible that an unplaced E|g=223.80 {I5} with I|g=0.37 {I12}
189OS3cG corresponds to the |g ray seen in (n,|g), although energy deviation of
189OS4cG |?1 keV seems quite large in view of quoted low uncertainties.
189OS G 265.2 1 0.33 5 E
189OS G 403.6 1 1.35 12
189OS G 428.8 5 1.11 18
189OS G 462.6 1 2.58 6M1 0.0813 E
189OSS G KC=0.0675 10$LC=0.01065 15$MC=0.00244 4
189OSS G NC=0.000595 9$OC=0.0001029 15$PC=7.73E-6 11
189OS2 G EKC=0.08 3 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 498.8 1 1.29 12M1 0.0667 E
189OSS G KC=0.0554 8$LC=0.00872 13$MC=0.00199 3
189OSS G NC=0.000487 7$OC=8.42E-5 12$PC=6.33E-6 9
189OS2 G EKC=0.095 35 (1979Sa18)
189OS cG E$1973Ho27 report a |g of 496.8 keV {I8} which may correspond to this
189OS2cG transition, although a large mismatch makes this unlikely
189OS L 549.89 63/2-
189OS B 0.24 5 8.4 1
189OSS B EAV=135.2 27
189OS G 273.6 5 0.15 3[M1] 0.332 E
189OSS G KC=0.275 4$LC=0.0440 7$MC=0.01009 15
189OSS G NC=0.00246 4$OC=0.000426 7$PC=3.18E-5 5
189OS cG E$1973Ho27 report a 275.8 {i8} which may be this transition,
189OS2cG although the large mismatch makes this unlikely
189OS G 454.7 2 2.8 5M1 0.0851
189OSS G KC=0.0707 10$LC=0.01115 16$MC=0.00255 4
189OSS G NC=0.000623 9$OC=0.0001077 16$PC=8.09E-6 12
189OS2 G EKC=0.09 4 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 480.4 1 0.55 18M1 0.0736 E
189OSS G KC=0.0612 9$LC=0.00963 14$MC=0.00220 3
189OSS G NC=0.000538 8$OC=9.31E-5 13$PC=6.99E-6 10
189OS2 G EKC=0.055 25 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 550.0 3 0.68 6M1 0.0517 E
189OSS G KC=0.0430 6$LC=0.00674 10$MC=0.001542 22
189OSS G NC=0.000376 6$OC=6.51E-5 10$PC=4.90E-6 7
189OS2 G EKC=0.058 40 (1979Sa18)
189OS L 599.57 43/2-
189OS B 1.3 2 7.5 1
189OSS B EAV=118.8 27
189OS G 101.1 5 0.06 3M1 5.45 11 C
189OSF G FLAG=E
189OSS G KC=4.50 9$LC=0.733 15$MC=0.168 4
189OSS G NC=0.0411 9$OC=0.00709 15$PC=0.000527 11
189OS2 G EKC=5.7 18 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 160.93 5 0.51 6M1 1.451 E
189OSS G KC=1.199 17$LC=0.194 3$MC=0.0445 7
189OSS G NC=0.01086 16$OC=0.00188 3$PC=0.0001396 20
189OS2 G EKC=1.9 3 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 323.7 1 0.18 6[M1] 0.211 E
189OSS G KC=0.1745 25$LC=0.0278 4$MC=0.00637 9
189OSS G NC=0.001556 22$OC=0.000269 4$PC=2.01E-5 3
189OS G 366.1 1 0.74 6
189OS G 380.2 1 0.43 12[E2] 0.0464 E
189OSS G KC=0.0326 5$LC=0.01050 15$MC=0.00256 4
189OSS G NC=0.000619 9$OC=9.79E-5 14$PC=3.38E-6 5
189OS G 382.8 1 0.61 12[E2] 0.0456 E
189OSS G KC=0.0321 5$LC=0.01026 15$MC=0.00250 4
189OSS G NC=0.000605 9$OC=9.57E-5 14$PC=3.33E-6 5
189OS G 504.1 1 4.5 4M1 0.0649
189OSS G KC=0.0539 8$LC=0.00848 12$MC=0.00194 3
189OSS G NC=0.000474 7$OC=8.19E-5 12$PC=6.16E-6 9
189OS2 G EKC=0.050 18 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 530.3 3 1.05 6M1 0.0569
189OSS G KC=0.0473 7$LC=0.00742 11$MC=0.001697 24
189OSS G NC=0.000414 6$OC=7.17E-5 10$PC=5.39E-6 8
189OS2 G EKC=0.058 40 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 563.4 1 9.0 5M1 0.0486
189OSS G KC=0.0404 6$LC=0.00633 9$MC=0.001447 21
189OSS G NC=0.000353 5$OC=6.11E-5 9$PC=4.60E-6 7
189OS2 G EKC=0.032 10 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 599.6 1 5.1 4M1 0.0413
189OSS G KC=0.0344 5$LC=0.00538 8$MC=0.001229 18
189OSS G NC=0.000300 5$OC=5.19E-5 8$PC=3.91E-6 6
189OS2 G EKC=0.034 10 (1979Sa18)
189OS L 621.97 11 (3/2-,5/2-)
189OS B 0.016 5 9.3 2
189OSS B EAV=111.5 26
189OS G 256.2 1 0.12 3[M1+E2] 0.27 13 E
189OSS G KC=0.21 12$LC=0.049 4$MC=0.0117 5
189OSS G NC=0.00283 14$OC=0.00046 5$PC=2.3E-5 15
189OS G 388.3 4 0.12 6[M1+E2] 0.087 43 E
189OSS G KC=0.069 39$LC=0.0134 37$MC=0.0031 8
189OSS G NC=0.00076 19$OC=1.28E-4 37$PC=7.8E-6 46
189OS L 672.18 8 5/2-
189OS B 0.045 13 8.7 1
189OSS B EAV=95.5 26
189OS G 306.6 5 0.12 6[M1+E2] 0.165 80 C
189OSF G FLAG=E
189OSS G KC=0.129 74$LC=0.027 5$MC=0.0065 9
189OSS G NC=0.00158 23$OC=0.00026 6$PC=1.45E-5 89
189OS G 438.50 10 0.38 12[M1+E2] 0.063 31 @
189OSF G FLAG=E
189OSS G KC=0.050 28$LC=0.0094 29$MC=0.00220 62
189OSS G NC=5.3E-4 16$OC=9.0E-5 29$PC=5.7E-6 33
189OS G 452.91 10 0.26 9 [M1+E2] 0.058 29 S
189OSS G KC=0.046 25$LC=0.0086 27$MC=0.00200 58
189OSS G NC=4.9E-4 15$OC=8.2E-5 27$PC=5.2E-6 30
189OS L 716.82 55/2-
189OS B 0.32 8 7.6 1
189OSS B EAV=81.6 25
189OS G 117.27 5 0.18 6M1 3.56 E
189OSS G KC=2.94 5$LC=0.478 7$MC=0.1097 16
189OSS G NC=0.0268 4$OC=0.00463 7$PC=0.000344 5
189OS2 G EKC=4.5 13 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 166.95 5 0.14 3E2(+M1) 2 GT 0.69 7 E
189OSS G KC=0.35 9$LC=0.256 10$MC=0.065 3
189OSS G NC=0.0155 7$OC=0.00235 8$PC=3.5E-5 11
189OS2 G EKC=0.35 14 (1979Sa18)
189OS G 218 1 0.6 3[M1] 0.621 12 C
189OSF G FLAG=E
189OSS G KC=0.514 10$LC=0.0826 16$MC=0.0189 4
189OSS G NC=0.00463 9$OC=0.000799 16$PC=5.96E-5 12
189OS G 351.1 1 0.6 3[M1] 0.1692 E
189OSS G KC=0.1403 20$LC=0.0223 4$MC=0.00511 8
189OSS G NC=0.001247 18$OC=0.000216 3$PC=1.614E-5 23
189OS G 441.2 5 0.12 6
189OS cG RI$from 1979Sa18. Other value: 2.4 {I3} from 1973Ho27 is inconsistent
189OS2cG with the spectrum of 1979Sa18 and presumably includes an impurity.
189OS G 483.2 1 0.68 18[M1] 0.0725 E
189OSS G KC=0.0602 9$LC=0.00949 14$MC=0.00217 3
189OSS G NC=0.000530 8$OC=9.16E-5 13$PC=6.89E-6 10
189OS G 497.3 1 2.3 6