189IR 189PT EC DECAY (10.87 H) 1972HE05,1972BA21 201704 201704
189IR H TYP=FUL$AUT=T.D. JOHNSON, BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 142, 1 (2017)$
189IR2 H CUT=15-Apr-2017$
189IR c 1972He05, 1972Ba21: measured E|g, I|g, E(ce), I(ce), |g|g-coin,
189IR2c (ce)ce(t), |g(ce)(t)
189IR c Decay scheme is from 1972He05.
189IR c 1980Be27: |g(|q,H,Temp); deduced multipolarity, mixing ratio
189IR c 1971Pl08, 1970Pl06, 1969Pl06: E|g, I|g, I(ce), |g|g-coin, E|b, I|b
189IR c 1970Ba56: E(ce), I(ce), |g|g-coin, (x ray)|g(t), (ce)ce(t), |g(ce)(t)
189IR c 1970Ba10: E|g, I|g
189IR c 1969Ha03: |g(ce)(t)
189IR c 1966Kr08: |g(ce)(t)
189IR c 1965Ja12: |g|g(t), |g(ce)(t); deduced level half-lives
189IR c 1964Kr03: |g(ce)-coin
189IR c 1964Le07: E|g, I|g, ce, half-lives of {+189}Pt and {+189}Ir decays;
189IR2c deduced multipolarities
189IR c 1955Sm42: measured half-life of {+189}Pt decay
189IR c Other E|g, I|g, ce measurements: 1962Kr04, 1962Ha24, 1962Gr27,
189IR2c 1961Kr02, 1960Ma28.
189IR cE E$1971Pl08 report two positron components with endpoint energies of
189IR2cE 885 {I10} and 479 {I20}, respectively, and
189IR3cE I|b{++}(885)/I|b{++}(479)=11 {I2}. These cannot be ascribed directly
189IRxcE to known levels and are probably composite.
189IR cG $Measured Auger electron intensities (on scale as relative I|g) from
189IR2cG Table 2 in 1972Ba21: KL{-1}L{-1}=4.9 {I7}, KL{-1}L{-2}=7.0 {I5},
189IR3cG KL{-1}L{-3}=5.0 {I8}, KL{-2}L{-3}=8.9 {I6}, KL{-3}L{-3}=3.3 {I7}
189IR cG $Unless otherwise stated, experimental K-conversion coefficients are
189IR2cG from 1972He05 and experimental subshell ratios are from 1972Ba21, both
189IR3cG papers are from the same group
189IR cG $A{-2}U{-2} from 1980Be27 defined by
189IR2cG W(|q)=|S{-K}B{-K}A{-K}U{-K}P{-K}(cos|q),
189IR3cG where B{-K} is related to the magnetic field and U{-K} is the
189IR4cG disorientation coefficient
189IR cG E,RI$From 1972He05
189IR cG M$From conversion electron data of 1972He05 and 1972Ba21, except where
189IRxcG noted
189IR cG MR$Magnitudes of |d values are from conversion electron data.
189IR2cG Signs are from low temperature |g(|q) data (1980Be27)
189IR cG RI(E)$Corrected for {+188}Ir contamination
189IR cG RI(F)$I|g(tot)=87 {I4}, intensity divided assuming intensity balance
189IR2cG through the 113.8 level.
189IR cG CC$Theoretical values from BrIcc code (2008Ki07) with "Frozen Orbitals"
189IR2cG approximation, unless otherwise stated
189IR cL E$From least-squares fit to E|g data. Reduced |h{+2}=1.5 as compared to
189IR2cL critical |h{+2}=1.4, with two |g ray-energies deviating by about 3|s
189IR cL J$From Adopted Levels
189IR cL T(B)$From 1972Ba21
189IR cL T(C)$From 1970Ba56
189PT P 0.0 3/2- 10.87 H 12 1980 14
189PT cP J,T$From {+189}Pt Adopted Levels
189PT cP QP$From 2017Wa10
189IR N 0.079 21 1 1
189IR cN NR$Weighted average of 0.061 {I21} (from I|e+I|b feeding of 43% {I15}
189IR2cN to the ground state as determined by 1972He05 from measured K x-ray and
189IR3cN Auger electron intensities, the latter are given in 1972Ba21, but the
189IR4cN K| x-ray intensities are not given in either 1972He05 or 1972Ba21); and
189IR5cN 0.104 {I25} (deduced by evaluators using the measured Auger electron
189IR6cN intensities from 1972Ba21, on the same relative scale as I|g, and the
189IR7cN theoretical Auger probabilities per K vacancy from 1991PeZY, Evaluated
189IR8cN Atomic Data Library from LLNL). The total K vacancies were corrected
189IR9cN for the contribution from internal conversion, and |eK/|e=0.81 was
189IRAcN assumed. 15% uncertainty, as recommended by 1991PeZY was assigned to
189IRBcN the theoretical Auger intensities. 1963Th07 reported I(K| x-ray)=1270,
189IRCcN which corresponds to I|g normalization of 0.11.
189IR PN 3
189IR G 251.99 25 0.4514 E2(+M1) 2.5 GT 0.182 21
189IRS G KC=0.113 20$LC=0.0522 10$MC=0.01302 21
189IRS G NC=0.00316 5$OC=0.000505 11$PC=1.23E-5 25
189IR2 G K/(L1+L2)=2.1 (1964Le07)
189IR G 263.0715 0.4 2
189IR G 352.6315 1.7 3
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(351.1+352.6)=0.071 {I24}
189IR G 383.8020 0.9018
189IR G 459.60 20 0.9018 M1 0.0897
189IRS G KC=0.0744 11$LC=0.01186 17$MC=0.00272 4
189IRS G NC=0.000669 10$OC=0.0001187 17$PC=9.02E-6 13
189IR2 G EKC=0.089 33
189IR G 484.6230 0.29 7
189IR G 751.0310 0.6510
189IR G 772.0015 0.20 6
189IR G 778.1040 0.17 5 E
189IR G 820.0050 0.16 5
189IR G 892.5020 0.42 6
189IR G 933.9030 0.30 6
189IR G 955.5020 0.18 5
189IR G 1033.74 10 0.50 8(M1,E2+E0)
189IR2 G EKC=0.20 6
189IR G 1123.8015 0.21 4
189IR G 1143.9415 0.3310 E
189IR G 1356.3530 0.28 6
189IR G 1408.5225 0.61 9
189IR G 1485.2030 0.17 3
189IR G 1504.0030 0.36 7
189IR G 1554.7640 0.13 4
189IR G 1579.8550 0.09 4
189IR G 1593.2420 0.38 6
189IR G 1601.7030 0.15 3
189IR G 1613.8540 0.37 6
189IR G 1635.4080 0.22 8
189IR G 1683.7030 0.27 4
189IR G 1740.2340 0.19 3
189IR G 1785.9640 0.15 6
189IR G 1792.0040 0.20 5
189IR G 1798.0440 0.30 6
189IR G 1811.3480 0.14 7 E
189IR L 0.0 3/2+
189IR E 0.24 24 21 21 6.9 GT 21 21 ?
189IR cE TI$1972He05 determined 43% {I15} from their K x-ray and Auger electron
189IR2cE intensities, but the values for K x-ray intensities were not given.
189IR3cE Value of 21% {I21} given here is deduced by the evaluators from |g
189IR4cE normalization factor of 0.079 {I21}
189IRS E EAV=446.9 62$CK=0.8033 5$CL=0.1406 2$CM+=0.04452 5
189IR L 94.34 3 1/2+ 11.4 NS 3
189IR cL T$weighted average of 11.3 ns {I3} (1969Ha03) and 11.6 ns {I6}
189IR2cL (1972Ba21). Other values: 12 ns {I1} (1965Ja12), 11 ns {I1} (1966Kr08)
189IR E 0.09 5 12 6 7.4 2 12 6
189IRS E EAV=405.5 62$CK=0.8057 3$CL=0.1414 2$CM+=0.04483 5
189IR G 94.34 4 82 6 M1+E2 3.2 3 5.99
189IRS G KC=1.26 10$LC=3.56 7$MC=0.914 19
189IRS G NC=0.221 5$OC=0.0338 7$PC=0.000162 12
189IR cG RI$%I|g=7.63 {I57}
189IR2 G EKC=1.1 5
189IR cG $K:L1:L2:L3=88 35:10.6 11:126 7:113 6
189IR L 113.834 24 5/2+ 76 PS 18 B
189IR cL T$other value: <300 ps (1966Kr08)
189IR E 0.0085 LT 1.2 LT 8.4 GT 1.2 LT ?
189IRS E EAV=397.0 62$CK=0.8061 3$CL=0.1416 2$CM+=0.04489 5
189IR G 113.82 4 31.122 M1+E2 0.55 5 3.88 8
189IRS G KC=2.82 11$LC=0.81 4$MC=0.196 10
189IRS G NC=0.0479 23$OC=0.0079 4$PC=0.000347 13
189IR cG RI$%I|g=2.89 {I28}
189IR2 G EKC=2.8 4
189IR cG $K:L2:L3=86 7:7.0 7:4.9 5
189IR cG CC$other values: K:L1:L2:L3=110 {I10}:<60:15 {I5}:14 {I5} (1964Le07)
189IR cG $K:L1:L2:L3::>92:|?33:11:7 (1962Ha24)
189IR L 176.53 33/2+ 22 PS 10 B
189IR E 0.07 3 13 5 7.3 2 13 5
189IRS E EAV=369.4 62$CK=0.8072 3$CL=0.1422 2$CM+=0.04507 5
189IR G 62.65 6 1.01 22 M1+E2 1.8 LT 16 12
189IRS G LC=12.3 91$MC=3.1 24
189IRS G NC=0.75 57$OC=0.116 84$PC=0.00164 81
189IR cG $L1:L2:L3=2.9 {I6}:1.5 {I6}:<0.9
189IR cG RI$calculated from I(ce(L1) 62|g)/I(721|g)=2.9 {I6}/100 {I4}
189IR G 82.22 4 31 3 M1+E2 0.17 +3-4 10.71
189IRS G KC=8.59 16$LC=1.63 7$MC=0.381 19
189IRS G NC=0.093 5$OC=0.0162 7$PC=0.001079 19
189IR2 G EL1C=1.3 2
189IR cG $L1:L2:L3=40 4:6.7 9:3.7 10
189IR G 176.53 7 10.6 5 M1+E2 0.7 2 0.99 9
189IRS G KC=0.75 10$LC=0.184 9$MC=0.044 3
189IRS G NC=0.0108 7$OC=0.00181 7$PC=9.1E-5 13
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.986 {I90}
189IR2 G EKC=1.1 3
189IR cG $K:L1:L2:L3=11.2 3:1.23 13:0.72 7:0.47 8
189IR L 300.50 47/2+ 20 PS LT
189IR E 1.8 LT 9.1 GT 1.8 LT 1U?
189IRS E CK=0.7966 2$CL=0.15352 19$CM+=0.04940 7
189IR G 186.70 6 24.024 M1+E2 -0.7 2 0.84 8
189IR cG MR$negative sign from parametric plots of A{-2} from ce(|q) and |g(|q)
189IR2cG (1983Fa11) in {+192}Os(d,xn) reaction
189IRS G KC=0.64 9$LC=0.152 6$MC=0.0364 18
189IRS G NC=0.0089 4$OC=0.00150 5$PC=7.8E-5 11
189IR2 G EKC=0.66 8
189IR cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M=15.8 {I12}:2.2 {I3}:0.54 {I11}:0.37 {I10}:0.83 {I9}
189IRxcG (1972Ba21)
189IR G 300.51 6 40.020 E2 0.0943
189IRS G KC=0.0598 9$LC=0.0262 4$MC=0.00652 10
189IRS G NC=0.001583 23$OC=0.000253 4$PC=6.43E-6 9
189IR cG RI$%I|g=3.72 {I34}
189IR2 G EKC=0.059 6
189IR L 317.68 35/2+
189IR E 0.037 10 15 4 7.2 1 15 4
189IRS E EAV=307.2 62$CK=0.8086$CL=0.1433 1$CM+=0.04548 4
189IR G 141.18 4 45.223 M1+E2 0.17 LT 2.27
189IRS G KC=1.87 4$LC=0.313 6$MC=0.0723 16
189IRS G NC=0.0178 4$OC=0.00313 6$PC=0.000230 5
189IR2 G EKC=1.94 14
189IR cG $K:L2:L3=88 5:1.53 23:0.23 12
189IR G 203.78 8 5.2 5 M1+E2 0.7 LT 0.73 9
189IRS G KC=0.59 9$LC=0.112 3$MC=0.0262 11
189IRS G NC=0.00641 24$OC=0.001110 20$PC=7.2E-5 11
189IR2 G EKC=0.77 25
189IR cG $K:L1:L2:L3=4.0 {I12}:0.8 {I2}:<0.25:<0.2
189IR G 223.34 10 16.011 E2 0.239
189IR2 G EKC=0.109 19
189IRS G KC=0.1279 18$LC=0.0838 12$MC=0.0212 3
189IRS G NC=0.00513 8$OC=0.000806 12$PC=1.313E-5 19
189IR G 317.65 6 35.018 M1+E2 0.5 2 0.209 21
189IRS G KC=0.170 19$LC=0.0299 15$MC=0.0070 3
189IRS G NC=0.00171 8$OC=0.000298 16$PC=2.06E-5 25
189IR cG RI$%I|g=3.26 {I30}
189IR2 G EKC=0.171 16 $ K/(L1+L2)=6.7 14 (1964Le07)
189IR L 372.17 411/2-
189IR G 71.69 4 1.03 23 M2(+E3) 0.1 LT 76 4
189IRS G LC=57 3$MC=14.6 8
189IRS G NC=3.63 18$OC=0.62 3$PC=0.0361 6
189IR cG $L1:L2:L3=41 {I4}:<6:13.8 {I14} (1972Ba21); L1:L2:L3:M12=100:11:38:90
189IR2cG (1964Le07); L1:L2:L3=50:10:16 (1962Ha24)
189IR cG RI$from I(ce(L1) 71|g)/I(721|g)=41 {I3}/100 {I4}
189IR cG MR$from L1/L3 in 1972Ba21 and L1/L2 (with 20% uncertainty) in 1964Le07
189IR G 258.37 6 3.4 3 E3 0.876
189IRS G KC=0.248 4$LC=0.470 7$MC=0.1235 18
189IRS G NC=0.0301 5$OC=0.00468 7$PC=4.26E-5 6
189IR2 G EKC=0.23 4
189IR cG $K:L1:L2:L3=0.78 8:0.25 13:0.98 10:0.45 6
189IR L 539.76 7 ?
189IR E 0.11 5 9.2 2 0.11 5 ?
189IRS E CK=0.8084 1$CL=0.1450 2$CM+=0.04612 5
189IR G 539.8515 3.1 3 (E1,E2) 0.013 7 ?
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.288 {I36}
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.016
189IR L 607.51 45/2-
189IR E 2.4 11 7.8 2 2.4 11
189IRS E CK=0.8078 2$CL=0.1456 2$CM+=0.04633 5
189IR G 306.80 15 0.32 6 [E1] 0.0239
189IRS G KC=0.0199 3$LC=0.00316 5$MC=0.000723 11
189IRS G NC=0.0001763 25$OC=3.04E-5 5$PC=1.97E-6 3
189IR G 430.84 15 1.7 3 E1 0.01100
189IRS G KC=0.00917 13$LC=0.001416 20$MC=0.000324 5
189IRS G NC=7.90E-5 11$OC=1.373E-5 20$PC=9.37E-7 14
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.012
189IR G 493.30 10 3.4 3 E1 0.00819
189IRF G FL=113.834
189IR cG E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=493.67
189IRS G KC=0.00684 10$LC=0.001045 15$MC=0.000239 4
189IRS G NC=5.83E-5 9$OC=1.016E-5 15$PC=7.05E-7 10
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0074
189IR G 607.60 5 28 11 [E1] 0.00530 @ ?
189IR cG RI$%I|g=2.6 {I10}
189IRF G FLAG=F
189IRS G KC=0.00444 7$LC=0.000667 10$MC=0.0001521 22
189IRS G NC=3.72E-5 6$OC=6.51E-6 10$PC=4.63E-7 7
189IR L 615.58 5 7/2- 0.18 NS 2 C
189IR G 243.50 6 7511 E2 0.181
189IRS G KC=0.1024 15$LC=0.0591 9$MC=0.01487 21
189IRS G NC=0.00361 5$OC=0.000569 8$PC=1.065E-5 15
189IR2 G EKC=0.108 19
189IR cG $K:L1:L2:L3=8.1 6:1.1 3:2.2 4:1.5 3
189IR cG $K:L12:L3=160 {I20}:75 {I20}:42 {I13} (1964Le07)
189IR cG $K:L2:L3=100:70:17 (1962Ha24)
189IR L 644.29 6(3/2,5/2)+
189IR E 0.84 23 8.3 1 0.84 23
189IRS E CK=0.8075 2$CL=0.1459 2$CM+=0.04646 5
189IR G 343.80 20 1.3 3 (M1) 0.194
189IRS G KC=0.1609 23$LC=0.0259 4$MC=0.00595 9
189IRS G NC=0.001462 21$OC=0.000259 4$PC=1.96E-5 3
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(343.2+343.8)=0.15 {I6}
189IR G 530.42 10 2.5020 M1(+E2) 0.8 LT 0.054 8
189IRS G KC=0.044 7$LC=0.0073 9$MC=0.00168 19
189IRS G NC=0.00041 5$OC=7.3E-5 9$PC=5.3E-6 9
189IR2 G EKC=0.052 14
189IR G 644.30 8 6.8 5 M1(+E2) 0.9 LT 0.032 6
189IRS G KC=0.026 5$LC=0.0043 6$MC=0.00099 14
189IRS G NC=0.00024 4$OC=4.3E-5 6$PC=3.1E-6 6
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.632 {I68}
189IR2 G EKC=0.031 9
189IR cG $A{-2}U{-2}=+0.30 {I18} gives |d=0.00 {I+12-15} (1980Be27)
189IR L 721.41 33/2+
189IR E 21 6 6.8 1 21 6
189IRS E CK=0.8066 2$CL=0.1467 2$CM+=0.04674 6
189IR G 403.90 15 15.2 8 M1(+E2) 0.3 LT 0.123 4
189IRS G KC=0.101 4$LC=0.0164 4$MC=0.00378 9
189IRS G NC=0.000930 21$OC=0.000165 4$PC=1.23E-5 5
189IR2 G EKC=0.115 11
189IR cG $A{-2}U{-2}=+0.075 {I91} gives |d=-0.02 {I+12-8} (1980Be27)
189IR G 544.91 5 62.025 M1+E2 +0.15 10 0.0566 17
189IRS G KC=0.0469 14$LC=0.00747 18$MC=0.00171 4
189IRS G NC=0.000421 10$OC=7.47E-5 19$PC=5.67E-6 17
189IR2 G EKC=0.057 5
189IR cG MR$from A{-2}U{-2}=-0.552 {I52} (1980Be27)
189IR G 607.60 5 59 11 M1+E2 +0.23 +9-7 0.0420 14 @
189IR2 G EKC=0.041 9
189IR cG $K:L12:L3=66 {I12}:11 {I1}:<1 (1964Le07)
189IRF G FLAG=F
189IRS G KC=0.0348 12$LC=0.00555 16$MC=0.00127 4
189IRS G NC=0.000313 9$OC=5.55E-5 16$PC=4.20E-6 15
189IR cG MR$from A{-2}U{-2}=+0.342 {I44} (1980Be27)
189IR G 627.08 8 25.310 M1+E2 -0.7 4 0.031 7
189IRS G KC=0.026 6$LC=0.0043 7$MC=0.00099 16
189IRS G NC=0.00024 4$OC=4.3E-5 8$PC=3.1E-6 7
189IR2 G EKC=0.027 5 $ K/(L1+L2)=4.8 12
189IR cG $K/(L1+L2) from 1964Le07
189IR cG MR$from A{-2}U{-2}=+0.94 {I11} (1980Be27)
189IR G 721.38 5 100 4 M1+E2 -0.87 +23-43 0.020 4
189IR cG RI$%I|g=9.30 {I81}
189IR2 G EKC=0.023 3
189IR cG M$from |a(K)exp
189IR cG MR$from A{-2}U{-2}=+0.492 {I63} (1980Be27)
189IRS G KC=0.017 3$LC=0.0028 4$MC=0.00064 9
189IRS G NC=0.000158 22$OC=2.8E-5 4$PC=2.0E-6 4
189IR L 792.71 4(1/2,3/2)+
189IR E 1.3 4 8.0 2 1.3 4
189IRS E CK=0.8055 3$CL=0.14743 16$CM+=0.04703 7
189IR G 616.1015 0.48 7
189IR G 678.9510 0.48 7
189IR G 698.33 8 2.3023 M1+E2 1 LT 0.025 5
189IRS G KC=0.021 5$LC=0.0034 6$MC=0.00079 12
189IRS G NC=0.00019 3$OC=3.4E-5 6$PC=2.5E-6 6
189IR2 G EKC=0.026 9
189IR G 792.67 5 14.5 9 M1+E2 0.9 +4-3 0.0158 25
189IRS G KC=0.0130 21$LC=0.0022 3$MC=0.00050 7
189IRS G NC=0.000122 16$OC=2.1E-5 3$PC=1.5E-6 3
189IR cG RI$%I|g=1.35 {I13}
189IR2 G EKC=0.0131 21
189IR cG MR$if J=3/2, A{-2}U{-2}=-0.03 {I7} is consistent only with |d<0.4.
189IR2cG The isotropic distribution of this |g ray favors J=1/2.
189IR L 828.18 53/2-
189IR E 0.62 20 8.2 2 0.62 20
189IRS E CK=0.8050 3$CL=0.14785 18$CM+=0.04718 7
189IR G 212.72 10 1.1 3 [E2] 0.281 ?
189IRS G KC=0.1450 21$LC=0.1024 15$MC=0.0259 4
189IRS G NC=0.00628 9$OC=0.000983 14$PC=1.477E-5 21
189IR G 288.34 10 0.7011 [D,E2] 0.17 14
189IRS G KC=0.14 12 $ LC=0.022 20 $ MC=0.005 4
189IR G 651.61 8 1.1411 (E1) 0.00460 *
189IR cG M$Supported by parity change and |a(K)exp, although
189IR2cG |a(K)exp does not exclude E2
189IRS G KC=0.00386 6$LC=0.000577 8$MC=0.0001314 19
189IRS G NC=3.21E-5 5$OC=5.63E-6 8$PC=4.04E-7 6
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0175
189IR cG RI$I|g(doublet)=1.14 {I11}
189IR G 714.9015 0.7523
189IRF G FL=113.834
189IR cG E$poor fit. Level-energy difference=714.34
189IR G 733.73 15 3.8 6 E1 0.00364
189IRS G KC=0.00305 5$LC=0.000453 7$MC=0.0001031 15
189IRS G NC=2.52E-5 4$OC=4.43E-6 7$PC=3.21E-7 5
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0053
189IR G 828.06 8 3.2 5 E1+M2 0.19 +9-15 0.0045 18 E
189IRS G KC=0.0038 15$LC=6.0E-4 26$MC=1.37E-4 61
189IRS G NC=3.4E-5 15$OC=5.9E-6 27$PC=4.4E-7 20
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.298 {I52}
189IR2 G EKC=0.0038 13
189IR L 850.07 11 1/2,3/2,5/2+ ?
189IR E 0.10 3 9.0 2 0.10 3 ?
189IRS E CK=0.8046 3$CL=0.14812 18$CM+=0.04729 7
189IR G 673.3115 0.47 7 E ?
189IR G 755.9515 0.7511 E ?
189IR L 900.16 12 (7/2,9/2)- ?
189IR G 284.5810 0.1 1 @ ?
189IR L 902.65 6 (3/2)+
189IR E 0.33 11 8.5 2 0.33 11
189IRS E CK=0.8036 3$CL=0.14881 20$CM+=0.04755 8
189IR G 181.30 10 1.2018 [M1+E2] 0.8 4
189IRS G KC=0.6 4 $ LC=0.176 25 $ MC=0.043 8 $ NC=0.0105 19$ OC=0.00172 20
189IR G 584.9510 0.7511
189IR G 788.4520 0.8 4 (M1) 0.0222 @C
189IRS G KC=0.0184 25$LC=0.0029 4$MC=0.00066$ NC=0.00016
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(788.4+788.4)=0.21 {I7}
189IR G 809.00 25 0.5812 M1 0.0208
189IRS G KC=0.01725 25$LC=0.00270 4$MC=0.000619 9
189IRS G NC=0.0001521 22$OC=2.70E-5 4$PC=2.07E-6 3
189IR2 G EKC=0.021 8
189IR G 902.6025 0.34 7
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0316 {I69}
189IR L 912.21 63/2+
189IR E 0.81 23 8.1 2 0.81 23
189IRS E CK=0.8034 3$CL=0.14895 21$CM+=0.04760 8
189IR G 190.83 10 1.2 3 M1 0.978
189IRS G KC=0.808 12$LC=0.1316 19$MC=0.0303 5
189IRS G NC=0.00745 11$OC=0.001319 19$PC=9.95E-5 14
189IR2 G EKC=0.92 30
189IR G 594.60 10 1.1512 M1 0.0458
189IRS G KC=0.0380 6$LC=0.00601 9$MC=0.001378 20
189IRS G NC=0.000339 5$OC=6.01E-5 9$PC=4.58E-6 7
189IR2 G EKC=0.044 10
189IR G 735.78 15 4.0 8 M1(+E2) 1.0 LT 0.022 5 E
189IRS G KC=0.018 4$LC=0.0030 5$MC=0.00069 11
189IRS G NC=0.00017 3$OC=3.0E-5 5$PC=2.2E-6 5
189IR2 G EKC=0.022 7
189IR G 798.20 10 2.0521 M1 0.0215
189IRS G KC=0.01785 25$LC=0.00280 4$MC=0.000641 9
189IRS G NC=0.0001575 22$OC=2.80E-5 4$PC=2.14E-6 3
189IR2 G EKC=0.018 6
189IR G 912.3020 0.44 9
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0409 {I89}
189IR L 924.76 8(3/2,5/2)-
189IR E 0.39 11 8.4 2 0.39 11
189IRS E CK=0.8032 3$CL=0.14913 21$CM+=0.04767 8
189IR G 384.8030 0.53 11 &
189IR G 811.05 20 1.3520 E1 0.00300
189IRS G KC=0.00252 4$LC=0.000372 6$MC=8.45E-5 12
189IRS G NC=2.07E-5 3$OC=3.63E-6 5$PC=2.66E-7 4
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0037
189IR G 924.75 8 3.0024 E1 0.00235
189IRS G KC=0.00197 3$LC=0.000288 4$MC=6.55E-5 10
189IRS G NC=1.603E-5 23$OC=2.82E-6 4$PC=2.09E-7 3
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.279 {I31}
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0023
189IR L 958.68 7(3/2-,5/2-)
189IR E 0.54 17 8.2 2
189IRS E CK=0.8025 3$CL=0.14964 23$CM+=0.04787 9
189IR G 130.54 10 0.8024 [M1+E2] 2.2 7
189IRS G KC=1.4 10 $ LC=0.62 24 $ MC=0.15 7 $ NC=0.037 16 $ OC=0.0060 22
189IR G 343.20 20 1.3 3 [M1,E2] 0.13 7
189IRS G KC=0.10 6 $LC=0.021 52$MC=0.0050 10$ NC=0.0012 3 $OC=0.00021 6
189IR G 351.1025 1.4 3 (M1+E2) 0.12 7
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(351.1+352.6)=0.071 {I24}
189IR G 640.5040 0.6018
189IR G 782.0915 0.6410 *
189IR cG RI$main intensity of this |g belongs to the decay of 959 level,
189IR2cG decay from a tentative level at 1610 is uncertain
189IRF G FLAG=E
189IR cG RI$I|g(doublet)=0.64 {I10}
189IR L 1106.39 7(3/2,5/2)+
189IR E 0.38 11 8.2 2
189IRS E CK=0.7987 5$CL=0.1524 4$CM+=0.04891 12
189IR G 384.8030 0.53 11 &
189IR G 788.4520 0.6 4 (M1) 0.0222 @
189IRS G KC=0.0184 25$LC=0.0029 4$MC=0.00066$ NC=0.00016
189IR G 929.7118 0.4112
189IR G 992.76 10 0.8613 M1 0.01236
189IRS G KC=0.01028 15$LC=0.001600 23$MC=0.000366 6
189IRS G NC=9.00E-5 13$OC=1.599E-5 23$PC=1.228E-6 18
189IR2 G EKC=0.014 5
189IR G 1011.8520 0.52 10 &
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(1011.8+1011.8)<0.0135
189IR G 1106.30 15 1.9019 M1(+E2) 0.9 LT 0.0083 12
189IRS G KC=0.0069 10$LC=0.00108 14$MC=0.00025 4
189IRS G NC=6.1E-5 8$OC=1.07E-5 14$PC=8.1E-7 12$IPC=3.3E-7 3
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.177 {I22}
189IR2 G EKC=0.0079 18
189IR L 1184.41 5 5/2- 80 PS LT C
189IR E 6.3 17 6.9 1
189IRS E CK=0.7961 6$CL=0.1543 4$CM+=0.04964 15
189IR G 568.85 5 76 3 M1+E2 -0.214 28 0.0499 16
189IRS G KC=0.0414 14$LC=0.00660 18$MC=0.00152 4
189IRS G NC=0.000372 10$OC=6.60E-5 18$PC=4.99E-6 17
189IR2 G EKC=0.046 4
189IR cG $K:L12:L3=3.5 {I3}:0.59 {I6}:<0.04
189IR cG MR$from A{-2}U{-2}=-0.142 {I31} (1980Be27)
189IR G 576.8515 0.4810
189IR G 1007.80 10 1.0315 E1 0.00200
189IRS G KC=0.001685 24$LC=0.000245 4$MC=5.57E-5 8
189IRS G NC=1.362E-5 19$OC=2.40E-6 4$PC=1.79E-7 3
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0039
189IR G 1070.6510 0.4 2 (E1) @
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(1070.6+1070.6)<0.0059
189IR cG RI$I|g(1070.6+1070.6)=0.85 {I13}
189IR G 1184.1520 0.38 6
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0353 {I62}
189IR L 1203.26 63/2+
189IR E 0.49 14 8.0 2
189IRS E CK=0.7953 6$CL=0.1548 4$CM+=0.04984 16
189IR G 885.60 10 1.9019 M1+E2 0.9 +11-6 0.0121 36 E
189IRS G KC=0.0100 31$LC=0.00163 42$MC=3.75E-4 95
189IRS G NC=9.2E-5 24$OC=1.62E-5 43$PC=1.18E-6 38
189IR2 G EKC=0.010 3$
189IR G 1026.73 7 2.9 5 (M1+E2) 0.008 4 @
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(1026.7+1026.7)=0.0081 {I18}
189IR cG RI$I|g(1026.7+1026.7)=3.70 {I22}
189IRS G KC=0.007 3$ LC=0.0011 4 $ MC=0.00025 9 $ NC=6.1E-5 22
189IR G 1089.5515 0.30 5
189IR G 1108.73 15 1.0010 E2(+M1) 0.6 GT 0.0061 19
189IRS G KC=0.0051 16$LC=8.2E-4 23$MC=1.89E-4 51
189IRS G NC=4.6E-5 13$OC=8.2E-6 23$PC=5.9E-7 20$IPC=3.1E-7 6
189IR2 G EKC=0.0050 16
189IR L 1238.73 12(3/2-,5/2,7/2+) ?
189IR E 0.06 4 8.9 3 ?
189IRS E CK=0.7939 7$CL=0.1559 5$CM+=0.05025 18
189IR G 623.1510 0.8 4 @
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(623.2+623.2)=0.020 {I7}
189IR cG RI$I|g(623.2+623.2)=2.5 {I4}
189IR L 1312.33 10 (3/2+,5/2,7/2+)
189IR E 0.11 4 8.5 2
189IRS E CK=0.7902 8$CL=0.1585 6$CM+=0.05126 23
189IR G 1011.8520 0.52 10 &
189IR G 1198.5015 0.19 4
189IR G 1312.3015 0.6810(M1+E2,E1) 0.0033 21
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.063 {I10}
189IRS G KC=0.0028 17 $LC=0.00042 27 $MC=0.00010 6
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0044
189IR cG M$|a(K)exp gives M1+E2 with |d>0.6 or E1
189IR L 1344.51 5(3/2+,5/2+)
189IR E 0.41 13 7.9 2
189IRS E CK=0.7883 9$CL=0.1599 7$CM+=0.05178 25
189IR G 623.1515 1.7 6 (M1+E2) 0.027 14 @
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(623.2+623.2)=0.020 {I7}
189IR cG RI$I|g(623.2+623.2)=2.5 {I4}
189IRS G KC=0.022 12$ LC=0.0039 15 $ MC=0.0009 4$ NC=0.00022 8
189IR G 1026.73 7 0.8 4 @
189IR G 1044.11 10 0.7812 (E2) 0.00479
189IRS G KC=0.00390 6$LC=0.000681 10$MC=0.0001581 23
189IRS G NC=3.87E-5 6$OC=6.72E-6 10$PC=4.43E-7 7
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0051
189IR cG M$|a(K)exp does not exclude E1, but additional argument
189IR2cG for E2 comes from log| {Ift} support for J|p assignment
189IR G 1167.9620 0.40 6
189IR G 1230.70 15 0.8012 (E2) 0.00349
189IRS G KC=0.00286 4$LC=0.000476 7$MC=0.0001099 16
189IRS G NC=2.69E-5 4$OC=4.70E-6 7$PC=3.24E-7 5$IPC=7.41E-6 11
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.00375
189IR cG M$|a(K)exp does not exclude E1, but additional argument for E2
189IR2cG comes from log| {Ift} support for J|p assignment
189IR G 1344.62 15 0.7010 (E2) 0.00297
189IRS G KC=0.00243 4$LC=0.000395 6$MC=9.10E-5 13
189IRS G NC=2.23E-5 4$OC=3.91E-6 6$PC=2.75E-7 4$IPC=2.51E-5 4
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.065 {I10}
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.00286
189IR cG M$|a(K)exp does not exclude E1, but additional argument for E2
189IR2cG comes from log| {Ift} support for J|p assignment
189IR L 1451.58 10(5/2)- ?
189IR E 0.072 21 8.4 2 ?
189IRS E CK=0.7801 14$CL=0.1659 10$CM+=0.0541 4
189IR G 836.00 8 0.90 9 M1+E2 1.0 +20-7 0.0133 49 ?
189IRS G KC=0.0109 42$LC=0.00181 56$MC=4.2E-4 13
189IRS G NC=1.03E-4 31$OC=1.80E-5 57$PC=1.29E-6 51
189IR2 G EKC=0.011 4
189IR L 1468.99 12 - ?
189IR E 0.15 6 8.1 2 ?
189IRS E CK=0.7783 15$CL=0.1671 11$CM+=0.0546 5
189IR G 284.58 10 1.6 4 [M1+E2] 0.22 11 @
189IR cG RI$I|g(doublet)=1.7 {I3}
189IRS G KC=0.17 10 $ LC=0.038 6 $ MC=0.0090 10 $ NC=0.0022 3 $OC=0.00037 7
189IR L 1476.46 101/2+,3/2(+),5/2+
189IR E 0.34 11 7.7 2
189IRS E CK=0.7775 16$CL=0.1677 12$CM+=0.0548 5
189IR G 1300.2530 0.18 5
189IR G 1362.5615 0.7511 (E1,E2) 0.0021 8
189IRS G KC=0.0017 7 $LC=0.00026 12$ MC=0.000060 28$NC=0.000015 7
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0027
189IR G 1381.6420 0.4 2 @
189IR cG RI$I|g(1381.6+1381.6)=0.63 {I10}
189IR G 1476.9120 3.0 7 (E2+M1) 0.8 GT 0.0031 6 @
189IRS G KC=0.0026 5$ LC=0.00040 8$ MC=9E-5 2 $ NC=2.2E-5 4$
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.279 {I68}
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(1476.9+1476.9)=0.0025 {I6}
189IR cG RI$I|g(1476.9+1476.9)=4.0 {I4}
189IR L 1500.19 7(1/2,3/2)-
189IR E 0.30 9 7.7 2
189IRS E CK=0.7749 18$CL=0.1696 13$CM+=0.0555 5
189IR G 855.7320 0.25 6
189IR G 1323.66 7 2.9020 E1 1.30E-3 E
189IRS G KC=0.001041 15$LC=0.0001494 21$MC=3.38E-5 5
189IRS G NC=8.29E-6 12$OC=1.466E-6 21$PC=1.113E-7 16$IPC=6.91E-5 10
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0017
189IR G 1405.9525 0.63 9
189IR L 1501.35 11(1/2-,3/2-,5/2-)
189IR E 0.17 5 8.0 2
189IRS E CK=0.7747 18$CL=0.1697 13$CM+=0.0556 5
189IR G 708.3515 0.38 8 ?
189IR G 1387.7525 0.7011
189IR G 1501.70 20 1.0816 (E1) 1.17E-3 &
189IRS G KC=0.000839 12$LC=0.0001199 17$MC=2.71E-5 4
189IRS G NC=6.65E-6 10$OC=1.177E-6 17$PC=8.99E-8 13$IPC=0.000181 3
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.100 {I16}
189IR cG $|a(K)exp(1501.7+1501.7)<0.0018
189IR L 1536.89 13
189IR E 0.081 24 8.2 2
189IRS E CK=0.7700 22$CL=0.1731 16$CM+=0.0569 6
189IR G 744.3020 0.45 7
189IR G 1423.0020 0.44 9
189IR G 1536.7030 0.13 3
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0121 {I29}
189IR L 1558.20 8
189IR E 0.15 5 7.9 2
189IRS E CK=0.7667 24$CL=0.1755 18$CM+=0.0578 7
189IR G 655.6110 0.50 8
189IR G 765.4015 0.38 8
189IR G 914.2560 0.15 5
189IR G 1240.6635 0.21 6
189IR G 1381.6420 0.2 2 @
189IR G 1443.6740 0.25 9
189IR G 1558.2625 0.2 1 @
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0186 {I94}
189IRF G FLAG=E
189IR cG RI$I|g(1558.3+1558.3)=0.40 {I6}
189IR L 1571.67 7(3/2,5/2)+
189IR E 0.66 19 7.2 2
189IRS E CK=0.764 3$CL=0.1772 19$CM+=0.0584 8
189IR G 1254.03 7 3.9424 M1+E2 2.0 LT 0.0055 15
189IRS G KC=0.0045 12$LC=0.00071 18$MC=0.00016 4
189IRS G NC=4.0E-5 10$OC=7.1E-6 18$PC=5.3E-7 15$IPC=1.34E-5 22
189IR2 G EKC=0.0046 12
189IR G 1395.2330 0.33 8
189IR G 1457.85 20 2.3023 E2 0.00258 E
189IRS G KC=0.00209 3$LC=0.000335 5$MC=7.69E-5 11
189IRS G NC=1.89E-5 3$OC=3.31E-6 5$PC=2.36E-7 4$IPC=5.40E-5 8
189IR2 G EKC=0.0022 7
189IR G 1476.9120 1.0 5 @
189IR G 1571.6020 0.80 8
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0744 {I95}
189IR L 1610.28 6(3/2,5/2)- ?
189IR E 0.12 4 7.9 2 ?
189IRS E CK=0.757 4$CL=0.1828 25$CM+=0.0606 10
189IR G 651.61 8 * ?
189IR G 782.0915 * ?
189IR G 1002.65 10 0.5511 M1,E2+E0 0.029 10 ?
189IR2 G EKC=0.022 8
189IR cG CC$from |a(K)exp, with |?30% added for higher shells
189IR cG M$|a(K)exp consistent with pure M1 (|a(K)(M1)=0.010) within 1.5|s or
189IR2cG with E2+E0 (|a(K)(E2)=0.0042) with large E0 component
189IR G 1070.6510 0.4 2 @ ?
189IR G 1292.3530 0.12 2 ?
189IR G 1496.3025 0.2 1 @ ?
189IR cG RI$I|g(1496.3+1496.3)=0.75 {I19}
189IR G 1610.8540 0.23 3 ?
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0214 {I32}
189IR L 1622.83 111/2+,3/2,5/2+
189IR E 0.14 4 7.8 2
189IRS E CK=0.754 4$CL=0.185 3$CM+=0.0615 11
189IR G 1305.2520 0.14 4 E
189IR G 1446.3725 0.6410 E
189IR G 1508.2540 0.18 3
189IR G 1528.4220 0.6713
189IR G 1623.0530 0.15 5
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0140 {I47}
189IR L 1672.83 11
189IR E 0.15 5 7.6 2
189IRS E CK=0.738 6$CL=0.196 4$CM+=0.0657 16
189IR G 880.0515 0.9014 (E1,E2) 0.0047 21
189IRS G KC=0.0038 16$LC=0.00067 25 $MC=0.00016 8$ NC=0.00004 2
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0056
189IR G 952.0020 0.22 6
189IR G 1496.3025 0.6 3 @ ?
189IR G 1558.2625 0.2 1 @
189IRF G FLAG=E
189IR G 1672.8 4 * ?
189IR cG RI$I|g(doublet)=0.20 {I3}
189IR L 1767.21 143/2,5/2+
189IR E 0.12 4 7.3 2
189IRS E CK=0.680 16$CL=0.237 12$CM+=0.082 5
189IR G 1159.6020 0.21 4
189IR G 1653.6025 0.56 8 E
189IR G 1672.8040 0.20 3 *
189IR G 1767.0840 0.60 6
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0558 {I71}
189IR L 1802.25 8 (5/2-)
189IR E 0.21 6 6.8 2
189IRS E CK=0.63 3$CL=0.271 21$CM+=0.096 9
189IR G 1080.8010 0.8012(E1) 0.00176
189IR2 G EKC LT 0.0075
189IR cG M$|a(K)exp allows E1, E2 or M1, but proposed |DJ|p favors E1
189IR G 1157.9520 0.21 4
189IR G 1195.1140 0.14 5
189IR G 1501.70 20 1.08 16 (E1) 1.17E-3 &
189IRS G KC=0.000839 12$LC=0.0001199 17$MC=2.71E-5 4
189IRS G NC=6.65E-6 10$OC=1.177E-6 17$PC=8.99E-8 13$IPC=0.000181 3
189IR G 1688.4930 0.18 4 E
189IR G 1802.3540 0.24 7 E
189IR cG RI$%I|g=0.0223 {I67}
189IR L 1814.86 12 (1/2,3/2)- ?
189IR E 0.12 4 6.9 2 ?
189IRS E CK=0.61 4$CL=0.29 3$CM+=0.103 11
189IR G 986.63 12 0.7712 M1 0.01255 E ?
189IRS G KC=0.01044 15$LC=0.001625 23$MC=0.000372 6
189IRS G NC=9.14E-5 13$OC=1.624E-5 23$PC=1.248E-6 18
189IR2 G EKC=0.016 6
189IR G 1637.9240 0.33 8 ?
189IR G 1720.9230 0.24 4 ?
189IR G 1815.4580 0.13 7 ?