189OS 189IR EC DECAY (13.2 D) 1970MA37,1969GR10,1962HA24201704 201704
189OS H TYP=FUL$AUT=T.D. JOHNSON, BALRAJ SINGH$CIT=NDS 142, 1 (2017)$
189OS2 H CUT=15-Apr-2017$
189OS c 1970Ma37: measured E|g, I|g, E(ce), I(ce), (ce)ce(t)
189OS c 1969Gr10: measured E|g, I|g, (x ray)(ce)(t)
189OS c Others: 1971Be71 (|g|g(|q)), 1966Sy01, 1963Cr06
189OS cG $|g|g(|q) angular correlations (1971Be71). NaI(Tl), resolving
189OS2cG time of 50 ns, chemical separation of sources. Assignments below were
189OS3cG made by evaluators assuming J|p(0)=3/2-, J|p(69)=5/2-, and J|p(95)=3/2-
189OS4cG from adopted levels. All parities are from adopted levels.
189OS cG $Experimental conversion coefficients from 1970Ma37, 1962Ha24.
189OS2cG Other: 1966Sy01. Normalized assuming |a(K)exp(245|g)=0.101
189OS cG E$Weighted average of 1963Cr06 and 1970Ma37 (from {+189}Ir |e decay),
189OS2cG and 1973Ho27 and 1979Sa18 (from {+189}Re |b{+-} decay), unless
189OS3cG otherwise noted. Uncertainty of 0.1 keV assumed when not available
189OS cG E(A)$From electron measurements in 1970Ma37
189OS cG E(B)$Only in 1970Ma37
189OS cG RI$From 1970Ma37
189OS cG M,MR$From Adopted Gammas
189OS cG CC$From BrIcc v2.3b (16-Dec-2014) 2008Ki07, "Frozen Orbitals" appr.
189OS cL J$From Adopted Levels
189OS cL T$From 1970Ma37, except where noted otherwise, based on |g|g(t).
189IR P 0.0 3/2+ 13.2 D 1 537 13
189IR cP J,T$From {+189}Ir Adopted Levels
189IR cP QP$From 2017Wa10
189OS N 0.060 6 0.060 6 1 1
189OS cN NR$From I(K| x ray)=1270 {I70} (1970Ma37) and corrections for
189OS2cN fluorescence yield, internal conversion, and I(K| x ray)/I|e.
189OS PN 3
189OS G 97.8 0.01 LT
189OS G 369.1 0.01 LT
189OS L 0.0 3/2-
189OS E 40 7 7.2 1
189OSS E CK=0.7846 12$CL=0.1628 9$CM+=0.0526 4
189OS L 30.79 4 9/2- 5.81 H 10 M1
189OS G 30.80 4 M3+E4 0.04 2 3.13E5 10 124 4A
189OSS G L/T=0.707 19$M/T=0.227 11
189OSS G N/T=0.057 3$O/T=0.0085 5$P/T=0.000152 6
189OSS G LC=2.21E5 6$MC=7.1E4 4
189OSS G NC=1.79E4 9$OC=2.66E3 10$PC=47.6 8
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3:M1:M3=17.4 {I10}:1.8 {I30}:90 {I6}:6.0 {I15}:26 {I8}.
189OS2cG Others: 1962Ha24, 1966Sy01
189OS cG TI$from intensity balance assuming no direct |e feeding. Other:
189OS2cG I(|g+ce)=153 {I10} from ce(L3)(30.8|g)/I|g(69.5|g)=90 {I5}/59 {I6}
189OS L 36.173 251/2- 0.53 NS 3
189OS E 2.0 17 8.4 4
189OSS E CK=0.7811 14$CL=0.1653 10$CM+=0.0535 4
189OS G 36.17 4 11.210M1+E2 0.046 5 20.2 4 A
189OSS G LC=15.6 3$MC=3.60 7
189OSS G NC=0.877 17$OC=0.150 3$PC=0.01064 16
189OS2 G EL1C=12 1
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3=135 6:21.3 6:4.4 20
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3:M:N=360:50:13:140:45 (1962Ha24)
189OS L 69.512 245/2- 1.62 NS 4
189OS cL T$weighted average of delayed coincidence measurements 1.59 ns {I8}
189OS2cL (1970Ma37), 1.63 ns {I4} (1969Gr10), and 1.7 ns {I1} (1969An17) in
189OS3cL {+189}Ir |e decay.
189OS E 35 5 7.1 1
189OSS E CK=0.7774 17$CL=0.1680 12$CM+=0.0546 5
189OS G 33.31 4 0.113 14E2 723 A
189OSS G LC=546 9$MC=138.5 21
189OSS G NC=33.0 5$OC=4.83 8$PC=0.00382 6
189OS2 G L2/L3=0.94 8 (1970Ma37)
189OS cG RI$from ce(L3)(33|g)/I|g(69.6)=33 {I2}/59 {I6}
189OS G 69.52 3 59 6M1+E2 +0.683 25 8.3 3 A
189OS2 G EL2C=3.0 3
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3=100 5:180 5:169 5
189OSS G LC=6.26 23$MC=1.56 6
189OSS G NC=0.375 14$OC=0.0573 20$PC=0.00113 3
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3:M:N=490:830:780:570:180 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG MR$other: 0.70 {I3} from ce data in |e decay. Sign from
189OS2cG 1968Ku17, 1968Pe09, 1972Wa24.
189OS L 95.23 3 3/2- 0.23 NS 3
189OS cL T other: <0.3 ns (1969Gr10)
189OS E 11.6 17 7.5 1
189OSS E CK=0.7740 19$CL=0.1705 14$CM+=0.0555 6
189OS G 25.65 10 0.40 5M1+E2 0.11 +5-3 84 34 A
189OSS G LC=64 26$MC=15.3 65
189OSS G NC=3.7 16$OC=0.60 23$PC=0.0293 6
189OS2 G EL1C=55 18
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3=22 7:12.5 38:4.2 +70-42
189OS G 59.05 2 20 2M1+E2 0.085 10 4.83 10 @
189OSF G FLAG=A
189OS2 G EL1C=3.6 4
189OS cG $L1:L2:L3:M1=75 8:8.8 10:3.0 30:25 19
189OSS G LC=3.72 8$MC=0.860 19
189OSS G NC=0.210 5$OC=0.0358 7$PC=0.00250 4
189OS cG MR$other: 0.06 {I4} from |e decay
189OS cG RI$I|g(59.0|g+59.3|g)=21 {I2}. See comment on 59.3|g.
189OS G 95.23 4 6.4 5M1+E2 +0.32 2 6.37 A
189OS2 G EKC=5.3 6 $
189OS cG MR$other: 0.29 {I4} from |e decay
189OSS G KC=4.93 9$LC=1.10 4$MC=0.262 8
189OSS G NC=0.0635 20$OC=0.0105 3$PC=0.000577 10
189OS cG $K:L1:L2:L3=33.8 {I8}:4.8 {I8}:1.35 {I15}:0.97 {I20}
189OS L 216.64 4 7/2-
189OS G 147.1 1 1.8014M1+E2 -1.0 +4-3 1.43 21
189OS2 G EKC=0.73
189OS cG $(147|g)(69|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.184 {I34}, A{-4}=+0.049 {I19};
189OS2cG J(217)=7/2
189OSS G KC=0.96 28$LC=0.36 5$MC=0.088 15
189OSS G NC=0.021 4$OC=0.0033 5$PC=1.07E-4 35
189OS cG $K:L1:L2:L3=130: |?25: |?20: |?15
189OS cG $Intensities obtained by multiplying by a factor of 10 to
189OS2cG compare with |g intensity from 1970Ma37
189OS cG MR$other: -1.2 {I+34-4} from |e decay
189OS G 185.85 1 3.0 3M1+E2 0.5 LT 0.91 6
189OS2 G K/L1 AP 7.2 $ EKC=0.82 (1962Ha24)
189OSS G KC=0.74 6$LC=0.133 5$MC=0.0309 14
189OSS G NC=0.0075 4$OC=0.00128 4$PC=8.6E-5 8
189OS cG MR$deduced assuming 50% uncertainty for |a(K)exp and K/L1
189OS G 216.7 1 8.6 4E2 0.254
189OSS G KC=0.1376 20$LC=0.0881 13$MC=0.0221 4
189OSS G NC=0.00532 8$OC=0.000809 12$PC=1.307E-5 19
189OS2 G EKC=0.14 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG $K:L2:L3:M=15:4.5:3.1:2; L2 not completely resolved
189OS L 219.36 5 7/2-
189OS G 149.9 1 1.4110E2 0.915
189OSS G KC=0.352 5$LC=0.425 6$MC=0.1082 16
189OSS G NC=0.0260 4$OC=0.00388 6$PC=3.20E-5 5
189OS2 G EKC=0.43 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG $K:L2:L3:M:N=6:3.5:2.4:2.2:6.3
189OS cG $L2 not completely resolved
189OS G 188.6 1 0.86 7M1+E2 1.5 +10-4 0.57 9
189OSS G KC=0.373 97$LC=0.147 6$MC=0.0362 20
189OSS G NC=0.0087 5$OC=0.00137 5$PC=4.0E-5 12
189OS2 G K/L3 AP 10$ EKC=0.39 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG MR$deduced assuming |a(K)exp and K/L3 uncertainties are 50%
189OS G 219.4 1 8.8 4E2 0.244
189OSS G KC=0.1332 19$LC=0.0837 12$MC=0.0210 3
189OSS G NC=0.00506 8$OC=0.000769 11$PC=1.268E-5 18
189OS2 G EKC=0.93 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M=13:|?1.5:4.5:2.4:2.1
189OS cG $L2 was not completely resolved
189OS L 233.53 6 5/2-
189OS E 1.09 12 8.1 1
189OSS E CK=0.743 5$CL=0.193 4$CM+=0.0642 14
189OS G 138.3 1 1.1413M1+E2 -0.8 2 1.84 13
189OS cG $(138|g)(95|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.123 {I19}, A{-4}=-0.004 {I9};
189OS2cG for |d(95)=+0.32: J(233)=1/2, |d(138)=+0.19; J(233)=3/2, |d(138)=-0.37;
189OS3cG J(233)=5/2, |d(138)=+0.043.
189OSS G KC=1.29 18$LC=0.42 4$MC=0.102 11
189OSS G NC=0.025 3$OC=0.0039 4$PC=0.000146 23
189OS2 G EKC=0.22
189OS cG $K:L1+L2:L3=16 8:2.0 10:0.8
189OS cG $K,L12 from 1966Sy01 and L3 from 1962Ha24. From 1962Ha24
189OS3cG K=13, and L1,L2 were reported as a composite of 2 different
189OS4cG lines and M was observed but not completely resolved. |a(K)exp
189OS5cG calculated using intensities from 1962Ha24.
189OS G 164.0 1 1.23 6M1+E2 1.7 LT 1.1 3
189OSS G KC=0.82 32$LC=0.22 4$MC=0.054 12
189OSS G NC=0.013 3$OC=0.0021 4$PC=9.3E-5 40
189OS2 G K/L1=7.3$ EKC=1.1 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG MR$deduced assuming 50% uncertainty for |a(K)exp and K/L1
189OS G 197.4 1 4.4 2E2 0.347
189OS cG $(197|g)(36|g)(|q): isotropic; J(36 level)=1/2
189OSS G KC=0.1755 25$LC=0.1298 19$MC=0.0327 5
189OSS G NC=0.00787 12$OC=0.001189 17$PC=1.642E-5 23
189OS2 G K/L2 AP 5.3$ EKC=0.40 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG $L2 was not completely resolved.
189OS G 233.5 1 5.0 2M1+E2 1.7 +6-3 0.28 4
189OS2 G K/L3=16 $ EKC=0.22 (1962Ha24)
189OSS G KC=0.19 3$LC=0.0658 10$MC=0.01612 24
189OSS G NC=0.00389 6$OC=0.000614 11$PC=2.1E-5 4
189OS cG MR$other: 1.4 {I+10-4} from |e decay
189OS L 275.84 5 5/2- 0.17 NS 3
189OS cL J$3/2,5/2 from |g|g(|q) in 1971Be71
189OS E 10.1 11 7.0 1
189OSS E CK=0.724 8$CL=0.206 6$CM+=0.0694 22
189OS G 56.50 4 2.5 5M1 5.17 A
189OS cG $(56|g)(219|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.075 {I25}, A{-4}=+0.031 {I30};
189OS2cG J(276)=3/2,7/2 and J(219)=5/2; sign of |d(56) not determined;
189OS3cG or J(276)=5/2 and J(219)=7/2-, |d(56)=-0.09 {I4}.
189OSS G LC=3.99 6$MC=0.916 13
189OSS G NC=0.224 4$OC=0.0386 6$PC=0.00287 4
189OS2 G EL1C=3.5 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG $L1:L2:M=39:5:10
189OS G 59.05 2 1 AP(M1+E2) 0.9 AP 22.1 AP @
189OSS G LC AP 16.70$MC AP 4.22
189OSS G NC AP 1.011$OC AP 0.1510$PC AP 0.001547
189OS2 G L1/L2 AP 5 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG $L1 not completely resolved
189OS cG RI$from ce(L3)(59.3|g)/I|g(245|g)|?0.03
189OS cG MR$estimated from intensity balance through 216.7 level assuming no
189OS2cG feeding to that level.
189OS cG E$note that this transition is not confirmed in (n,|g) |g|g coin
189OS2cG measurements
189OS G 180.5 1 0.49 5M1+E2 0.2 GT 0.75 28
189OS cG $(180|g)(95|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.087 {I15}, A{-4}=+0.066 {I63};
189OS2cG J(276)=1/2,3/2,5/2; |d(95|g)=+0.32
189OSS G KC=0.53 32$LC=0.166 24$MC=0.040 8
189OSS G NC=0.0098 18$OC=0.00155 19$PC=5.9E-5 39
189OS2 G EKC=0.86 (1966Sy01)
189OS cG $K/L=3.0 {I15}/2.8 {I10}
189OS cG $|a(K)exp is calculated using intensities from 1962Ha24 where K=3.2.
189OS G 206.3 1 1.33 5M1+E2 1.9 GT 0.35 5
189OS cG $(206|g)(69|g)(|q): A{-2}=-0.100 {I20}, A{-4}=+0.058 {I38};
189OS2cG J(276)=3/2,5/2,7/2
189OSS G KC=0.20 5$LC=0.1067 20$MC=0.0266 7
189OSS G NC=0.00641 16$OC=0.000984 16$PC=2.07E-5 60
189OS2 G K/L AP 2.6 $ EKC=0.15 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG MR$deduced assuming uncertainties for |a(K)exp and K/L to be 50%
189OSxcG percent
189OS G 245.1 1 100 E2 0.1703
189OSS G KC=0.0997 14$LC=0.0535 8$MC=0.01338 19
189OSS G NC=0.00322 5$OC=0.000493 7$PC=9.67E-6 14
189OS2 G EKC=0.59 (1962Ha24)
189OS cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M:N=100: |?15:25:18:14:4
189OS cG $1962Ha24 note this a recurring transition listed twice
189OS G 275.8 1 9.0 5M1+E2 1.8 2 0.167 10
189OSS G KC=0.120 9$LC=0.0360 7$MC=0.00874 14
189OSS G NC=0.00211 4$OC=0.000337 7$PC=1.29E-5 11
189OS2 G EKC=0.2
189OS cG $K:L1:L2:L3:M1=14:2.7: |?1.3:0.8:1
189OS cG MR$deduced assuming 50 percent uncertainty for |a(K)exp and all ratios
189OS L 438.64 6 1/2-,3/2-
189OS E 0.076 9 7.8 3
189OSS E CK=0.27 17$CL=0.53 12$CM+=0.20 6
189OS G 343.2 1 0.91 6[M1] 0.180 B
189OSS G KC=0.1491 21$LC=0.0237 4$MC=0.00543 8
189OSS G NC=0.001327 19$OC=0.000229 4$PC=1.717E-5 24
189OS G 402.8 1 0.11 1[M1] 0.1173 B
189OSF G FL=36.173
189OS cG E$somewhat poor fit, level-energy difference=402.46
189OSS G KC=0.0973 14$LC=0.01541 22$MC=0.00353 5
189OSS G NC=0.000861 12$OC=0.0001489 21$PC=1.117E-5 16
189OS G 438.5 1 0.06 2[M1] 0.0936 B
189OSS G KC=0.0777 11$LC=0.01228 18$MC=0.00281 4
189OSS G NC=0.000686 10$OC=0.0001186 17$PC=8.91E-6 13